"And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?"
Luke 6:46
The United VacciNations
Christopher J. E. Johnson
Published: July 14, 2011
Updated: Aug 15, 2016

Warnings on the Label
What's in that Shot?
Casualties From Vaccines
How We Are Deceived
SIDS & Vaccines
Autism & Vaccines
The Illusion of Herd Immunity
The Philosophy Behind Vaccination
What Can I Do?

The World Health Organization (WHO) says:
"Vaccines are very safe. Most vaccine reactions are usually minor and temporary, such as a sore arm or mild fever. Very serious health events are extremely rare and are carefully monitored and investigated. You are far more likely to be seriously injured by a vaccine-preventable disease than by a vaccine."
-World Health Organization, "What are some of the myths - and facts - about vaccination?" April, 2013, retrieved June 4, 2015, [who.int/features/qa/84/en]

In this study, we will demonstrate this statement from WHO is a flat-out lie. This same phrasing is repeated over and over and over on TV, in newspapers, on talk shows, and even in the dictionary:

vaccine: any preparation used as a preventive inoculation to confer immunity against a specific disease; employing an innocuous form of the disease agent to stimulate antibody production
(See 'vaccine', Random House Dictionary, Random House Inc, 2010; See also Collins English Dictionary, 10th Edition, William Collins Sons & Co, 2009)

The very definition of a vaccine is deceptive because it implies that it creates immunity as a preventative form of fighting diseases, but the facts, or the lack of evidence for their effectiveness, is staggering when one does in-depth research on vaccines, or as this pediatrician more directly puts it:
"The greatest threat of childhood diseases lies in the dangerous and ineffectual efforts made to prevent them through mass immunization... There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood diseases."
-Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, M.D. pediatrician, How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor, Random House Inc, 1987, p. 230-231, ISBN: 9780345342768

Dr. Gerhard Buchwald has been a witness in more than 150 court trials concerning vaccine damages, and he stated the following in a speech to the International Congress of Doctors Against Vivisection (i.e. operations on live animals for scientific experimentation and research): "Contrarily to general belief, the vaccinations have had a negative influence on the decrease of the infective maladies and mortality... Vaccines don't protect, but do harm. A scientific proof of their usefulness has never existed, whereas the severe, sometimes fatal damages they cause are a proven fact."
-Gerhard Buchwald, M.D. & Director of the Park-Sanatorium of Bad-Steben, West Germany, Speech to the International Congress of Doctors Against Vivisection, Italian Parliament, Nov 8, 1989; CIVIS International Foundation Report No. 8 1989-1990, POB 152-Via Motta 51, CH-6900 Massagno, Switzerland

We will not only cover the danger of vaccines, but we will also cover the government subsidization and protection of the vaccine industry despite the evidence of vaccine-related injury and death of millions of American children over the past century. The co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center stated:
"What we have in this country is that every citizen is forced by law to use vaccines which are being poorly studied, tested, and regulated for safety, as well as unsafely administered, and no one is held accountable when a citizen, usually a child, is injured or killed by that product. No other product in America is protected from the pressures of the marketplace like that..."
-Barbara L. Fischer, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, quoted by Leonard G. Horowitz, Emerging Viruses, Tétrahedron, 1996, p. 500, ISBN: 9780923550127

For the past few decades, vaccines have been a normal part of life for many Americans, but how much does the average American really know about them? What substances are in that shot? Are they safe? Is it reasonable to trust the pharmaceutical industry, making billions from vaccinations, with the health of our families? The mainstream media certainly seems to think so, but let's take a closer look at these vaccines and decide for ourselves.

I am not a medical professional, nor does this article constitute legal medical advice. Research the referenced documents for yourself and make your own educated decision about your health and the health of your family.

Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.
-3 John 1:2


When I started to do research on vaccinations, the first place I thought to go was to the information packet that comes with the shots.

(DPT info packet from CDC. Click image for larger view.)

I read carefully over the DPT [diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough)] packet, and it has some interesting warnings that are never talked about in the mainstream media--warning parents that they should be cautious of high-fever, collapse, shock, uncontrollable crying, epilepsy (seizures), progressive encephalopathy (brain swelling), and much more, within 48 hours of taking the vaccine.
(See Vaccine Information Statement, "DTaP: What You Need to Know," Center for Disease Control, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, May 17, 2007, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-26, retrieved June 4, 2015, [immunize.org/vis/dtap.pdf])

I want you to imagine for a moment that you're sitting in a restaurant, you order the special, and when they bring out your delicious plate of warm food, they also hand you an information packet with it, warning you to eat the meal at your own risk as it may put you into shock, cause you to collapse, or give you permanent brain damage. After reading the warning packet, would you still eat the meal?

Older versions of the packets I've read warned the reader of illnesses such as Apnea, which is a term for when the respiratory system (lung) muscles lock up, not allowing the body to get oxygen, which can cause permanent brain damage or death if not treated quickly, and Guillain-Barré syndrome, a disorder that attacks part of the nervous system, and leads to nerve inflammation that can cause permanent damage. However, recently, those warnings have been removed because of research papers like the following from the Journal of Medical Case Reports in 2011:
"The association of Guillain-Barré syndrome with vaccination has been described in the literature; it is infrequent and controversial... To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of GBS to be reported in the English literature after administration of a Tdap vaccine."
-Hussam Ammar, "Guillain-Barré Syndrome After Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: A Case Report," Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2011, 5:502, doi:10.1186/1762-1947-5-502, retrieved June 4, 2015, [jmedicalcasereports.com/content/pdf/1752-1947-5-502.pdf]

However, it took me literally a few minutes to find not just cases, but won cases and settlements paid due to the contraction of GBS from the DPT shot. Of course, the defendants denied that GBS and DPT are connected, but they paid the settlements anyway to keep things quiet:
  • Roughly $61 million awarded to multiple victims under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in May of 2011 (originally filed in 2008).
    (See United States Court of Federal Claims, Petitioners v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Case No. 08-463V, May 19, 2011)
  • Neurological injury sustained from DPT awarded $200,000 in March of 2011 (originally filed in 2008).
    (See United States Court of Federal Claims, Petitioners v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Case No. 08-348V, Mar 23, 2011)
  • DPT shot involved in a $70,000 award in Oct of 2012 (originally filed 2011).
    (See United States Court of Federal Claims, Petitioner v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Case No. 11-21V, Oct 31, 2011)
  • GBS injury from DPT; petitioner awarded $175,000 settlement in March of 2011.
    (See United States Court of Federal Claims, Petitioner v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Case No. 09-834V, Mar 7, 2011)
  • GBS injury from DPT; petitioner awarded $100,000 settlement in February of 2012 (originally filed in 2010).
    (See United States Court of Federal Claims, Petitioner v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Case No. 11-387V, Feb 29, 2012)
  • GBS injury from DPT; petitioner awarded $130,000 settlement in July of 2012.
    (See United States Court of Federal Claims, Petitioner v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Case No. 11-648V, July 17, 2012)
  • A $180,000 settlement paid to injuries sustained from DPT in October of 2012.
    (See United States Court of Federal Claims, Petitioner v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Case No. 11-783V, Oct 26, 2012)
  • GBS injury from DPT; petitioner awarded $50,000 settlement in November of 2012.
    (See United States Court of Federal Claims, Petitioner v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Case No. 11-305V, Nov 20, 2012)
  • GBS injury from DPT; petitioner awarded $90,000 settlement in November of 2012.
    (See United States Court of Federal Claims, Petitioner v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Case No. 11-105V, Nov 29, 2012)
And there far more than just these few I've listed here. To date, there are thousands of cases and settlements paid to vaccine injuries like these, and more keep coming in every year.

Vaccine Manufacturers Are Immune

What's really absurd about all this is the department the U.S. government created in the mid-1980s called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), in which all parents who have a child permanently injured from vaccines must go through a long, drawn-out, overbearing process of paperwork and litigation to even get their claims heard. They have ridiculous time frames they have to meet, and must get a doctor who is willing to go on the record and testify that the vaccine they administered actually did harm, which is almost impossible, as we'll see later.

Vaccine manufacturers were taking hard hits in court cases, many millions of dollars per case. For example, Wyeth laboratories had to end up paying out $15 million to Charles & Tammy Graham, whose daughter suffered severe adverse reactions to the DPT vaccine.
(See Graham v. Wyeth Laboratories, No. 85-1481-K, 666 F.Supp. 1485, July 21, 1987, retrieved Feb 4, 2016, [leagle.com/decision/19872149666FSupp1483_11921/GRAHAM%20v.%20WYETH%20LABORATORIES])

Earlier, I had posed the question about a warning label coming with a meal from a restaurant, and some of you may have thought that the restaurants are required by law to sell food that is good for consumption, otherwise they'll have to pay out a lot of money in legal expenses to pay for the family's suffering, and may even lose their restaurant over bad media exposure. That's true, but now imagine a restaurant that is protected by the government and doesn't have to suffer any consequences for their actions; would you still eat there?

The NVICP is specifically designed so that the drug companies that produce and sell vaccines have complete immunity to lawsuits, or in other words, because they were losing money fast, they lobbied the government to the point that the government finally made the vaccine manufacturers exempt from suffering the consequences of their actions. One of the major purposes of the U.S. courts of law is the punishment of evildoers, which would include someone who knowingly sells a product that is harmful to customers, so in a nutshell, the government shut down the good purpose of the courts of law to protect drug companies from having to be accountable.

Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.
-Leviticus 19:15

They are waxen fat, they shine: yea, they overpass the deeds of the wicked: they judge not the cause, the cause of the fatherless, yet they prosper; and the right of the needy do they not judge.
-Jeremiah 5:28

According to the National Vaccine Information Center, from the NVICP's creation in 1986 to 2010, vaccine manufacturers have awarded about three billion dollars to vaccine victims. Keep in mind, these are only the small fraction of parents that knew of the organization's existence, those who were able to file in the time frames, those who actually got heard, and those who could get a doctor willing to risk his/her own practice/license to tell the truth in a court of law.
(See National Vaccine Information Center, "Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)," retrieved Feb 4, 2016, [nvic.org/injury-compensation.aspx])

Also keep in mind that it is NOT the vaccine manufacturers that are paying these settlements through the NVICP; it's the taxpayers (i.e. you and I) that pay out for it. That's right, the hard earned money you have worked for is being used to protect vaccine manufacturers from being held accountable for their actions. There ought to be rioting in the streets from such injustice, but the old saying is true that ignorance is bliss, or in other words, people are happy when they lack knowledge.

Hear the word of the LORD, ye children of Israel: for the LORD hath a controversy with the inhabitants of the land, because there is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land. By swearing, and lying, and killing, and stealing, and committing adultery, they break out, and blood toucheth blood [i.e. one sin is committed on top of another]... My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
-Hosea 4:1-6

"The court--and the law that established it more than two decades ago--buffers [i.e. protects] Wyeth and other makers of childhood-disease vaccines from much of the litigation risk that dogs [i.e. harasses or tracks] traditional pill manufacturers... Vaccine makers have also become big business. They are poised to generate $21.5 billion in annual sales... by 2012."
-Avery Johnson, "Vaccine Makers Enjoy Immunity," The Wall Street Journal, Feb 23, 2009, [wsj.com/articles/SB123535050056344903]

Many people are brainwashed into thinking that vaccines are a necessary part of our society, and we'll go over the details of that later in this article, but there are others who know the damage these vaccines are doing, and still war against the common people with full knowledge they are destroying families. The roots of this vaccine problem obviously go much deeper than most people realize.

Concerned yet? You should be.

DTP, commonly referred to as the "tetanus shot," is part of the basic "immunization package" that children receive anywhere from 6 weeks to 7 years of age, and many parents have had a doctor administer the shot to their children without ever knowing the risks involved. (Most doctors never mention the risks.)

Many mainstream sources attempt to argue the validity and safety of vaccines, but the very creation of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986 is clear evidence that they are not safe. This act required that doctors log and report all adverse effects of vaccines on their patients, but government reports and surveys from the National Vaccine Information Center have recently indicated that 90% of doctors are ignoring this requirement, and in the 1990s, from only a small fraction of doctors who were doing their jobs, 12,000 cases of injury & death were being reported every year.
(See Michael Dye, Vaccinations: Deception & Tragedy, Hallelujah Acres Publishing, 1999, p. 10-15, ISBN: 0-929619-07-2)

Dr. Bernard Rimland, research psychologist and director of the Autism Research Institute, testified before the Committee on Government Reform in 2000:
"They claim the vaccines are safe, but physicians are indoctrinated to disbelieve claims of harm and are not trained to recognize nor required to report any adverse reactions. From 90% to 99% of the adverse reactions reported to doctors are never reported by those doctors to the government’s extremely lax Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, known as the VAERS."
-Dr. Bernard Rimland, "Testimony of Bernard Rimland, Ph.D. Before House Committee on Government Reform," Apr 6, 2000, retrieved Mar 2, 2016, [vaccinationnews.org/DailyNews/June2001/RimlandTestimonyCongress.htm]

As we saw earlier, the CDC's DPT info packet stated that the serious injuries were "very rare," but since less than 10%, possibly only 1%, of doctors are complying with the 1986 law, that means most cases never see the light of day. In other words, the serious injury statistics are low, not due to a lack of injury, but because there are very few injuries filed to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

In addition to that, many parents won't even be able to make the connection between their child's illness and vaccines due to delayed reactions. At the 1982 American Academy of Neurology, Dr. William C. Torch reported a study of vaccine-related deaths, and out of 150 studied, 90% occurred within one week after the vaccine was administered (half within 24-hours), and the remaining 10% occurred within 20 months, following "protracted reactions." (i.e. reactions lasted a long time, and got worse at the end) This means that it is easy for a parent, whose child started showing symptoms a month after a vaccine was administered, to not have enough information to make the connection, and because there have been no proper experiments done showing accurate comparisons, the court throws out most of the cases.
(See Dr. William C. Torch, "Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus (DPT) Immunization: A Potential Cause of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome", Neurology, Vol. 32, 1982, A169)

Sadly, more recent statistics get worse, as the Executive Director of the NVIC states in a meeting with the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines in 2015:
"My comments today will again focus on the need for a higher degree of transparency in reporting the activities of the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). To follow up on my initial comment this morning regarding the lack of current information on the Data & Statistics report I would clarify by saying that this lack of transparency was noted by investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson in her article of May 31st titled 'Government Wipes Recent Vaccine Injury Data from Website.'... This lack of transparency with the public is not new... We again note that new information has been provided to the Data and Statistics report such as doses of vaccine distributed against the number of petitions for compensation. This information tells an incomplete story and minimizes vaccine injury and is not required to be included. This report does not include the number of vaccine reactions reported to VAERS for the same timeframe, or information regarding the fact that the majority of vaccine reactions go unreported."
-Theresa Wrangham, NVIC Public Comment to the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines, June 4, 2015, retrieved Feb 4, 2016, [nvic.org/cmstemplates/nvic/pdf/accv/nvic-accv-public-comment-6-2015.pdf]

While we're on the subject, let's look at what Sharyl Attkisson found during her investigation:
"In March, the federal government removed the latest vaccine injury court statistics—more than a year’s worth of data—from one of its publicly reported charts. It was an abrupt departure from the normal practice of updating the figures monthly. Wiping the latest data means the 'adjudication categories by alleged vaccine' chart on a government website no longer reflects the recent, sharp rise in court victories for plaintiffs who claimed their children were seriously injured or killed by one or more vaccines. Since January of 2014, the number of flu vaccine cases conceded by the government is more than double the previous eight years combined. The adjudication chart only reflects half of the current number."
-Sharyl Attkisson, "Govt Wipes Recent Vaccine Injury Data From Website," sharylattkisson.com, June, 2015, retrieved Feb 4, 2016, [sharylattkisson.com/govt-wipes-recent-vaccine-injury-data-from-website]

So this is both a problem with doctors who are not following the law of reporting the injuries and deaths related to vaccines (because they administered them, so they definitely don't want to claim responsibility), but also the government is removing key information from public websites. This is not the first time its happened, as the head of the NVIC stated:
"This shameful record of gross underreporting of adverse events following vaccination by doctors around the country coupled with the shameful cover-up of vaccine-associated deaths and injuries by the federal government is an example of why more and more parents are losing faith in the mass vaccination system."
-Barbara L. Fisher, quoted by Jonathan Eisen, Suppressed Inventions, Penguin, 2001, p. 53, ISBN: 9780399527357

Let's continue to look at the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine, another staple of the "standard immunization package" recommended by government officials:
(MMR info packet from CDC. Click image for larger view.)

An information sheet put out by the CDC (Center for Disease Control) warns users that the shot may cause seizures, stiffness in joints, bleeding disorders, allergic reactions, deafness, long-term comas, permanent brain damage, etc.

In this information packet, the CDC tries to soften the risks involved by telling readers that "The risk of MMR vaccine causing serious harm, or death, is extremely small.," but once again, it only appears small because as high as 99% of doctors are not reporting vaccine-related injuries. Although vaccines have been regularly administered in the U.S. for over 100 years, only in the past 25 years (since the CDC's Monitoring System for Adverse Events Following Immunization in 1991) has there been any requirement to report any negative effects from vaccine application.
(See Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccines: What You Need To Know, Center for Disease Control Department of Health and Human Services, 42 USC 300aa-26, March 13, 2008, retrieved June 4, 2015 [cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/mmr.pdf])

To this day, almost no one in our government is making effort to enforce the law over medical practitioners to report damages. However, the manufacturer insert packet for MMR warns that the following adverse reactions "have been reported during clinical trials":
-Arthralgia (joint pain)
-Panniculitis (skin inflammation)
-Vasculitis (inflammatory destruction of blood vessels)
-Pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas)
-Diabetes (insulin deficiency)
-Thrombocytopenia (low platelet count in blood)
-Anaphylaxis (hypersensitive reaction, can cause death if not treated)
... and much more!
(See MMR Manufacturer Insert Packet, M-M-R II (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live), Merck & Co. Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889, Issued December, 2010, "Adverse Reactions," p. 7 [http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf])

It should be noted that the above list of symptoms are the SHORT-term effects of these vaccines, and that proper studies have never been done on them, let alone taking the steps to get studies on LONG-term effects. Even the DPT info packet admits that the shot "has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility," or in simple terms, that means it has not been tested for dangers of developing cancer, permanent damage to your DNA, or permanent damage to your reproductive system.
(See GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals DTP vaccine product information packet, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, August 2010, section 13, p. 13; retrieved Feb 1, 2011 [http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_infanrix.pdf])

If a box of cereal caused these illnesses in children during taste testing, it would never legally be allowed on the shelf at a grocery store. However, the government will allow and encourage it to be directly injected into your children's bodies, which leads to the obvious conclusion that something else is going on behind the scenes, and we'll discuss more on that later.

Rebecca Carley is a former medical doctor who made this image because she advocates against vaccinations of any kind. I don't trust everything Carley says because she gives the public a sideways portrayal that she's a Christian, but she's not; she's a pagan mystic. However, despite her wicked religious beliefs, she makes an excellent point:
"That photograph started some controversy. When I gave a lecture at Palmer Chiropractic College in Iowa... the person who setup my conference there had put that baby-with-the-needles picture on the posters that advertised my coming, and people were outraged, and they actually made them take the poster down. When I gave my talk, I told the Palmer students, 'Isn't it a shame that showing that picture is offensive, but doing it is not.'"
-Rebecca Carley, "Vaccines - The True Weapons of Mass Destruction," retrieved Feb 4, 2016, [youtube.com/watch?v=9WoMps4Pmpo]

In 1991, the Institute of Medicine stated that not only was there a lack of reporting, but that the few reports that are on file don't have any of the proper information they ought to have:
"In the course of its review, the committee encountered many gaps and limitations in the knowledge bearing directly and indirectly on the safety of vaccines. These include inadequate understanding of the biologic mechanisms underlying adverse events following natural infection or immunization, insufficient or inconsistent information from case reports and case series, inadequate size or length of follow-up of many population-based epidemiologic studies, and limited capacity of existing surveillance systems of vaccine injury to provide persuasive evidence of causation. The committee found few experimental studies published in relation to the number of epidemiologic studies published. Clearly, if research capacity and accomplishment in these areas are not improved, future reviews of vaccine safety will be similarly handicapped."
-Institute of Medicine (U.S.), Committee to Review the Adverse Consequences of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines, Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines, National Academies, 1991, p. 317

To summarize, they said there were gaps in the knowledge on vaccine safety, as well as limited, inconsistent, and inadequate information, lack of follow-up with little to no investigation, and almost no published experiments. Eleven years later, in 2002:
"The committee was unable to address the concern of some that repeated exposure of a susceptible or fragile child to multiple vaccines over the developmental period may also produce atypical or nonspecific immune or nervous system injury that could lead to severe disability or death... There are no epidemiological studies that address this, either in terms of exposure or outcome... Thus the committee recognizes with some discomfort that this report addresses only part of the overall set of concerns of some who are most wary about the safety of childhood vaccines."
-Institute of Medicine (U.S.), Immunization Safety Review Committee, Immunization Safety Review: Multiple Immunizations and Immune Dysfunction, National Academies Press, 2002, p. 36, ISBN: 9780309083287

They said concern is growing, but nothing has changed. There are still no studies to answer the injury, disability, and death caused by vaccines. Six years later, in 2008:
"In 2008... Dr. Louis Cooper, vaccine inventor and a former president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, wrote that the total vaccine safety science research budget was $20 million or 0.5 percent of the $4 billion total vaccine budget for purchase, promotion, and delivery of vaccines. Despite insufficient scientific knowledge and funding for safety research, the compulsory vaccination program continues to expand."
-L.K. Habakus & M. Holland, Vaccine Epidemic, Skyhorse Publishing, 2011, p. 52 ISBN: 978161082727; See also Louis Z. Cooper, "Protecting Public Trust in Immunization," Pediatrics, 122:1 (2008): 149-153 [www.pediatrics.org]

So to summarize again, after almost two decades of questions and complaints left unanswered by vaccine manufacturers and our government (who seem to kneel at drug companies' every desire), only 0.5 percent of the budget for vaccines is being used on scientific research and safety to find out the truth about the effects of vaccines, while 99.5% of the money was used to promote mandatory vaccinations without any studies on what damage they cause.

At this point, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that those who produce and make money from vaccines DO NOT want legitimate public research studies done on their product. Do you really think that multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industries are going trade their nice homes, cars, and 6-7 digit paychecks for proof their products are harmful to the public?

For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
-1 Timothy 6:10

And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
-Matthew 19:24

If you go back and read the info packets above, there's a very important thing you'll notice is NOT there: a list of ingredients. What exactly is causing all these adverse reactions in children? Whereas foods and household cleaners are required to list their product ingredients, drug companies try to keep their ingredients a secret.


(Canadian broadcast listing out some of the ingredients in the flu shot.)

Consuming naturally combined substances into the body is one thing, but injecting synthetically altered substances directly into the bloodstream is something completely different. No one would be able to drink these vaccines because our bodies would regurgitate most of it, rejecting it before it enters the bloodstream, because the digestive tract has a built-in defense system. Many medical "experts" will claim that these substances are harmless because the body produces or consumes a small amount of chemicals naturally, but they are confusing natural with synthetic, and also not weighing the body's reactive consequences of forcing those synthetic substances into your bloodstream, rather than taking them via natural consumption through your digestive system.

To begin, let's look at glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde, which are not only dangerous chemicals, but also some of the primary toxic ingredients in the DPT shot.
(See Immunization Action Coalition, Package Inserts - DTaP, Sanofi Pasteur, retrieved June 4, 2015, [vaccineshoppe.com/image.cfm?doc_id=11179&image_type=product_pdf])

Glutaraldehyde is commonly used as a disinfectant for dental equipment, which is toxic enough to kill germs, but the equipment still has to be washed before use, otherwise it's too dangerous to put in someone's mouth. Direct contact with it can cause severe throat and lung irritation among many other symptoms, and most health care providers now list Glutaraldehyde as one of the primary causes of asthma in the work place.
(See US National Library of Medicine, "Occupational asthma due to glutaraldehyde," National Institutes of Health, February, 1998, retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9632908]; See also Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, "Asthma, Work-related," OSH Answers Fact Sheets, Table #3, retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [ccohs.ca/oshanswers/diseases/asthma.html])

Formaldehyde has many uses, but is most commonly known for its combination with other materials to make components for vehicle engines, transmissions, brakes, and other various parts. Other uses include a resin that is commonly used in permanent adhesives for carpeting and plywood, foam to make insulation, or even combined with alcohols to make paints and explosives. Recent studies have shown that minor exposure to formaldehyde can cause asthma, reproduction problems in women, and leukemia (cancer).
(See Gerald McGwin & Jeffrey Lienert, "Formaldehyde Exposure and Asthma in Children: A Systematic Review," US National Library of Medicine, March, 2010, retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2854756/]; See also L. Zhang & L. Freeman, "Formaldehyde and Leukemia: Epidemiology, Potential Mechanisms and Implications for Risk Assessment," US National Library of Medicine, April, 2010, retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2839060])

Before diving deeper into the strange chemicals in these vaccines, this information alone should be enough to give anyone pause to consider the facts before getting a shot. Since we've already documented that at least 90% of doctors aren't reporting vaccine-related injuries and deaths, we should ask ourselves how many cases of asthma, cancer, and other serious medical problems may have been from vaccines, and parents were completely unaware?

Let's look at another common chemical in vaccine, thimerosal:
Thimerosal is used in eye/nose medicines and tattoo inks, but the primary usage is in vaccines. Thimerosal is (according to weight) about half mercury, in the form of ethylmercury. Government safety guidelines have been produced to prevent injury from methylmercury, but no experimental studies have been done to test the safety of ethylmercury. Methylmercury symptoms include blindness, cerebral palsy, deafness, growth problems, mental retardation, microcephaly (small head), etc.
(See "Methylmercury Poisoning," New York Times, retrieved Feb 9, 2016 [nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/methylmercury-poisoning/overview.html])

The World Health Organization (WHO) makes statements on their website that thimerosal is safe in effort to lessen the growing public concern of pharmaceutical companies poisoning children:
"[T]he most recent pharmacokinetic and developmental studies do not support concerns over the safety of thiomersal (ethyl mercury) in vaccines."
-World Health Organization, "Statement on thiomersal" July, 2006, retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [who.int/vaccine_safety/committee/topics/thiomersal/statement_jul2006/en]

However, there are two very important facts WHO doesn't make very clear to the public. First, they are referring to a "study" done by the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), in which they only gave a consultation of a data review, or in other words, they didn't do any experiments. The other important fact is that WHO gets regular funding from organizations that promote and distribute vaccines:
(See World Health Organization, "Voluntary contributions by fund and by donor for the financial period 2010–2011," Ap 5, 2012, A65/29 ADD.1, retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [who.int/about/resources_planning/A65_29Add1-en.pdf]

The fact is that organizations involved in the production, sale, promotion, and distribution of vaccines ALL make an extraordinary profit, and no one wants to spend that profit to do research that may prove their profit is causing problems they're claiming to cure. (We'll cover more on that later.) It shouldn't take a degree in rocket science to figure out that if some of the people who invented methyl mercury died from it, then we should have some real experimental studies done for ethyl mercury before using it on anything.

"The first methyl mercury compounds were synthesized in a chemical laboratory in London in the 1860s. Two of the laboratory technicians died of methyl mercury poisoning. This so shocked the chemical community that methyl mercury compounds were given a wide berth for the rest of the century."
-Thomas W. Clarkson, "The Three Modern Faces of Mercury," Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, 2002, retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241144/pdf/ehp110s-000011.pdf]

It appears people living in the 19th century had more basic sense in their heads than people living in the 21st century. It's amazing to me that dangerous chemicals, some without any experimental testing, are included in these vaccines, but most people automatically believe the media when they say there is no danger.

"Little is known about ethylmercury compared to methylmercury."
-Ralph D. Feigin, Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Elsevier Health Sciences, Vol. 2, 2004, p. 3144, ISBN: 9780721693293

Although little is known, what is known is that ethylmercury gets converted to methylmercury in the body, or in other words, the substance the vaccine industry tells us is harmless gets converted into a substance that kills people when it metabolizes in the body. Dr. Paul King noticed:
"[D]uring the metabolic process in the human and animal bodies the supposedly 'harmless' ethylmercury compound, Thimerosal, is metabolized (converted) into the toxic and 'harmful' methylmercury. And then in turn, the harmful methylmercury is metabolized (converted) into the most harmful, long-term-toxic, 'inorganic' mercury that is retained in bodily tissue... Unexpectedly, the rats treated with Thimerosal (ethylmercury) were found to have three types of mercury in the blood samples and their organs, ethylmercury (the originating 'supposedly harmless”'compound), methylmercury (the admittedly harmful compound) and inorganic mercury (the most harmful, tissue bound end product of mercury metabolism)."
-Eileen Dannemann, "The Vaccine Establishment’s SAFETY Debate: Use Of Thimerosal In Vaccines Versus The Admittedly Dangerous Use Of Methylmercury," Activist Post, Sep 28, 2011, retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [activistpost.com/2011/09/vaccine-establishments-safety-debate.html]; See also Shabnum Nabi, Toxic Effects of Mercury, Springer, 2014, p. 231, ISBN: 9788132219224

Former U.S. Representative Dan Burton questions director of the FDA William Egan about the dangers of thimerosal during a hearing before the Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness on Sept 8, 2004:
BURTON "We're talking about why they're putting mercury in vaccinations and why it's never been tested since 1929 when Lilly developed it. Mr. Egan, has thimerosal ever been tested by our health agency?"
EGAN "It's been--only in the--there were those early tests that you know of that were done by Lilly."
BURTON "And when was that test done? That was done in 1929."
EGAN "Yes."
BURTON "Okay, let's follow up on that. In 1929, they tested this on 27 people that were dying of meningitis. All of those people died of meningitis, and so they said there was no correlation between their death and the mercury in the vaccines. That is the only test that's ever been done on thimerosal that I know of; can you think of any other?"
EGAN "Not in people, no. Except for accidental exposures-"
BURTON "So we have mercury that's being put into peoples' bodies in the form of this preservative, and has been since the 30s, and it's never been tested by our health agencies. And yet, you folks come here and you testify that there's no conclusive evidence, CONCLUSIVE evidence, and the IOM says they favor, get this, they don't say they're sure. They say they 'favor a rejection of a causal relationship between mercury and autism and other neurological disorders. Mr. Egan, can you say to me right now that that amount of mercury being injected into a baby will not hurt it?"
EGAN "It's--you know--it's impossible to make those categorical statements of 100%."
BURTON "That's right. That's what I want you to say. So it is possible that the amount of mercury that's being injected, even in trace amounts, could damage a child neurologically, right?"
EGAN "I don't think it has that capacity. [Burton laughs] We can argue-"
BURTON "I know you don't think it is, but you can't say categorically can you?"
EGAN "Do I have evidence for every single child for every possible dose? The answer is no."

So to summarize, the health committee asks the director of the FDA to give a straight answer about what the FDA does and does not know, and he can barely get an answer out of him. In the late 1920s, a "test" was done on 27 people who were already dying, and then when they died, the conclusion was there was no connection to thimerosal, which is an absurdly loaded "experiment." That's like a scientist walking over to a man on the floor dying from a heart attack, shooting him in the foot, and after the man has died from the heart attack, the scientist claims that bullets aren't harmful to people. For over 80 years, drug companies have been injecting the public with a toxic chemical that has never been properly tested, and today, the subject is still being avoided.

The following chart is short list of a few vaccines alongside some of the toxic ingredients contained in them. I will only be highlighting the three chemicals we have covered so far, and I would ask the reader to consider all the chemical agents we have not discussed:
Anthrax Aluminum Hydroxide, Amino Acids, Benzethonium Chloride, Formaldehyde, Inorganic Salts and Sugars, Vitamins
Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) Asparagine, Citric Acid, Lactose, Glycerin, Iron Ammonium Citrate, Magnesium Sulfate, Potassium Phosphate
Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis (DTP) Aluminum Phosphate, Ammonium Sulfate, Casamino Acid, Dimethyl-beta-cyclodextrin, Formaldehyde or Formalin, Glutaraldehyde, 2-Phenoxyethanol
Haemophilus Influenzae (Hib or PRP) Ammonium Sulfate, Formaldehyde, Sucrose
Hepatituis A (Hep A) Aluminum Hydroxide, Amino Acids, Formaldehyde or Formalin, MRC-5 Cellular Protein, Neomycin Sulfate, 2-Phenoxyethanol, Phosphate Buffers, Polysorbate
Influencza Beta-Propiolactone, Calcium Chloride, Neomycin, Ovalbumin, Polymyxin B, Potassium Chloride, Potassium Phosphate, Sodium Phosphate, Sodium Taurodeoxychoalate, Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB), Egg Protein, Formaldehyde, Kanamycin, Neomycin Sulfate, Polysorbate 80, Egg Albumin (Ovalbumin), Egg Protein, Gentamicin, Hydrocortisone, Octoxynol-10, a-Tocopheryl Hydrogen Succinate, Polysorbate 80, Sodium Deoxycholate, Thimerosal
Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Amino Acid, Bovine Albumin or Serum, Chick Embryo Fibroblasts, Human Serum Albumin, Gelatin, Glutamate, Neomycin, Phosphate Buffers, Sorbitol, Sucrose, Vitamins, Gelatin, Monosodium L-glutamate, MRC-5 Cellular Protein, Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Sodium Bicarbonate, Sorbitol, Sucrose, Potassium Phosphate Monobasic, Potassium Chloride, Potassium Phosphate Dibasic
Meningococcus Formaldehyde, Phosphate Buffers, Lactose, Thimerosal, Amino Acid, Yeast
Rabies Human Serum Albumin, Beta-Propiolactone, MRC-5 Cellular Protein, Neomycin, Phenol Red (Phenolsulfonphthalein), Amphotericin B, Beta-Propiolactone, Bovine Albumin or Serum, Chicken Protein, Chlortetracycline, Egg Albumin (Ovalbumin), Ethylenediamine-Tetraacetic Acid Sodium (EDTA), Potassium Glutamate
Varicella Bovine Albumin or Serum, Ethylenediamine-Tetraacetic Acid Sodium (EDTA), Gelatin, Monosodium L-Glutamate, MRC-5 DNA and Cellular Protein, Neomycin, Potassium Chloride, Potassium Phosphate Monobasic, Sodium Phosphate Monobasic, Sucrose
(See John D. Grabenstein, ImmunoFacts: Vaccines and Immunologic Drugs, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012, ISBN: 9781574393446; Grabenstein is an authority and specialist on immunologic drugs; See also "Vaccine Ingredients - A Comprehensive Guide" vaxtruth.org, Aug 15, 2011)

Another factor that is often overlooked is that the vaccines themselves contain viruses. That is the foundation for the concept of vaccination, that a virus forced into mankind will create immunity. Furthermore, these viruses are being grown in animals, and animal cells are being injected directly into the bloodstream:
"Cell-based flu vaccine production does not require large numbers of chicken eggs because the vaccine viruses used to make vaccine are grown in animal cells."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "How Influenza (Flu) Vaccines Are Made," retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/how-fluvaccine-made.htm]

Eating the meat of an animal is something that the Lord God directly told us we could do:

Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
-Genesis 9:3

No one has been injured for life from eating good, well-prepared meat. However, these doctors are injecting viruses, grown in animal organs, directly into our bloodstream, and that is an entirely different matter. The Lord God created a digestive system to filter out what's bad and process what's good, but injections are bypassing that method of filtration.

Barbara Fisher, President of the National Vaccine Information Center, spoke to the Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness at the U.S. House of Representatives in 2003:
"I began speaking and writing about monkey virus contamination of polio vaccines ten years ago when questions were raised in the medical literature about whether the use of monkeys infected with monkey viruses to produce oral polio vaccines was responsible for HIV and the AIDS epidemic. (Attachment 2: Kyle, W.S. 1992. Simian retroviruses, polio vaccine, and origin of AIDS. The Lancet 339: 600-601.) Between 1994 and 1997 I submitted several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the government regarding testing of certain lots of oral polio vaccine for monkey virus contamination (Attachment 3 – Correspondence between BL Fisher and FDA) During the course of my research I discovered that it was well known that the first polio vaccine produced in the 1950's – the inactivated polio vaccine created by Jonas Salk – was made using rhesus monkeys that were infected with a monkey virus called simian virus 40 or SV40."
-Barbara L. Fischer, "The SV40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused an Increase in Cancer?" National Vaccine Information Center, Sept 10, 2003, retrieved Feb 10, 2016, [nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Polio-SV40/BLFTestimonySV40.aspx]

Vaccine producers take diseases and viruses, inject them into the liver or brains of an animal (like a monkey), causing them to get sick until they die, and they extract that tissue to make a vaccine to inject into children. I don't care if someone is ignorant enough to think that vaccines are not harmful, they still would not allow themselves to be injected with that shot if they could actually see the process of the vaccine being created.

This brought to mind how PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), the cult that worships animals as gods, will jump onto a "Hellywood" movie set to file lawsuits if an animal is ever-so-slightly handled the wrong way, but when it comes to the torture of animals in vaccine labs, a word is never spoken about it. In fact, PETA helps people get their animals vaccinated too.
(See PETA, "Vaccines," retrieved May 14, 2016, [peta.org/about-peta/learn-about-peta/helping-animals-in-hampton-roads/snip/vaccines])

It's not just animals either; tissue from babies is being injected into other people:
"The MRC-5 cell line was developed in September 1966 from lung tissue taken from a 14 week fetus aborted for psychiatric reasons from a 27 year old physically healthy woman."
-Coriell Institute for Medical Research, "AG059654-C," MRC-5, retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [catalog.coriell.org/0/Sections/Search/Sample_Detail.aspx?Ref=AG05965-C&PgId=166]

"The WI-38 cell line was developed in July 1962 from lung tissue taken from a therapeutically aborted fetus of about 3 months gestational age."
-Coriell Institute for Medical Research, "NA06814," WI-38, retrieved Feb 9, 2016, [catalog.coriell.org/0/Sections/Search/Sample_Detail.aspx?Ref=AG06814-N&PgId=166]

These two cell lines were grown from murdered babies in the 1960s and are still used in a variety of vaccines today, including MMR, hepatitis A, chicken pox, and polio. Should it be any surprise to us why drug companies keep their ingredients a secret, and why your doctor has never told you ahead of time what's in the shot?

With a mix of animal and human DNA and RNA, live and inactivated viruses, bacteria, chemicals, metals, and an assortment of other potentially harmful substances (like mercury, which never leaves your body), these vaccines will not only injure a child from the inside, but also alter their body's DNA. When a child's molecular structure is altered during growth, the problems can be severe unto death.


The National Vaccine Information Center has gathered, from organizations like the CDC and FDA, recommendations for how many vaccine shots a child should be getting from birth to 18 years of age:
AT BIRTH Hepatitis B
2 MONTHS Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio, HIB, Rotavirus, Hepatitis B, PCV
4 MONTHS Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio, HIB, Rotavirus, PCV
6 MONTHS Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio, Rotavirus, Hepatitis B, PCV, Influenza
7 MONTHS Influenza
12-18 MONTHS Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, HIB, PCV, Varicella, Hepatitis A
2-6 YEARS Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella, Influenza
7-18 YEARS Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Influenza, HPV, Meningococcal
-National Vaccine Information Center, "Vaccination," 2013, retrieved Feb 10, 2016, [nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NVIC/pdf/49-Doses-PosterB.pdf]

Government agencies recommend children getting life threatening, DNA altering, animal and human tissue with live viruses injected into them 25 different times before they learn to walk.

Let's consider the Hepatitis B vaccine given to children. The only people who end up getting Hepatitis B are those having sexual intercourse and sharing needles when using drugs. Why do children need this?

This is obviously insanity, but the CDC tries their best to justify it:
"Myths and misinformation about vaccine safety can confuse parents who are trying to make sound decisions about their children's health care... While some of the sickness or reactions that follow vaccination may be caused by the vaccine, many are unrelated events that occur by coincidence after vaccination."
-Center for Disease Control and Prevention, "Addressing Common Concerns," retrieved June 5, 2015, [cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Concerns/Index.html#Concerns]; See also "Vaccine Safety and Adverse Events," retrieved Feb 10, 2016, [cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/safety]

While doing updates on this article, I went to the CDC website to check on this quote, and it's interesting that the first part is still there, but the second part, that says "some of the sickness or reactions that follow vaccination may be caused by the vaccine" was removed from their website two months after I got the quote. This is because the CDC has taken steps in attempt to cover up the injuries and deaths caused by vaccines.

Of course, articles like the one you're reading right now is what the CDC will call "myths and misinformation," but I encourage everyone to check out the sources I'm providing and view the information for yourself. The only events that vaccine manufacturers will ever take responsibility for causing are minor things like a swollen or sore throat, but if it's something they could be potentially prosecuted for, like permanent brain damage or death, they NEVER claim it's due to the vaccine, despite the fact that we read the packet inserts that say it can happen.

At this point I need to state what's hard for anyone, parents or government agencies, to hear: It is currently impossible to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that vaccines are related or unrelated to injuries/death after taking them. The only way to build a case is with evidence, and convincing evidence can only be gathered by 24-hour/day, 7-day/week monitoring, which is not possible for government agencies to do for every individual case.

So is there anyone who could monitor a child 24/7 after they have received a vaccine? Yes. The parents can do it. So let's look at some testimonies from parents about their children to gain a better understanding of the harm vaccines can cause.

This is the testimony of Colette Cogliandro from Virginia:
"It was on January 10, 1989 that I took my fifteen-month-old daughter [Anna]... for her routine MMR (mumps, measles, and rubella) vaccination. [The doctor] explained that serious reactions are quite rare, quoting some statistic and then reassuring me that the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks of not vaccinating... Basically, I felt the decision to vaccinate my child had already been made for me, and I was merely going along with that decision. We were told to expect cold-like symptoms... 10 to 14 days after, which she did display. But after the cold symptoms subsided, Anna's personality didn't return to normal. She remained fussy, demanding and wanted to be held constantly. She began tripping and falling frequently and had a knot on her leg at the injection site."
"Over a six-week period, her condition worsened until she couldn't stand, walk, crawl or talk. Repeated visits to the pediatrician did not identify any problems. [W]e took her to a pediatric neurologist... MRI results showed swelling of her brain, which caused lesions and permanent brain damage. Testing continued for a month... she received seven spinal taps... Only after all tests returned with negative results did the neurologist make the diagnosis of post-immunization encephalopathy... while it was obvious that they were reluctant to consider the vaccine as the source of her disability."
"We also filed a claim for compensation with the U.S. Claims Court to cover Anna's medical expenses under the National Childhood Injury Act... but only after eight years of litigation with the Department of Health and Human Services did the court agree to make an award. To receive the settlement we had to sign a document agreeing not to hold any other entity responsible for Anna's injuries (i.e. the doctor or vaccine manufacturer). It is also stated that even though the compensation program agreed to compensate Anna, it in no way meant that the Department of Health and Human Services agreed with that decision or concurred with the neurologist's report that Anna's injuries were due to a vaccine reaction."
-Colette S. Cogliandro, testimony of vaccine-injuries of her daughter Anna, Chesapeake, Virginia, June 7, 1999; Photos from Michael Dye, Vaccinations: Deception & Tragedy, Hallelujah Acres Publishing, 1999, p. 19-21, ISBN: 0-929619-07-2

"Our 16-month old grandson received his 4th DPT shot on Dec 5, 1989, and he died 24 days later. He also received the MMR and oral polio vaccine at the same time. Within 24 hours his legs were red and swollen, he had a fever of 103 degrees, and he was very fussy and irritable... His previous shots had similar reactions. We know the shot contributed to his death."
-Neil Z. Miller, quoting victims' family testimonies, Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?, New Atlantean Press, 1992, ISBN: 9781881217107

The following is a testimony from a mother in Canada (named "NF" to protect privacy by website author):
"In Dec 2007 my 5 month old daughter was given the following shots, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Hib, hepatitis B, Meningococcal C and Prevnar (8 vaccines given at the same time). Two days later she had a grand mal seizure. By the time we got to the hospital it was over. I told the doctor and nurses that she just had her shots two days ago and they said well maybe she had a fever from the shot and that caused her seizure. She had no fever before or after the event; my concerns were ignored and brushed off. We were assured that everything was fine and it shouldn’t happen again so we went ahead with our travel plans to Ontario the next day.
She had another seizure when we arrived in Ontario. She was hospitalized for days and again I told every doctor and nurse we saw that this started two days after immunization – again brushed off and ignored. Probably fever seizures we were told again, except there was no fever.
She went a month or more with no seizures then when she got immunized again in Feb 2008 (a probable repeat of the 8 vaccines) they got worse and she was put on clobazam and she only had 1 seizure a month after that. In July 2008 she received five vaccines at the same time – meningococcal C, measles, mumps, rubella and chickenpox. That one did her in. Within a week she was having 2 seizures a week, then 3 and multiples in a day. She also stopped talking – she won’t even babble, just moans different pitches. By the beginning of September she was hospitalized for a month. Test after test with no answers.
Three MRIs, spinal tap, dozens of blood tests, liver, muscle, skin biopsies – no answers. What makes me extremely upset is that I was never warned of these possible side effects. I found out through my own investigation. No one reported the first incident or even questioned the fact that maybe further immunizations should be withheld until further investigation.
The second vaccine incident I first brushed off because I was reassured by many healthcare professionals that they can’t possibly be linked together. The third immunization incident the same thing. I thought it must be something else. I’ve racked my brain daily for hours on end. What changed, what happened in July to cause this? I am convinced 100% that these shots have damaged my daughter forever.
She is now 15 1/2 months old she has grand mal cluster seizures every 4-7 days. No meds are working enough to stop them, just enough to calm them. She used to say mama, dada and bubba (for bottle) now I can’t even get her to make a sound other than moans and growls. She can’t wave, clap or mimic anything at all. She used to dance to music now she won’t. She used to smile and laugh all the time – now it’s a struggle to get her to laugh. She can barely pull herself to stand. Walking anytime soon does not look promising."

-Vaccine Choice Canada, "Personal Stories," retrieved Feb 10, 2016, [vaccinechoicecanada.com/personal-stories]

"Our son had his 1st DPT vaccination and oral polio vaccine at 14 months old on Feb 22, 1990. That evening he started high-pitched screaming. The next two days he had a temperature of 101 degrees and slept for 15 hours. When he awoke he was extremely irritable. My son was in a lot of body pain. At times he looked like he had a stroke. At other times he was curled up in a hard knot we couldn't straighten. He was having seizures and we didn't know it... He continues to have seizures. The doctor, even though law required him to record manufacturer and lot number, did not record the number."
-Neil Z. Miller, quoting victims' family testimonies, Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?, New Atlantean Press, 1992, ISBN: 9781881217107

The following is a letter sent to Vaccination News from Robin D:
"I gave birth to my son by c-section on July 29,1996. Nicholas was perfect! He was very alert and had not health problems. My baby boy never got sick during, and he was very advanced for his age. He did everything early... he walked at 10 months old and at a year and a half, he could say the alphabet. Unfortunately at 18 months old, he received the MMR, DPT, HIB, Hep-B, and Polio... a total of 9 vaccines! Over a period of a month, my son changed drastically. He lost all his speech, stopped playing with toys, lost his eye contact, could not sleep, became irritable, developed poor fine motor skills, became terrified of people (except family) and would get heart palpitations if we where in the same room with strangers, he developed hearing sensitiveness and a ton of allergies... all this over a 30 day period following the recommended vaccine schedule. Today, my son is 6 years old, but he is developmentally age 3. He just started talking in sentences last year. He enjoys playing with toys again, video games, bike riding, and soccer. He is no longer afraid of people outside of our home, and has eye contact once again. He still has hearing sensitivities, he's hyper-active, and he still is not potty trained."
-Vaccination News, "Nicholas' Story," retrieved Feb 10, 2016, [vaccinationnews.org/DailyNews/December2002/NicholasStory9.htm]

Anne Abbot wrote the following to The Snap Mom:
"Our daughter, Roz, was born a happy, healthy little girl on June 17, 2010. She developed just like all children her age and hit her milestones on or before the target age. My husband and I decided to do vaccines one at a time on a delayed schedule after our first family doctor gave her PediaX vaccine with a combination of vaccines. At the age of one, we began with her DTap vaccinations and spread them out over a period of time. Then at her two-year checkup, we decided to begin her MMR vaccinations.
On June 12, 2012, Roz was given the MMR vaccine. She had the normal fussy period, as she did with the DTap, but after a week, she began to seem a little off, not as responsive, and she continued to be fussy. She began to run a low-grade fever on June 27. On June 28, Roz had been outside for a short period of time. After her shower, my husband put her in the chair. He walked in after about five minutes and noticed she wasn't moving and was in a staring state, unresponsive. We immediately rushed her to the ER. After 30 minutes, the doctor confirmed she was having a seizure and had a fever of 101.1. They ran a series of tests and found nothing in the ways of infection, virus or bacteria. They transferred her to Children’s Hospital, where we spent the night for observation. The doctors told us that she had had a febrile [fever] seizure. They told us not to worry because febrile seizures are common in children.
Everything went well for the next few months. Then on August 8, after playing at a park, Roz became lethargic. When I got her home, she was in a seizure state. She received emergency seizure meds in the ER, and after 45 minutes, she was transferred again. She remained in the hospital for a couple of days and had an MRI and EEG. The MRI showed that her myelination was not developing normally. Myelination is the formation of the myelin sheath around nerve cells that allows the nervous system to function properly. However, we were told not to worry since Roz was so young and since her EEG was normal. We made sure to keep her inside when it was hot, watched her diet and took precautions.
On November 1, Roz woke up acting strangely; then she suddenly began to seize. I administered Diastat. She woke up an hour later and went into another seizure. We found ourselves back at Children’s with croup [hoarse cough] this time. Beginning in December, she had seizures about every month, and they began to get worse. Instead of having partial complex seizures, she began to have partial complex that generalized and Tonic-clonic (TC) seizures. By April 2013, she was having seizures every week. In the middle of April, Roz had three major TC seizures within a week’s time. We decided to take her to Cincinnati Children’s to get some answers. Throughout all the seizures, Roz continued to develop according to her age except for a speech delay. Over a period of time, her seizures changed but became more frequent.
Our neurologist suggested that we meet with the epilepsy doctor to see if Roz would be a candidate for brain surgery. On October 7, 2013, Roz was admitted for a week of VEEG monitoring and major scans that concluded she was a candidate for resectioning surgery of her right occipital lobe. The scans showed an area that was thinning. So we waited and watched her continue to seize multiple times daily. On February 5, we went in, and Roz underwent internal grid placement on the right side of her brain (120 electrodes in all.) We met with doctors daily. They told us that that the seizures were continuously happening all over the right hemisphere of her brain, not just in the right occipital lobe, and that a resection was not an option. Our hearts dropped. After the doctors got the information they needed, they felt she had Rasmussen Syndrome or Cortical Dysplasia. Our normal little girl had to have a craniotomy and right hemispherotomy that would leave her with left hemiparesis. (She would have to have half of her brain removed)
On February 12, she went in for a nine-hour surgery. She went in with a fully functioning body and came out with half a body working. She underwent four weeks of intense inpatient rehab and came home not walking. The biopsy confirmed she had Rasmussen Syndrome. We are still seizure free, 11 months post-op, but she remains unable to use her left hand and has weakness in her left arm and leg. She is also blind in the left side of both eyes, but she is talking so much more. It is hard to believe that a little girl, who was healthy at birth, has experienced a life full of traumatic events following her first MMR vaccine. I blame myself every day with the 'what ifs.'"
-Anne Abbot, quoted by Whitney J, "Fighting the Vaccine Battle With Half a Brain," Jan 6, 2015, retrieved Feb 10, 2016, [thesnapmom.com/fighting-vaccine-battle-half-brain]

This is the testimony of a mother of two children sent to Think Twice, Global Vaccine Institute:
"Dear Thinktwice, I recently took our only children, Harley (2 months) and Ashlee (2 years), to the doctor for their well-baby appointments. Harley had the sniffles and Ashlee had a cold, otherwise both were in perfect health. Harley was given his first DPT, polio, and Hib shots. Ashlee received her first Hib and MMR shots, as well as her third DPT and fourth polio shots.
After the vaccinations I laid the children down for their naps. Harley woke first; his thighs were red. I heard Ashlee wake and then I heard a 'THUMP!' Ashlee fell flat on the floor. She cried out 'Mommy, me no walk!' I checked her over and stood her up; there was no strength in either leg.
I called the hospital and rushed Ashlee to the emergency ward. I left Harley with a responsible woman to look after him while we were away. At the hospital we waited more than 20 minutes for the doctor to finish his popcorn before he would check Ashlee. He never touched her, nor was she undressed. The official report stated that the child couldn't walk, 'no other problem.
When we returned home, Harley was high-pitched screaming. The babysitter said it started more than one-and-a-half hours before. He was inconsolable. He finally screamed himself into exhaustion two hours later. I called the emergency ward. They recommended a warm bath and told me it was 'nothing to worry about.'
For ten days Harley's behavior changed. He barely slept, hardly ate, and seemed to be getting worse. On May 17 at 9:00 a.m., my husband got up, checked on Harley, and yelled out, 'Bonnie, get up, call the ambulance. Harley is dead!'
The state police and county coroner arrived with the ambulance. The coroner peered into the ambulance, never examined Harley, and stated, 'SIDS.' Harley was then rushed away. My husband and I didn't get to see him again for more than three days, until 1:00 p.m. on May 20 -- in his coffin!
I want to mention the following points: The attendant giving the vaccines never mentioned the possibility of side effects when we were rushed through the signing of the releases.
Ashlee has been to doctors since her paralysis. They never documented our verbal concerns regarding a connection to the vaccines.
The autopsy lists Harley as a 5-week-old baby; he was 9 weeks old.
The pathology department never received tissue samples. Also, Harley's blood arrived by U.S. mail after an eleven-day wait; it was not shipped on dry ice.
The doctor never recorded the lot numbers of the vaccines. The manufacturers cannot help us without this information.
An administrator at the Minot Air Force Base (where the vaccines were administered), told us: 'Get on with your lives, drop this search. It's only a baby.'
We were rejected for compensation through the Federal Vaccine Compensation Act."

-Think Twice: Global Vaccine Institute, "Harley and Ashlee," retrieved Feb 10, 2016, [thinktwice.com/stories.htm]

I want to take a moment here to mention the fallacy of a "WELL-baby" visit to the doctor's office. There is no logical sense in taking a baby to see a doctor when there is nothing wrong with them, and the only true purpose of that "well-baby" visit is to get a vaccination.

Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.
-Jeremiah 17:5

Mothers (and fathers), you need to get educated and make sound, rational decisions for your health and the health of your family. If you blindly put your trust in a doctor or your government or a drug company to do what's best for your family, you'll end up with a cursed family. The Lord God did not make doctors and multi-billion dollar corporations the caretakers of children; He made the parents the caretakers.

And of course neither the CDC nor vaccine manufacturers will ever confess that they have injured and killed millions of children through vaccines over the past century. For example, the follow plaintiffs were awarded injury compensation, but the federal government states for the record:
"Respondent denies that the Tdap, HPV, and/or meningococcal immunizations, either singly or in combination, are the cause of the petitioner's alleged ADEM and/or any other injury." [i.e. Calling it "alleged" means they won't admit there was injury at all.]
-United States Court of Federal Claims, Petitioner v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Case No. 11-21V, Oct 31, 2011

Yet, as I demonstrated earlier, the federal vaccine compensation program is still paying out thousands of settlements. If these injuries were truly unrelated to vaccines, then all the drug companies would have to do is let them go to court instead of settling, prove their case to a jury in court a few times, and then further lawsuits would be thrown out before they begin, but they settle to keep the matter quiet and not bring public attention to the case.

The few stories I've listed here are only a tiny fraction of the thousands of testimonies from parents in the U.S. alone, but the CDC wants us to believe these instances are rare occurrances. We also saw in these testimonies how many doctors would not log or record any information concerning the injuries from the vaccination, so how are we supposed to know about the dangers of vaccines if the dangers are not recorded?

So good results are kept on record, the injuries and deaths are removed from history, then TV programs, newspapers, and magazines make anyone who questions vaccines look like ignorant quacks. Parents and their victimized children are made to look stupid and uninformed, while the doctors are made to look like superheroes fighting for the greater good.


In order to understand how so many people could be deceived into thinking that vaccines work, we need to look at some statistics more closely than one would normally see in a three minute propaganda piece by CNN. Let's begin by looking at a statement from the CDC about Diphtheria:
"Diphtheria is an acute, toxin-mediated disease caused by the bacterium Corynebacterium diphtheriae. The name of the disease is derived from the Greek diphthera, meaning leather hide... C. diphtheriae has four biotypes—gravis, intermedius, mitis and belfanti. All strains may produce toxin and can cause severe disease... Death occurs in 5%-10%."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases," 13th Edition, p. 107, retrieved Feb 10, 2016, [cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/dip.pdf]

The Diphtheria vaccine was created in the 1920s, produced in the 1930s, and by 1949 was put into mainstream distribution by combining it with tetanus and pertussis shots to form what is known today as the DPT. Some of you might be wondering why it took 20 years to get into mainstream distribution, and that was because there was a big event going on at the time called World War II, which coincidentally gives us an interesting perspective.

The CDC, on their website, only provides charts of the cases of Diphtheria in the U.S. from 1940 onward, right around the time the DPT vaccine was put into widespread distribution:
(Images taken from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases," 13th Edition, retrieved Feb 10, 2016, [cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/dip.html])

Then the CDC says:
"After a primary series of three properly spaced diphtheria toxoid doses in adults or four doses in infants, a protective level of antitoxin (defined as greater than 0.1 IU of antitoxin/mL) is reached in more than 95%. Diphtheria toxoid [i.e. Diphtheria vaccine] has been estimated to have a clinical efficacy of 97%."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases," 13th Edition, retrieved Feb 10, 2016, [cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/dip.html]

And then they go pat themselves on the back for their wonderful achievements in developing a vaccine that eliminates diphtheria.

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
-Romans 1:22

If I didn't give out any more information on diphtheria than what the CDC has provided, you would walk away thinking that vaccines work, and wouldn't know how to respond. To understand the deception, we need statistics on diphtheria BEFORE the 1940s.

The following chart shows the average death rates of diphtheria from 1900 through 1949, and most of these statistics can be found buried on the CDC's website from old Census Bureau reports:
(See Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Vital Statistics of the United States: 1890-1938," retrieved Feb 11, 2016, [cdc.gov/nchs/products/vsus/vsus_1890_1938.htm])

In fact, the U.S. government reported a significant decrease in diphtheria in the late 19th century:
"[D]iphtheria was decidedly less prevalent in 1890 than it was in 1880,"
-John S. Billings, M.D., Report on Vital and Social Statistics in the United States at the Eleventh Census, 1890, Part 1-Analysis and Rate Tables, p. 11, retrieved Feb 11, 2016, [cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsushistorical/vsush_1890_1.pdf]

The CDC tells everyone that the diphtheria vaccine is 97% effective, but the truth is the opposite; 97% of diphtheria was already nearly purged from U.S. society before they started mass inoculating diphtheria. Diphtheria's massive decline in the U.S. was NOT because of vaccination, but because of improved conditions like better sanitation, plumbing with clean water, increased food supply, personal hygiene, etc. However, the credit is still given to the DPT shot because it's convenient, and they know that most people won't dig through thousands of pages of U.S. historical statistics to prove the deception.

Likewise, the measles vaccine was developed and distributed in 1963. The CDC states:
"In 1978, CDC set a goal to eliminate measles from the United States by 1982. Although this goal was not met, widespread use of measles vaccine drastically reduced the disease rates."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Measles History: Measles Elimination," retrieved Feb 11, 2016, [cdc.gov/measles/about/history.html]

However, Census Bureau records from the first half of the 20th century show that measles was mostly purged from U.S. society before a vaccine was ever developed.
(See Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Vital Statistics of the United States: 1890-1938," retrieved Feb 11, 2016, [cdc.gov/nchs/products/vsus/vsus_1890_1938.htm]; See also Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Vital Statistics of the United States: 1939-1964," retrieved Feb 11, 2016, [cdc.gov/nchs/products/vsus/vsus_1939_1964.htm])

However, the problem gets worse because even though the purpose of vaccines was to build up an immunity to the particular disease, the CDC admits that measles outbreaks were occurring in vaccinated children:
"By 1981, the number of reported measles cases was 80% less compared with the previous year. However, a 1989 measles outbreak among vaccinated school-aged children prompted the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) to recommend a second dose of MMR vaccine for all children."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Measles History: Measles Elimination," retrieved Feb 11, 2016, [cdc.gov/measles/about/history.html]

If the vaccine had worked like they claim it does, there shouldn't have been any outbreaks among vaccinated children, but of course, their solution is to pump them full of more vaccines. The fact is that measles was already on its way out of U.S. society long before a measles vaccine was introduced, but this information isn't made directly known to the public by the hospitals, clinics, the CDC, the FDA, or any drug manufacturer.

The only thing these vaccines are accomplishing is keeping old diseases alive and well in the blood streams of those who take them. For those who would rather respect persons than investigate facts, I'll include the testimony of pediatric doctor Larry Palevsky from the New York College of Medicine who discovered exactly what I'm explaining in this article:
PALEVSKY "When I went through medical school, I was taught that vaccines were completely safe and completely effective, and I had no reason to believe otherwise. All the information that I was taught was pretty standard throughout all the medical schools and the teachings and the scientific literature throughout the country. I had no reason to disbelieve it, and over the years I kept practicing medicine and using vaccines, and thinking that my approach to vaccines was completely on board with everything else I was taught. But more and more, I kept seeing that my experience of the world, my experience in using vaccines, in reading about vaccines, in hearing what parents were saying about vaccines, was very different than what I was taught in my medical school and residency training. This became a very difficult position for me as a medically trained doctor... it became clearer to me as I read the research, and as I listened more and more to parents, and found there were other practitioners who also shared the same concern, that vaccines had not been completely proven safe or even completely effective based on the literature that we have today... conclusions were made about vaccine safety and efficacy that just did not fit the scientific standards that I was trained to uphold in my medical school training...
There's a very strong teaching that the polio epidemic went away because of the vaccines, that the small pox epidemic went away because of the vaccines, and that most of the diseases that we were faced with in the 20th century in the United States were brought down and went away because of the... implementation of the vaccine policy. There are significant numbers of studies in the literature that actually claim that there were many other reasons that infectious diseases went away. There's a wonderful article in Pediatrics Journal in 2000... [that] described that before World War II, the majority of the infectious diseases that the United States was faced with, things like diphtheria and tetanus and polio and pertussis and measles and influenza... were all brought down before World War II, before there were antibiotics and vaccinations available to treat or to vaccinate against these diseases. The article goes on to say that the reasons for the drops in the mortality and the incidence rates of these diseases was prodominantly due to the implementation of public health strategies; clean water, better living conditions, better sanitation, better nutrition, people were living in cramped places and now were spread out and living in less cramped conditions, and that these were the reasons that the disease states and their mortality rates had gone down... the rates went down before vaccinations and antibiotics were available.

There are also examples of diseases that simply disappeared on their own, and no vaccine was ever created for them. One example is scarlet fever (scarlatina), which was a big problem in early 20th century, and to which the CDC says:
"There is no vaccine to prevent strep throat or scarlet fever."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Scarlet Fever: A Group A Streptococcal Infection," retrieved Feb 11, 2016, [cdc.gov/features/scarletfever]

Most Americans today have never heard of scarlet fever unless they have heard the phrase used in a book or movie, and this is because there are extremely few known cases of scarlet fever in the U.S. Even the bubonic plague disappeared without vaccines, so this demonstrates that diseases can mostly be prevented by good sanitation practices, just like the Lord God told the Jews to do in Scripture:

And whomsoever he toucheth that hath the issue, and hath not rinsed his hands in water, he shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even.
-Leviticus 15:11

That means anyone who had signs of illness, and you came in contact with them and did not wash your hands, you were to wash your clothes, take a bath, and not have any contact with others for a few hours. The Lord God also continues to add that they were to wash themselves in running water (i.e. a shower).

And when he that hath an issue is cleansed of his issue; then he shall number to himself seven days for his cleansing, and wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in running water, and shall be clean.
-Leviticus 15:13

All those that had disease were supposed to wash themselves. It is because people over the past few thousand years have not followed these sanitation practices that we ended up with many life-threatening diseases in our history.

So without their precious vaccinations, how does the CDC suggest that parents deal with deadly infectious diseases like scarlet fever?
"The best way to keep from getting infected is to wash your hands often and avoid sharing eating utensils, linens, towels or other personal items. It is especially important for anyone with a sore throat to wash his or her hands often."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Scarlet Fever: A Group A Streptococcal Infection," retrieved Feb 11, 2016, [cdc.gov/features/scarletfever]

On Feb 11, 2010, the Associated Press (AP) had reported on an outbreak of over 1,000 cases of mumps in New York & New Jersey within the Orthodox Jewish community. In the beginning of the article, the AP had reported CDC health officials told them that "The mumps vaccine is 79 percent to 95 percent effective if two doses are given," but later in the same article, the CDC also reported that out of the 1,500 cases, "88 percent had gotten at least one vaccine dose, 75 percent had two doses." So the CDC reports that two doses was supposed to be an average of 87% effective, but the actual statistics they reported show it to be an average of less than 18% effective.
(See "Mumps Outbreak in N.Y., N.J. Tops 1,500 Cases," Associated Press, Feb 11, 2010, reports from the CDC in Atlanta, retrieved Feb 23, 2011, MSNBC, [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35350606/ns/health-infectious_diseases])

I firmly take the position that these vaccines are 0% effective, but just based on the statistics given in this report, this would prove vaccines are not anywhere as effective as the CDC keeps claiming they are. The majority of these people were vaccinated, so why was there no resistance to the disease? At the very least, why was it not only the unvaccinated that contracted it?

This raises more questions: If you end up getting mumps anyway, what's the point of the MMR in the first place? And since these vaccines carry the virus, we need to ask a very important question that often gets overlooked: Could the vaccine have been the original cause of the outbreak?

This is going to be difficult for some people to read/hear, especially if they are not very familiar with the truth behind the vaccine industry, but we need to cover a bit on SV40. SV40 is a virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells, and was used to make the polio vaccine. Here is an official statement from the 108th U.S. Congress House of Representatives Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness hearing:
"There is no dispute that millions of Americans received polio vaccines that were contaminated with the virus called Simian Virus 40, or SV-40. There also is no dispute that SV-40 is capable of causing cancer, but there is a major dispute as to how many Americans may have received the contaminated vaccine, with estimates ranging from 4 million to 100 million people. There is also a major dispute as to when the polio vaccine supply got cleaned up. In addition, nobody knows how many people got sick or died because of the contaminated vaccines."
-108th Congress House Hearings, "The SV-40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused an Increase in Cancer?," Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness, U.S. Government Printing Office, DOCID: f:91047.wais, Serial No. 108-85, Sept 10, 2003

The following video is an interview conducted by Dr. Edward Shorter, Psychiatrics Professor at the University of Toronto, with Dr. Maurice Hilleman, Chief of Staff overseeing vaccine design and production at Merck & Co. Inc and is the inventor of the MMR vaccine. The video contains audio that was recorded for the purpose of a PBS documentary called "The Health Century," but this section of the audio was edited out of the final product, and as you read Hilleman's words, you'll see why:
SHORTER: "Tell me how you found SV40 in the polio vaccine."
HILLEMAN: "I came to Merck, and I was going to develop vaccines. And we had wild viruses in those days--the wild monkey kidney viruses and so forth... And I finally after six months gave up... you cannot develop vaccines with these... monkeys. We're finished and if I can't do something about it, I'll quit. I'm not going to try it. So I went down to... the zoo in Washington D.C... I told Bill... look I've got a problem... he said you go ahead, get your monkeys out of west Africa, get the African Green, bring them out of Madrid, unload them there, there are no other traffic for animals, fly them into Philadelphia and pick them up. So I brought African Greens in; I didn't know we were importing AIDS virus at the time."
SHORTER: "*laughs* It was you who introduced AIDS virus into the country. (Woman in background: 'Now we know.')"
HILLEMAN: "This is the real story."
SHORTER: "What Merck won't do to develop a vaccine."

HILLEMAN: "So anyway, the Greens came in... now I'm discovering new viruses."

HILLEMAN: "Yellow fever vaccine had leukemia virus in it... this is in the days of very crude science... I said... I have a feeling in my bones that this virus is different... I just think this virus may have some long term effects. And he [another doctor at a convention] said, 'What?' I said, 'Cancer.'"
SHORTER: "*laughs* I love it."

HILLEMAN: "The jokes that were going around was that we would win the Olympics because the Russians would all be loaded down with tumors... this is where the vaccine was being tested... it really destroyed them..."

SHORTER: "Why didn't this get out in the press?"
HILLEMAN: "Well, I guess it did; I don't remember really because we had no press release, and obviously you don't go out -- this is a scientific affair within the scientific community... It was good science at the time because that was what you did; you didn't worry about those wild viruses."

Please take careful notice of what he said about no press releases, and that it was a "scientific affair within the scientific community," because the average person won't realize what he's saying. In simple terms means that if men, women, and children are suffering life-long injuries or death from their vaccines, it's none of the public's business. These men don't care who they hurt in the process, and they expect you to leave such matters up to the elites (scribes) of the "scientific" community.

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.
-Matthew 23:25

Hilleman openly confessed bringing the AIDS virus, and many other wild viruses, into the country, and introduced them into the U.S. population through vaccines. At the end of the video, I also included a testimony from an author who had a direct conversation with Hilleman, and he told her that if 20% of children are injured or killed through vaccines, it was an acceptable sacrifice for vaccine research.

These kinds of statements are becoming commonplace. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny talks about an NVIC meeting she attended:
"I remember I was at an NVIC meeting years ago and I remember one of the attorneys talked about that he had sat inside some of those board rooms when they were bringing the new vaccine to market, and some of the language was that 'we expect a certain percentage of wastage when this happens. And as long as the percentage of wastage is small, it's acceptable.' That was meant not only from manufacturing wastage, but also from a certain number of children will die, and as long as that number is small, it's acceptable. I've got that on tape. That was from a conference; I can remember being in that room and you could hear a pin drop on the carpet."
-Sherri Tenpenny, "Interview with Sherri Tenpenny about dangers of vaccines," The Health Ranger Radio Show, retrieved Mar 10, 2016, [https://youtu.be/GO2xn9Svp6g?t=1h25m17s]

The truth about these issues continues to go unreported in the mainstream, but those who decide to dig in and do research can easily find the facts:
"The truth about polio and smallpox vaccines is that they are heavily contaminated with animal viruses, being produced on monkey kidneys and calves, respectively. This gave us AIDS which started in central eastern Africa in those states where the W.H.O. conducted the eradication campaign against smallpox and polio. The batches of vaccines used here were heavily contaminated with both SV40 and SIV (Simian Immuno-deficiency Virus) and bovine retrovirus, another AIDS-related virus... It is beyond coincidence that the present raging epidemic of AIDS is affecting mostly those states where the polio/smallpox eradication campaign was conducted."
-Dr. Viera Scheibner, Vaccination: A Medical Assault on the Immune System, self-published, 1993, p. xviii, ISBN: 9780646151243

Though polio and smallpox were both almost entirely eradicated from U.S. society before the vaccines were introduced, it is the vaccines themselves that have helped keep these diseases active, as Dr. Thomas Levy reports:
"In 1992, the CDC admitted that the polio live-virus vaccine had become the largest cause of polio in the United States. Specifically, the CDC asserted that, from 1973 to 1983, 87% of all (non-imported) cases of polio resulted directly from vaccine administration. Furthermore, it was also asserted that every non-imported case of polio in the U.S. from 1980 to 1989 was vaccine-induced."
-Dr. Thomas Levy, MD, "VACCINATION--The Shot That Keeps on Shooting," [http://www.whale.to/m/levy1.html], retrieved Apr 22, 2011; See also Neil Z. Miller, Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?, New Atlantean Press, 1992, ISBN: 9781881217107

Jonas Salk invented the polio vaccine in 1953, and received a lot of mainstream popularity for it, but his vaccine caused an epidemic. Students are educated about his invention of it, but they almost never educated about the destruction he caused because it may lead people to lose faith in vaccines.

The State Health Director of Idaho stopped vaccinations of polio in his state the year after it was introduced:
"According to the Daily Telegraph (June 18, 1955) Mr. Peterson, State Health Director of Idaho, stopped further inoculations and stated: 'We have lost confidence in the Salk Vaccine.' He also stated that he 'holds the vaccine, together with the instructions for its manufacture, directly responsible for the outbreak of polio and the deaths that had occurred."
-Eleanor McBean, The Poisoned Needle, Health Research Books, 1993, p. 102, ISBN: 9780787305949

The Associated Press published the reported cases of polio before and after the polio vaccine was administered in 1954. By 1955, every state involved in the process showed large increases in polio cases:
(See Associated Press Dispatch, Boston, Aug 30, 1955; Washington D.C. Star, Sept 20, 1955; See also Gary Kranser & Barry Mesh, "The Salk Vaccine and The 'Disappearance' of Paralytic Polio - Is Paralysis a Viral Disease?" retrieved Feb 23, 2016, [whale.to/a/krasner1.html]

Massive increases were reported in higher populated locations:
"An Associated Press Dispatch from Boston on August 30, 1955, reported 2,027 cases of polio in Massachusetts against 273 the same time the previous year-representing an increase of 743%... New York State, 764 to 469 [62%]; Wisconsin, 1655 to 326 [407%]. The Milwaukee Journal, on August 30, 1955, reported that the city's schools closed indefinitely because of the polio outbreak, following inoculation with the Salk [polio] vaccine."
-Gary Kranser & Barry Mesh, "The Salk Vaccine and The 'Disappearance' of Paralytic Polio - Is Paralysis a Viral Disease?" retrieved Feb 23, 2016, [whale.to/a/krasner1.html]

About 90% of Idaho cases of polio paralysis start in the limb where the vaccine was injected:
"The interval between inoculation and the first sign of paralysis ranged from 5 to 20 days and in a large proportion of cases it started in the limb in which the injection had been given. Another feature of the tragedy was that numbers of developing polio were far greater than would have been expected had no inoculations been carried out. In fact in the state of Idaho, according to a statement by Dr. Carl Eklund, one of the Government's chief virus authorities, polio struck only vaccinated children, in areas where there had been no cases since the preceding autumn; in 9 out of 10 cases the paralysis occurred in the arms in which the vaccine had been injected."
-News Chronicle, May 6, 1955, quoted by Leon Chaitow, Vaccine and Immunisation: Dangers, Delusions and Alternatives, Random House, 2011, p. 48, ISBN: 9781446489840

How many more examples do people need to see before they begin to question what they've been taught? There is a willful blindness that comes over many people, parents and doctors alike, who become fearful at the thought that they may have harmed children. In the aforementioned video interview with Larry Palevsky, Dr. Joseph Mercola confesses:
"[It] reminds me of the enormous guilt that could be initiated if one truly embraces this paradigm... I broke down in tears realizing that I had vaccinated thousands of harmless, innocent children and probably caused damage to so many of them, and it's a very difficult thing to accept intellectually."

However, this problem gets much worse. The diseases themselves are only the beginning because brand-new illnesses and medical phenomena are arising with the growth of inoculations.


Everyone I talk to has heard of SIDS, but surprisingly, almost no one I've talked to has even considered that they have no idea what it is:

SIDS [Sudden Infant Death Syndrome]: The abrupt and unexplained death of an apparently healthy infant under one year of age, remaining unexplained after a thorough case investigation
(See 'SIDS', Medical Dictionary Online, 2016, retrieved Feb 23, 2016 [online-medical-dictionary.org/definitions-s/sids.html])

The problem with SIDS is that, when doing research on it, you will never find a "first reported case." I challenge anyone to go do research on the history of SIDS, and you won't find an introductory history or outbreak of any kind, because in reality, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome was a name doctors simply began to call a recent phenomenon of increased numbers of babies dying for no detectable reason.

"It appears that medical doctors invented the term sudden infant death syndrome to explain away the 'coincidence' that babies die about the same time they receive vaccines. There is no way that a pathologist can tell the difference between crib death and death from vaccination. I called attention to this fact at a vaccination committee meeting in Washington, D.C., where they had a panel of people from about ten countries and I asked, 'How can you tell the difference between sudden infant death syndrome and death from vaccination?' The Americans simply could not answer the question. They waffled and couldn't state any guidelines. But the European representatives were more honest and said, 'Indeed, there is no way in the world that we can tell the difference between them and it is a very big problem for us.'"
-Dr. Harris Coulter, quoted by Michael Dye, Vaccinations: Deception & Tragedy, Hallelujah Acres Publishing, 1999, p. 28, ISBN: 0-929619-07-2; See also Dr. Harris L. Coulter & Barbara L. Fisher, A Shot in the Dark, Penguin, 1991, ISBN: 9780895294630

SIDS is an invented medical term that saves medical professionals from liability for death by vaccination.
If something goes wrong, just blame it on SIDS.

SIDS has only been named for the past few decades, and this kind of sudden death in infants didn't happen so frequently prior to the 20th century. I'm not saying that a sudden infant death never occurred, but most of the time, there was a reason. Changes in diet, sleeping conditions, reactions to clothing, etc -- all these would leave behind evidence of a cause of death, but the medical establishment claims that SIDS has no known cause.

A common suggested explanation to mothers worried about their children is apnea, or suspended breathing function while sleeping. There has been some connection to this, even though autopsy reports claim there was no sign of respitory failure; the baby just stops functioning. Something obviously has to have changed in the 20th century to cause this phenomenon, and there is one significant change in the average modern baby in the past few decades that would alter the victim's DNA and could remain undetected: Vaccination.

We'll see a moment that the CDC (of course) denies any connection between SIDS and vaccines, but at the very least, they confess:
"Babies receive many vaccines when they are between 2 to 4 months old. This age range is also the peak age for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), or infant death that cannot be explained. The timing of the 2 month and 4 month shots and SIDS has led some people to question whether they might be related."
-Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)," retreived Feb 23, 2016, [cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/sids.html]

Before you get your hopes up that the CDC is unbiased on this issue, they also assert:
"Vaccines do not cause SIDS. Multiple research studies have been conducted to look for possible links between vaccines and SIDS. Results from these studies and continued monitoring show that vaccines do not cause SIDS."
-Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)," retreived Feb 23, 2016, [cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/sids.html]

This is where things get interesting: If you recall earlier in this article we went over how about 95% of vaccine-related injury and death is not being reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), even though doctors are required by law to do so. So when the CDC does "multiple research studies," I'm sure you can guess where they look for statistics:
"A study looked at the ages and seasons of infant deaths after vaccinations reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)."
-Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)," retreived Feb 23, 2016, [cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/sids.html]

So first of all, no one knows what SIDS is, which was why it was named 'SIDS' in the first place, and thus, no one immediately made the connection between vaccines and SIDS. That means most doctors won't report a SIDS death to a vaccine injury system because they have already ruled out any connection between SIDS and vaccines.

This also means that not only will the cases go unreported, we also have to keep in mind that 95% of cases of vaccine injury go unreported anyway, so there would be almost no information at VAERS that would link SIDS and vaccines. Thus, what the CDC is doing is going to an organization that doesn't get any reports about SIDS and vaccination to tell people there is no connection between SIDS and vaccination, and it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out this is sleight of hand.

Despite the efforts of the illusionists working at the CDC, evidence of vaccinations causing sudden death in infants has been recorded. For instance, in 1933, when the pertussis shot came to Denmark, death was recorded within minutes for some babies:
"In both cases, the children concerned were new-born in families at the time when whooping caugh was present. The physician in charge therefore considered it desirable to vaccinate the new-born children. Immediately after birth one child was given 0.1 cc. of whooping caugh vaccine... causing no symptoms, and four days later 0.15 cc. was given. One-half hour after the last injection, contractions in the arms and legs occurred, followed by cyanosis [blue discoloration from lack of blood circulation], hiccup, convulsions and death within a few minutes. The other case, occurring two years later, was that of a child... born five weeks prematurely. Eight days after birth, 0.1 cc. of whooping caugh vaccine was given, causing no symptoms. Three days later, 0.2 cc. was injected... Two hours after this injection, the child died suddenly with slight cyanosis but no convulsions or vomiting. At the postmortem examination no definite cause of death could be established [i.e. SIDS]... Furthermore, some of my colleagues have told me that they have seen considerable malaise [adverse reactions] following the vaccination."
-Dr. Thorvald Madsen, "Vaccination Against Whooping Caugh," Journal of the American Medical Assocation, Vol. 101, No. 3, 1933, p. 187, retrieved Feb 23, 2016, [jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=244020]

Of course, the author still ignorantly insisted on the use of vaccines, but suggested they move the timing from new-born to a few weeks. Many other countries followed suit later, which is why sudden infant death after vaccination averages in many places has moved from new-born to 2-4 months.

Two New York doctors documented the cases of twins dying within 24-hours of each other after they received vaccinations:
"Deaths related to the injection of foreign protein in man are fortunately few. The exact number of such occurrences is difficult to estimate from the available literature. By 1942 Kojis was able to find 61 such deaths, and he added 4 more from the Willard Parker Hospital. The most complete and most recent study of necropsies [autopsies of dead bodies] was made by Vance and Strassmann, who added 7 autopsy studies from the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner to 19 taken from the literature... They state that all these persons who died had vascular [blood vessel] collapse,"
-Dr. Jacob Werne & Dr. Irene Garrow, "Fatal Anaphylactic Shock: Occurrence in Identical Twins Following Second Injection of Diphtheria Toxoid and Pertussis Antigen," Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 131, No. 9, 1946, p. 730, retrieved Feb 23, 2016, [jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=286701]

That's direct documentation from The Journal of the American Medical Association that children were suddenly dying after getting vaccinated, but the CDC insists that evidence doesn't exist. It's always very difficult to find what you're not looking for.

Most people will go to sources like Wikipedia, which I strongly advise against when doing real research. Wikipedia is not unbiased information on a wide variety of topics, and has done much to aid the propaganda machine around the world. Wikipedia also makes the statement that vaccines do not have any connection with SIDS, and they point to a study done by the GeSID Group, made up of people who sell and administer vaccines in medical institutions around Germany and New Zealand, or in other words, those who are doing the research also profit from vaccines.

The GeSID Group states:
"Although previous studies have shown either no association between immunisation and SIDS or even a decreased risk of SIDS, adverse effects, including death, from immunisations continue to cause concern, especially when a new vaccine is introduced."
-M.T. Vennemann, "Sudden infant death syndrome: No increased risk after immunisation," Vaccine, Vol. 25, Issue #2, Jan 4, 2007, retrieved Feb 23, 2016, [sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X06008978]

In case you didn't understand it, they're basically saying the study is a formality to quell the fears of the ignorant and lowly public who are insulting the medical establishment by daring to question them, but what's really important is that they state that no previous studies have ever shown a correlation between SIDS and vaccines. This is a flat-out lie, or at least willful ignorance on their part.

"Although some studies were unable to find correlations between SIDS and vaccines, there is some evidence that a subset of infants may be more susceptible to SIDS shortly after being vaccinated. For example, Torch found that two-thirds of babies who had died from SIDS had been vaccinated against DPT prior to death. Of these, 6.5% died within 12 hours of vaccination; 13% within 24 hours; 26% within 3 days; and 37%, 61%, and 70% within 1, 2, and 3 weeks respectively. Torch also found that unvaccinated babies who died of SIDS did so most often in the fall or winter while vaccinated babies died most often at 2 and 4 months—the same ages when initial doses of DPT were given to infants. He concluded that DPT 'may be a generally unrecognized major cause of sudden infant and early childhood death, and that the risks of immunization may outweigh its potential benefits. A need for re-evaluation and possible modification of current vaccination procedures is indicated by this study.' Walker found 'the SIDS mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DPT to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization.' Fine and Chen reported that babies died at a rate nearly eight times greater than normal within 3 days after getting a DPT vaccination."
-Neil Miller & Gary Goldman, "Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?" U.S. National Library of Medicine, Sept 30, 2011, retrieved Feb 23, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075]; See also J.M. Fine & L.C. Chen, "Confounding in Studies of Adverse Reactions to Vaccines," American Journal of Epidemiology, July 15, 1992, p. 121-135

Why is it these medical researchers can find this information when the CDC can't? It's because the CDC doesn't follow up. The CDC looks at VAERS, doesn't find any information because doctors aren't reporting it, but the medical researchers I just quoted are looking at surveys in which the parents were questioned about the events leading up to their baby's death, and most of parents reported having their child vaccinated anywhere from 12 hours to 21 days before death.

After multiple doctors and researchers took a look at the actual survey numbers, they realized that a baby is 7-8 times more likely to die from SIDS in the days and weeks following vaccination. I don't care how many people want to deny it, this is a serious issue that requires serious attention, and for the "medical professionals" to ignore these facts is a slap in the face to every parent who has a dead child from SIDS.

"According to a 1988 issue of Pediatrics Supplement, SIDS in Australia was reduced by 50 percent in the same year that vaccines dropped by 50 percent, when vaccines became non-mandatory in that country. The same medical publication notes that in 1979 Japan quit administering vaccines to infants and raised the age of vaccination to two years, and the result was that infant deaths and infantile convulsions practically disappeared."
-Michael Dye, Vaccinations: Deception & Tragedy, Hallelujah Acres Publishing, 1999, p. 29, ISBN: 0-929619-07-2

The media gives parents a suggestion for SIDS, that it is the parents' fault for suffocating their babies since there has been a link between SIDS and apnea (child stops breathing when sleeping). For example, a 2013 CBS article tells parents of a SIDS child (who already feel guilty that they did something wrong) that they are killing their babies because sharing a bed with an infant "significantly increases their risk of dying from sudden infant death syndrome."
-Michelle Castillo, "Bed sharing may increase risk of SIDS by five times," CBS News, May 21, 2013, retrieved Feb 25, 2016, [cbsnews.com/news/bed-sharing-may-increase-risk-of-sids-by-five-times]

However, what the mainstream media and medical communities will ignore is the actual experimentation that has been done with children who have shown the signs of apnea. To address the problem with SIDS, Dr. Viera Scheibner (a research scientist with a doctorate in natural sciences) made a request to her husband, Leif Karlsson, who was a biomedical engineer specializing in patient monitoring systems, to create a breathing monitor device for infants:
"Leif developed a computerized breathing monitor for babies which we called 'Cotwatch', short for 'watching the cot'. Our monitor gives computer print-outs, and you can monitor for weeks on end, because Cotwatch is a non-touch medical technology. The sensor pad goes under the mattress; nothing is attached to the baby and the baby can roll all over the cot while the breathing is monitored. In 1986, pediatric researchers studying Crib Death Syndrome or Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) believed babies were dying because of an inborn fault in the breathing control center in the brain. So they concentrated their studies on breathing. Many parents opted for monitoring their newborn babies' breathing at home, and we collected feedback from all parents who used our monitor in this research.
OUR FIRST CASE HISTORY This baby was put on our monitor before he was vaccinated, and for more than three weeks, there were hardly any alarms at all. Then suddenly, the mother recorded a whole series of alarms. We thought there was a defect in the monitor, and I sent a different unit, but the alarms continued. After one night when they had six alarms in 24 hours their pediatrician advised them to stop monitoring. But if you have alarms on certain days and no alarms on other days, it is not the equipment malfunctioning; there is good reason for alarms like that. I transferred the baby's forms onto a graph, but did not understand it at the time. Five years later, I telephoned the mother and asked her when the child was vaccinated. The first injection was given one day before these alarms started. The child hadn't even recovered before the second injection was given. So there was a high level of stress caused by vaccines even when the child was not dying. There were no alarms before vaccination, and then a series of alarms. The alarms sound to tell you that your child is under stress when their breathing is shallow (hypopneas) or when their breathing ceases temporily (apneas). We then informed the pediatric and SIDS researchers that the babies were having alarms after vaccinations. We were not critical of vaccines and we didn't even know about the raging controversy surrounding vaccinations. At this point, the Crib Death Management Center pediatricians stopped sending parents to get our monitor. They didn't want parents to know that vaccines were stressing their children. Until that time, I was actually pro-vaccination."

-Dr. Viera Scheibner, "Vaccinations: Part I - Medical Research on SIDS and Epidemics," retrieved Feb 25, 2016, [consumerhealth.org/articles/display.cfm?ID=19990705002005]

Scheibner and her husband continued to monitor babies before vaccination, and after vaccination with their Cotwatch machines, and found the same pattern repeated. Alarms were going off more consistently, and in greater number, after vaccines were administered to the infant.
(See Dr. Viera Scheibner, "Pertussis Vaccine Failure is not Just Modern but Historical: Vaccine has Never Been Effective," Health Impact News, retrieved Feb 26, 2016, [healthimpactnews.com/2013/pertussis-vaccine-failure-is-not-just-modern-but-historical-vaccine-has-never-been-effective])

As a research scientist, Scheibner wanted to research the subject of SIDS in relation to vaccines. Despite what the mainstream media and government websites keep telling us, that there is no connection whatsoever between SIDS and vaccines, Scheiber testifies:
"Then I asked myself, are we the only people who stumbled over the dangers of vaccines? Does the medical profession know about all this? Is there anything published in the medical literature? I began to do research in medical libraries, and to my absolute astonishment, there is no end to it. For my book, Vaccination, I studied more than 30,000 pages of data published in medical journals about Crib Deaths after vaccinations. In one study, there were 41 babies who died within 21 days of their first Triple Antigen injection, and there was a clustering of these deaths along those critical days we recorded in the babies' breathing after vaccination. This is the ultimate evidence of the causal link between the administration of those vaccines and these deaths. In the so-called 'Tennessee Deaths', hundreds of babies died there, after their DPT injections. We soon established that the vaccines are killing babies, and Crib Deaths (SIDS) are 95% vaccine deaths."
-Dr. Viera Scheibner, "Vaccinations: Part I - Medical Research on SIDS and Epidemics," retrieved Feb 25, 2016, [consumerhealth.org/articles/display.cfm?ID=19990705002005]

Despite all the so-called "technological innovations" in the medical community, the Infant Mortality Rate (IMR--the percentage of babies who die after birth) in the U.S. is rising rapidly. The lower the IMR of a country, the healthier it is. In 1960, the U.S. ranked 12th in the world for the lowest IMR, but as of 2010, the U.S. has dropped to 34th.
(See Central Intelligence Agency, "The World Factbook: Infant Mortality Rate," retrieved Feb 23, 2016, [cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/fields/2091.html#118])

"Despite the United States spending more per capita on health care than any other country, 33 nations have better IMRs. Some countries have IMRs that are less than half the US rate: Singapore, Sweden, and Japan are below 2.80. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 'The relative position of the United States in comparison to countries with the lowest infant mortality rates appears to be worsening.'"
-Neil Miller & Gary Goldman, "Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?" Human and Experimental Toxicology, 2011, p. 1, DOI: 10.1177/0960327111407644, retrieved Feb 25, 2016, [nvic.org/PDFs/Infant-Mortality-study.aspx]

For example, Singapore, as of 2015, is rated #1 in the world for the lowest infant mortality rate, and they have lifted any requirements to get vaccines under the age of twelve months. Their SIDS rates are almost non-existent.
(See United Nations, World Population Prospects: 2015 Revision, retrieved Feb 25, 2016, [esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf]; See also The Asian Parent, "Are vaccinations mandatory? Can I opt out of it?" retrieved Feb 25, 2016, [sg.theasianparent.com/are-vaccinations-mandatory-can-i-opt-out-of-it])

In another example, Japan (2015) is #3 in the world for lowest IMR, and they also do not vaccinate under twelve months of age. In addition, Japan banned the MMR vaccine in 1993 when reports of adverse reactions were flooding in after children had received the shot.
(See United Nations, World Population Prospects: 2015 Revision, retrieved Feb 25, 2016, [esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf]; See also Jenny Hope, "Why Japan Banned MMR Vaccine," Daily Mail, retrieved Feb 25, 2016, [dailymail.co.uk/health/article-17509/Why-Japan-banned-MMR-vaccine.html])

As a final note on SIDS, we need to briefly cover the "Shaken Baby Syndrome." There are parents around the world currently serving jail time for "shaking" their baby to death. We first need to look at instances of scurvy arising in vaccinated children.

Dr. Archie Kalokerinos wrote a book on the work and research he and Dr. Glen Dettman both did on the strange and sudden deaths of half of all the aboriginal babies in Australia in 1970 & 1971. Kalokerinos concluded that these deaths were due to the Australian government's recent expansion of their vaccine program to aboriginals, and due to their particular diet, children were also suddenly lacking vitamin C and contracting scurvy; concluding a connection between vaccines and scurvy.
(See Dr. Archie Kalokerinos, Every Second Child, Keats, 1981, ISBN: 9780879832506)

People in general only have small reserves of vitamin C, and they must get it from eating the proper fruits and vegetables, but this also applies to babies. When babies are injected with a parade of toxic substances, the body will immediately call upon all of its vitamin C reserves to fight it off, but the babies don't necessarily have enough to do so. When the reserves of vitamin C deplete from battling against the toxicity of the vaccine, they will begin to show signs of scurvy, which can be extremely deadly to a child.

In Kalokerinos's books, Dr. Irwin Stone testified about a woman was put in jail for killing her baby, when it wasn't her fault at all:
"Baby Evelyn was normal at birth. But at six months, she was emaciated [thinning of the muscles and flesh], weak, dying and covered with bruises. To the medical authorities and the police, this was an open and shut case of child abuse. According to their lights, her mother Nancy, a 'typically ignorant' Aboriginal, had neglected her child, then beaten her fatally. Mother Nancy was tried, convicted and jailed. But Dr. Archie Kalokerinos knew better. He immediately saw Baby Evelyn's case for what it was: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome or Crib Death, resulting from the standard Aboriginal diet of junk food, worthless baby formula and no vitamin C. What is more, Kalokerinos had evidence from his own experience in treating thousands of Aboriginal babies, plus the expert testimony of medical colleagues, to prove his diagnosis. The result Nancy was declared innocent one month before her sentence for killing her baby was completed. Still the needless deaths go on in Australia, in the United States, where Dr. Irwin Stone estimates that 10,000 baby deaths occur annually because of this same lack of recognition of the true cause and throughout the world."
(See Dr. Archie Kalokerinos, Every Second Child, Keats, 1981, ISBN: 9780879832506)

Vitamin deficiencies, like scurvy or rickets, will weaken the entire body; bone, muscle, and tissue, which leave behind evidence that, to doctors and police ignorant of these vitamin deficient diseases, looks like physical violence. In 1999, Alan Yurko was prosecuted for killing his own son on this same basis.

(Exceprts from documentary "Vaccine Nation," showing interviews with Alan & Francine Yurko)
ALAN: "We thought we were good parents. We had outlined contingency plans, if something happened what we would do, and we thought we were doing all the right things. Then came time for vaccinations. The HIV, Hep B, DTP, and the polio vaccine..."
FRANCINE: "All in one day. Regardless of all those things that were going on with him, he received all six of those shots in one day."
ALAN: "I, in effect, arbitrarily trusted my son's life to a stranger; a man I never knew. I just kind of trusted him because he had a white coat on... I worshipped the vaccines just like people do blindly. I thought they were the sacred cow; never would question them..."
FRANCINE: "[A]bout the tenth day or so after his shots, this is when he developed that high-pitched cry... Alan and I discussed, well, if he's not any better come Monday, that we'll take him into the doctor again. Well that Monday morning came, and I got up, and little did I know that I would literally kiss my family goodbye for the last time."
ALAN: "He was a little fussy that morning. He didn't take his whole bottle... I noticed that he was very still. I didn't know he'd stopped breathing at first. I ran red lights; fish tailed into the emergency room. I handed the baby over the counter in the emergency room and I said, 'Please make him breathe again.' Doctors, they got him resuscitated; talking to the doctors, they're saying well, we think it's sepsis [body's violent reaction to infection], we're going to take him to the bigger hospital... and it was a long day there at that hospital in the waiting room."
FRANCINE: "And there we sat, and sat, and sat. No one would talk to us. No one would tell us what was going on."
ALAN: "Around ten o'clock that night, that doctor came out... and had a little conference with us and sat us down in chairs, and quite coldly, and as a matter of factly, said 'Your baby has broken ribs and bleeding in the brain and he's going to die.'"
FRANCINE: "I lost it at that point... I wound up having to be sedated."
ALAN: "I think you've got the wrong baby. Can you check -- I mean, I seriously thought he had the wrong baby. Broken ribs? Bleeding in the brain? There's no broken ribs, this is some mix up... he's saying 'No, this is your baby. We have the X-rays here. We need to know what happened.'"
FRANCINE: "Not too long after that, Children and Families was called in, and investigators were called in. Before we knew it, they were throwing out accusations of child abuse, and the nature of shaken baby syndrome."
ALAN: "The doctor, meanwhile, was trying to ask me what happened, what happened? And I told him what happened a hundred times; over and over this is what happened: He stopped breathing. I got him to the hospital. Why didn't you call? The phone's not on. They thought that that was suspicious that I didn't call 911 and wait for an ambulence. I don't know why. I got him there in under four minutes... Around two in the morning, the nurses said 'The detectives are here. They want to talk to you.' Did you shake him? No. Did you hurt him? No. Did you hit him? No. Did he drop? No. Did he fall? No. Is it possible that when you were running with him that maybe these injuries could have happened? I guess it's possible, but I don't think it's very probable. Eventually life support was taken off. They rushed Francine in for life support, but not before I was arrested. All while this is going on, they're pressuring Francine to donate the organs. They even forged her name on some of the papers."
FRANCINE: "I get a phone call from the nurse, not even from [the] doctor... himself, who on the phone said to me, 'The doctor would like you to hurry up and get down here because he would like this over with before noon.' Meaning, they wanted me to sign off the papers so they can go ahead and whisk him off to harvest his organs... while I was there holding him, with all these wires and stuff, those investigators were outside the door; I just lost my son! I just left him! They had this elaborate plan that they wanted me to get on the phone with Alan. They were going to make special arrangements that I could call into the prison facility, and they wanted me to tell him that I thought that he could do something like this, and let's see what he would say. And when I refused to cooperate, that's when they became angry, and they had gotten up, and they had threatened me that I myself could be arrested."

The vaccines made the baby's bones so brittle that they broke, and then after being admitted into the hospital, the doctors and nurses gave him Heprin, which caused his brain to bleed. It was pointed out during the court case that the autopsy showed bleeding of the brain after the child was dead, meaning that the injury was not caused by a physical altercation, but rather a chemical that was still working on the brain tissue after death.

The jury was falling asleep during the trial because they brought in "expert" witnesses for the prosecution that bogged them down with so much complex medical jargon they couldn't understand. The jury was also not allowed to take notes. Alan Yurko ended up with life in prison plus ten years for the murder of his son, when in fact it was the pediatricians and other hospital medical staff that caused his death and covered it up.

The good news is that Alan was freed after he and his wife were able to file an appeal in 2003. Being more prepared and not being represented by a half-hearted public defender like they were the first time, they demonstrated in court the ignorance of the medical community and of the prosecuting "expert" medical witnesses. Alan was freed in 2004.

John Caffey, a pediatric radiologist, coined the phrase "Shaken Baby Syndrome" in 1946 in Caffey's Pediatric Diagnostic Imaging, and this is where most of the pediatricians look to today for their diagnosis that has led to thousands of parents being wrongly found guilty of harming their children.
(See Brian D. Coley, Caffey's Pediatric Diagnostic Imaging, Elsevier Saunders, 12th Edition, Vol. 1, 2013, ISBN: 9780323081764)

Dr. David Ayoub, radiologist working for one of the largest radiology groups in the country, explains that most of the textbook literature on vitamin deficient illnesses are non-existent today:
"I was looking closely at aluminum adjuvants in vaccines and their association with diseases in early infancy. One of the classic diseases that aluminum is linked to is rickets. It’s also plausible that aluminum is anticoagulant. In other words, it can induce bleeding conditions. What comes to mind is fractures and bleeding (what do you think of) in infants – shaken baby syndrome (SBS)... There's over a 95 percent reduction in our textbooks from what was in the textbooks 50 years ago. Radiologists today and clinicians today do not know the full range of what you see in a radiograph in rickets... When guys like Colin Paterson and the American researcher Marvin Miller... both almost about the same time started publishing papers on temporary brittle bone disease, a state of fragility and multiple fractures in early infants occurring in this two-to-four month window of age, they were lambasted [harshly criticized] in the editorial pages. They were attacked by the child abuse community. Colin Paterson went through the General Medical Council (GMC) just like Andrew Wakefield did. He lost his license."
-David Ayoub, quoted by Joseph Mercola, "A Special Interview with Dr. David Ayoub," retrieved Mar 1, 2016, [jeffreydachmd.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Child-Abuse-or-Rickets-Interview-David-Ayoub.pdf]

We will discuss Andrew Wakefield towards the end of this article, but the point is that these medical doctors and researchers are losing their jobs and licenses for simply showing a connection between brittle bones in infants and the age range of 2 to 4 months. Why is that so offensive? Because, as we read earlier, the CDC already admits that the recommended age range to begin child vaccination is 2 to 4 months, and that means these research papers, whether mentioning vaccines or not, are a direct threat to the vaccine (i.e. pro-poison) community and industry as a whole.

It's not that this information doesn't exist, despite the fact that CDC or the AMA (American Medical Association) keep advocating for their non-existence, but rather that the information is suppressed and ignored because there is a bigger plan to all this. Sadly, there are parents serving jail time today for the crimes of the doctors and nurses they trusted, but this gets even worse when we look at the new life-long disorders being created by vaccines.


Autism has almost appeared out of nowhere around the same time vaccine cocktails were heavily pushed into the public school system. I am not saying that vaccines are the singular cause of autism, but as we will find out in this section, vaccines are triggering autism in vulnerable children.

autism: a disorder beginning in childhood... marked by the presence of markedly abnormal or impaired development in social interaction and communication and a markedly restricted repertoire of activity and interest
(See 'autism', Medical Dictionary Online, 2011, retrieved Mar 1, 2016 [online-medical-dictionary.org/definitions-a/autism.html])

There's a problem of deception concerning autism and statistical charts. This chart from JAMA shows the percentage of children receiving MMR vaccines in California, and the bottom line shows the REPORTED number of cases of autism. First of all, autism was only recently recognized as a disorder in 1980, which means if the doctors don't know about a disorder, they don't diagnose it, and so many cases of autism never made it onto this chart.

We need to understand that studies like this lead doctors to conclude that autism rises while inoculation stays roughly the same, so they will say there is no connection between the two. However, this chart is NOT solely demonstrating autism-to-vaccine ratio; this chart is partially demonstrating the rate at which doctors were informed and educated about autism and they began to recognize it as a viable diagnosis.
(Chart taken from L. Dales, S. Hammer, & N. Smith, "Time Trends in Autism and in MMR Immunization Coverage in California," Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA], 2001;285(9):1183-1185. doi:10.1001/jama.285.9.1183)

The public gets deceived by charts like this because they are purposefully made to make it look like there is no connection between vaccines and autism. As we have already seen in other disease charts in this article, they start the charts at a time which is convenient for a presupposition they already hold, or in other words, they cherry-pick a time frame that will support their vaccine agenda, and the general public doesn't know how to see through the illusion.

In order to properly analyze statistics, we would need ALL cases of autism from the 1960s to today, and that's impossible to get because we don't know how many cases of autism there were before the 1980s when some doctors started diagnosing it. We also don't know how many total cases of autism there were in the 80s and 90s because many doctors were still learning what autism was and how to recognize it. What we need are actual studies, but as we are about to find out, those studies have either not been done at all, hidden from the public, or corrupted by men protecting the vaccine industry.

After everything we've covered so far, I'm sure we all can guess what the CDC says about autism and vaccines:
"There is no link between vaccines and autism. Some people have had concerns that ASD [Autism Spectrum Disorder] might be linked to the vaccines children receive, but studies have shown that there is no link between receiving vaccines and developing ASD."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism," retrieved Mar 1, 2016, [cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html]

After we've already seen how the CDC deceives people, such a statement carries no weight with those who value research over prestige. Dr. Alan Cohen specializes in environmental medicine, and notes the timing between the use of vaccines and the appearance of autism:
"Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism... did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions."
-Gary Null, The Complete Encyclopedia of Natural Healing, Kensington Books, 2005, p. 81, ISBN: 9780758213167

"When legions of parents began to complain that their children had become ill soon after their vaccinations, while still controversial, the government studied the situation and in 2001 began to gradually phase thimerosal out of the vaccinations. Even with this gradual removal, however, the damage was done. Now there are countless new cases of autism, with more emerging every day, and there are also millions of other children with very serious cases of the other 4-A disorders, which are also partly due to the unsafe vaccinations."
-Kenneth Bock & Cameron Stauth, Healing the New Childhood Epidemics, Random House Digital Inc, 2008, p. 21, ISBN: 9780345494511

The numbers of parents who have seen signs of autism appear in their children within hours, days, or weeks of a vaccine is staggering, but most of these cases are never researched or heard about because the medical establishment has already stated that autism and vaccines have no link, so therefore, the tiny fraction of doctors in the U.S. who lawfully file reports to VAERS will never report a case of autism in relation to vaccine injury.

In fact, the CDC has already been exposed in 2014 for purposefully omitting statistics in their studies on vaccines that were showing an increase in autism. Parents began protesting outside CDC headquarters, as was documented in this CBS News report:

Dr. William Thompson, a CDC scientist, brought forth evidence of CDC cover up of studies showing a clear connection between autism and vaccination:
"Ten months ago, [California biomechanical engineer Brian] Hooker said he started talking to William Thompson, a scientist with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Thompson worked on a 2004 autism study published in the medical journal Pediatrics that found no link between autism and vaccines, but he now claims the researchers omitted data that would have shown that there was indeed a link. 'I regret that my co-authors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics,' Thompson said in a statement through his lawyer. 'The omitted data suggested that African-American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.'"
-Sydney Lupkin, "How a Now-Retracted Autism Study Went Viral," ABC News, Oct 9, 2014, retrieved Mar 1, 2016, [abcnews.go.com/Health/now-retracted-autism-study-viral/story?id=25248179]

I give praise to the Lord Jesus Christ for convicting Thompson with guilt to finally come out with the truth because during the hearing, Thompson's affidavit (i.e. sworn statement) was read that testified of his time in the room with the other doctors, and how they took the research that showed a link between vaccines and autism, and threw them in a large garbage bag for disposal. Thompson knew that was against the law, so he rescued some of the files for safe keeping.

A few months ago (March, 2016), News Target reported the evidence of the CDC committing scientific fraud that the mainstream media ignores:
"Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, revealed that Dr. Julie Gerberding, the former head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) actively participated in willful scientific fraud in order to bury clinical evidence linking the MMR vaccine to a 340% increase in autism among African American children... Documents in the possession of Adams reveal that Gerberding and other CDC officials intentionally hid the truth about the vaccines. And, as a reward for all her efforts, Gerberding has been granted a lucrative executive position at vaccine maker Merck, where she still works today. The CDC whistleblower who attempted to reveal this huge conspiracy was said to have been reprimanded by CDC leaders themselves, for having had the courage to tell the truth. Furthermore, those CDC scientists who perpetrated the cover-up, including Coleen Boyle — the Director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD) at the CDC — were granted a coveted award from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services “Autism Public Health Response Team” for keeping their mouths shut about the scientific fraud they helped perpetrate."
-Tara Paras, "CDC commits scientific fraud, inflicts vaccine violence among African American children in shocking exposé," News Target, Mar 3, 2016, retrieved June 4, 2016, [newstarget.com/2016-03-03-cdc-commits-scientific-fraud-inflicts-vaccine-violence-among-african-american-children-in-shocking-expose.html]

Next News reported the findings of the Freedom of Information Act request made by Dr. Brian Hooker that revealed more deception. In certain studies, up to 40% of the cases were dropped because the children didn't have proper birth certificates. Unless birth certificates are the cause of autism, that would make no sense from a scientific/medical standpoint. The real reason this was done is becaue a large number of black children who received the vaccine got autism afterwards did not have legal birth certificates in Africa, and so those running the study dropped the black children without birth certificates, not for scientific reasons, but as a convenient excuse to make their doctored numbers look better for the sake of protecting vaccinations and their manufacturers.
(See Gary Franchi, "Whistleblower at the CDC," Aug 20, 2014, retrieved June 4, 2016, [youtube.com/watch?v=YEq2-snxO8g])

In addition to the cover-up of vaccines and autism links, there are some cases in which the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has ruled in favor of autism injury compensation:
"In his conclusion, Special Master Abell ruled that Petitioners had proven that the MMR had directly caused a brain inflammation illness called acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) which, in turn, had caused the autism spectrum disorder PDD-NOS in the child: 'The Court found that Bailey's ADEM was both caused-in-fact and proximately caused by his vaccination. It is well-understood that the vaccination at issue can cause ADEM, and the Court found, based upon a full reading and hearing of the pertinent facts in this case, that it did actually cause the ADEM. Furthermore, Bailey's ADEM was severe enough to cause lasting, residual damage, and retarded his developmental progress, which fits under the generalized heading of Pervasive Developmental Delay, or PDD [an autism spectrum disorder]. The Court found that Bailey would not have suffered this delay but for the administration of the MMR vaccine, and that this chain of causation was... a proximate sequence of cause and effect leading inexorably from vaccination to Pervasive Developmental Delay.'"
-Robert F. Kennedy, "Vaccine Court: Autism Debate Continues," Huffington Post, Mar 27, 2009, retrieved Mar 1, 2016, [huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-and-david-kirby/vaccine-court-autism-deba_b_169673.html]

Over and over we're told there is no connection between vaccines and autism, but parents and lawyers have proved it in hearings with the NVICP. The court found that the child's autism was caused by encephalitis (brain swelling), which was caused by the vaccination.

The Journal of Immunotoxicology agrees with the court:
"Documented causes of autism include genetic mutations and/or deletions, viral infections, and encephalitis [swelling of the brain] following vaccination."
-Journal of Immunotoxicology, 2011; 8(1): 68-79; See also Age of Autism [ageofautism.com], "New Medical Journal Review: Vacine Injury is a Documented Cause of Autism," Feb 10, 2011, retrieved July 14, 2011 [http://www.ageofautism.com/2011/02/new-medical-journal-review-vaccine-injury-is-a-documented-cause-of-autism.html]

Dr. Mark Geier (president of Genetic Centers of America) and Dr. David Geier (president of MedCon Inc) conducted a study on vaccines and their connection to neurodevelopmental disorders, in which they not only concluded a connection to autism, but also a connection to heart disease:
"This study provides strong epidemiological evidence for a link between increasing mercury from thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and neurodevelopment disorders and heart disease... previous epidemiological studies showing adverse reactions from such vaccines, a causal relationship between thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and neurodevelopment disorders and heart disease appears to be confirmed."
-Mark R. Geier & David A. Geier, "Thimerosal in Childhood Vaccines, Neurodevelopment Disorders, and Heart Disease in the United States," Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2003, p. 10, retrieved Mar 10, 2016, [jpands.org/vol8no1/geier.pdf]

If you haven't gotten frustrated with being deceived yet, you're about to. The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) published the transcript of a "top secret" meeting between CDC, FDA (Food and Drug Administration), and vaccine manufacturers (June, 2000) about whether or not vaccines cause neurological disorders, like autism. Much of the discussion was focused on Dr. Thomas Verstraeten "and his co-workers using Vaccine Safety Datalink data as a project collaboration between the CDC's National Immunization Program (NIP) and four HMOs. The study examined the records of 110,000 children" (the study which, by the way, was ordered by the CDC), and during discussion about statistics that showed higher risk of autism in those who got a larger dose of vaccination, the following conversation took place:
"Dr. Brent: What is your explanation? What explanations would you give for that?
Dr. Verstraeten: Personally, I have three hypotheses. My first hypothesis is it is parental bias. The children that are more likely to be vaccinated are more likely to be picked and diagnosed. Second hypothesis, I don't know. There is a bias that I have not recognized, and nobody has yet told me about it. Third hypothesis. It's true, it's Thimerosal. Those are my hypotheses... I went back through the literature, I was actually stunned by what I saw because I thought it is plausible."

-Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, "Selected vaccine authorities from CDC, FDA, and manufacturers discuss, in a closed meeting, the possibility of neurodevelopment disorders resulting from vaccine components," retrieved Mar 1, 2016, [aapsonline.org/vaccines/cdcfdaexperts.htm]

But CDC representations will come out of such a meeting and still parrot to the public that there is no connection between vaccines and autism. How much more do we need to cover before parents and doctors quit blindly trusting the CDC and begin to take extreme caution with vaccines? Even if the CDC says "our reports say there is no link," how can we possibly trust anything they say when we've already seen the clear evidence of multiple cover-ups?

Another doctor present at this meeting urged the participating organizations to continue investigation into the dangers of chemical agents of vaccines causing these disorders; otherwise it would give credibility to anti-vaccine legislation, or in other words, the public outrage would end up bankrupting the vaccine program altogether:
"In addition, the possibility that the associations [between vaccines and neurological disorders] could be causal [i.e. a link] has major significance for public and professional acceptance of Thimerosal-containing vaccines. I think that is a critical issue. Finally, lack of further study would be horrendous grist [useful material] for the anti-vaccination bill. That's why we need to go on, and urgently I would add... The number of dose related relationships are linear and statistically significant. You can play with this all you want. They are linear. They are statistically significant."
-Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, "Selected vaccine authorities from CDC, FDA, and manufacturers discuss, in a closed meeting, the possibility of neurodevelopment disorders resulting from vaccine components," retrieved Mar 1, 2016, [aapsonline.org/vaccines/cdcfdaexperts.htm]

Please understand, the vaccine program in America does not just benefit the manufacturers; doctors, nurses, clinics, government agencies -- all of them would lose money, and many of them would lose their jobs if these programs get cut and the American people get informed, which is why it is so carefully guarded. For those of you unfamiliar with how certain jobs are acquired in the vaccine world, manufacturers will often hunt for new prospects to hire within government organizations like the CDC, and many of those employees would jump at the opportunity because government work is not as glamourous or high-paying as private company work, so CDC employees in most cases would never want to expose the very industry they're trying to get hired into.

Yet another doctor points out that they must be cautious of how they proceed with the information that is being recorded in the meeting, and that they have to alter how the documents are released to the public so certain groups won't get exposed for their deception:
"[E]ven if this committee decides that there is no association and that information gets out, the work that has been done and through the freedom of information that will be taken by others and will be used in ways beyond the control of this group. And I am very concerned about that as I suspect it is already too late to do anything regardless of any professional body and what they say... I am very concerned that this has gotten this far, and that having got this far, how you present in a concerted voice the information to the ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] in a way they will be able to handle it and not get exposed... What are the potential outcomes and how will you handle it? How will it be presented to a public and media that is hungry for selecting the information they want to use for whatever means they have in store for them?"
-Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, "Selected vaccine authorities from CDC, FDA, and manufacturers discuss, in a closed meeting, the possibility of neurodevelopment disorders resulting from vaccine components," retrieved Mar 1, 2016, [aapsonline.org/vaccines/cdcfdaexperts.htm]

This meeting was only focusing on one of the many deadly ingredients in the vaccines, Thimerosal (mercury), but the CDC lies to the public in a very casual manner:
"One vaccine ingredient that has been studied specifically is thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative used to prevent contamination of multidose vials of vaccines. Research shows that thimerosal does not cause ASD."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism," retrieved Mar 2, 2016, [cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html]

Such a statement is not only absurd after everything we've just read, but it will get sickening when you read this FDA study published in JAMA:
"Every year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspects several hundred clinical sites performing biomedical research on human participants and occasionally finds evidence of substantial departures from good clinical practice and research misconduct. However, the FDA has no systematic method of communicating these findings to the scientific community, leaving open the possibility that research misconduct detected by a government agency goes unremarked in the peer-reviewed literature."
-C. Seife, "Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature," Journal of the American Medical Association, April, 2015, p. 567-577, doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7774, retrieved Mar 4, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25664866]

There are many violations to protocol in "peer-reviewed" journals of medicine, and they get completely ignored. Even the doctors who read them don't know about the violations. How frequently does this occur?
"Fifty-seven published clinical trials were identified for which an FDA inspection of a trial site had found significant evidence of 1 or more of the following problems: falsification or submission of false information, 22 trials (39%); problems with adverse events reporting, 14 trials (25%); protocol violations, 42 trials (74%); inadequate or inaccurate recordkeeping, 35 trials (61%); failure to protect the safety of patients and/or issues with oversight or informed consent, 30 trials (53%); and violations not otherwise categorized, 20 trials (35%)... No corrections, retractions, expressions of concern, or other comments acknowledging the key issues identified by the inspection were subsequently published."
-C. Seife, "Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature," Journal of the American Medical Association, April, 2015, p. 567-577, doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7774, retrieved Mar 4, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25664866]

It is an understatement to say this is huge. That document should have been breaking news on every TV station, newspaper, and magazine in the country because that is clear evidence of fraud and cover-up that should have led to one of the biggest internal investigations in U.S. history. However, almost no one has heard of these studies, and people continue to trust in the medical community, thinking that they are above reproach.

And just to put the cherry on top of this train-wreck sundae, in the secret meeting transcript, one of the doctors that has been giving those vaccines to children said:
"I got called out at eight o'clock for an emergency call and my daughter-in-law delivered a son... Our first male in the line of the next generation, and I do not want that grandson to get a Thimerosal-containing vaccine until we know better what is going on."
-Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, "Selected vaccine authorities from CDC, FDA, and manufacturers discuss, in a closed meeting, the possibility of neurodevelopment disorders resulting from vaccine components," retrieved Mar 1, 2016, [aapsonline.org/vaccines/cdcfdaexperts.htm]

The hypocrisy is almost unbelievable. These men are willing to administer the shots to their patients, tell parents to get their children vaccinated on schedule, but they will NOT inject THEIR OWN children with these vaccines.

Of course, none of this appears in mainstream media sources, so the general public has no idea this is going on. The only thing the general public gets to see is the CDC director, Eileen Boyle, quoting studies done by a man named Poul Thorsen, who did studies that are claimed to have disproven a link between vaccines and autism, but the problem is that this man is a fugitive wanted by the U.S. Government for over one million dollars in grant fraud, as is stated on HHS website:
"From approximately February 2004 until February 2010, Poul Thorsen executed a scheme to steal grant money awarded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC had awarded grant money to Denmark for research involving infant disabilities, autism, genetic disorders, and fetal alcohol syndrome. CDC awarded the grant to fund studies of the relationship between autism and the exposure to vaccines, the relationship between cerebral palsy and infection during pregnancy, and the relationship between developmental outcomes and fetal alcohol exposure... Thorsen allegedly diverted over $1 million of the CDC grant money to his own personal bank account. Thorsen submitted fraudulent invoices on CDC letterhead to medical facilities assisting in the research for reimbursement of work allegedly covered by the grants."
-Office of Inspector General, "Fugitive Profiles," U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, retrieved Mar 2, 2016, [oig.hhs.gov/fraud/fugitives/profiles.asp]

Congressman Posey questions the CDC director during the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee in 2012 concerning Thorsen's involvement in the CDC's vaccine/autism studies:
CONGRESSMAN: "What steps has the CDC undertaken to ensure the integrity of the research that was performed by Dr. Poul Thorsen, who as you know has been indicted for misconduct and misallocation of resources?"
CDC: "[He] was just one investigator..."
CONGRESSMAN: "Have you gone back to validate the variety of studies he participated in? You know this guy is a humongous scumbag, one of the most wanted men on earth, and you relied upon him for data to determine whether thimerosal had a negative effect."
CDC: "Two studies don't conclude a body of work..."
Later during the hearing...
CONGRESSMAN "The witness told me the fugitive doctor had been involved in a couple of studies with CDC, and I have information here that he was involved in 21 of the 24 studies."

If you listen to the entire interaction between Congressman Posey and CDC Director Boyle, Boyle makes the excuse that Thorsen was only a small part of the studies, and that he was only involved in a couple of them. The fact is that she NEVER addressed the question if they reviewed the studies after Thorsen was charged with theft and fraud (because they didn't), and Thorsen was involved in almost all of the 24 unreviewed studies (not just two), but so long as the "studies" support vaccine distribution, the CDC doesn't care who it comes from or how it gets done.

It is for these very reasons that I personally hate seeing the "Autism Awareness Ribbon" portrayed on bumper stickers all over America. The problem is that few of these people really understand what the ribbon stands for:
"The autism ribbon symbol is a jigsaw ribbon with several bright colors that include red, yellow and blue. It symbolizes awareness of autism among those directly affected by it and even those who have not heard of the disorder until they were told what the cool jigsaw puzzle ribbon design is all about. It is used to spread awareness about the disorder of autism, often letting everyone know that whoever is sporting the ribbon is someone who understands the disorder and is making a statement that they are supporting the cause."
-Health Guide Info, "The History of the Autism Ribbon Symbol," retrieved Mar 3, 2016, [healthguideinfo.com/living-with-autism/p86993]
The problem is not "autism awareness" right now, because today, autism is fairly well-known in the U.S. It's talked about all the time, even in the mainstream media. These ribbons are only representing making people aware of the SYMPTOM of the underlying cause. What we really need is VACCINE awareness ribbons, so I made one. (If anyone decides to market this idea, that's fine, but just be fair by sending me and my wife some of the profits.)

People wearing SIDS ribbons or autism ribbons as a symbol that they have a dead child or autistic child is completely meaningless, and helps no one. What can help others is to make them aware of one of the major CAUSES of these disorders and deadly diseases, but I believe very few would be willing to wear a ribbon like this because they know what kind of vicious reactions arise in some people who are not able to discuss such issues in a rational manner.


The term "Herd Immunity" is repeated over and over on television interviews as a scare tactic that creates a wall of fear and anger between those who blindly vaccinate and those who refuse vaccination based on research. It's a simple, quick media strategy that helps keep the ignorant herd in line with the pharmaceutical agenda, however, if you listen carefully to those who go on TV and talk about herd immunity in vaccines, you'll notice they never actually provide any evidence for it.

This is an image provided by vaccine.gov, alongside their recommendation that 95% of the population should be vaccinated:
"When a critical portion of a community is immunized against a contagious disease, most members of the community are protected against that disease because there is little opportunity for an outbreak. Even those who are not eligible for certain vaccines—such as infants, pregnant women, or immunocompromised individuals—get some protection because the spread of contagious disease is contained."
-Vaccines.gov, "Community Immunity ('Herd Immunity')," retrieved Mar 4, 2016, [vaccines.gov/basics/protection]; Image from same source.

They believe that barriers are created by the grand majority of vaccinated people that is supposed to also create some shielding for the minority unvaccinated, which sounds very professional and scientific to those who have not done thorough research on the subject because if you remember earlier, I've already quoted many examples in which there were outbreaks in a mostly vaccinated population. Again, vaccine.gov says that that vaccines create herd immunity in which those who are vaccinated are protected from disease, but in one of the outbreaks I mentioned earlier, the CDC reported 1,500 cases of mumps in one community, and among the mumps infected citizens, almost 90% were vaccinated with the MMR, and 75% had two doses.
(See "Mumps Outbreak in N.Y., N.J. Tops 1,500 Cases," Associated Press, Feb 11, 2010, reports from the CDC in Atlanta, retrieved Feb 23, 2011, MSNBC, [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35350606/ns/health-infectious_diseases])

The CDC website also reports an outbreak of measles in a high school in which 100% of the students were vaccinated:
"The affected high school had 276 students and was in the same building as a junior high school with 135 students. A review of health records in the high school showed that all 411 students had documentation of measles vaccination on or after the first birthday, in accordance with Illinois law."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Measles Outbreak among Vaccinated High School Students -- Illinois," Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, June 22, 1984, p. 349-351, retrieved Mar 4, 2016, [cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000359.htm#sthash.p9S9gw8e.dpuf]

The New England Journal of Medicine reported an outbreak of measles among a secondary school population in which 99% of the students had been vaccinated:
"An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced. Serum samples from 1806 students at two secondary schools were obtained eight days after the onset of the first case... more than 99 percent had records of vaccination with live measles vaccine.... We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune."
-T.L. Gustafson & A.W. Lievens, "Measles outbreak in a fully immunized secondary-school population," The New England Journal of Medicine, Mar 26, 1987, p. 771-774, retrieved Mar 10, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823]

I find it hilarious when they say that "95 percent are immune" because the "immune" children still ended up with measles. How can they sit back and call it immunity when they're still getting it? I don't care what propaganda is spread in the media and on so-called "science" websites about vaccine-induced herd immunity, the fact is that in real application it doesn't work.

Vaccine-induced "herd immunity" is nothing but propaganda.
In practice, it doesn't work.

One of the major fallacies with the immunity theory is that no one has ever proven immunity to disease; we have only seen evidence of resistance, and I want to emphasize that because anyone, no matter how many antibodies they have, can fall into poor health in if they have a poor (processed food) diet and bad hygiene. Herd immunity is not the term that should be used, but rather we should say "herd resistance."

Experiments published in the European Journal of Immunology showed that protection from disease in a baby requires antibodies from the mother (womb and milk) and natural exposure to infections:
"The formal demonstration that both maternal antibodies and early exposure to infection are required for long-term protection illustrated that constant re-infection cycles have an essential role in building a stable herd immunity."
-A.A. Navarini, "Long-lasting immunity by early infection of maternal-antibody-protected infants," European Journal of Immunology, January, 2010, doi: 10.1002/eji.200939371, retrieved Mar 4, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19877011]

The author goes on to explain that attempts to eliminate a disease from society is a deadly risk:
"Attempts to eradicate measles virus or poliovirus eliminates antigen exposure of infants to these pathogens. Such quasi-sterile epidemiological situations may actually increase the risk of outbreaks."
-A.A. Navarini, "Long-lasting immunity by early infection of maternal-antibody-protected infants," European Journal of Immunology, January, 2010, doi: 10.1002/eji.200939371, retrieved Mar 4, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19877011]

Forcing laboratory-grown and altered diseases into the body (along with poisonous substances) does not automatically create this immunity fantasy talked about on two-minute news segments. This problem can quickly spiral out of control in the next generation because girls who were vaccinated grow to have lower levels of antibodies in the milk, and thus their babies will lack natural protection.

A study published by Pediatrics showed the measles rate in babies born to mothers before 1963 (introduction of the MMR vaccine), and compared it to the rate of measles in babies born to mothers after 1963, and found:
"Infants whose mothers were born after 1963 had a measles attack rate of 33%, compared with 12% for infants of older mothers.... Infants whose mothers were born after 1963 are more susceptible to measles than are infants of older mothers. An increasing proportion of infants born in the United States may be susceptible to measles."
-M. Papania, "Increased susceptibility to measles in infants in the United States," Pediatrics, November, 1999, retrieved Mar 4, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10545585]

This means the more vaccines that have been introduced into a population, the more susceptible that population has become to those diseases. This is the exact opposite of the explanation of "herd immunity" we're getting from the media, but what's really absurd is in the study I just quoted, the solution they suggest to solve this problem is to give children MORE vaccines.

Any type of "herd immunity" (i.e. resistance), that has provided complete protection against a particular disease, has never come from vaccines. There is a natural herd immunity that automatically takes place in populations that experience disease, which is why when some people in the U.S. who travel to foreign areas, like Africa or South America, can become incredibly sick; they have not been part of the herd long enough to build up resistance to the diseases common in that area.

Children who grow up in a particular environment, and get natural sicknesses of that environment, and drink the milk of their mothers who have the antibodies necessary to survive in that environment, gain life-long resistances to the diseases of that environment. It is vitally important to understand that vaccine manufacturers cannot provide the same life-long resistances, and worse still, any "immunity" a vaccine might produce is only creating antibodies to fight the particular strain used in the production of the vaccine.
Children who naturally acquire illnesses use the resources in their bodies to fight off all the strains floating around the environment. Children who get vaccinated use all the resources in their bodies to fight off one particular strain, which may not even be the strain they need protection from at that moment in their specific environment; they only get protection from whatever strain was used in the lab.

It is precisely for this reason that vaccines are reducing our resistances to diseases, and the herd resistance we once had is being deteriorated, as Dr. Russell Blaylock notes:
"One of the grand lies of the vaccine program is the concept of 'herd immunity'. In fact, vaccines for most Americans declined to non-protective levels within 5 to 10 years of the vaccines. This means that for the vast majority of Americans, as well as others in the developed world, herd immunity doesn't exist and hasn't for over 60 years."
-Dr. Russell Blaylock, quoted by Neil Z. Miller, Vaccine Safety Manual for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners, New Atlantean Press, 2011, p. 16-17, ISBN: 9781881217374

After looking at the arguments slowly, we can see that vaccine-induced "herd immunity" is a completely backwards way of thinking. To understand why this vaccine philosophy is so backward, we need to go back in time about 200 years to Edward Jenner, the man who invented the concept of vaccination, and who is often called "the father of immunology."

Edward Jenner (born 1749) was a British surgeon, but not a surgeon as you would typically think of today. Jenner was an 18th century surgeon whose duties consisted of basic things like setting bones, amputating limbs, and 'bleeding', which was a foolish practice based on the myth that if you take out a sick person's blood, they'll get better. While he was living in a country town in southwest England, Jenner heard a local superstition that anyone who contracted cowpox would not get smallpox, and he had such a lack of basic medical understanding that when he heard the word 'pox', he automatically thought the two diseases were linked together.

"It had not occurred to any one to associate [cowpox] in any way with the smallpox until rather late in the eighteenth century; and those who did connect the two would appear to have been rather the idle gossips than those country people who had some real practical knowledge of either or both diseases. The single bond connecting cowpox with smallpox was the occurrence of the word 'pox' in each name... The jingle of the names had the effect that it often has upon credulous people, whose acquaintance with any matter is more verbal than real. Those who had been unlucky enough to catch the cowpox on their fingers from milking cows with sore teats had an instinctive notion why the affection had been called a pox; but the officious gossips who knew no more than the name of the thing must needs make a fine romantic legend out of it. You have had the cowpox, they said to the milkers; therefore you cannot take the smallpox."
-Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination: A Strange Chapter of Medical History, 1889, p. 20-21, [University of Michigan]

That's extremely similar to mainstream media today: "You have had the vaccine; therefore you cannot take measles." Are our doctors and scientists little more than superstitious romantics?

The medical establishment loves to build up Edward Jenner and make him seem like a successful doctor and scientist. The CDC says:
"Smallpox has been a vaccine-preventable disease for more than 200 years. In 1796, Edward Jenner demonstrated that immunity to smallpox could be produced by inoculating a human with material from a lesion on the udder of a cow. Jenner called this infectious material vaccine, and the procedure came to be called vaccination."
-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Smallpox Vaccine Overview," retrieved Mar 8, 2016, [bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/training/overview/pdf/vaccineoverview.pdf]

However, here's what the medical establishment tends to skip over in their explanations about Jenner:
"It is a remarkable fact that Jenner's first child, his eldest son, on whom he experimented, died subsequently of consumption [pulmonary tuberculosis; infection in lungs]. Another of his subjects, the man Phipps, whome Jenner vaccinated, also died of consumption."
-The British Homeopathic Review, Vol. 12, 1868, p. 360, [University of Michigan]

Jenner had vaccinated his own son against smallpox three times during his life; at age 21, Jenner's son died of tuberculosis, and towards the end of his life became "a sickly child and exhibited signs of mild mental retardation."
(See Thomas A. Kerns, Jenner On Trial: An Ethical Examination of Vaccine Research in the Age of Smallpox and the Age of AIDS, University Press of America, 1997, p. 12, ISBN: 9780761807186)

This shouldn't be a surprise; many doctors and parents have fought against vaccines over the past 150 years. In this instance, physicians in the late 1800s and early 1900s noted a clear connection between tuberculosis and smallpox vaccination:
"First came what was called 'arm-to-arm vaccination.' This consisted of inoculation with pus from the sore of a vaccinated person. Then it was arm-to-arm vaccination that became 'one of the best established of medical facts' and 'highly salutary to the human race.' But, alas, for this improvement! Its continued practice brought the discovery that scrofula, tuberculosis, and even worse diseases latent in the constitution of the subject from whom the vaccine virus was taken, were being sown among the people."
-John Pitcairn, Appendix of the Legislative Journal, Pennsylvania General Assembly, Part 5, 1913, p. 6058, [University of Chicago]

With the invention of vaccination 200 years ago, Edward Jenner was having the same problems with vaccination that we are having today; diseases, disorders, and death. Almost everyone I listen to seems to think we need to revise the medical establishment or our government, but no one ever seems to want to address the foundational philosophy behind modern-day vaccination.


Before anyone shuts down their brains at hearing the word "philosophy," just understand that the word 'philosophy' simply means 'a way of thinking.' Most people go throughout their day doing their normal activities, but never stop to consider that everything they do, from their employment or business, to shopping, to child care, to entertainment, to eating habits -- literally everything you do and say is determined by the way you think (your philosophy).

What you believe determines how you behave.

Everyone has a philosophy, even if they have never considered it before, because if you don't adopt a philosophy by taking the time to reason and consider things, a philosophy will be implanted in your head for you by influence of friends, television, movies, music, video games, etc.

To those who have never considered the problem of a "vaccine philosophy," you might be surprised to learn that modern-day vaccine philosophy is heavily grounded in Evolutionism. Evolution is a religious philosophy that is not part of science, and to learn the details about that, I would strongly suggest watching our seminar "The Age of the Earth," to learn why it is impossible for the earth to be millions and billions of years old. It is important to understand that the age of this world has a profound impact on the philosophy people adopt.

Evolutionism is a philosophy (i.e. a way of thinking) that blind random chance developed all things we see, and thus, nothing can be trusted to work perfectly, or always be consistent, because everything evolved separately. This philosophy believes that mankind is the "god" over the universe, and that all things must be subject to man's understanding. Since all emotion, thought, and reasoning processes boil down to simple chemical reactions, if something isn't working the way the ruling elite want, or something isn't thinking the way the ruling elite want, then the ruling elite must alter the chemical balance in that person until they get the result they desire for the herd.

These evolutionists refer to themselves as "homo sapiens," which literally translates to "wise man."

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
-Romans 1:22

Instead of giving praise to the Lord God for his creation and design, they simply call it "nature," and glorify the creatures of the earth.

And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things... Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator,
-Romans 1:23-25

The problem with the evolutionary religious philosophy is that it rejects the concept of God who judges mankind in their sin, and with that, it also rejects the originally perfect creation of God who created mankind and his food to work in perfect harmony. It is not surprising that many will object to what I'm writing here, but this is exactly the attitude of the priests (or so-called "scientists") of Evolutionism.

The following author, who is a widely-published evolutionary ecologist at the School of Biological Sciences in Monash University, Australia, believes that mankind will use Evolutionism to control all disease:
"Evolutionary considerations suggest a new way to achieve effective interventions with minimal side-effects, namely by controlling the evolution of pathogens so that the immune system is facing a less formidable adversary... In one sense, evolutionary control of pathogens is already part of mainstream medicine - live vaccines are developed by evolving organisms with attenuated virulence [weakened ability to cause disease] in the lab. Our suggestion, however, is that interventions can bring about similar effects by favouring evolutionary reductions in pathogen virulence [breeding weaker viruses]. Vaccination is the most transparent example of an intervention that can enhance immune defences and simultaneously favour evolutionary reductions in virulence."
-Evolutionst Aldo Poiani, Pragmatic Evolution: Applications of Evolution Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2011, p. 121, ISBN: 9781139502252

Continuing down that line of hopeless reasoning, Evolutionism would require one to think about where diseases are headed, and how they may strengthen themselves beyond the control of mankind, eventually killing everyone on the planet. It's those kind of scare tactics that are precisely what help keep vaccine manufacturers in business:
"We do not want the evolution of viral diseases as deadly as Ebola evolving in the direction that our research has demonstrated is possible... The researchers recommend rigorous testing and vigilant monitoring of next-generation vaccines to prevent the runaway evolution of more-virulent strains of viruses,"
-Evolutionist Dr. Andrew Read, quoted in Science Daily, "Some Vaccines Support Evolution of More-Virulent Viruses," July 27, 2015, retrieved Mar 8, 2016, [sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150727143139.htm]

Even then this evolutionist isn't thinking deeply enough into his religious beliefs, because he tries to limit the possibilities of viral diseases. If evolution were actually true, viral diseases would have no limitations because evolutionists believe that life can spontaneously arise from non-living material, which would break the boundaries of genetic limitations:
"I have asserted that all life forms must be examined from the perspective of virus evolution, not just those pathogens that impact on us. How viruses evolve in a more general sense [i.e. the general religious Evolutionism hypothesis] informs us of evolutionary paradigms that have not been previously well understood (especially the evolution of consortia or the dynamics of vast reticulated [constructed, arranged] gene pools)."
-Evolutionist Esteban Domingo, Origin and Evolution of Viruses, Elsevier, 2008, p. 479, ISBN: 9780080564968

In essence, the battle to create more and more vaccines will NEVER end under Evolutionism philosophy because, according to their religious beliefs, viruses will evolve more and more complexity infinitely over time. Evolutionists believe in a "given-enough-time-pigs-can-fly" concept that cannot and will not ever happen, but applying that belief to viruses shows us a never-ending series of changes, and a religious belief there will always be a need for more funding for newer vaccines for new diseases and variety of their strains.

This author points out that the Mexican government had tried to vaccinate against influenza in 1995, but failed because a new strain took over. (i.e. Another example that shows us that vaccines are actually useless.) He then pushes his religious philosophy in response:
"This may mean that poultry influenza vaccines need continual modification to track viral evolution in response to vaccine-induced immunity,"
-Stephen C. Stearns, Evolution in Health and Disease, OUP Oxford, 2007, p. 120, ISBN: 9780191548765

I pray that the few people who will read this article will understand the hopelessly circular cycle that Evolutionism is creating for the vaccine industry. Again, many will hate this section of this teaching because they hold a false religious belief of Evolutionism in their minds, but until they repent of lies of their first education, they not only have no hope to fight against the snake-oil, vaccine salesmen, they more importantly have no hope to be saved by the Lord Jesus Christ.
(Read "The Earth's Age Affects Salvation Doctrine" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
-2 Thessalonians 2:9-12

When a society upholds a false religious dogma like Evolutionism as its foundational way of thinking, it doesn't matter how many pharmaceutical companies you take down, and it doesn't matter how many government employees you get impeached from their office -- for every one you take down, two will replace it if they have the philosophy that tells them mankind must find a chemical solution to the problems of this world. Vaccines and their manufacturers are not the root cause of the problem.

Pharmaceutical companies poisoning children and corrupt government officials; all these are symptoms of an underlying philosophical problem.

If someone who believes in evolution wants to fight against vaccines, they will lose every argument they make. There is no way for anyone who believes in Evolutionism to justify why vaccines are "evil," because, in the evolutionary worldview, there is no such thing as "good."
(Read "Atheists Can't Justify Morals" here at creationliberty.com for more details)

Right and wrong don't exist in Evolutionism.

In an earlier video we looked at, the man who invented certain vaccines at Merck said that if 20% of children who received vaccines were injured or killed, that was an acceptable sacrifice. The suffering and torture of little children might be painful to an evolutionist, but it is not wrong in an evolutionary worldview.

I've had a number of discussions with atheists and evolutionists on our podcast show in the past, and each guest has proven that they have no clue what real right and wrong is; they just argue how they feel about things. This is because there is no absolute standard of morality in an atheistic universe. You can't just dip a ladle in primordial soup and expect to draw out morals.

Evolutionist: "Vaccines are harming people."
Evolutionism Philosophy: What's wrong with harming people?

Evolutionist: "Vaccines kill children."
Evolutionism Philosophy: The world's overcrowded, so what's wrong with killing them? We do it all the time through abortion.

Evolutionist: "Killing children makes me feel bad."
Evolutionism Philosophy: Why does everyone have to follow your personal feelings? Hitler didn't feel bad killing the Jews' children, so does that make his actions acceptable?

Evolutionist: "Harming people is illegal."
Evolutionism Philosophy: So if it becomes legal, it's acceptable to harm people?

The evolutionist almost never takes the time to consider what they actually believe, and that's because if they do, they'll end up in hopeless circular reasoning. You can't fight vaccines by adopting vaccine philosophy; that's like trying to fight fire by pouring gasoline on it.

If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?
-Psalm 11:3

If you're just animal that evolved by random chance,
what makes you any better than a lab rat?


Fixing the pagan philosophies is the first step, and the hardest one, but assuming that's been fixed and the reader has children, what can you do to protect them? I can only speak for U.S. citizens since this is where I live, but sadly, based on what I've read, the majority of countries around the world are forcing vaccination onto children against the will of the parents, but worse still is that most parents comply willingly because they blindly hold faith in their government and doctors.

Paul Offit, deceiver--I mean, director of the Vaccine Education Center and physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said that children could safely receive 100,000 vaccines at once:
"No doubt about it, the immunization schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) can seem daunting... But it should be the least of your worries. 'Children have an enormous capacity to respond safely to challenges to the immune system from vaccines,' says Dr. Offit. 'A baby's body is bombarded with immunologic challenges - from bacteria in food to the dust they breathe. Compared to what they typically encounter and manage during the day, vaccines are literally a drop in the ocean,' In fact, Dr. Offit's studies show that in theory, healthy infants could safely get up to 100,000 vaccines at once."
-Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, "Parents Pack Newsletter," October, 2005; See also "Paul Offit's 10,000 vaccines at once," retrieved Mar 2, 2016, [whale.to/vaccines/offit23.html]

After the public outrage at such a statement, he changed it to 10,000, which isn't any better at all, but propaganda like this is fooling people at an alarming rate. Some of the saddest stories I've heard from parents, with the most vicious injuries and quick deaths have come from children who have received six doses or more in one day, so all parents better take some time to seriously consideration this matter before you decide to let them inject your child.

For other countries, I don't have an answer for you. For me, it's likely I would die before letting them inject my child with anything, but since I don't have any children (as of 2016), it's easy for me to sit here and say that; it's obviously a lot more difficult when you're in the situation, but if you're given an ultimatum, praying to the Lord God to protect your child from illness and death is your best option.

For those in the U.S., you're much more likely to have a choice, and that has been due to the hard work of parents across the country being vigilant against the lobbying of drug companies, because vaccine manufacturers are doing everything they can to take away our right of choice. For example, here in Indiana where my wife and I live, public schools order vaccines and administer them at the schools, but parents can (as of 2016) take a piece of paper, write a note that says their child is not to receive vaccination for religious reasons, sign it, and hand it directly to whomever hands out the vaccines to opt-out of the program. I'm firmly against the "opt-out" program, and believe that it should be an "opt-in" program where the parents have to give written notice that they want it, but at least we still have an option.

Right now, I believe religious exemption is your best choice, but there are two other types of exemptions we ought to mention. First, is a medical exemption, but in the U.S., it's a joke because there is almost no medical condition on the planet that would successfully get someone an exemption from vaccination. The other is a philosophical exemption, which (as of 2016) less than half of states offer, and some states are starting to pass bills that eliminate those exemptions.

Barbara L. Fisher, director of the National Vaccine Information Center, is at the forefront of the debates on protecting citizens' right to choose. (By the way, isn't it amazing the liberals fight so hard for women's "right to choose" to kill their babies through abortion, but when vaccines are killing babies, we lose our right to choose?) Fisher writes:
"Now public health and medical trade groups are pressuring legislators to pass laws that would not only eliminate non-medical religious and conscientious belief [philosophical] vaccine exemptions for children to attend school, but also would require children to get every one of the 69 doses of 16 federally recommended vaccines - unless a parent can get a medical vaccine exemption from a doctor. This vaccine dragnet, which is already being applied to health care workers, is also pulling in childcare workers and teachers as proposed new vaccine laws threaten them with loss of employment if they cannot find a doctor to write a medical vaccine exemption."
-Barbara L. Fisher, "Blackmail and the Medical Vaccine Exemption," National Vaccine Information Center, May 18, 2015, retrieved Mar 9, 2016, [nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/may-2015/blackmail-and-the-medical-vaccine-exemption.aspx#_edn77]

States are using 'cloak-n-dagger' methods of attack against parents and their families by sneaking in bills and voting on them without the public's notice or consent. Let's look at Vermont for example:
"On Apr. 22, 2015 while many parents were on spring break with their children, the Vermont Senate Health and Welfare Committee held a hearing that was not recorded for public viewing and only allowed doctors to testify about repeal of the philosophical exemption to vaccination. The sneak attack on Vermont families supporting informed consent rights was engineered by Senator Kevin Mullin and colleagues, who tacked an amendment onto an unrelated bill (H98) sponsored by Senator George Till, M.D. Vermont parents without medical or academic credentials were barred from participating in the democratic process and testifying in opposition to the bill. The Senate approved the amendment to repeal philosophical vaccine exemption 18 to 11 and quickly passed the bill on a voice vote."
-National Vaccine Information Center, "Over 1,000 Californians Show Up to Testify; Vermont Politicians Cut Parents Out of the Democratic Process; Texas Pushes Back on Teacher Vaccine Mandates," May 29, 2015, retrieved Mar 9, 2016, [nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/April-2015/democratic-process-sidelined-in-vaccine-exemption.aspx]

Of course, the NVIC calls it a "democratic" process since they don't have any understanding that this country was never a democracy in the first place (i.e. they are deceived on other issues outside of vaccinations), but the main point is that these representatives could care less what the people, whom they are supposed to be representing, want. They sneak, lie, cheat, and all for the money that is awarded under the guise of "doing what's best for humanity," thinking that they will not be judged, but the Bible says:

And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
-Hebrews 9:27

Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts... But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
-2 Peter 3:3-7

Mothers be warned: If you choose to have your baby in a hospital, the doctors and nurses WILL automatically vaccinate your baby without your consent. When entering the hospital, you must inform firmly, and repeatedly, to all nurses and doctors involved with your child, that he/she is NOT to be vaccinated under any circumstance, and even then I wouldn't trust them. This is an issue where I would recommend mothers give birth to their children at home with the help of a friend or midwife, which is the way it's been done for thousands of years, but that's a separate topic I will not be discussing in this article, and there are plenty of online sources to look up more information about it.

I'd like to emphasize what those doctors are injecting to those new-born babies, and that's the Hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine. The World Health Organization tells us that children are most likely to get HepB:
"The likelihood that infection with the virus becomes chronic depends upon the age at which a person becomes infected. Children less than 6 years of age who become infected with the hepatitis B virus are the most likely to develop chronic infections."
-World Health Organization, "Hepatitis B," July 2015, retrieved Mar 9, 2016, [who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs204/en]

How does someone get HepB?
"In highly endemic areas, hepatitis B is most commonly spread from mother to child at birth,"
-World Health Organization, "Hepatitis B," July 2015, retrieved Mar 9, 2016, [who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs204/en]

This line right here is what will trick people in fear that their baby needs a HepB vaccine because most people don't know what "endemic" means. In this context, endemic simply means an area where a lot of people already have HepB, so what they said was, "In places where people have HepB, children get it from their parents." Think about that for a moment; the vaccine does not protect you from diseases you already have. However, we still haven't been told how people get HepB in the first place.

"Hepatitis B is also spread by percutaneous or mucosal exposure to infected blood and various body fluids, as well as through saliva, menstrual, vaginal, and seminal fluids. [i.e. sexually-related activities] Sexual transmission of hepatitis B may occur, particularly in unvaccinated men who have sex with men and heterosexual persons with multiple sex partners or contact with sex workers. [i.e. homosexual activity, sex orgies, and prostitutes] Infection in adulthood leads to chronic [long-lasting] hepatitis in less than 5% of cases. Transmission of the virus may also occur through the reuse of needles and syringes either in health-care settings or among persons who inject drugs."
-World Health Organization, "Hepatitis B," July 2015, retrieved Mar 9, 2016, [who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs204/en]

Apparently, the doctors and nurses in your hospital are afraid that your baby, in the first 12 hours of his/her life, will fall victim to sex with sodomites, participate in orgies, hire prostitutes, and get high by sharing dirty needles. Any parent that believes his/her baby needs a HepB vaccine should be legally diagnosed with mental retardation.

However, they had to start selling it to babies because doctors failed at selling it to adults. Pediatricians were happy to pick up the extra cash:
"Dr. Richard Aach, a hepatitis expert at Mount Sinai Medical Center in Cleveland, said he favored the strategy of vaccinating children because the vaccine 'has not been well received' among adults. 'Our strategies just have not worked,' he said. And Dr. Carol Phillips, a pediatrician at the University of Vermont who is a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics' committee on infectious diseases, said pediatricians would endorse hepatitis B vaccinations."
-Gina Kolata, "U.S. Panel Urges That All Children Be Vaccinated for Hepatitis B," The New York Times, Mar 1, 1991, retrieved Mar 10, 2016, [nytimes.com/1991/03/01/us/us-panel-urges-that-all-children-be-vaccinated-for-hepatitis-b.html]

Despite all the increased use of the HepB vaccine, cases of HepB are increasing:
"Despite the advent of the hepatitis vaccine, which Dr. Jules Dienstag, a specialist in the disease at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, calls 'one of the triumphs of medicine,' the incidence of hepatitis B has soared in the past decade, increasing by more than 60 percent, according to the Centers for Disease Control."
-Gina Kolata, "U.S. Panel Urges That All Children Be Vaccinated for Hepatitis B," The New York Times, Mar 1, 1991, retrieved Mar 10, 2016, [nytimes.com/1991/03/01/us/us-panel-urges-that-all-children-be-vaccinated-for-hepatitis-b.html]

What vaccines can't do, personal hygiene and diet health can. The following video focuses on the testimony of a woman who cured her son's autism by changing her family's diet, along with a couple of other clips explaining what changes they are making, and why it is so important:

If parents want to know what they can do, these are some suggestions of things to research and consider. Again, I am not a medical professional, and this does not constitute legal medical advice; I'm simply urging parents to do their research and consider the following:
  1. Don't go to hospitals or clinics unless absolutely necessary. People need to stop taking their child to a doctor every time they cough. If they have a broken arm, and you can't set it, a hospital is a wonderful option, but since most doctors and nurses today are trained primarily in pharmaceutical drugs, every solution they come up with involves a prescription of something that is likely to cause more problems than it solves.
    (Read "The Cure for Cancer" here at creationliberty.com for more details on the hostile pharmaceutical takeover of American medical schools.)
  2. Avoid antibiotics. Your gut has organisms called 'microbes' in it, some good and some bad, and these help fight off all sorts of disease, but when you take antibiotics, they kill off BOTH bad and good microbes, which, over time, will leave your body vulnerable to disease. Babies do not have a fully developed gut, and taking antibiotics will kill off the good microbes and can leave them sick unto death.
  3. Fix your diet. Processed food, sugar, caffeine, and an assortment of other dangerous chemicals are littered throughout the average American diet. All these substances and fake foods are destroying the body's God-given ability to heal itself and function normally. This doesn't mean just your children's diet, but parents, you need to fix YOUR diet as well; become the change you want to see in your children.
  4. Do not get vaccinated. This should be obvious at this point. Also make sure to avoid "Well-Baby Visits" to the doctor because, as you'll soon find out if you've never been to one, its only purpose is to inoculate your child.
If parents want to take another step in helping fix the problems caused by vaccination, hyperbaric oxygen has seen wondrous healing results in autistic and Alzheimer's patients. In our article "The Pre-Flood World," we cover the Biblical implications of hyperbaric oxygen, as well as the modern scientific analysis of it, and doctors who have started using it have seen very positive results in restoring brain function to patients abandoned by the mainstream medical community.

In my opinion, I would say the absolutely most important and most simple thing parents can do is change their diet, but because many people are so addicted to their processed food, sugar, and cheeses, they will typically make an excuse, and the number one excuse I hear is money. Yes, buying healthier food options is, on average, more expensive thanks to our corrupt government (that's another topic I won't cover in this article), but what I find amazing is how much the average American spends money on while complaining they have no money.

I know there are people out there with little to no money who are just barely getting by. Believe me, I've been there many times. However, there are FAR more people who complain about not having money who just want an excuse not to have to change:
Eat fast food? I just found money for your diet budget.
Go out to the movie theater much? I just found money for your diet budget.
Paying for cable TV? I just found money for your diet budget.
Are you a smoker or drinker? I just found money for your diet budget.
(Read "The Bible vs Alcohol" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

The truth is that people who don't want to change won't change. In reality, they claim with their mouths that they love their children, but they are not willing to give up any pleasures for them at all, which means they really don't love them at all.
(Read "False Doctrine: Learn to Love Yourself here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.
-Proverbs 22:6

The problem is that most parents are setting horrible examples to their children in their basic living practices, and when those children get old, they don't depart from those same practices because it's all they've ever known. Parents need to be the change they want to see in their children, and parents should not ask their children to do something they would not be willing to do themselves. There are many American parents that are beyond selfish in how they raise their children, not willing to lay up for them.

[F]or I seek not yours, but you: for the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children.
-2 Corinthians 12:14

Though some states are slowly ridding a parent's right to choose for their children, there are other states that still have exemptions from vaccination. Many parents will make excuses that they have no choice, but there is a choice -- move to another state.

There's always a choice, but often, lazy
Americans equate a difficult choice with no choice.

If parents decide to flock by the thousands to states that have exemptions, then the overall health of that state will be better and wealthier with a higher population. This would demonstrate an overall improvement in states that have exemptions, and would help to demonstrate the uselessness of vaccines, but unless Americans decide to do what's right over what's convenient, the day will come when soldiers will be on our front doorsteps with needles in hand.

If this article has been beneficial to you and your family, please take the time to share it with someone else. If you want to do something to help, informing others is one of the best grassroots methods of helping that I know of. We never know how many lives might be spared by taking a few seconds to share information with others, but I want to give a bit of fair warning of what people need to expect if you share it, and some of the deceptive people you might run into.

I would like to bring up the issue of Dr. Andrew Wakefield who was briefly mentioned in a quote earlier in this article. Wakefield is a gastrointestinal surgeon and researcher who was accused of fraud and fabricating studies that demonstrated a clear link between MMR vaccines and inflammatory bowel disease, but I want to make sure readers get the full story.

In 1998, Dr. Wakefield, along with 12 other doctors, published his research in The Lancet (another medical journal) about the casual link between MMR and bowel disease, of which he was very vocal about testifying to this fact, but in 2010, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) published an article by a journalist named Brian Deer that accused Dr. Wakefield and his collegue Dr. Walker-Smith of fraud. The Lancet retracted Wakefield's study, and the UK General Medical Council barred Wakefield and Walker-Smith from practicing medicine.
That's the general mainstream story, but what no one mentioned is that the BMJ entered into a partnership with Merck (vaccine manufacturer) under their tradename (MSD - Merk Sharp & Dohme) in 2008:
"The pharmaceutical company MSD (known as Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited in the UK and Merck & Co., Inc. in the US) and BMJ (British Medical Journal) Group today announced a partnership in medical education through which BMJ Learning will be made available to physicians through MSD's medical portal univadis. "
-PR Newswire Association, "MSD Signs Partnership With BMJ Group," The Free Library Jun 17, 2008, retrieved Mar 11, 2016, [thefreelibrary.com/MSD+Signs+Partnership+With+BMJ+Group.-a0180213953]

The Lancet and Univadis (Merck) also have a partnership they announced in 2010, about the same time the complete Wakefield retraction was made:
"MSD (known as Merck in the United States and Canada) is pleased to announce an exciting and exclusive new partnership between univadis – (MSD's medical education and unbiased health information website) and The Lancet – (one of the world's leading independent general medical journals)."
-Business Wire, "Univadis and The Lancet Announce New Partnership," Nov 2, 2010, retrieved Mar 11, 2016, [businesswire.com/news/home/20101102006304/en/univadis%C2%AE-Lancet-Announce-Partnership]

The mainstream media also doesn't tell anyone that Walker-Smith filed an appeal against the UK General Medial Council (GMC) board, and he was completely exonerated from all charges brought against him:
"Justice John Mitting ruled on the appeal by Walker-Smith, saying that the GMC 'panel’s determination cannot stand. I therefore quash it.' He said that its conclusions [i.e. drawn from Brian Deer's expose in the BMJ] were based on 'inadequate and superficial reasoning and, in a number of instances, a wrong conclusion.' The verdict restores Walker-Smith’s name to the medical register and his reputation to the medical community."
-Health Impact News, "British Court Throws Out Conviction of Autism/Vaccine MD: Andrew Wakefield’s Co-Author Completely Exonerated," retrieved Mar 11, 2016, [healthimpactnews.com/2012/british-court-throws-out-conviction-of-autismvaccine-md-andrew-wakefields-co-author-completely-exonerated]; See also BBC News, "MMR doctor wins High Court appeal," Mar 7, 2012, retrieved Mar 11, 2016, [bbc.com/news/health-17283751]

Walker-Smith's insurance covered the high costs of filing an appeal with the UK's GMC, but Andrew Wakefield's insurance would not cover the cost to give him the same opportunity. The reason the connections to Merck are so important is because Merck owns the patents for the MMR, and though he was not anti-vaccine at the time, Wakefield simply suggested that the MMR should be separated into three vaccines for safety purposes, but what most people don't see is, from a business perspective, that would kill Merck's government contracts for their patented product, which is a major contributing factor to this witch hunt.

In 1997, before Wakefield published his study, president of the NVIC, Barbara Fisher, had a conversation with him, warning him of what would happen if he went public and fought for the safety of children concerning vaccination:
"So, as Andrew Wakefield and I were standing in the conference auditorium five months before The Lancet article was published, I told him that he did not have to speak at our conference. I told him it was not worth losing his job. I told him that I could look back and count the doctors lying on the road, who had lost their careers because they dared to conduct research into or speak about vaccine risks. I told him his own colleagues would hang him for challenging the status quo. Despite the fact he had been threatened by senior doctors in positions of authority demanding that he withdraw from our conference, Andrew Wakefield refused my offer to stand down. He said that if he did not speak at our conference, he would always be afraid and he was not going to live in fear for the rest of his life."
-Barbara L. Fisher, "Vaccines: Doctor Judges & Juries Hanging Their Own," National Vaccine Information Center, Jan 29, 2010, retrieved Mar 11, 2016, [nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2010/Vaccines-Doctor-Judges-Juries-Hanging-Their-Own.aspx#_edn2]

Sure enough, the media and the medical establishment kicked Wakefield to the curb, and even though Wakefield had resisted the threats to his career, ten of the other doctors involved gave in to the threats and published retractions of the study. Those retractions came at the request of The Lancet's Dr. Richard Horton in 2004, requesting a retraction of the interpretation of the paper; the problem with this was that Wakefield was being accused of linking MMR to autism in his interpretation, but Wakefield never said that.
"INTERPRETATION: We identified associated gastrointestinal disease and developmental regression in a group of previously normal children, which was generally associated in time with possible environmental triggers."
-A.J. Wakefield, "Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children," The Lancet, Feb 28, 1998, p. 637-641, retrieved Mar 11, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9500320]

"Environmental triggers" could mean many things, not limited to or including vaccination, and even if vaccines were part of it, the interpretation was it was "possible" but not definite. Anyone who would read Wakefield & Walker-Smith's study would find a casual connection between MMR and autism, even though that's not what they concluded, because they reported honestly that most of the parents claimed the symptoms started right after their MMR shots:
"Onset of behavioural symptoms was associated, by the parents, with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination in eight of the 12 children, with measles infection in one child, and otitis media in another. All 12 children had intestinal abnormalities, ranging from lymphoid nodular hyperplasia to aphthoid ulceration."
-A.J. Wakefield, "Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children," The Lancet, Feb 28, 1998, p. 637-641, retrieved Mar 11, 2016, [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9500320]

Even though today, many doctors have come forward on international television and declared there is a direct connection between the gut and autism, Wakefield was thrown to the wolves for accidentally finding the same thing, and he didn't even conclude that in his study. Earlier, we read the FDA reports that showed incredibly high numbers of medical studies and experiments that ignore procedure, break laws, and lie about their findings, but none of them get addressed or examined at all, unless the findings will lighten someone's wallet, and that's why we see such a strange and unusual detailed analysis of Wakefield's paper.

It is also important to note that, although 10 of the 13 doctors gave in to post retractions about something the study never said in the interpretation, 3 of the 13 refused to post retractions, standing by their work. The first, Wakefield, is the one being highlighted in the media for fraud, the second didn't have any known repercussions, and the other was exonerated in a medical court, which demonstrates this is not some "conspiracy" against vaccines like the mainstream media keeps whining about.

If you fight against the trillion-dollar industry of vaccination, be prepared to take a trillion-dollar beating. However, it doesn't just happen in the mainstream, and I want to focus on this final thought for Christians specifically, because this ministry is for those born-again in Christ. This kind of beating takes place in "creationist" or "Christian" circles as well.

An example I'll use is Dr. Jay Wile, who I used to give presentations with at creation events in Indianapolis until my wife and I sanctified ourselves from the wicked organization he's a part of. Despite all the information I've provided here, Wile joins in the witch hunt against any parents who refuse to inject their children with the poison of snake-oil salesmen, and he uses Wakefield as one of his burnt effigies:
"Here’s the problem. In several parts of the paper, Wakefield claims to have reviewed the children’s developmental records. Thus, either he lied about doing that or (more likely), he lied about what those medical records said. In the end, then, the case is clear. Andrew Wakefield committed scientific fraud."
-Jay Wile, "Anti-Vaccine Researcher Andrew Wakefield Committed Fraud," Proslogion: Jay Wile's Blog, Jan 7, 2011, retrieved Mar 11, 2016, [blog.drwile.com/?p=3679#r1]

Here's the problem with Wile's comment: Wakefield was only one of thirteen doctors who looked at the developmental records. They all concurred at the end of the study. The ten people only sent out retractions of an interpretation six years later, and even then, the retractions were about a statement that was NOT in the interpretation in the first place, but Wile still accuses Wakefield of lying and of fraud because Wile, if you read a couple of his blog posts, obviously has a presuppositional bias for respecting all things in the medical establishment.

My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.
-James 2:1

To Wile, if a "prestigious medical journal" says something is true, then there's no way it could be false. That's respecting persons; not looking objectively and rationally at a subject as Wile claims he does. If you look at Wile's website, he never once posted anything about the aforementioned Poul Thorsen being a wanted fugitive for fraud, and not a one of his 21 studies were ever put under one second of scrutiny by the CDC (because Thorsen supports vaccines).

Wile concludes all this by putting his blind faith and hope into the BMJ, and encourages others to do the same:
"Unfortunately, he still has a rabidly loyal following here in the U.S. Let’s hope that the rational among them read The British Medical Journal report to learn just what kind of man they are following."
-Jay Wile, "Anti-Vaccine Researcher Andrew Wakefield Committed Fraud," Proslogion: Jay Wile's Blog, Jan 7, 2011, retrieved Mar 11, 2016, [blog.drwile.com/?p=3679#r1]

No one is "following" this guy like the cult leader Wile makes Wakefield out to be, but rather we are trying to make sure parents have ALL the information so they can make an educated decision, and not have to rely on propaganda coming from so-called "ministries" like Wile's. In other teachings, I've warned Christians to beware of so-called "Christian" ministries in which the men who, when you go to their "About" page, tell you all about their credentials, but mention nothing about the Lord Jesus Christ (like what you find on Jay Wile's website) -- you're likely dealing with a false convert who is deep into respecting persons.
(Read "Why Are Christians Respecting Persons?" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

Respecting persons, for example, is someone who is warned of danger about a drug, but that someone ignores the warning because a man with a medical degree, a lab coat, and stethoscope tells them it's safe; blindly trusting in their prestige. That issue of respecting persons is what keeps people blinded, and the Lord God does not respect persons:

For there is no respect of persons with God.
-Romans 2:11

Wile claims he relies on data, but I've tried to explain to him that his blind faith in the medical community is so huge, that when the medical community (which is today mostly run by the pharmaceutical industry) decides not to publish information that contradicts their current position, he will never know about it because he only trusts the medical community. He just throws out anything else. Wile said he went into the "anti-vaccine" community and read their research and materials, and after everything that I've published here, I want you to read carefully his conclusion:
"As I investigated this side of the vaccine issue, however, I became very disappointed... Most of those in the anti-vaccination movement have little idea of how the human body or modern medical science works. Also, when they did reference the medical literature on the issue, they often lied about what it said."
-Jay Wile, "Vaccines: One of the Greatest Medical Advances God has Allowed us to Discover," Proslogion: Jay Wile's Blog, May 3, 2009, retrieved Mar 11, 2016, [blog.drwile.com/?p=8]

This is a man who is blinded by the pride of his own degree, and I use Jay Wile as an example because he's only one of many. Most people are blinded by the pride of their stations in life, and worse still is that many more are blinded by putting their trust into men of high station:

Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.
-Jeremiah 17:5

The Lord God said His people were destroyed for lack of knowledge:

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee,
-Hosea 4:6

I want to warn Christians not to be blinded by respecting persons, and understand that many people respect persons. Not only that, but these people have injected their children, and like Wile, have recommended children to be injected with poison, so be prepared for others to be offended and fight back when you tell them anything about truth behind vaccines. It is much easier for a man to believe he's doing what's right than to admit that he has blood on his hands.

A final note for PhDs and MDs, every one of us will eventually face judgment before The Holy and Righteous God for everything we have ever said, thought, or done, whether you believe in Him or not, and your degree will not help you in that day. It would be wise to take that into heavy consideration before you go back to work. The Lord is longsuffering with each of us, that all should come to repentance:

But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men... The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
-2 Peter 3:7-9

CLE Only

Google+ Facebook Tumblr
Twitter Youtube Youtube

Android via Amazon
Google Play