601
News:
If you are a new member, don't forget to post in the "Introduce Yourself"
section of the forum, as it is a requirement for new members! 
NOTE: If you have trouble logging in, click the
"Login" link above the username/password boxes.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
602
General Discussion / Re: Car Bomb in Nashville
« on: January 04, 2021, 12:19:12 PM »
Jeanne, I know that I normally don't like to get in to theorizing with you, but on this occasion, I wouldn't argue with you. This was VERY oddly timed, and the HUGE red flag for me (as you aptly pointed out) was the lackadaisical manner in which the mayor seemed to almost not care at all. Sort of like he already knew it was going to happen in advance, and pretty much the next day declared that there was no threat to citizens. How could anyone possibly know that, especially in that short amount of time?
I'm not sure that I completely agree with that theory based on understanding digital technology and how information is sent and stored, but I haven't said anything else about this because I was waiting for more information to come out over the next week or two.
I'm not sure that I completely agree with that theory based on understanding digital technology and how information is sent and stored, but I haven't said anything else about this because I was waiting for more information to come out over the next week or two.
603
Law/Legal / Re: A Taste of What is Coming on Jan 6th
« on: January 02, 2021, 03:57:19 PM »
By the way, anyone did not understand what evidence there was of voter fraud, here is a tiny drop of what is available. This should tell you everything you need to know:
Hopefully, more of this will come out on Jan 6th, and if it doesn't, there might be a very angry million-march crowd outside the State House.
Hopefully, more of this will come out on Jan 6th, and if it doesn't, there might be a very angry million-march crowd outside the State House.
604
What's New @ CLE / (ARTICLE) Should Christians Submit to Governing Authority?
« on: January 01, 2021, 05:43:57 PM »
Should Christians Submit to Governing Authority?
This article has been completely re-written to address concerns from both sides of the arguments. I have had some people write me trying to justify their sin by blaming police for their own crimes, and I am not going to suffer that without a hardy rebuke. Furthermore, we have seen unbelievable riots going on in this country from people trying defund our police, which is a violation of Scripture in so many ways, it is hard to know where to begin.
This teaching answers all that and more because Christians should obey the government and police in most cases, but should remember to hold obedience to the Lord God in higher regard.
This article has been completely re-written to address concerns from both sides of the arguments. I have had some people write me trying to justify their sin by blaming police for their own crimes, and I am not going to suffer that without a hardy rebuke. Furthermore, we have seen unbelievable riots going on in this country from people trying defund our police, which is a violation of Scripture in so many ways, it is hard to know where to begin.
This teaching answers all that and more because Christians should obey the government and police in most cases, but should remember to hold obedience to the Lord God in higher regard.
605
Evangelism / Re: Kenneth's Preaching Against an Ecumenical Heretic
« on: December 31, 2020, 08:25:27 PM »
I didn't know it was the same one! HA HA HA! 
606
Evangelism / Kenneth's Preaching Against an Ecumenical Heretic
« on: December 30, 2020, 12:06:34 PM »
I just really liked this video and wanted to share it:
The officers' accusation of "disorderly conduct" was LAUGHABLE. The following is from a Tennessee attorney's website describing what a prosecutor has to prove in order to sentence someone with disorderly conduct:
"In Tennessee, a person may be convicted of the crime of Disorderly Conduct if the state prosecutor proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the person was in a public place and with intent to cause public annoyance or alarm:
1) Engaged in fighting or in violent or threatening behavior; or
2) Refused to obey an official order to disperse issued to maintain public safety in dangerous proximity to a fire, hazard or other emergency; or
3) Created a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act that served no legitimate purpose."
Kenneth was nowhere near any of those charges, which leads me to believe that the officers were either trying to snow him, or they don't understand what it means. Here's the Tennessee code 39-17-305, under Disorderly conduct directly from the state law:
(a) A person commits an offense who, in a public place and with intent to cause public annoyance or alarm:
(1) Engages in fighting or in violent or threatening behavior;
(2) Refuses to obey an official order to disperse issued to maintain public safety in dangerous proximity to a fire, hazard or other emergency; or
(3) Creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act that serves no legitimate purpose.
(b) A person also violates this section who makes unreasonable noise that prevents others from carrying on lawful activities.
(c) A violation of this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
I'm not sure Kenneth wants to spend the time to do it, but the fact that he was ordered (under threat of arrest) to move off of a public sidewalk on the grounds of disorderly conduct is an offense that ought to be heard in court, meaning that Officer Smith ought to have his day in court so a judge can educate him on what the law is, and the boundaries of his authority. It would have been perfectly acceptable for Kenneth to stand on the street corner without any microphone and preach as much as he wanted.
The officers' accusation of "disorderly conduct" was LAUGHABLE. The following is from a Tennessee attorney's website describing what a prosecutor has to prove in order to sentence someone with disorderly conduct:
"In Tennessee, a person may be convicted of the crime of Disorderly Conduct if the state prosecutor proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the person was in a public place and with intent to cause public annoyance or alarm:
1) Engaged in fighting or in violent or threatening behavior; or
2) Refused to obey an official order to disperse issued to maintain public safety in dangerous proximity to a fire, hazard or other emergency; or
3) Created a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act that served no legitimate purpose."
Kenneth was nowhere near any of those charges, which leads me to believe that the officers were either trying to snow him, or they don't understand what it means. Here's the Tennessee code 39-17-305, under Disorderly conduct directly from the state law:
(a) A person commits an offense who, in a public place and with intent to cause public annoyance or alarm:
(1) Engages in fighting or in violent or threatening behavior;
(2) Refuses to obey an official order to disperse issued to maintain public safety in dangerous proximity to a fire, hazard or other emergency; or
(3) Creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act that serves no legitimate purpose.
(b) A person also violates this section who makes unreasonable noise that prevents others from carrying on lawful activities.
(c) A violation of this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
I'm not sure Kenneth wants to spend the time to do it, but the fact that he was ordered (under threat of arrest) to move off of a public sidewalk on the grounds of disorderly conduct is an offense that ought to be heard in court, meaning that Officer Smith ought to have his day in court so a judge can educate him on what the law is, and the boundaries of his authority. It would have been perfectly acceptable for Kenneth to stand on the street corner without any microphone and preach as much as he wanted.
607
General Discussion / Wind & Solar Are Not As Good As You Might Think
« on: December 29, 2020, 04:29:22 PM »
Lorraine is very heavily interested in these topics, and she asked me to post this. (Why she could not post it is still confusing to me, but I'll do it anyway.) Nuclear energy is the safest, cheapest, and cleanest option there is, but because it does not cost very much, it does not make as much money for company owners. Therefore, they push for unreasonable solar and wind projects because they believe they can steal the money from taxpayers through ridiculous plans, such as the New Green Deal, which is a 100 trillion dollar project that was created by a idiotic young congresswoman, and it would absolutely destroy our country's economy.
Nuclear energy is the safest, cheapest, and cleanest option there is, but because it does not cost very much, it does not make as much money for company owners. Therefore, they push for unreasonable solar and wind projects because they believe they can steal the money from taxpayers through ridiculous plans, such as the New Green Deal, which is a 100 trillion dollar project that was created by a idiotic young congresswoman, and it would absolutely destroy our country's economy.608
What's New @ CLE / (WEEKLY TEACHING) Corruptions of Christianity: Catholicism p15
« on: December 28, 2020, 01:40:29 PM »609
General Discussion / Re: Separated vs. Emotions
« on: December 26, 2020, 11:04:02 PM »
I'm not sure, but I think I just released the answer to that.
http://www.creationliberty.com/articles/fellowship.php
http://www.creationliberty.com/articles/fellowship.php
610
Law/Legal / A Taste of What is Coming on Jan 6th
« on: December 26, 2020, 04:20:21 PM »Someone the other night told me they did not know what I meant when I said something big is coming Jan 6th. Wait and pray for it because there is a movement of God-fearing people that are working hard in this country to do what is right, and one of the biggest protests this country has ever seen will take place on Jan 6th. Lorraine and I were in tears listening to this Congresswoman from Colorado because it was great to hear; it's just a shame that our women are having to stand up and do the job the men should be doing.
611
Law/Legal / GA Democratic Senator Runs Over His Ex-Wife's Foot
« on: December 26, 2020, 11:58:34 AM »This was too interesting not to share. This is one of the men who is running as a democratic (or rather, communistic) senator in GA. He claims to be a pastor. This is who Trump went down to GA to help the Republican candidates campaign against. He got into a furious rage and ran over his ex-wife's foot while she was trying to take care of her daughter. Knowing the crocodile tears of feminists, I was watching the woman closely, and her tears and fear seemed consistent in her body language, and I believe her. At the end, you will see that she even tells the officer that she works in the Mayor's office and she has kept her ex-husband rage a secret from the public for the sake of his reputation, but she needs to come forward and tell Georgians the truth.
Amazing how these leftists claim that "every woman should be believed"... unless they are accusing a democrat.
612
What's New @ CLE / Re: (BOOK) Christian Music: For The Love of Money
« on: December 26, 2020, 10:37:20 AM »
This book is now available in paperback and Kindle in the Amazon store.
CLICK HERE for details.
CLICK HERE for details.
613
General Discussion / Re: Car Bomb in Nashville
« on: December 25, 2020, 07:19:33 PM »
After listening to the eye witness, it sounds to me like a mafia-esque job. The circumstances were far too strange for it to be a normal suicide attempt, assuming that the body parts discovered were of a victim/bomber from within the RV. This was a message of some sort. Who the message was for is probably only known to those who it was meant for. This happening on Christmas morning was likely not a coincidence either. We will have to wait and see to hear more details, but situations like this only make things more difficult for preachers to get out and teach God's Word because of restrictions and lockdowns.
614
What's New @ CLE / (ARTICLE) The Biblical Understanding of Fellowship
« on: December 22, 2020, 04:55:56 PM »
615
What's New @ CLE / Re: (ARTICLE) My Notes on the Book of 2nd Corinthians: Chapters 1-5
« on: December 22, 2020, 04:54:30 PM »
I did not notice your post until now. I just fixed that.
616
What's New @ CLE / (WEEKLY TEACHING) Corruptions of Christianity: Catholicism p14
« on: December 21, 2020, 03:29:48 PM »617
What's New @ CLE / Re: (WEEKLY TEACHING) Corruptions of Christianity: Catholicism p13
« on: December 19, 2020, 05:03:20 PM »
Oh, I forgot to mention, the man Jesus was talking to was a rich RULER, or in other words, he held government office, and that was the reason for his wealth. Those verses are meant as rebuke and instruction for the very communist leaders who would make those claims.
618
What's New @ CLE / Re: (WEEKLY TEACHING) Corruptions of Christianity: Catholicism p13
« on: December 19, 2020, 10:36:30 AM »
To that, I would reply that the rich man was not FORCED to give up everything he had for the good of the country, but rather, Jesus told him to GIVE everything he had to the poor and FOLLOW JESUS. The one thing you will notice about communists is that they never give those with wealth a choice, they certainly do not follow Jesus Christ, and those communists at the top sit in wealth but do not sacrifice it like they expect everyone else to do.
619
What's New @ CLE / Re: (WEEKLY TEACHING) Corruptions of Christianity: Catholicism p13
« on: December 17, 2020, 10:47:14 AM »
Likely, their argument would be this:
Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.
-John 15:13
However, contextually, that does not mean that a man takes food out of the mouth of his children to provide for a lazy man who won't work:
But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
-1Ti 5:8
For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.
-2Th 3:10
So those who teach that communism is Biblical are not only ignorant of Scripture, but they are deniers of the faith; heretics and infidels who have no love of God in them because they love the things of this world over Scripture.
Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
-1Jo 2:15
Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.
-John 15:13
However, contextually, that does not mean that a man takes food out of the mouth of his children to provide for a lazy man who won't work:
But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
-1Ti 5:8
For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.
-2Th 3:10
So those who teach that communism is Biblical are not only ignorant of Scripture, but they are deniers of the faith; heretics and infidels who have no love of God in them because they love the things of this world over Scripture.
Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
-1Jo 2:15
620