CLE Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: strangersmind on November 27, 2018, 05:10:58 PM
-
Have any of you guys went threw David W. Daniels research on the codex he has done?
-
Have anyone of you look into David W. Daniels research on the codex the new age bibles come from?
-
I have no idea what you're talking about. If you want somebody to look into something for you, then you need to provide a link to what is being taught. Speaking just for myself, I've never heard of this guy and I'm not really interested in Googling him.
-
The codex? is this referring to the oldest Bible claimed to be found?
-
David W Daniels has done many interesting and thoroughly researched videos concerning that Sinaiticus.
Here is a short one of a series:
https://youtu.be/OVjOhDJ5HKo
-
I'm confused, I was not making a new post, I was replying to a post but some how made new post. I hit reply on the chick publication post. But thank you Kenneth, that is what I was referring to
-
The Lord used this man, and a couple of others, to convince me of the inerrency of the King James Bible.
That revelation changed nearly everything in my Christian walk.
-
Billy, I moved the subject to a new post. Many of the things you write on this forum don't make sense because you have often quickly change the subject from the topic and context being discussed, instead of making a new post and asking a question. The topic being discussed was the details of Chick Publications ministry as a whole, and you started asking questions about someone that I think few of us have ever heard of; therefore, I put it in a new topic.
-
Ok I see now well I am sorry about that. David works with chick publication that is why I ask.
-
Do you mean David W. Daniels? I thought you were referring to someone else. Wait... am I insane? I thought you put down David C Daniels... you did write David W Daniels... what is wrong with me? I'm just going to go back to writing; I need to get off this forum. I'm sorry I said anything.
-
Chris, the title of the thread says David C. Daniels, but the post itself says David W. Daniels. So no, you're not going crazy. ;)
-
Yeah, but I thought I had copy/pasted the title from the name; or did I write it out myself? I have no idea what I'm doing anymore, and now I'm the one causing trouble on the forum.
-
It could also be lately I been replying off the topic of what a post is on. I am working hard to stop doing it but being here makes it hard. You will be lucky to keep a topic for 5 minutes before they jump to something else. I been here for over a year, and see how important it is to not be equally yoked together with non believers. Even tho you try not to you will pick up there ways. You guys are all I got for rebuke and correction. So Chris have you ever look into David research on the codex
-
No, I don't know who he is; apparently Kenneth does, and I should have left it alone as it was originally 'cause you were right.
-
Well if you ever get time to check out his research you should see what he found out about the Sinaiticus. I am now 100% on the side it was made in 1800s. Like the first part he found. Was pure white. Or how he plublish a book on part of the second part he was given, a year before he ever came to see it. There are many more things that makes the Sinaiticus one big 1800s scam. You will get the feeling that the Catholic Church knew it was there and keep on trying to he him to go there to find it. The pope could not have a Catholic find it because he new the true church would reject it, but found a non catholic to run hand and hand with the pope to make came to finding it. You should look it up some time
-
I'll keep that in mind for later, thanks.
-
The reason why it is so hard to find the book Tischendorf plublish before he found the second half of the codex, is because today they changed the title and published date in the archives. So when someone went to look for it they would never of found it. So in that screams conspiracy