Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - smolemong

Pages: [1]
1
General Discussion / Exchange on "The Mark" (Telegram)
« on: March 01, 2022, 05:46:10 AM »
The following is a record of an exchange I recently had on Telegram. I posted it here because I wanted fellow believers to see & judge me & the matter.

It started with this post:
Dr. Zelenko came right out and said it.
😳👇🏼
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2022/02/dr-zelenko-this-is-the-mark-of-the-beast-its-enslavement/

My response:
Revelation 14:9 KJV And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, I am not denying the evil of what is going on, but no one is getting jabbed in their hand or forehead. Please handle the word of God carefully because you have the power to mislead people and bring wrath upon yourself. It is dangerous.

Response (not from the person who posted the video): I will call them Party B
Silindile, if I may give you my personal opinion on the meaning of the mark being in the forehead or the hand is this:  in ancient times, when Revelation was being written, slaves were marked either on the hand or sometimes on their forehead with a branding iron.  This was done so that a slave could be easily identified.   In other words, the important issue here is that a person is marked, permanently as belonging to a master which is not God.  You do not need to receive a vaccine in your hand or forehead to fulfill this prophecy, you only need to be branded somehow (very obviously your body is marked in the most meaningful way possible, by means of your genes being changed so that everyone that is jabbed also share the same genetic make-up and it is irreversible).  Further, your hand is a symbol of actions just as your forehead is a symbol of intelligent thought since the pre-frontal cortex of the brain, which is the center for the most advanced thought in a human is a symbol for that.  So when the vaccine starts determining whether you may work or not and it also determines how you think then it has already become a mark.  Many of those who have accepted this injection will have their thoughts and actions permanently controlled by the NWO.  Thoughts = mark in the forehead.  Actions = mark in the hand.  Those going along with the NWO Agenda are mind-controlled (mark on the forehead) and they do the works of the beast by complying (mark on the hand). We cannot always interpret the Bible literally since many analogies, parables and symbols are used to make it's message understandable.

People who are jabbed are allowed world-wide to travel and to work, to trade and to sell while those who do not comply are denied participation in all the above.  In many ways the transhumanist agenda is changing people to be something other than human, using even a gel in the jabs referred to Luciferace (Race of Lucifer).  We need to not decide on behalf of others how the scriptures are to be interpreted since understanding of scripture comes from the revelation of the spirit and we should acknowledge that.  I hope you will receive this message from me as I send it, with the greatest of spiritual love and respect.

My response:
I did not join this group to be contentious but it is hard sit back & watch the Word being blatantly mishandled because as I said before, it is dangerous, both to the hearers and the speaker. 2 Peter 2:1-3 KJV But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. [2] And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. [3] And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not." In fact, I am not deciding on scriptural interpretation for anyone, I precisely quoted God's word & issued a warning about the danger of mishandling God's word which can be clearly seen: Revelation 22:18-19 KJV For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: [19] And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

I am aware that the Bible can be taken literally and figuratively, in so much that I don't expect believers to sprout wool because of being called sheep but deciding that the mark is figurative doesn't make contextual sense. For example, in Revelation 13:17 it says that to buy or sell one must have the mark, name or the number of the beast. Let's say Zelenko is right and we are really dealing with the mark, where is the beast's number (one patent number linking biometrics and crypto surely cannot be the sole foundation for this conclusion), and where is the beast's name and what is it? In fact even more curious, where is the beast, is he also then figurative? Revelation 13 & 14 clearly demonstrate that the beast is not figurative in a number of ways, among them the fact that scripture refers to "his mark" & "his image" whatever this beast may be he is not merely "a system".

Receiving the beast is sufficient to condemn people to eternal suffering: Revelation 14:9-11 KJV And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, [10] The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: [11] And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name. Considering that fact, I continue warning that telling people what constitutes that mark should be approached very carefully, as should everything to do with scripture.

I acknowledge that scripture is interpreted through the Spirit; it is also interpreted by other scripture, because how does a Christian differentiate between their feelings & truth, except by the Word? (Isaiah 28:9-10 Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts. For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:) You gave me your opinion about why Zelenko & you consider the technology to be the mark but when it comes to talking about God's Word should there not be at least one correlating scripture to support the truth of what was said? If everyone's opinions or feelings are sufficient to determine truth then there is no standard of truth. I would appreciate it if you support what you say with scripture so it can be weighed & sifted through the right prism.

In general, it matters little to me what people believe about the beast and his mark etc., the problem is publically spreading information that does not stand up to the light of scripture and deceiving the hearts of the simple (Romans 16:17-18). There are many people in this group & Dr Zelenko has many people that listen to him so, as much as it is within my power, I don't want people being deceived because it will lead God's name into disrepute because when people are spiritually deceived they don't usually just blame the person who deceived them, they also tend to blame God.

Focus on things like the mark of the beast also detracts & distracts from what the real problem is, which is that mankind lacks repentance (Godly grief & sorrow for sin - 2 Corinthians 7:9-10 KJV Now I rejoice, not that ye were made sorry, but that ye sorrowed to repentance: for ye were made sorry after a godly manner, that ye might receive damage by us in nothing. [10] For godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of: but the sorrow of the world worketh death.)  It is lack of repentance that blinds men & leads to acceptance of the mark. No matter how much anyone speaks about the mark & what it is or isn't no one will be prevented from getting it unless they are humbled to repentance & God has mercy on them.

The response from Party B: (Telegram wouldn't accept my post because it was too long so I put it into a MS Word document & sent that to the group, that is what she means by document.)
Sorry to tell you but a document is not conclusive evidence to me.  People who wish to tell me how to believe and what to believe when they cannot conduct a logical bible based debate is wasting their time, and mine.  You make several erroneous statements that are inaccurate and unkind.  This is not how I would expect believers to react to others merely because you differ from a doctrinal standpoint.  It rather comes across like an ego that wants to shove their viewpoint down others' throats.  I did not miss the several slights/hidden insults in your dox.   I would rather we all be aware and careful about the threat that the "beast system" holds to us as believers than be castigated for daring to differ from you.  It seems a bit over the top to react like this merely because you believe that the mark will be inserted directly into a person's right hand and forehead.  Extreme literal interpretations may ALSO lead people astray if the Bible's message was meant to be allegorical.  Parable was the chief teaching method that Jesus employed during his earthly ministry, and He is the one giving the Revelation to the apostle John (using many, many parables, symbols and illustrations throughout from congregations compared to candlesticks to beasts rising from the sea to Babylon the Great compared to a harlot, riding a beast with seven heads and ten horns (surely you do not interpret all of these literally, do you?), so there is no reason to reject the concept of parable and symbols in Revelation just to try to make something fit your view.  There is even less reason to accuse fellow believers of being false prophets and deceptive teachers when BOTH of us really have no way of being sure of exactly what every part of the prophecy means until we see it's fulfillment play out.  Jesus said:  by their fruits you will know them speaking of his disciples.  Galatians 5 tells us that those fruits are:   love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.  These are things that we can work on because these are the things that there can be no doubt about.  Prophecy will be revealed in it's own good time.  You cannot be the arbiter of it until then.

End of correspondence.

I was tempted to answer the accusations made against me but I decided that it wouldn't make any difference as my points were already made & not considered & it would have only been to make myself feel better/vengeful i.e. not charitable.



2
Bible Discussion / The Curse of Canaan
« on: September 19, 2021, 02:03:42 PM »
This is something that I have been wondering about for some time. The question is at the end, it requires context.

Gen 9:20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:
 21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent.
 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.
 23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father's nakedness.
 24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
 27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
 28 And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years.
 29 And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years: and he died.


My question is why was Noah's grandson, Canaan, the one who was made a servant of servants when it was his father, Ham, that offended?

3
General Discussion / Strange doctrine
« on: July 29, 2019, 11:55:39 AM »
Lately, a number of my clients/patients have been openly discussing their beliefs with me. In the interests of professionalism I generally avoid personal discussions with my clients beyond the usual social niceties, unless they bring something up and even then I don't always engage.

I have been running across some really strange stuff though and I think today took the cake. The guy had a lot to say but the gist of his idea was that GOD created Lucifer (which I agree with) and then went on to say GOD created evil and he has darkness and evil in HIM because of how the Bible says he created all things (which I completely disagree with). He went on to say how there is light and darkness in the world and that this reveals the nature of GOD HIMSELF. To my shame and consternation the scriptures about sweet water and bitter water and especially this one:
 1Jo 1:5

4
Quote
Test tube babies is people messing around with things they shouldn't be.  It is God who either allows you to have children or not have children.

Okay, but this would be another topic to discuss.

There is a divorced woman, who I considered a friend. Right now, I am hard pressed to define what we are. I mentioned to the church via Skype last year that she wanted to have a baby via artificial insemination from a sperm donor. She is adamant that anyone that thinks she's wrong should show her the exact scripture in the Bible. Nothing I have said about the problems of the situation made any impact on her and last week, I think, she shared that she is now pregnant. I really wrestled with myself about what to say now that the matter has come to the stage it is. I am concerned about her (because of the divorce - the lack of a child put a strain and contributed to the divorce and her decision to have this child) but I am even more concerned about the consequences of her decision for the child.

I am struggling to see how I can stay friends with someone who it seems doesn't hold GOD in the esteem I thought she did and I am wondering what kind of a friend it would make me to abandon someone who is clearly in crisis. I fear that her decision making stems from the emotional battering she took through the divorce. There are a number of other factors that I consider to contribute to the lack of wisdom of this decision even if I didn't consider the spiritual implications. One of them is how much she works (A LOT). This has really been bothering me but I just laid it aside because there is nothing I can do. I have reasoned to no avail.
I really needed to at least talk about it.

5
General Discussion / The latest act in the feminist drama
« on: November 28, 2018, 03:22:22 AM »
Apparently a bible changing He to She in reference to GOD isn't enough, it must be taken  a multitude of steps further. Now the bible will be interpreted from a female point of view whatever that even means. https://www.enca.com/life/theologians-join-forces-draft-womens-bible

Revelation 22:19 KJV
And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

6
General Discussion / Witchcraft on the rise
« on: November 06, 2018, 08:00:35 AM »
This link is to an article about how Black women are leaving the church and turning to witchcraft. It reminded me of Christopher's article on feminism and it's dangers and how there is a link between witchcraft and feminism. There is still a veil over people's eyes with regards to the GOD of the Bible and true Christianity. Satan is seducing the masses and we ought to fervently pray for ourselves and the lost.

https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/574393/

7
General Discussion / Is Practising Martial Arts Spiritually Dangerous
« on: June 28, 2018, 10:49:19 AM »
A few years ago I stopped doing martial arts (karate, tae kwan do) after a few months of attending classes because I was uncomfortable with something a guest instructor said. He said we should invite the "spirits" of martial arts to aid/guide us something along those lines. I didn't go back because I considered the possibility that practising what I just considered a sport may be a potential doorway for demonic spirits.

I am interested to know what the church thinks about this, especially because my organisation wants to make martial arts compulsory for serving members. Considering the Eastern origins of most martial arts, is it possible to separate kicking, blocking and punching from whatever underlying philosophies may have inspired them? Can one practice martial arts without engaging in the "spiritual" aspects that seem to exist in them?

8
Bible Discussion / Garments pertaining to men and women
« on: April 12, 2018, 10:58:52 AM »
Deuteronomy 22:5 The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.

I likely have a warped sense of clothes worn in Biblical times due to "Bible movies" but I cannot comprehend this verse because I have always been under the impression that men and women basically wore the same garments and the differences were in the cut, maybe the design and perhaps fez-like hats for men and head scarves for women; but more important than any differences that may have existed between men and women's clothes is the reason GOD would consider it an abomination for either one to wear the other's clothes. GOD saw fit to make HIS view on this matter very clear, why does this matter so much?

I considered the possibility that for men it was applicable if they became eunuchs in a kings harem. In some parts of Asia it was practice for eunuchs to dress as women, probably to not stand out in the performance of their duties. Nevertheless I am unable to come up with a really suitable explanation for the relevance and importance of this scripture and it has both since we have it.

9
Bible Discussion / First born from the dead
« on: April 01, 2018, 12:51:15 PM »
Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.

What does it mean that JESUS is the firstborn from the dead? HE is not the first person to ever be resurrected, there are instances of the dead rising (Elisha and JESUS raised people from the dead) so why is JESUS the firstborn from among the dead?

10
Introduce Yourself / Greetings from sunny South Africa
« on: March 04, 2018, 10:27:17 AM »
Silindile from South Africa. I considered myself to be born-again for about a decade, only to realise four or five years ago that I was just deeply involved in the 'charismania' movement and it is thanks to people who speak the Biblical truth like Christopher that I got the courage to walk away. It has been difficult and lonely but it is was right and I am at peace with it.

Sometimes when I think of the time I wasted thinking I believed in GOD it makes me want to weep but in some ways I am grateful that I went through it because now I often recognise the signs of blatant manipulation by "men of God". I admit to being more wary now of teachers of the Word, perhaps more than I ought to be. Nowadays, when I listen to a teacher of the Word my automatic instinct is to consider them leavened and work from there.

My guard is much higher than it used to be. This has created some conflict in the the community of people I used to go to church with that have stayed in my circle because I tell them the problems with their pastors and churches.
So far, I have yet to come across someone I know who is really receptive when I warn them of the spiritual dangers I see. My heart aches when I think of the millions of people that do not see the deception of the new age churchianity, walking around believing they are believers. I was one of those and all that separates me from them is GOD choosing to open my eyes. It reminds me of the scripture that says: Matthew 6:23 But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!
 
I am very flawed and if ever a person was unworthy of the saving grace of GOD, I certainly am. I struggle daily and often lose. It is only by GOD, for reasons I can never fathom, seeing fit to remove the scales from my eyes that I have any knowledge of Truth and can say HE is my SAVIOUR.

Pages: [1]