Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - creationliberty

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 32
321
The Biblical Understanding of Weddings & Marriage p4
In part 4, we go over the wedding cake pagan tradition, and then move on to talk about the Biblical requirement for marriage.

322
Wild Emails @ CLE / Woman Heaping to Herself Many Corrupt Teachers
« on: March 30, 2020, 04:13:18 PM »

ROSE FROM "USA"

Wondering if you are familiar with the ministry of Zac Poonen?  He preaches from a church the Lord gave him in India.  Since the Lord graciously opened my eyes to come out of the institutionalized church fairly recently, I've been listening to the teaching of Zac Poonen because he preaches the gospel of the cross/Self denial which, as you well know, is not taught in most churches across America.

I am wondering if you able to help me out with discernment here, as I just listening to this message he preached on repentance, he does not address godly sorrow over sin as you do but a 100% turning from sin.  If you have time or interest -  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwrpz6Cv70E&feature=emb_rel_end

He does not take an offering in his church and seems to have strict guidelines to even refusing a gift from non believers.
https://www.cfcindia.com/our-financial-policy

Now I sense the Holy Spirit possibly leading me away from his ministry since I just learned that his son has a ministry in Colorado and they are State incorporated.  Zac Poonen does conferences here also at his son's church.
http://rlcfchurch.org/

I really hate to think that he is double minded as I've learned much from his teachings in a short time.  However, I also know I've been deceived about many things for a long period of time and do not want to be deceived any longer.

Please let me know if you able to help me discern the truth about this ministry and if the Spirit might lead you to share the truth about the 501c3 deception to
them, in case they might be truly ignorant of the danger in it.

Thanks for all the hard work you've done to help us not be deceived in a world filled full to brim with it.



Wondering if you are familiar with the ministry of Zac Poonen?
No.

He preaches from a church the Lord gave him in India.  Since the Lord graciously opened my eyes to come out of the institutionalized church fairly recently, I've been listening to the teaching of Zac Poonen because he preaches the gospel of the cross/Self denial which, as you well know, is not taught in most churches across America. I am wondering if you able to help me out with discernment here, as I just listening to this message he preached on repentance, he does not address godly sorrow over sin as you do but a 100% turning from sin.  If you have time or interest -  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwrpz6Cv70E&feature=emb_rel_end
Well, if that is the case, then he is preaching works doctrine. I have not opened the video, but if you testify that he has taught turning from sin is repentance, then he teaches works to salvation. I'm in the middle of other work right now, and it would take me most of the day to sit down and critique an entire hour-long teaching, so if there is a particular time stamp you can give me (e.g. "Chris, would you respond to his comments from 23:00-24:00 min?"), that would be very helpful.

He does not take an offering in his church and seems to have strict guidelines to even refusing a gift from non believers. https://www.cfcindia.com/our-financial-policy
His first statement is contradictory:
"A genuine work of God may use money, but it is never dependent on money. It is dependent only on the power of the Holy Spirit. Where any work is dependent on money, it is not a genuine work of God."
I understand what he's trying to say, but the problem is that, for example, a man who builds a shelter in the city for the homeless has electricity, water, and taxes they have to pay for, which is dependent on money, so his first paragraph is immediately turning me away from his ministry because he obviously lacks understanding. Because there are so many instances in which such a statement could be contradicted, it is dangerous to make such statements in the first place, and such statements are actually based on the so-called "wisdom" of men, not based on the Word of God.

Now I sense the Holy Spirit possibly leading me away from his ministry since I just learned that his son has a ministry in Colorado and they are State incorporated.  Zac Poonen does conferences here also at his son's church. http://rlcfchurch.org/
Well, if he's based out of India, he probably does not understand the matter. Also, I would just stick to judging the man's doctrine, which he teaches from his own mouth, because you cannot judge a man for what his son chooses to do, otherwise, you would have to condemn King David.

I really hate to think that he is double minded as I've learned much from his teachings in a short time.  However, I also know I've been deceived about many things for a long period of time and do not want to be deceived any longer.
All truth and knowledge comes from the Holy Spirit of God, not from men. That goes for what I teach as well:
These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you. But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
-1Jo 2:26-27

That is why it is better not to create loyalty to a particular man, but to create loyalty to the Lord Jesus Christ.

Please let me know if you able to help me discern the truth about this ministry and if the Spirit might lead you to share the truth about the 501c3 deception to them, in case they might be truly ignorant of the danger in it.
I do not know this man, I do not know anything about his ministry, I have never heard of any of these people or their organizations, and the conviction seems to be coming from you, not from me. So if God has given you conviction, there is no reason to pass the burden of that conviction on my shoulders; rather, you should take that up if you have been given that passion to do so.

Thanks for all the hard work you've done to help us not be deceived in a world filled full to brim with it.
I'm glad the Lord Jesus Christ has allowed me to be of some service to you in that manner.

ONE MONTH LATER...

Hi Chris,
Just thought I would take a minute and thank you for helping me in regard to discerning the spirit of this ministry.  The Lord has been gracious to open the eyes of my heart to come out from among them. 

FYI,  if it matters, I neither had a conviction, nor was I trying to place a burden on your shoulders in regard to revealing revelation regarding 501c3 to this church.  I was merely asking in light of your expertise on the matter and in dealing with those who become offended if it was something the Lord might allow you the privilege of doing.   I do apologize for the misunderstanding and for not making myself more clear in the matter regarding my conviction and passion.

While I appreciate your ministry and all that you are doing to help those misled, if your heart is open I would ask if you might consider looking at the following teaching regarding Repentance.  I must admit that I came away a bit dismayed with your teaching on this subject.  While I appreciate your overwhelming emotional response, I don't think God has designed each of us to have exactly the same response to His grace as you were graciously allowed to experience.

https://blowthetrumpet.com.au/the-way-of-salvation/

https://blowthetrumpet.com.au/biblical-repentance-part-1/

https://blowthetrumpet.com.au/the-power-of-a-surrendered-life/

Sincerely In Christ and For His Glory, may the Lord continue to bless you abundantly.


NOTE: I knew her letter was deceptive by many reasons, and that she did not understand what she was talking about, but I chose to respond as charitably as I could to see what she would say and/or do.

While I appreciate your ministry and all that you are doing to help those misled, if your heart is open I would ask if you might consider looking at the following teaching regarding Repentance.  I must admit that I came away a bit dismayed with your teaching on this subject.  While I appreciate your overwhelming emotional response, I don't think God has designed each of us to have exactly the same response to His grace as you were graciously allowed to experience.
I need to ask you some questions first before I look over those things: By the phrase "emotional response," I take that to mean that you listened to the audio teaching I did on the subject (i.e. as opposed to reading the article teaching). Is that correct?

Did you listen to only part 1 and stop? Or did you listen to the entire series and check out the Scripture I provided? Here is the entire playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbY08k2vP8_nXQtC1izDN_p7lutKuX9OI
I am assuming that you listened to all of it, and not just part, since you have indicated that you are a dedicated servant of Christ, and the Bible says:
He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.
-Pro 18:13
And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men;
-Col 3:23


Moving forward on the assumption that you would only respond after hearing the entire matter, what specifically did you have a problem with? Your letter was quite vague, and did not include any details yet. I would like to hear more details from you, and so if you can respond with your explanation (quotes and Scripture would be helpful), I will read it and get back with you. Since you were "dismayed" (i.e. discouraged, lowered in spirit, and/or put into a state of fear), and that you profess your heart to be open, and profess your concern for others, I am sure you would want to be as accurate with me as possible to correct any errors, and so I will leave a link to my article where you can pull up any quotes to point out the mistakes:
http://www.creationliberty.com/articles/repent.php

I'm very glad you are a willing servant of Christ that is so charitable with your time and effort to help me understand these matters. Most people are just content to send me nothing but blanket accusations and links, but I would presume that you are hard-working, dedicated, and care enough about my soul, that you would spend an appropriate amount of time to write out a full explanation for me. I want to hear back from you before responding further. Thanks for your charitable work on my behalf.

THREE DAYS LATER, I HAD RECEIVED NO RESPONSE, SO I WROTE AGAIN...

It's been a few days, and I haven't heard anything back from you. I'm not sure if you received my letter or not, or if you're just working on your response. Please let me know, and I hope your family is healthy and doing well.

TEN DAYS LATER, STILL NO RESPONSE, SO I WROTE BACK A FINAL TIME...

It's been ten days, and there is no response coming from you, which tells me that either you never check your email (which I don't believe), you had a dire medical emergency (which I very much hope is not the case) or you're avoiding my emails and/or you have preemptively blocked my email address. The latter sounds correct, and so from this point, I'm no longer going to move forward under the assumption that you are a charitable Christian that cares about my soul, but rather, I will be addressing your lack of discernment, your lack of understanding of God's Word, and in cowardice, your hiding in fear so you will not have to be accountable for your deceptive words.
But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
-Mat 12:36

I am telling you these things for the sake of your soul, because I care about you, I want you to know the truth, even if you hate me for it, and I want you to get right with the Lord Jesus Christ.

Let's address your letter:
Just thought I would take a minute and thank you for helping me in regard to discerning the spirit of this ministry. The Lord has been gracious to open the eyes of my heart to come out from among them.
Well... after this letter, we will see if that is true.

FYI,  if it matters, I neither had a conviction, nor was I trying to place a burden on your shoulders in regard to revealing revelation regarding 501c3 to this church.  I was merely asking in light of your expertise on the matter and in dealing with those who become offended if it was something the Lord might allow you the privilege of doing.   I do apologize for the misunderstanding and for not making myself more clear in the matter regarding my conviction and passion.
That was a lie. What was in your heart was clear by what you said; read it yourself from your first letter:
Please let me know if you able to help me discern the truth about this ministry and if the Spirit might lead you to share the truth about the 501c3 deception to them, in case they might be truly ignorant of the danger in it. 
Obviously, you were concerned about them being in danger of error, and therefore, you were hoping the Holy Spirit might lead me to conviction to share the matter with them so you would not have to (and you probably did not share it with them anyway, and based on what you have said to me so far, if I had to guess, it's because you wanted to avoid controversy, as women often do). I have no problem with your heart on the matter one way or another, but do not lie to me about what you wrote me; I do not appreciate that, and I do not know why you are trying to hide it, unless it was because you do not want to confess the truth that you did not really care enough about them to share it with them yourself.

While I appreciate your ministry and all that you are doing to help those misled, if your heart is open I would ask if you might consider looking at the following teaching regarding Repentance.  I must admit that I came away a bit dismayed with your teaching on this subject.  While I appreciate your overwhelming emotional response, I don't think God has designed each of us to have exactly the same response to His grace as you were graciously allowed to experience.
I will address the finer details of what you said in just a moment, but there is a very big difference between this letter, and the last letter you wrote me. Perhaps you did not see it, but I will explain. You were thankful for help regarding the discernment of another ministry in the last letter, but in this letter, you were extremely confident that you had solid discernment on the author of the links you sent me, despite the fact that there are many serious problems with this "blowthetrumpet" author.

Let's be frank before I begin: I have no idea what you believe. People often listen to me, then they write me, and they do not express what it is they believe. I have no way of discerning most of them because they have nothing online they have produced, so I cannot assess what they believe. I am forced, in most cases (under the doctrine of charity), to assume that everyone who writes me claiming to be a believer on Jesus is born again in Him, unless they express something in their letter which opposes Biblical doctrine and leads me to think otherwise. I just wanted to make that disclaimer so that you understand where I am coming from.

One of the main problems between your first letter and second letter is that when you had an objection against something a particular ministry was teaching, you were much more specific. You pointed out particular things you had problems with. However, when it came to critiquing me, you suddenly became incredibly vague, and then pointed to someone else's teaching on repentance, which you obviously prefer. Why you cannot be specific as to your objections with what I teach, I do not know because you have not written enough to help me discern that information.

Now, of course, the person you are referencing to obviously has some importance to you, otherwise you would not share what they teach on the gospel of repentance and faith, which means this is one of the primary men you follow, and that tells me a lot more.

I'm not sure if you actually read everything this man teaches, nor if you know what he believes, but the man is obviously a Zionist (i.e. those who, for all intents and purposes, worship Israel as if the nation itself is a god); that's for sure, and that also means his doctrine will be quite dangerous. He states it pretty clearly on his About page, without coming out and just saying he's a Zionist.

For example, he states: "We believe that the New Covenant ratified in the blood of the Messiah was made with the House of Israel and Judah and not with the Church." The problem is that is NOT what the Bible teaches. In the Holy Spirit, there is no Jew or Greek, but all are one in Christ Jesus (i.e. the seed of Abraham is by faith), and Jesus is the head over the church:
For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
-Gal 3:26-29
For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
-Eph 5:23
And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.
-Col 1:18


The author also heavily leans to the writings of Hebrew-roots cultists I have seen, which is pretty clear if you scan through some of his teachings down the list he has on the right side of his website. I find it amazing that you needed my help in discerning another ministry, but you cannot see that you need more help in this area, and that's because you are weak in the faith and are splashing around the milk of the Word.
For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
-Heb 5:13-14


This man is a coward. He simply says his name is "Raoul." He refuses to put his name on what he is writing, and I know the typical excuse they use, namely that they claim they are "serving God," so they claim they should not put their name on what they are teaching, but the problem is that the man is hiding so he does not have to be held accountable for what he says, and it contradicts what God has taught us:
But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.
-2Ti 4:5
Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
-Mat 5:14-16


The domain is owned by a man named "Ian Ward" (I have no idea who that is) and is also registered by "Raoul Caire." Why he cannot just come out an say that is nonsensical, and demonstrates his cowardice.

Next, he uses new-age bible versions, which are corrupt and designed after the Westcott & Hort Greek New Testament, which was taken from the corrupt minority texts of the Catholic Church. I have a teaching on that where you can learn more details:
Why I Use The King James Bible
That is why so many authors provide Scripture references more often than they quote Scripture, and why they typically do not leave a link where you can read the Scripture reference for yourself because they are trying to pander to those who use a variety of new-age versions.

I'll end my analysis of Raoul with that because, in short, there are a lot of corruptions in this man's writings that could be mentioned, but it would take a lot of time I don't really want to spend time on it right now because I'm working on other projects. (i.e. Having to rebuke your letter is going to take enough time as it is.) In summary, Raoul is a man you obviously really like and follow because you wanted to share his doctrine when it comes to salvation. You would not share a man's doctrine on salvation if you did not truly believe everything he was teaching.

Before I get into Raoul's corrupt doctrine on repentance, I found it very strange that you cannot just be straight-forward with me and tell me you're from Illinois. I have no idea why you are treating me in such a fearful manner when you were more than willing to put your email and location (along with zip code) on an Unregistered Baptist Seekers list for everyone to see, but I can assure you that their website (independencebaptist.com) is filled to the brim with a lot of false teachers and cultic church buildings, and so born again Christians cannot find much there. I found your Facebook profile too, based on the information you gave me in these emails, and you are also guilty of swapping out corrupt new-age bible versions to get the Bible to say what you want it to say, so it makes sense why you blindly follow Raoul's false doctrine.

Also, it is sad that you are not prepared and/or refuse to spend the time to explain these subjects of doctrine yourself, but rather, you just refer to another preacher. I am starting to notice this pattern with you, where it seems you are adopting many teachers, and the Bible says that heaping (or piling up) many teachers is not what we Christians should be doing; rather, those who do that are turning their ears away from the truth because they seek to find what sounds good to them, instead of the what is right:
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
-2Ti 4:3-4


That all being said, let's go to Raoul's doctrine on repentance.
https://blowthetrumpet.com.au/biblical-repentance-part-1/
The first thing Raoul does in his article is shoot down the doctrine of repentance itself by lying about the facts:
"Many think that repentance is to feel sorry for doing something wrong"
First of all, most people do not teach that, and second, it seems that Raoul is trying to approach this from a Roman Catholic's point of view, instead of viewing it from a general population point of view. (But he does not tell his readers that from the start.) Most people believe that the word 'repent' means "turning from sin" or "changing one's mind," and even something so childishly simple a Google search could disprove him, and so Raoul has his facts wrong.

After he has established what he believes "many people think," he then changes what he believes most people think. He says:
"Religious people often equate repentance with a prayer of confession but it never really changes the way they live"
The only conclusion I can come to is that either this man is lying, or he is extremely secluded from reality and the rest of society, and furthermore, he just changed his argument. First, he says that most people say that 'repent' means to "feel sorry," and then turns around and says that most people think 'repent' means "a prayer of confession." That's a man who cannot make up his mind.

He then goes on to write a section about why repentance is important BEFORE he defines it. That makes no sense to me, but if we skip down a few pages, he finally starts to define what he means. He starts out by defining repentance correctly as "grief," but then he says something very strange that he never really explains:
"You may be remorseful but not repent. Judas Iscariot was filled with remorse after he had betrayed the Lord Jesus but he never repented."
That is simply not true, and it shows his gross misunderstanding of the Scripture. There is a good reason why Raoul does not finish explaining this in his writing, nor does he refer to any Scripture when he mentions this, and that's because the Bible does not say what Raoul is trying to argue.

Judas had the sorrow of repentance in his heart, but he did not trust in the Lord Jesus Christ. That was the problem. Judas had repentance, and even turned from his sin, which is why he took the pieces of silver he was paid back to the temple and threw it on the floor.
Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood. And they said, What is that to us? see thou to that. And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.
-Matthew 27:4-6

If Judas had cast down that silver, departed, and went and fell on his knees before the Lord Jesus Christ in his repentance, and trusted in Christ to save him, Jesus would have saved and healed him. Instead, Judas chose not to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and trusted only in his own works. He believed that there was nothing he could do to be redeemed, and though he had heard Jesus preach the Gospel first-hand for years, he did not believe it, which is why he hung himself. (This applies to a number of Catholics as well, as many of them are taught repentance as godly sorrow, but then worship a false christ.)

Part of the reason for Raoul's confusion is, once again, because he uses new-age bible versions. There are a number of versions that change the word 'repent' to 'remorse', and there is a lot of things that can be discerned by that alone. He is following after their corrupt versions, and without the Holy Spirit, he is blinded to it, and so because he follows new-age versions instead of the preserved Word of God (i.e. the King James Bible), he ends up in error, which is why I have told Christians countless times that they need to study the KJB.

I printed off that guy's article and discussed his teaching with my wife, and we went over a lot of it. There are MANY more problems with his teaching than just this, but I wanted to provide you with some examples, and the reason for that is because (if I may borrow your words) "if your heart is open I would ask if you might consider looking at" my entire teaching on repentance, which I know you did NOT do.

How did I figure that out? By what you wrote:
While I appreciate your overwhelming emotional response,
I know I had an emotional response at the end of that teaching, which I normally do not do, and try to avoid for the sake of others, but I only had that response in PART 1 of the 6-part series. What that means is that you listened to part 1 and stopped, but you didn't think I would be able to figure that out, did you?
He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.
-Pro 18:13


Finally, the most condemning thing is what you finished saying:
I don't think God has designed each of us to have exactly the same response to His grace
For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.
-Mat 12:37

That shows me that you have not come to godly sorrow of your wrongdoing, and that this entire email you sent me was selfish, not sent out of any kind of love. You do not care about me or my soul one bit, which is why you would not respond to my inquiry. I took the time to respond to you because I care about your soul, but you hid because you are trying to justify yourself.
And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God.
-Luke 16:15

You started that sentence with "I think," not with "the Bible says" because you are not looking to the Word of God, but rather, you worship your own thoughts and opinions.
Every way of a man is right in his own eyes: but the LORD pondereth the hearts.
-Pro 21:2
He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered.
-Pro 28:26

You believed, but you never had any repentance, and that should be embarrassing to you because even Judas repented. You need to pray that God would give you a contrite spirit and repentant heart, and that he would transform your prideful and selfish heart of stone into a heart of flesh because, again, He will not give His grace to the proud of heart:
But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.
-James 4:6
A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.
-Eze 36:26

God draws close to those who have that heart of godly sorrow, and He saves them.
The LORD is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart; and saveth such as be of a contrite spirit.
-Psa 34:18

It is precisely for this reason why I wrote the book:
Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell

And Rose, be warned what Jesus taught in the Sermon on the Mount:
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
-Mat 7:21-23

Attempting to use a corrupt preacher to justify yourself will not save you from this.

Of course, from past experience, I can say it is very likely you will never read this letter, and more likely you will never read the Why Millions book because, again, you only wrote that email to try and justify yourself. However, I'll share this with others in our church so that they can benefit from the information, that they may increase their discernment and know better how to answer fool according to his folly.
Every prudent man dealeth with knowledge: but a fool layeth open his folly.
-Pro 13:16
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
-Pro 26:5


The Lord God has been extremely merciful and longsuffering to me, and I have already prayed that He would not only extend to you that same kindness, but that He would also provide you and your family health and prosperity in your household. Have a great day, and I hope you depart from our ministry in peace.

END OF EXCHANGE


323
The Biblical Understanding of Weddings & Marriage p3
In part 3, we go over more ridiculous and lewd pagan wedding traditions that churchgoers believe are sacred.

324
What's New @ CLE / (CORRECTION) The Phrase "Repent FROM"
« on: March 25, 2020, 01:18:47 PM »
This is concerning my teaching:
Is Repentance Part of Salvation?

Previously, I had taught that the phrase "repent FROM" was never used in Scripture. It turns out that there is one place that needs some more explanation because there is one instance where it appears to be used that way, or rather, a place where people who do not study Scripture will claim there is an anomaly (i.e. a unique instance out of place), and I have made appropriate adjustments on that in my article. I will not say it is error just yet (even though I'm posting this as a correction), and I'll explain it in a moment. However, the article now reads as follows:


Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not? And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.
-Jonah 3:9-10


The first mistake made by churchgoers and preachers is that 'repent' does not mean "to turn" in this passage, and it would not make sense to say that it does because it would mean the Bible says, "if God will turn and turn, and turn away," which would be the definition of redundant (i.e. exceeding what is necessary). That would mean God was doing a 540-degree turn. (i.e. 180 [degrees] x 3) What I ask Christians to do is to study the Bible slowly and carefully because we should not just speed-read past these verses.

When we use the word 'turn' in a sentence, we use the preposition 'from' after it, so for example, "Sally turned from the house," which indicates direction and location. The Bible uses turn in the same way, namely, "turn from." I want to point out that the word 'repent' is never used that way in Scripture. (i.e. the verb 'repent' in connection to the preposition 'from') Notice that when the word 'repent' is used in the Bible, it is always followed with the preposition 'of', which is an indication of a relationship between two things (i.e. grief and the heart), but today, most pastors and churchgoers use the phrase "repent from" very casually in their speech, despite the fact that it is not how the Bible uses it.

In the above verses, it says if God will "turn away FROM his fierce anger," and that the people of Ninevah "turned FROM their evil way." In the next part, it says that "God repented OF the evil" that He was going to do to them. The prepositions change for the word 'repent'. 'From' is used in context of distance, region, or position, but 'of' is used in context of the source, author, or object. The words 'repent' and 'of' are based on the person, whereas the words 'turn' and 'from' are based on the direction.



So now let's address an anomaly. Based on my experience studying Scripture, if the Bible uses a term or phrase in a unique way, there is typically a special reason for it.

Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God, Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment. And this will we do, if God permit.
-Heb 6:1-3


I believe that these verses have relevance to us as Christians because the culmination of the Old Testament law and prophets is fulfilled in Christ, and Paul prefaces this by calling it "the doctrine of Christ," so we ought to take this matter to heart, but we also need to remember that Paul is writing to the Christian Hebrews in this chapter, and that will help us lay a foundation of context to gain a full understanding of what is being referred to. The key to understanding why the phrase "repentance FROM dead works" is used is the definition of "dead works" according to the context, and by looking at what the preposition 'from' is attached to in this sentence.

When we read this as Gentiles, we see it more straight-forward, but that is not the sense in which the Jews will read this because they know this is referring the sacrifices of the Temple. According to their own rabbinical teachings, it commonly said among them the following phrase, and we can see the reflection of the humility of godly sorrow that is intended to be in a man's heart during the sacrifices:
"When a man sacrifices a beast, he thinks in his own heart, I am rather a beast than this; for I am he that hath sinned, and for the sin which I have committed I bring this; and it is more fitting that the man should be sacrificed rather than the beast; and so it appears that 'by the means of his offering he repents'"
(See Al Garza, Epistles, Lulu.com, 2018, p. 56, ISBN: 9781387646395)

Thus, the "dead works" that are being referred to here are the animal sacrifices. So, once we have a heart of repentance (i.e. grief and godly sorrow of wrongdoing), leaving the principles of Christ (not in a contentious manner, but in faith of His ultimate sacrifice for sins forever), they should depart FROM the sacrifices of the Temple, and therefore, the preposition FROM is correctly used there to indicate the direction away from laying a foundation in sacrifices.

The repentance (i.e. grief and sorrow) of a sacrifice should no longer be exercised, for the godly sorrow should be established in Christ. Therefore, it is not repentance from dead works in the sense of turning from dead works (as many preachers erroneously teach by the false definition that 'repent' means "to turn"), but rather, not laying a foundation of repentance in the dead works of the sacrifices, having godly sorrow in Christ alone, not in continual sacrifices, which is why, a few chapters later, Paul concludes that the Jewish priests vainly put their hope in the animal sacrifices:
And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins:
-Heb 10:11


In summary, my statement was not technically wrong the first time because the word 'from' is not applied to 'repentance' in that sentence because the preposition 'from' is applied to an action, and the action in that verse is not from 'repentance' itself, but rather, it is from "laying a foundation in dead works," and that the Christian Hebrews should turn from that. Therefore, I don't think I have anything to apologize for, and what I said was technically correct (i.e. there are no instances of 'repent from' used in Scripture), but the problem is that most people who do keyword searches (instead of Bible studies) for the phrase "repentance from" will not understand this verse, and I hope that will help others to understand the matter more thoroughly.

325
What's New @ CLE / (ARTICLE) Denominations Are Unbiblical
« on: March 24, 2020, 03:51:36 PM »
Denominations Are Unbiblical
Denominations are directly rebuked in Scripture, and they oppose Christ's church.





I know I am going to be metaphorically burned at the stake for daring to question everyone's "holy sacred cow" of denominations, and furthermore for questioning a bunch of churchgoers faith in "Protestant Reformers," but this denominational junk is completely unbiblical, and directly rebuked in Scripture. We Christians ought not to have anything to do with them.

326
Wild Emails @ CLE / She Did Not Want The Answer To Her Question
« on: March 23, 2020, 04:55:41 PM »
I am posting this letter because I want to briefly discuss people who do this. What you are about to read is not uncommon for me to receive, but this time, I decided I wanted to follow up to get more information about the person who asked me the question. I'll comment more at the end.

SUSAN FROM USA:

My mother and I were baptized at a 501c3 church within the past 6 months. Should we repent? Is the baptism valid? We do not belong to the church and we do not attend services.
Thank you for clarifying this confusing matter.



Why do you believe that 501c3 is the source of the problem? Did you not read the whole book or listen to the entire teaching?

NINE DAYS LATER...

It's been over a week. Either you don't check your email very often, or you didn't want to have a conversation with me in the first place. I hope there is nothing wrong, like a medical emergency. Assuming nothing bad has happened to you, I guess I just don't understand why people so often write me on this subject when they do not really want to have a conversation to gain understanding about it. Nonetheless, I hope you have a great day.


Christopher, I'm going to be honest with you. This email feels a little attacking as the last one did too. It may just be my perception, but I'm not inclined to have a conversation at this point.


I asked you a question about what you believed and if you listened to the entire teaching, and you felt uncomfortable with that? Okay. I'm sorry, but there is not much I can do about that. I appreciate the explanation though, and it's good to know there was no emergency of any kind. Have a great day.

END OF DISCUSSION

As I stated at the beginning of this post, I have received questions like this many times over the years, and often, when I respond with a question about whether or not they listened to the entire teaching, I never hear back from them again. Also, if I respond with the question of why they believe that 501c3 is the source of the problem, I almost never hear back from them again.

If a person believes that their baptism is invalid because of 501c3, then they do not understand that leaven (i.e. corruption) is the problem, not 501c3, which leads me to believe that either they didn't listen to the entire teaching, or they didn't understand it. To say that a baptism was not valid because the building that someone got baptized in was 501c3, is like saying that baptism was not valid because it was done in a swimming pool.

Frankly, it sounds like Susan does not understand baptism (i.e. God looks at the heart) or 501c3 (i.e. the core problem is leaven), and therefore, it is very difficult to answer such a question when it is asked from someone who does not understand the basics of either topic. In hindsight, what I probably should have done is just left her a link to both teachings, and then if she wanted to respond with more details, she could.

However, I wanted to know what her reasoning was because this has happened so many times, I was really curious. Susan's response was actually quite surprising to me at first because it was a somewhat emotional response that did not make any sense.

Notice, in her final letter, she said that she felt like I was attacking her in my first letter. (i.e. "This email feels a little attacking as the last one did too.") I asked her two questions that I wanted the answer to, and specifically, I wanted to know what she believed/thought about 501c3, so I could know whether or not she understood the core problem of leaven, and if she did, I would answer one way, and if she did not, I would answer another.

Furthermore, if she had not listened to the entirety of the series, there was a lot she was going to miss, and that understanding might have automatically helped her to understand the answer to her question. Therefore, I wanted to know the answers. Instead, she took those questions as a "personal attack."

I have no idea who this woman is, and I have no idea what she believes. What reason do I have to attack her? If you give someone a sandwich, and ask them, "Did you eat the whole sandwich?" -- that is not attack; that is simply asking someone a question to retrieve information.

Okay, so why is this so strange? Why did she react this way? Why do many people run away the second I ask them a question? Part of the reason I wanted to post this letter is because I have made some deductions about why I believe people react in these nonsensical ways.

For example, if any of you have ever been part of a book club, and you did not read the assigned portion of the book you were supposed to discuss that week, but you show up to the book club meeting anyway, you probably did not come out and tell everyone you didn't read it as soon as the meeting starts. Why not? Why hide that fact? Because it is an embarrassment that others did the work and have the understanding, but you don't, because you were irresponsible and did not do the work, but want to be part of the club anyway.

Therefore, what those types of people tend to do is shy away from participating in the conversation because they did not put in the work, read the material, and gain understanding from it. So, let me paint a picture of what I think is going on here:
1. Susan is not a regular listener to this ministry.
2. Susan likely was already doing research into 501c3 on her own.
3. Susan happened by my website, glanced at the material very briefly (if at all), but did not read or study the material.
4. Susan immediately emailed me to ask a question without knowledge of what I teach on it because the entire purpose her writing me was to mine information on baptism vs 501c3, not to learn about or understand either of those two topics.

So, in short, I believe Susan has no idea who I am, she has no idea what I teach, but was willing to trust whatever I told her without doing any of her own investigation. (Part of the reason you can tell she has no idea who I am is because she posed a general question at first, but then, after I responded to her, she addressed me "Christopher" because that is the name that comes up in my email.) However, when I asked her questions about her knowledge, she immediately tucked tail and ran away because she does not want to make the effort to learn about the subject matter, but does not want me to know that, nor does she want me to know that she dide not bother to find out what I teach on the subject (i.e. she probably only saw the title of my article and assumed the rest), which is why she would not answer my questions.

This also explains why she felt "attacked," and that is more telling of her guilt than anything else. She knows she didn't bother reading or listening to anything, and so my very simple questions about her understanding was offensive to her because she does not have any understanding in the first place, even though I was trying to charitably assume that she had at least looked over some of what I teach.

So, that's why I wanted to post this letter, for the sake of other Christians reading these things. I want you all to understand that when someone reacts in an emotional manner that does not make sense, typically, there is something sinful behind that nonsensical response, and in Susan's case, I believe it was her pride and laziness that caused her to react in that way, and furthermore, it reveals to us that she has done almost no evangelist works because if she did not have enough patience to answer a couple of simple questions, she obviously does not have any patience built up in her through experience of persecution from unbelievers.


And not only so, but we glory in tribulations also: knowing that tribulation worketh patience; And patience, experience; and experience, hope: And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us.
-Rom 5:3-5

327
The Biblical Understanding of Weddings & Marriage p2
In part 2, we go over the pagan origin and magical use of wedding rings in witchcraft.

328
The Biblical Understanding of Weddings & Marriage p1
In part 1, we go over the Scripture and reasoning why Christians ought to sanctify themselves from the corrupt religious traditions of men.

329
Tithe is NOT a Christian Requirement p11
In part 11, we discuss the financial mess of the tithe-centered Crystal Cathedral, and the corruption of Robert Schuller.

330
One of my videos got taken down for hate speech, but get this: It wasn't for my teachings. It a video exposing Steven Anderson's hateful rhetoric. I appealed it, telling them that their removal of a video exposing a man's hateful speech is contradictory to their claim to strike it, but it's probably going to go nowhere because Youtube's entire system is actually much more absurd garbage than you all may know. This kind of thing has been happening to a lot of people over the past few years. It's ridiculous that I would receive strikes from Youtube for such a thing, but I am aware that eventually, some day, I will likely no longer have a Youtube channel, and this is just the beginning. That's why everyone should really stick with the audio teachings.
http://www.creationliberty.com/audio.php

332
I did not respond to this person, but I wanted to publish this for two reasons:
1. I wanted you all to see what type of emails I do not respond to. It is rare for me to not respond to a letter, but this qualifies as something to ignore.
2. I wanted you all to see how extreme some of these people are, and that I occasionally receive these types of letters, but no one knows about it.

COREY FROM WISCONSIN:

the chtuches should be payiing both property and taxes on there salerys. the mega chruch movement has taken over my area in the waukesha county area. these men are mainly freemasons and own other business like mcdonalds stores that they used to fininace these chruches i found out. they also are not open to other faiths in my area like musllums and buddism and other spirutal ways. the bible was written by man and is being pushed down our thoats and every master mason has to swear a blood oath over a king james bible despite him only seeing the bible as symboic and alogorigcal of sun worship of the winter solstice.

END OF LETTER

As you can probably see for yourself, there was no purpose in me responding to this man. What good would it do? Were there any questions in it? Was he pointing to a particular teaching that I have and wanted to discuss something with me? Was he looking for a Christian just to talk to? No one knows because he never makes that clear.

Just imagine for a moment that, while you are out grocery shopping, a man approaches you, says, "Hi, my name is Corey," and before any other words are exchanged, he says, "The Bible was written by man and is being pushed down our throats and every master mason has to swear a blood oath over a King James Bible!" Likely you would take a defensive posture, seek to get away from this man, and/or call the police because you have no idea what crazy thing he is going to say or do next because people do not act that way under normal circumstances.

This man could be demonically possessed for all I know. I have no idea what he believes, I have no idea why he wrote me, and I have no interest in responding to people who write scattered nonsense and compile it into a poorly written letter that is almost incomprehensible in its thought process.

I can understand spelling errors, as I make my own, but these are beyond errors; it looks more like he gets bored in the middle of typing a sentence, falls asleep, and hits his head on the keyboard, which wakes him back up and he keeps writing. If that is the case, then the reason for it may be a medical condition, and if so, we should pray that God would heal this man of his narcolepsy.

333
Tithe is NOT a Christian Requirement (2020) p10 | 3-1-20
In part 10, we show how some pastors have become the very money-changers Jesus kicked out of His temple.

334
Wild Emails @ CLE / A Black Man's Racist Feelings
« on: February 25, 2020, 09:59:25 AM »

DAMON FROM WASHINGTON DC

Hello and praised the Lord I was listening to your study on Martin Luther King Jr, I must say I agree on 90% of your articles but I was a little disappointed by your comments about black people and the affects of slavery that we should just get over it I thought it was a little insensitive and very hurtful! Am I angry at you no not at all I just would like to point out that being a white pastor and down playing the effects of slavery might cause some to be Slavery has affected the black race and white privileged and white supremacy has played and is playing a major role in our society and culture. Do we hold on to this with malice and anger no not if we are true born again believers in Christ I do not hate my white brothers and sisters but I can recognize the system isn't fair and we as black people must fight and survive in this unjust system that's called America! We have God given rights yes we do! also at the same time life in America isn't fair not even a little bit. Please don't take this as whining or kicking it's just the truth as a black person in this Country! I email you in love my brother and even if we don't agree I pray that we meet in those pearly Gates one day

From Damon your brother Keep fighting the good faith

https://www.cpt.org/files/Undoing%20Racism%20-%20Understanding%20White%20Privilege%20-%20Kendall.pdf

Thought this article shared a lot on how lots of blacks feel I don't agree on everything! I pray that if you get a chance to read it it will give you a little insight



Hello and praised the Lord I was listening to your study on Martin Luther King Jr, I must say I agree on 90% of your articles but I was a little disappointed by your comments about black people and the affects of slavery that we should just get over it I thought it was a little insensitive and very hurtful!
I do not see a quote of what I said, so I unless you provide a quote with exactly what I said (word-for-word, not paraphrasing what you simply believe I said), and then explain exactly what words I said that you had a problem with, then I want to directly state I do not care about your personal feelings and vague opinions. I don't want either of us to have our time wasted, so I'm being direct with you. My job to the Lord Jesus Christ is to tell the truth, and if you do not like that, you are free to depart and go find content somewhere else.

Am I angry at you no not at all
If you were not upset, you would not have written this email, so please don't stand on pretense. People who are not angry with me do not have to tell me that they are not angry because their words will reflect the truth.
But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.
-Matthew 15:18

Flattering lips does not help anyone.
Help, LORD; for the godly man ceaseth; for the faithful fail from among the children of men. They speak vanity every one with his neighbour: with flattering lips and with a double heart do they speak.
-Psa 12:1-2

I prefer it when people speak to me openly, honestly, and directly. If you can do that from this point on, I would appreciate it because it will save us both a lot of time.

I just would like to point out that being a white pastor and down playing the effects of slavery might cause some to be
Your comments are so vague, misleading, and based on assumptions, it's going to take a number of points to unravel them:
1. In over a decade of ministry, I don't recall ever claiming to be a pastor, so the fact that you made that assumption is concerning about how you approach subject matter based on what you believe, rather than what is being said. That's not good. It furthermore indicates to me that you probably have not listened to anything else I have ever taught; so when someone writes me upset about political topics after a single teaching, you probably will not last very long with us.
2. So long as I was speaking the truth, my comments should not matter whether I was white or black, so the fact that you are looking at the skin color of the person who is making the comments is showing your racism, and you need to judge yourself on that matter:
For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.
-1Co 11:31

3. The phrase "down playing the effects of slavery" is a vague and/or false accusation. It's impossible to comment on that because no one can read your mind, and furthermore, you did not quote what I said and comment specifically on it in detail. By that statement alone, I can tell it is going to be very difficult to have a conversation with you.
4. That is not a complete sentence. I cannot even tell what you are trying to say. You're putting all these images (emojis) in your letter, some of which are not even coming through (i.e. they appear as boxes on my screen), and I don't speak emoji. You need to speak plainly like everyone else if you want to continue this conversation.

Slavery has affected the black race and white privileged and white supremacy has played and is playing a major role in our society and culture. 
Black people are ridiculously privileged in American culture. Perhaps things are different in Washington DC, because DC is not technically part of the United States. (i.e. It's a corporation of it's own, it's not part of any state.)
I have talked with people like you before (i.e. the kind who rely on their opinions instead of facts), so I know you will try to twist my words if I do not provide some disclaimers; therefore, I will say that your comments definitely would have been accurate a few hundreds years ago in some U.S. cities and states, it certainly is accurate in other countries around the world (e.g. Libya, which has an open slave trade to this day), and there are some strange neo-nazi white supremacist groups out there, but in the U.S., black people are given all kinds of privileges no one else gets. In fact, I would say an American black woman is the most privileged creature to ever walk the face of the earth, and if you do not understand that, then either you do not understand what the word 'privilege' means, or you are willingly blind to what's going on around you. If you let me know which one is the problem, I can address that and help you understand (i.e. assuming you even want to understand).
(I wrote a book exposing feminism, in which I discuss the topic of black women briefly with statistics; it's free-to-read here: Feminism: Castrating America)

Just to give an example, take something like affirmative action, which is a U.S. regulation that allows black people specifically to get into colleges and careers at a MUCH lower standard than everyone else. Not only do black people end up receiving positions in colleges and jobs that they did not earn and do not deserve, but white people who worked harder and have scored better are being rejected from some of these positions because affirmative action quotas have to be met. (i.e. That's called black privilege.) Furthermore, statistically, a LOT of those black people who were accepted to these institutions through affirmative action end up failing or quitting because their work ethic was not originally high enough to allow them to grow and flourish in those fields, and on top of that, it's not just whites that are being under-privileged because of such regulations, but other cultures (like Asians) as well.
(See Lia Eustachewich, "Harvard's Gatekeeper Reveals SAT Cutoff Scores Based on Race," New York Post, Oct 17, 2018, retrieved Feb 24, 2020, [https://nypost.com/2018/10/17/harvards-gatekeeper-reveals-sat-cutoff-scores-based-on-race/])

I normally do not send people to outside sources like this, but I do not have a teaching specifically on racism yet, so for now, I will refer you to an open, unedited public debate on a college campus concerning this matter, where anyone was allowed to come up and debate the host.
PART 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfEk8UJIwTc
PART 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZheWh1cMOFM
I do not agree with this host on everything he teaches, but I agree with the host that such things are black privilege, and they are racist. So that's just one of many examples that could be given to demonstrate how privileged black-skinned people are in America today, and they get far more advantages than white people do, so your statements are very racist against white-skinned people, whether you understand it or not. In summary, the problem for all skin colors in America comes down to morality and work ethic, not skin color.
The Christian Work Ethic

Do we hold on to this with malice and anger no not if we are true born again believers in Christ
If you were born again in Christ, then you would not be holding on to such racist bitterness, which means you would not have had a need to write me this letter in the first place. I cannot say if you are born again in Christ or if you are just a churchgoer at this point, because I don't have enough information about the doctrine you believe. (i.e. Simply claiming you are a Christian does not automatically make you one -- SEE HERE for more details.) Perhaps you should let go of your malice and anger so you won't end up making racist comments like you have in this letter.
If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.
-James 1:26
And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
-Acts 17:26


I do not hate my white brothers and sisters but I can recognize the system isn't fair and we as black people must fight and survive in this unjust system that's called America!
All this statement tells me is that you have been brainwashed very deeply, especially since you look at color first before truth. In fact, the black Christians in our church would argue against you because you are simply not informed, and I have had many conversations with them on these, and various other subjects along this line. I am not going to comment with further detail to someone who makes vague accusations that just follows the mainstream communist political agenda; you need to actually bring evidence to the table, not your feelings and opinions.

We have God given rights yes we do! also at the same time life in America isn't fair not even a little bit. Please don't take this as whining or kicking it's just the truth as a black person in this Country!
Do you know why you had to request that I not take your letter as whining and kicking like an emotionally-enraged toddler? That's because you are writing your letter as if are you are whining and kicking like an emotionally-enraged toddler. This does NOT mean that you are an emotionally-enraged toddler, but it IS providing evidence of it, and not only have you set a very bad first impression, you are not helping your argument by doing so.

If you believe America is not fair to you, then move to Libya, and I hope you have a safe and wonderful trip.

I email you in love my brother and even if we don't agree I pray that we meet in those pearly Gates one day
I have no idea what your beliefs are, so I cannot agree to that until I understand what you believe. It's not a good idea to just assume that everyone who says they are a Christian is automatically saved.
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
-Matthew 7:21-23

Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell

From Damon your brother Keep fighting the good faith
I cannot tell what you believe, so I have no idea if you are a born again Christian, or a just a churchgoer.

https://www.cpt.org/files/Undoing%20Racism%20-%20Understanding%20White%20Privilege%20-%20Kendall.pdf
Thought this article shared a lot on how lots of blacks feel I don't agree on everything! I pray that if you get a chance to read it it will give you a little insight

This reveals a lot about you, namely, that I was correct that you base your statements on your personal feelings and vague opinions, instead of facts. The article you sent me had ZERO statistical information. It was all opinions, and even the references in it were only quotes of opinions, not study or fact. Furthermore, the source website where that comes from is very strange because true peace is only made through acknowledgment of the truth, and that's why Jesus did not say that He came to bring peace, but rather, division.
Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:
-Luke 12:51

If you want to understand the reason for that, this teaching can help:
The Biblical Understanding of Sanctification

If I simply gave my feelings and opinions about Martin Luther King Jr. in my teaching, and did not back anything up with facts, you would have determined that I was a racist, and you would have had a good reason to accuse me of it. And yet, when you present me with nothing but feelings and opinions, I am expected to believe you are not a racist. You know why that is? It's called black privilege. Believe it or not, your black skin does not make you immune to being a racist, and your letter contains racist and uninformed comments, so I follow the evidence (i.e. by judging righteous judgment), not the outward appearance you want me to believe.
Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
-John 7:24

Unbiblical Cop-Outs: 'Don't Judge Me!'

Unless you present me with direct quotes from my teaching, explaining what specifically I said that you had a problem with, and provide evidence instead of "whining and kicking," then I have no reason to respond to you further. I am one person working on all this, so I am busy, and I need to get back to work. Nonetheless, I hope you have a great day, and if you decide to put in the effort to provide proper quotations, explanations (in English, not emojis), and factual, statistical information and studies (like how I did in the MLKJ article), then I would be much more inclined to continue with you in that conversation.

[As a side note, he did not stop using emojis in his following two short emails, which means he either did not read my entire letter, or he was doing it out of spite.]

Christopher Johnson, Thank you for reply I will just say my prayers are with you!

TEN MINUTES LATER...

Christopher Johnson, just so you know I've been listening to your teachings all week have learn a lot! Lord knew my heart when I reached out to you! So know that I'm not angry nor am I mad at all. God bless you and your family


That was not a response, that was a cop-out. Just to make sure you understand what that means:
cop-out (n): an instance of avoiding a commitment or responsibility
In other words, you are avoiding responsibility for what you said. You know you can skate by and avoid it over email, but I warn you, for your own sake, that you will not escape responsibility when you stand in judgment before the Living God.
But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
-Mat 12:36

And yes, He knows the wickedness of your heart when you reached out to me.
The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
-Jer 17:9
He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered.
-Pro 28:26


I will not waste anymore time with someone who is going to do this slap-n-run garbage, especially after he tries to hide behind flattering words. That's what the Bible calls "murmuring," and God hates it. I pray that the Lord God would give you as much mercy and longsuffering as He has given me.
I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
-Luke 13:3

Is Repentance Part of Salvation?

END OF EXCHANGE

I did some research on the information I received with this man's email address, and I believe I found his Facebook profile. It had his same first and last name, it was in his general area where he said he lived, and his email username was associated with footwear sales, and the Facebook profile I found says he was a personal trainer. I cannot be 100% certain, so I will not share the profile link, but he would have comments that spoke of "God," but everything else on his profile was either incredibly worldly and sinful (like violent and wicked movies and music), or it was church-ianity staples like new-age churchgoer's movies and music. So, if that was his profile, that tells me a lot about why he wrote me this letter; he claims to be of Christ on the outside, but inwardly, he holds the philosophy of the world.

Frankly, his comments in his email should have made him ashamed. The fact that any American today, especially one who claims with his mouth to follow Christ, would try to use slaves from hundreds of years ago to justify their whining, communist-leaning emotions ought to be an embarrassment, and they should be ashamed of themselves, but instead, they glory in their shame because their minds are focused on earthly things.

Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things.
-Phl 3:19


Nonetheless, it seems my initial suspicion was correct; he has not hardly listened to anything I teach, and once he gets to the subject of repentance, he will likely depart and not return. It is very difficult to get American churchgoers to hear the Gospel of Christ nowadays, especially when they, on the one hand, believe they are sanctified in Christ, while they, on the other hand, believe they are free and justified to speak and do whatever sinful thing they please.
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
-Col 2:8


335
Tithe is NOT a Christian Requirement p9
In part 9, we finish going over Creflo Dollar's hypocrisy, and we talk about statistics and studies that have been conducted on how few pastors have really been called by God, but are satisfied to profit from it anyway.

336
Bible Discussion / Analysis of Brian Moonan's Repentance Teaaching
« on: February 18, 2020, 05:50:04 PM »
This is coming from Brian's radio blog on the subject of repentance which can be found here:
https://www.blogtalkradio.com/kjv-prepper/2018/08/21/truthdealer-radio-episode-27-repentance-and-faith-both-gifts-of-god

Once again, I would highly recommend for anyone reading this to check out the doctrine I have available on repentance. It will clear up any confusion on the matter.
Is Repentance Part of Salvation?

As the audio begins, it is the typical radio intro he does. I don't personally care for it, but that's not a big deal. I just want to emphasize that he emphasizes an importance on the truth over all else.

@2:30 - Brian says that if something is not in the Word of God, then it will not be approved by God, and I agree with that. I'm just waiting for him to begin presenting his definitions for repentance, which is something he said he would discuss in this broadcast.

@2:40 - I think he made an error there because I believe he was trying to quote from 1Th 5:21, which says "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." However, he said "test all things," which is what new-age bible versions teach. There can be a big difference between testing something and proving something. It was probably just a slip of the tongue back from when he might have learned from a new-age version before he switched to the King James, so I just wanted to clarify.

@3:50 - If you listen carefully, Brian starts out by correctly pointing out the false doctrines of various preachers, including Steven Anderson, who teach that you do not need to repent of your sins. Brian then continues on to say that those men teach that "you don't need to turn from your sin."
First of all, you guys know I have my teaching on Wolves in Costume: Steven L. Anderson, in which I demonstrate that Anderson is not of Christ, but in Anderson's defense, he does NOT teach that people do not need to turn from their sin. He teaches that people do not need to turn from their sin to be saved, and on that point, I actually agree with Anderson because to teach that a man must turn from sin to be saved is to teach WORKS-salvation doctrine.
Secondly, Brian has, through the slip of his tongue again, stated what he believes the word 'repent' means before he has given his listeners a clear definition of it and backed it up. So, in my mind, it is misleading to state things in that way, because it begins to IMPLY (not prove) that repentance means "turn from sin."

@4:30 - This is where things start to get really confusing because Brian does seem to believe that people should have godly sorrow of their wrongdoing, which is repentance, but then as he continues to talk about it, he does not seem to believe that repentance itself is grief and godly sorrow. I mean, he states clearly that he believes people should look at their sin and grieve. I agree with that, but that itself is repentance, and so I have, for a long time, thought Brian to be in the camp of those that are confused about it based on things he has been taught in the past, rather than just too-quickly labeling and accusing him of being a false teacher.

@6:40 - I'm not sure that Brian understands what sanctification is. I can't tell from this. He says that sanctification is God "molding and shaping us," but sanctification is to set something apart for a holy use. There is difference between internal and external sanctification, I understand, but defining sanctification as "God shaping us" is rather vague and I am not sure I can agree with him on that. This is not to say that God does not shape or mold us, don't misunderstand what I mean; I am simply addressing the definition of the word 'sanctify'.

@7:40 - This is confusing me again because now Brian is teaching not turning away from sin, and forsaking sin, which he started to teach, but now is teaching "being WILLING to turn from sin." I can't tell what position he is taking yet.

@8:15 - Brian says that repentance and conversion go together, and I strongly agree with that. However, that is making me wonder what Brian thinks the word 'covert' means in Scripture. The word 'convert' means "to turn" or "to change," so if he thinks that repent means "to turn" what does he think conversion means? He can't believe that the word convert also means to turn because that would make his statement nonsensical. You can't say that 'repent' and 'convert' go together if you believe they mean the same thing because that redundant. It would be like saying clouds and water go together; that's redundant nonsense that no one would normally say because clouds are water. Therefore, if he thought 'repent' and 'convert' meant the same thing, he would not say "they go together."

@10:20 - I think Brian believes that 'convert' means "to believe." So here's a breakdown so far of Brian's definitions:
convert = to believe
repent   = to turn
sanctify = to shape


In reality, here are the definitions found in Scripture:
convert = to turn, to change
repent   = to grieve
sanctify = to set apart


@11:50 - Brian just used the word 'repent' and the definition "to change" interchangeably in the same sentence. So, it seems that Brian has fallen in the trap that many preachers have fallen into, which is confusing 'conversion' with 'repentance', and because of that, they will end up leading many people down a false road of works doctrine.

@12:20 - Wait a second... Brian just defined 'convert' as "to turn from sin." I agree with that, but that's how he defines 'repent' as well. Is Brian really blinded to all this? I didn't think he would use such words redundantly as he does, or at least, I didn't think he would believe the Bible was using those words redundantly. There are places where the Bible defines words by using them together in the same sentence, but the verses Brian has quoted so far are not the places where the Bible is defining the terms.

@13:30 - Brian still says you can't have one without the other, meaning that you cannot repentance without conversion, or conversion without repentance. I agree, but for completely different reasons because what Brian is saying, according to his own definitions, does not make sense. Ultimately, Brian is saying: "You can't have turning from sin without turning from sin." That's nonsense, and I'm not sure that hardly any of his listeners are catching this.

@15:00 - Okay, there is a problem here, and I'm trying to figure out what's going on, so I'm not sure I can write this out very clearly right now. He's saying on the one hand that you have to turn from sin to be saved, but then on the other hand, saying that God is the one who does it for you. Well, if God does it for you, then if you aren't turning from sin, that would be God's fault, not yours. Brian, if you ever read this, your doctrine makes no sense, and I hope you would be willing to hear what I'm teaching on this. Feel free to analyze what I'm teaching in the same way I am analyzing what you are teaching.

@16:20 - Wait, what?! Did he just say that "they turned God's grace into lasciviousness?" Maybe I misunderstood him, but I don't think Brian knows what lasciviousness is either. Lasciviousness is an unregulated indulgence in lust of the flesh, and although Jack Hyles was a fornicator, that had no contextual relevance to what Brian was talking about. I cannot make sense of that.

@17:10 - I will not say 'Amen' along with Brian on that because he is still teaching that men must turn from the sin to be saved. He and I both fervently preach that repentance is necessary for salvation, but because we both believe they mean two different things, that means he and I are teaching two different gospels, and which gospel is the truth, I'll leave that for all of you to decide, but I will not stand in agreement with Brian until he comes to correction on his error.

@17:45 - Brian is saying that we should not go out and scream "repent or perish!" to people, but the sad part about that is that Brian had to say that to his listening audience, and it's because he does not understand what repentance means, just as those who scream and rail don't understand what it means either. Once you understand that repentance is grief and godly sorrow of sin, then you don't have to tell them not to rail and scream because the message of repentance is a gentle message automatically. Rebuking sin itself can sometimes be very sharp, but godly sorrow is a calm message.

I made it to his commercial break, and I think I'm going to stop there. If our church wants to discuss this on our Thursday meetup, we can do so.

337
What's New @ CLE / (VIDEO) CLE Update Feb 15, 2020
« on: February 15, 2020, 04:05:21 PM »

338
What's New @ CLE / (BOOK) The Biblical Understanding of Weddings & Marriage
« on: February 13, 2020, 01:51:36 PM »
The Biblical Understanding of Weddings & Marriage

I know I completely rewrote this book last year, but I have spent the past couple of months renovating it entirely all over again, and it is much longer than it was before, even though it is still seven chapters. I wanted to polish this as much as I could in preparation for an audio teaching on this subject, and so I hope some of you might be willing to read through it and tell me if you think I left out anything you think was important.










339
Tithe is NOT a Christian Requirement p8
In part 8, we finish up exposing Ed Young, and then we go into details about the millions of dollars Creflo Dollar extorts from his congregations.

340
Tithe is NOT a Christian Requirement p7
In part 7, we continue exposing Ed Young's greed, heresy, and hypocrisy, and we find out how much money some pastors really make.

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 32