Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - creationliberty

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 32
361
I have renamed and rewritten the old article, "The Trinity vs God in Three Persons," into the new:
I'm not sure I would call this a "correction" as much as a renovation to keep things within Scriptural terms. On a technical level, I still do believe the phrase "God in Three Persons" works, and the reason is because the word 'person' is used many times in Scripture, and it is used in context of defining an individual; however, it is also sometimes used in terms of defining and office or station, like how I describe in the teaching "Respecting Persons is Sin," and therefore, it can cause some confusion, especially among heretics who falsely accuse, because they may equate the term 'person' with an "office" or "form" of God, rather than God Himself.

In a previous forum post, I had addressed a heretic by the name of Edward (i.e. specifically Edwardpf123, a man who teaches a wide variety of false doctrines), who made a Youtube video scoffing at my teaching on the subject. Tim, one of our moderators here on the forum, and member of our church (who used to subscribe to Edward's channel many years ago), analyzed my new teaching and some of Edwards more recent videos on this subject, and discovered that Edward believes mostly the same thing that I teach, but Edward denies that the Father and the Son are one, as Jesus clearly stated in the Bible. Not only is Christ and the Father one, but so are Christ and the Holy Ghost, as He states in John 14:

Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him. Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father? Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works. Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father. And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it. If ye love me, keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.
-John 14:6-18


Jesus is claiming to be the Father, while the Father and the Son are separate entities, they are one at the same time. Jesus also said He would send a Comforter, which is the Holy Spirit, and He then said, "I will come to you," which is Christ claiming to be the Holy Ghost as well. God is infinite, omniscient, and omnipresent, and we are simply incapable of understanding the fullness of His essence, and so if we cannot understand it, then we should simply believe it for the sake of the evangelistic works that we do, that the church be not divided over nonsensical theories and false doctrines.

If heretics like Edward do not want to believe Christ, that's their business. God has given men liberty to deny Christ if they choose. However, I want Christians to be aware of the deception of such men, most especially Youtube preachers, who are a dime-a-dozen nowadays, who falsely accuse others, while scoffing from the foundation of a malicious heart. I pray that God would bring Edward to repentance (i.e. grief and godly sorrow) of his sin, so he can be saved, and have his understanding opened, as we have received God's grace of understanding.

For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
-Titus 1:10-13


In summary, if we stick with the Biblical term 'Godhead', it brings people's attention back to the Scripture, so they will not get involved in endless debates about what a 'person' is. If you want to learn more about this subject, please follow this link to the teaching:

362
What's New @ CLE / (ARTICLE) The Godhead vs The Trinity
« on: December 05, 2019, 02:48:21 PM »
The Godhead vs The Trinity
The Bible describes the Lord as the 'Godhead', not the 'Trinity'.





This article has been completely rewritten. I am much happier with it as it is now, and before I was even done with it and published it, I already had emails from people who happened upon it while I was still working on it, and I was told they got a lot out of it, so I thank God for His mercy and patience with me as I corrected anything that could have potentially caused confusion or error.

363
What's New @ CLE / (WEEKLY TEACHING) 501c3: The Devil's Church (2019) p13
« on: December 02, 2019, 01:40:15 PM »
501c3: The Devil's Church (2019) p13
In part 13, we look at how pastors frequently use Lyndon Johnson as a convenient excuse to cover up their greed and covetousness.

364
What's New @ CLE / Amazon Author Page
« on: November 30, 2019, 01:02:33 PM »
I created one; it links all the books I'll be publishing together in one account, so it makes it easier for people to find them.
https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B07Z9D8VB3
I had to sign an agreement that stated Amazon can remove my account for any reason at their own discretion, so I expect that to happen in the future. For now, I'm just a nobody no one has ever heard of, and that's been a blessing from God because it allows me to continue working for the sake of those who will hear.

Also, I just want to remind everyone that if you have read the books, it would help me out if you wrote a detailed review of them. It's a testimony that let's others know that there is valuable information in these books, that someone in passing might read the Scripture therein and be saved; we never know. However, I just want to repeat that (should you choose to do so) you should be detailed; don't just write "It's great!" because people generally don't pay any attention to those types of vague comments.

365
What's New @ CLE / (WEEKLY TEACHING) 501c3: The Devil's Church (2019) p12
« on: November 25, 2019, 02:26:08 PM »
501c3: The Devil's Church (2019) p12
Answering Common Questions About 501c3, like "How do I find a 501c3 church?" & "How do I open a bank account in my church's name without 501c3?"

367
I have rewritten my teaching The Beginner's Guide to Tribulation and Rapture, and renamed it, The Beginner's Guide to Christian Rapture, as I thought the title was more appropriate to the updates and corrections I've made. I had to go through and completely rewrite this teaching, which has taken me several weeks with long hours. I was sick this past Sunday (Nov 10, 2019), so that was a blessing in that the Lord God gave me more time to get it done this week.

What I'm about to explain has been sent to me a number of times, but I rejected it only because the people who were sending me this information were in error themselves, but refused to see it. Therefore, it put me on guard against all which they said, and since many of them did know enough to explain it themselves (i.e. they were just repeating what preachers told them), they also ended up in error that, hopefully, I might help correct.

That being said, Matthew 24 is not "just for the Jews," as many preachers teach in willful blindness, and as I point out in my article, there are many passages in Matthew 24 (as well as other correlating passages from other books of the Bible) which disproves that fallacy. However, there is one paragraph of Matthew 24 that is specifically for the Jews, and that is what has confused a lot of people; it seems that most churchgoers are either advocating that all of Mat 24 is for Christians, or all of Mat 24 is for Jews, but in truth, most of it is for Christians, and one paragraph of it is for the Jews, namely, the following paragraph:

When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day:With that understanding, it should give us a fresh perspective on the next two verses: For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.
-Matthew 24:15-22


My first mistake was thinking that the abomination of desolation and the son of perdition were one and the same event. That's not true, and sadly, my sight was clouded by past teachings I had been taught by other preachers who I no longer listen to. In hindsight, I can see that I did not stand faithful in God's Word when first writing this, and succumbed to fear, which is why, in my ignorance, I wrote in the assumption of the false doctrine of a final seven-year period of tribulation, and I did so without much explanation. It was vague, it was unfaithful, and it was lazy. For this, I am sorry, and I am ashamed that I may have further deceived other Christians, but I pray the Holy Spirit of God watch over them, and teach them what He has taught me.

The son of perdition is who appears in the last days, but this specific paragraph in Mat 24 was fulfilled between 66-73 AD, with 70 AD being the year the destruction of Solomon's Temple took place. If you read in the article, I go into a bit of detail about the confusion of that timeline, and why the prophecy of 70 weeks (in Daniel) starts with Darius II in 417 BC (not Darius I as many have assumed), and how you can prove that in Scripture, which brings the destruction of the temple to 70 AD in a perfectly timed prophecy that was foretold by the Holy Spirit of God through Daniel thousands of years ago.

The reason Jesus added this passage into his teaching on the end times is because it is a necessary part of the information about the end times, and answers to the context of what He told them at the beginning of Mat 24. The son of perdition will stand in the Temple to declare himself to be God, but Jesus did not want the believing Jews to misinterpret that to have happened in 70 AD, which is why He warned His disciples of what was coming with the fulfillment of Daniel's 70-week prophecy.

The problem with many of the people who have written me is that they believe that ALL of Mat 24 was fulfilled in 70 AD, and that is just flat-out willful blindness. Furthermore, others have written me to claim that all of the book of Revelation was fulfilled in 70 AD, and that's even more insane, as you will see if you read through my teaching on the subject now. (i.e. I prove all that nonsense wrong with the Scripture.)

Therefore, there is no time frame of "years of tribulation" at the end. There is the beginning of sorrows, and the tribulation will get worse from there, but the tribulation that was the worst the world will ever see (outside of the wrath of God) took place in 70 AD with the Roman assault against Jerusalem. Don't misunderstand, our tribulation will be terrible in the end, but theirs was the worst of it.

However, the time of the tribulation of the end days is uncertain, and we will be offered up to be killed in the last days, assuming my generation sees any of it. We can only go by the signs we are given to watch for, and if you read the article, I explain what all those are. But technically, pre-trib, mid-trib, and post-trib are terms that should not exist because there is no "trib" period of time, and so I rebuked and/or eliminated those things from my teaching; the term "pre-wrath" still makes sense, and so if I had to give my position a name, I would side with that, although I don't want people to believe that all who believe in pre-wrath are Christians (or that I necessarily side with them) because there are many false preachers who believe in it, such as Steven Anderson for example.

Thank you to everyone for your patience with me as I learn, and (God willing) I will continue to correct that which I have wrong for the sake of Christ; it's a lot of work, but it will be worth it so we will all be like-minded in our words, deeds, philosophy, and doctrine.

368
What's New @ CLE / (ARTICLE) The Beginner's Guide to Christian Rapture
« on: November 14, 2019, 03:18:16 PM »
The Beginner's Guide to Christian Rapture
I have completely re-written this teaching for the purpose of correcting some errors that I had previously taught on this subject. Most of the teaching was still correct, but there were serious points I had wrong in prior years, and I have now corrected those. (READ THE CORRECTION BY CLICKING HERE.) I know that few of you would spend the time to go over the subject again, but for those of you who will, I hope this helps clarify some of the confusion I may have caused by my errors.
As the title states, this is a beginner's guide for those of you who may never have known how to study this topic on your own, or where to begin. It is a comprehensive guide that will help new learn it, and help veteran Christians to understand this matter more thoroughly.







369
Wild Emails @ CLE / Scoffing New-Age Bible Version User Refuses to Hear
« on: November 08, 2019, 11:12:56 AM »

TYLER FROM ALASKA:

What I don't understand is how you would justify the KJB argument to foreigners or different cultures who translate the Bible into their own language. For example...

In the incredible story of Bruce Olsen, the tribe he was led by the Spirit to bring Christ to had zero understanding of anything beyond their own origin stories and culture. So in the ground-breaking moment of Revelation, after having lived with them for years, Bruce was able to share the Gospel in a way that they could actually understand by employing one of their own stories to embody it. The end result? Incredible transformation by the Spirit and the first name for Jesus becoming "Man who became ant and died".

This is quite common in different parts of the world. Again, in the parable in Matthew of building your house on the sand or rocks, this tribe who had come to know Jesus personally REFUSED to believe that Jesus would encourage someone to build their house on the rocks because only a fool would build their hut on rocks rather than rich deep sand into which they they could sink their poles for stability.

You get it? It wasn't the exact word for word understanding of the scripture but the Truth of God's Word was sustained and heard by them. Build your house on the foundation that doesn't move--for them and their only understanding of building, this meant sand NOT rocks.

You heard of Ray Comfort? He made a Bible called the Evidence Bible and used KJB but had it slightly altered it so it could read better (no thous and thees). When defending the text he simply said if a Russian family became saved and then needed a Bible to read, would you force them to first learn English then learn a type of English that is even more difficult to understand? No, you wouldn't. You'd give them a translation in their own language, which is going to be literally different than an English KJB.

I'd also like to point out that the KJB has been used for some of the most disastrous blasphemies of the Spirit and God in the history of mankind--proof that a translation in itself is not protection against misunderstanding of God's perfect Word. So there is great concern for you to claim that while a different translation is not a salvation issue, it is in fact a heart issue. What does this mean? How can some of the greatest works of Christ in the world today and the most genuine acts of kindness and love be read, preached, understood, and propagated by translations that are not the KJB? What would you say to the tribe that not only doesn't use the KJB but has the parable in Matthew changed so it reads to encourage the building of a house on the sand?

Please consider these things in their entirety, and looking forward to hearing from you! I am not bashing the KJB, just seriously questioning the belief that it is the purest and most noble translation, and that those who choose to read it are in fact more pure and noble in heart themselves. (This idea in itself seems to be rooted in a righteousness that is aside from the righteousness of Christ in you).



What I don't understand is how you would justify the KJB argument to foreigners or different cultures who translate the Bible into their own language. For example...
I have no idea who you are or what you actually believe, but it seems I was just thrust into the middle of a conversation we were not having.

In the incredible story of Bruce Olsen, the tribe he was led by the Spirit to bring Christ to had zero understanding of anything beyond their own origin stories and culture. So in the ground-breaking moment of Revelation, after having lived with them for years, Bruce was able to share the Gospel in a way that they could actually understand by employing one of their own stories to embody it. The end result? Incredible transformation by the Spirit and the first name for Jesus becoming "Man who became ant and died".
What a great story, and I emphasize STORY. I hear stories all the time, and it turns out, many stories are not true. So far, you have not explained what it is you believe, you have thrust me into a conversation we were not having, and now have shown me that you believe whatever you hear, as long as it sounds good to you. In case you didn't see it, I just wanted to clarify that this is not a good first impression.
That being said, Paul used such things to the Greeks in Athens in Acts 17, however, what he did not do is pick up corrupted documentation of Christ's doctrine to teach those converts, which (based on your letter) seems to be what you are advocating.

This is quite common in different parts of the world. Again, in the parable in Matthew of building your house on the sand or rocks, this tribe who had come to know Jesus personally REFUSED to believe that Jesus would encourage someone to build their house on the rocks because only a fool would build their hut on rocks rather than rich deep sand into which they they could sink their poles for stability.
That depends on what you mean by "quite common." I have had actual correspondence (not hypothetical stories) with actual apostles (who you may know by the Catholic term "missionaries") who are in other countries and having a hard time getting the doctrine of Christ to the people due to the influence of those new-age bible versions you're defending.
There is another problem with doctrine that you're not seeing, and I can tell by your letter that you don't understand it. It's the fallacy that all those who claim to "believe on Jesus" are automatically born again Christians. This is not at all what Jesus taught because He spent a lot of time warning us of false converts who have a fake faith, and I cover more on that here:
Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell
That is the actual gospel teaching of Christ, and if you cannot understanding that, then what bible version you're using is not going to matter at all.

You get it? It wasn't the exact word for word understanding of the scripture but the Truth of God's Word was sustained and heard by them. Build your house on the foundation that doesn't move--for them and their only understanding of building, this meant sand NOT rocks.
Well, I know you don't get it. The preacher you were talking about was foolish because he missed the key point of that doctrine:
And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.
-Mat 7:26-27

If you believe that men can build their houses on sand, and survive floods in a storm, then you are just as foolish as the unbelieving preacher who taught these poor people that they should NOT trust what Jesus Christ said. Thereby, when they read the Word of God, they would only LOSE faith in Christ because of the influence of that foolish preacher. (Even if they put poles into sand, in order for them to remain, they would have to hit bedrock, and those tribes are not stupid; they understand that concept.) I cannot believe that a preacher who claims to have the wisdom of God would be so ignorant as to not be able to show those people a rock and sand and have them discern the difference between the two. And here you are, in your foolishness, writing this letter to try to convince me of this nonsense. Your letter would be almost unbelievable if I was not reading it firsthand. I should not be surprised after all the years of hearing this garbage, but it never ceases to amaze me how arrogant people become due their vain doctrines, trusting in the feelings of their own hearts instead of the truth, and you should be ashamed of yourself.
He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered.
-Pro 28:26
Every way of a man is right in his own eyes: but the LORD pondereth the hearts.
-Pro 21:2


You heard of Ray Comfort?
The same Ray Comfort from the leavened (i.e. corrupt) ministry Living Waters? I no longer recommend anything he produces. I'm not convinced he has been born again in Christ; I believe he's a false preacher based on a number of problems with his ministry, but most particularly, the fact that he has confessed that he has not come to actual repentance, and he contradicts himself in numerous places. I have a direct quote about that from Comfort documented on my website, and though I believe you will stand firm in willful blindness on the matter (because it seems like you highly revere Comfort), I will leave you a link to my teaching on that subject so you will not be able to speak honestly that I did not try to warn you of the danger:
Is Repentance Part of Salvation?

He made a Bible called the Evidence Bible and used KJB but had it slightly altered it so it could read better (no thous and thees).
You didn't read my teaching on the KJB. That revealed the truth. Did you skim it, just read a few paragraphs, or did you read the title and stop? One way or another, you're embarrassing yourself right now because you're answering the matter before you have heard it, and the Bible says you're a fool that should be ashamed of yourself.
He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.
-Pro 18:13

Again, I don't believe for a second that you will read to understand, but I will give you the particular section in my teaching where I cover that topic, and why the thee's and thou's are so important. They're not there for artistic value, and perhaps you should try doing some actual research instead diving in headfirst while wearing a blindfold simply to justify yourself.
What's with the thees, thous, eths, and ests?
If you had read this first, you would know that Ray Comfort is also a fool, and if you think he's going to stand before God and not be guilty of his wrongdoing with his new-age version, you haven't studied the last chapter in the Bible.
And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
-Rev 22:19


When defending the text he simply said if a Russian family became saved and then needed a Bible to read, would you force them to first learn English then learn a type of English that is even more difficult to understand? No, you wouldn't. You'd give them a translation in their own language, which is going to be literally different than an English KJB.
And I would say, "No." I have had email correspondence with many who have used a translation that was taken directly from the KJB, and used the KJB side-by-side to learn the English. (Again, not hypothetical stories, but actually correspondence with those who are experiencing this firsthand.) God had His Word completed in English for a reason, just as those who wanted to learn the law and prophets in the Old Testament had to learn Hebrew. I mean, did you honestly believe that God had His Word translated into every language in the Old Testament? Or have you not considered that before? Either way, your comments further demonstrate that you do not exhibit the spirit of one who is born again in Christ, because those of us who are know that we will go to any length to understand God's Word, no matter how far we must travel or how much studying we have to do.
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
-2Ti 2:15


I'd also like to point out that the KJB has been used for some of the most disastrous blasphemies of the Spirit and God in the history of mankind--proof that a translation in itself is not protection against misunderstanding of God's perfect Word.
That's because you do not believe that God can, or did, preserve His Word. You can claim all you want to believe in the inspiration of the Scripture itself, but you have no reason to do so after what you just stated (i.e. inspiration is destroyed without preservation), meaning that you cannot justify what you believe. But I can justify what I believe because I haven't built my house on the sand. If you don't like that, then depart in peace, and have a great day.

So there is great concern for you to claim that while a different translation is not a salvation issue, it is in fact a heart issue. What does this mean?
I think your email is a fine example of what that means.
The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
-Jer 17:9


How can some of the greatest works of Christ in the world today and the most genuine acts of kindness and love be read, preached, understood, and propagated by translations that are not the KJB? What would you say to the tribe that not only doesn't use the KJB but has the parable in Matthew changed so it reads to encourage the building of a house on the sand?
I already answered you according to your folly.
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
-Pro 26:5

Depart in peace, and I hope have a great day.

Please consider these things in their entirety, and looking forward to hearing from you! I am not bashing the KJB,
Who are you trying to convince? Anyone who reads your letter can see your scorning and scoffing nature.
A scorner seeketh wisdom, and findeth it not: but knowledge is easy unto him that understandeth.
-Pro 14:6

I can see your heart by what you say, so for you to lie in order to keep up appearances does no one any good.
But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.
-Mat 15:18
Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
-John 7:24

Please consider these things in their entirety.
God Does Not Justify Lies

just seriously questioning the belief that it is the purest and most noble translation, and that those who choose to read it are in fact more pure and noble in heart themselves. (This idea in itself seems to be rooted in a righteousness that is aside from the righteousness of Christ in you).
That is more deceptive venom dripping from your mouth because I never stated nor implied any such thing (i.e. your false accusation that I teach that I am "more pure and noble in heart" than others), and so you can take your wicked tongue back where you came from. We who are born again are worthless sinners who, through repentance (i.e. godly sorrow of wrongdoing) and faith in Christ, have been redeemed. (Mark 1:15) It is those who have little love for the Word of God that care little about it's preservation, which is why you would rather have a corrupt bible than a pure one, and that you scoff and scorn at those who would (by His grace of understanding) seek the pure Word of God, while lying through your lips to justify yourself.
These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
-Pro 6:16-19
And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God.
-Luke 16:15


I pray the Lord Jesus Christ would be as longsuffering and merciful to you as He has been to me. Have a great day, and I hope you depart in peace.


I began to read your response and realized you are not a loving or kind man. Good luck with your religion Chris.
(Sent from my iPhone)


END OF EXCHANGE

I did not bother responding to his scoffing response because I suspected that's what he would do. (Hypocritically sending me an unloving and unkind response while accusing me of being unloving and unkind.) He was so lazy, he just typed it into his phone real quick out of spite, and as he admitted, he only read a small fraction of this letter (i.e. "I began to read your response"), made a quick decision based on his feelings, and refused to read any farther, and that's exactly what I suspect he did with my KJB teaching as well. (i.e. He answered the matter before he heard it.) I could see the lazy, scornful heart in his letter fairly quickly, and I suspect that even all the "stories" he was presenting in his letter was stuff he picked up from Ray Comfort, and I have learned to be very cautious with Comfort because he can be very deceptive due to his generally nice outward demeanor (kind of like Billy Graham).

For those who may read this and not understand, keep in mind that Ray Comfort is 501c3 incorporated, he yokes together with unbelieving and rebellious false preachers like Joyce Meyer and Kirk Cameron, confesses that he has not come to repentance (which I have documented in my teaching on repentance), and he also teaches people that they must turn from their sins to be saved (i.e. works doctrine), as you can see in this clip (it's a longer video, but the link will take you to the time stamp where Comfort says it): https://youtu.be/-_IomL6Wxfk?t=3m19s

For this man to say that salvation in droves from countries all over the world is "quite common," is to say that Jesus was wrong. This man is used to following Ray Comfort, who gives the impression that thousands of people are being saved every day, but Jesus said:

Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
-Mat 7:13-14


There are still some being saved, as some in our church have testified to the conversion of some through God's grace to our evangelistic works, but we don't see masses flocking to the message of repentance (i.e. godly sorrow) and faith. Even if we did, we would be cautious moving forward with them because we would know by Christ's words that there is likely many false converts among them, as time would tell.

370
One of the members on our forum had pointed out that a couple of reviews to this book had been written on Amazon. I'm the kind of person who generally ignores reviews when looking at books because someone's opinions or feelings is not relevant to the truth. (This is why I don't utilize Youtube likes or dislikes.) But this critique was rather long and quite detailed, so I'm going to post it here and then try to respond to it.

Here's the link where it was original posted, and is entitled "Beware of Gnostic Leaven:"
https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-
reviews/RBERF71VPV5XY/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1089322461


Just to clarify, as far as I know, I do not know who this person is, but after looking at her profile on Amazon:
JOY W. AMAZON PROFILE
You can start to see the worldliness come through in her (assuming it is a woman) purchases and reviews. It should be noted that, as far as I could tell, this is the only book review she's ever done on Amazon.

REVIEW OF WHY MILLIONS OF BELIEVERS ON JESUS ARE GOING TO HELL -- BY JOY W. ON AMAZON

Chris is doing a good job in addressing the errors of the false church system and sugar-coated Christianity, but he simultaneously preaches a false gospel antithetical to Scripture throughout this book while implying repeatedly that anyone who doesn't believe that "foundation" for repentance is "grief" is, therefore, "prideful" and unsaved.
To say that I "implied" something, is not an argument. For example, if you were in a court of law, you could not accuse a man of admitting guilt by saying he "implied" that he was guilty.  There was no implication in the book because I wrote directly, and used the Scripture very thoroughly in everything I said, and so what's she's doing is making an accusation based on how she felt, not what I said.

In an effort to expose the false church system and false Christianity, Chris goes to the opposite extreme in an effort to avoid a works-based mindset that many fundamentalists promote of teaching by comparing repentance and conversion and glossing over 'conversion' quickly in location 161 and attacks the false church system for not teaching 'grief.'
I have no idea what "location 161" is. Furthermore, I did not rebuke the false church system for not teaching "grief," but specifically, godly sorrow, which is what the Bible teaches. Were only into her first paragraph, and I can already see the deception in her words.

It is not that grief over sin is wrong or less important, but he seems to be capitalizing on this doctrine to the extreme by making the claim that the false church is in such a poor state that it is in because they have not (and do not) grieve(d) over their sins (rather than repenting all together [going and sinning no more] which Christopher says is impossible. Does he believe Romans 8:13, 1 John 2:1, Genesis 4:7, Romans 8:13, 2 Peter 3:17, John 8:34, and many, many more?)
Where did I say that it was impossible for a man to go and sin no more? This woman is deceptive because she makes a claim based on "implication," and not on fact. I never said it was impossible for a man to go and sin no more, but if man thinks he has no sin, or even to say that he has no faults, which would be the potential for sin (Jms 5:16), then he is turning the truth of God into a lie. (1Jo 1:8-10) And again, we have another person here who believes that a man must turn from all sin in order to be saved, which is not possible for any man; for some reason, this woman read the book from the perspective of one who is already saved, rather than someone who is not saved, and her deceptive critique reveals a deeper desire to defend her belief that she has been saved without true repentance. (2Co 7:10)

As much as Chris accurately exposes 501-C3 churches, false Christianity, debunking the logical fallacies of satanic worldviews, exposing the Prosperity Gospel and false pastors and much more in his ministry, I expected more depth and consistency and the defense of truth in this book than what has been delivered throughout the entire work of his life.
This is just a generalized disgruntled statement; it doesn't say much of anything. Basically, this woman is saying that I am correct in pretty much everything else I teach, but then when it comes to the salvation gospel of Jesus, she hates what I teach, and that's usually indicative of someone who has never come to true repentance, which is a gift from God. (2Ti 2:25)

In this book, Chris is judging one's salvation based on whether or not they have expressed grief for sin, rather than taking up your cross, following Christ, dying to yourself, and being filled with the Spirit producing a new creation in Christ Jesus.
Okay, this actually confirms for me that this woman believes in works doctrine. In my book, I teach that a man must come to godly sorrow (i.e. repentance) and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ (i.e. faith in His shed blood on the cross) to be saved. (Mark 1:15) As you can see, this woman opposes Mark 1:15, and is instead teaching that you must take up your cross (i.e. doing works), follow Jesus (i.e. studying and works), and dying to yourself (i.e. turning from sin) in order to be saved. That's heresy; those things come after a man has been converted, not before. Nowhere in this book did I ever teach that a man does not become a new creation in Christ, because I taught that a man must be born again, and so now she's lying.

I've been following Christopher's Creation Evangelism Ministry for a few years now and expected much more accuracy given the excellent and logically consistent coverage he presents for other topics in his ministry.
This shows a lot of blindness on her part. If I have been wrong on the basic salvation gospel of Jesus Christ for this many years, and she never noticed it once in all the years she has been listening to me (because I share that gospel often in my teachings), then she is either deaf and blind, or she does not have the Holy Spirit of God in her to discern good from evil. (Heb 5:14)

I am not impressed with this writing and am deeply concerned for his understanding on the matter of salvation. He seems to be taking great pride in how sorrowful and grievous he is in a sense. His argument is filled with numerous contradictions which parrot the works of Augustine and the fruit of the Reformation which I will list toward the end of this review:
I don't really care whether or not she's impressed with what I wrote, but did I read that right? So let me see if I understand this: God brings me to sorrow of my sin, and I'm being accused of being prideful for it? That's a new one. I have never heard that in all my years of ministry. But notice also that she said "he seems" and she does not quote any particular section that provides actual evidence. In addition, I have not read any works of the Reformation apart from Foxe's Book of Martyrs, and I don't believe I even know who "Augustine" is, so I have no idea what she's referring to, and thus, she is accusing me of bringing in influence of these other sources into my book, when I have done no such thing, and other readers can attest to that fact.

The premise of the entire book is based on the doctrine that "Repentance" means "godly sorrow" instead of, "to turn."
So when she says "instead of," it means that she believes repentance means "to turn from sin and turn to God," and in my book, I explained the contradiction of Scripture to say that. Thus, she is desperately defending her "turning from sin and turning to God," because she never came to that godly sorrow of her wrongdoing, and therefore, if what I taught by the Gospel of Christ is true, then she will be one of the churchgoers who ends up in hell, and that's what this is all about.

He goes on to imply that anyone who rejects this doctrine is "prideful" and hasn't truly repented. One of the main proofs he gives for this argument is that the "false churches are filled with joy, which shows they haven't truly repented. Chris states the following concerning this:
Again, there's the word "imply," and there is no implication in the book. I speak plainly and directly. The implication is her opinions and feelings, but she does not want to say that openly because her critique will not seem as "professional" if she tells the whole truth.

"There are many who join church buildings and profess 'joy in the Lord,' but Jesus taught that such people who quickly receive the Word of God with joy have no root in themselves, meaning that they were never saved because they did not receive the words with tears of grief over their sin. Jesus taught about this in what is known as 'The Parable of the Sower.'"
This is a quote from my book. It is correctly stated, and it is correct doctrine.

The Parable of the Sower nowhere states that "joy" was the core foundation,
Notice that she makes this statement, but does not quote the Parable of the Sower. Allow me to do so:
But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it; Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended.
-Matthew 13:20-21

The word 'anon' means "quickly," and so a person who quickly receives the word of God with joy, instead of tears of godly sorrow, are those who have no root in themselves because they were never humbled before God. And here is a correlating verse from Mark to clarify:
And these are they likewise which are sown on stony ground; who, when they have heard the word, immediately receive it with gladness; And have no root in themselves, and so endure but for a time: afterward, when affliction or persecution ariseth for the word's sake, immediately they are offended.
-Mark 4:16-17

This woman is rejected this doctrine that Jesus taught, and so instead of outright saying she rejects it (because that would make her look bad), she instead tries to change the meaning of it, to deceive others. This likely indicates that she received the word with gladness, but never came to godly sorrow, and that is a pattern I have seen in many people, namely that the few who have been humbled to repentance (i.e. godly sorrow) love Christ's doctrine here, but those who have not, hate His doctrine, and refuse to acknowledge it.

neither was it an indication that they have no root within themselves; this is quite a stretch.
Christ literally said, word-for-word that they "have no root in themselves." I cannot make this any clearer, but this woman rejects Christ's doctrine, and that's why she hates my book.

Chris goes on to imply that if you cannot accept this teaching, then you do not hear God's voice.
Again, she said, "implies" instead of "here is where he said this, and I quote." It's all about how she feels, not what is true. (Pro 28:26)

This argument is not only unbiblical, but is a logical fallacy in appeal to popularity--i.e., The false church is doing X, therefore X is wrong.
I'm going to attempt to unravel the knot she just tied because there are a number of things wrong with what she just said. After I do this, I'm done reviewing this woman's critique because if she started out deceiving people, then the rest of her review is going to be a waste of my time. (Col 4:5)
First of all, an appeal to popularity means that you are arguing the following:
--A lot of people do X.
--Therefore, X is the correct thing to do.
She is taking an inverted meaning of the "appeal to popularity" fallacy, which is not really a correct usage of it because the basis of appeal to popularity is following the masses. The masses, or at least, the mass majority of churchgoers, do not follow or believe the doctrine I'm teaching because Christ said FEW (not many) would find the way to eternal life. (Mat 7:13-14)

Next, she arguing that I am looking to church building tradition for the basis of what I teach. That is false. I have never done that. She's claiming that I look for whatever church buildings do, then I do the opposite. Those who listen to my teachings know that's not true. What I do is look at a church building tradition, and simply ask if that's what we in the New Testament church were taught to do. If we were not taught to do that, then I throw it out, but if we were taught to do those things, then I hang on to them. For example, we are taught to pray often, and so I hang on to that tradition that was set for us by the early church doctrine, despite the fact that many churchgoers pray under false pretenses. However, when it comes to things like tithe, such things were never commanded in the New Testament, and so I throw it out. The point is that I am basing these things on Scripture, whether or not we were taught these things by Christ and His apostles in the Bible, but she is asserting (not by evidence, but by her personal feelings) that I'm just walking against the wind because I don't want to follow everyone else, which is not true, and if that were the case, then why has she supposedly been listening to me teach for years without sanctifying herself from my ministry?

So she said I was using an appeal to popularity, which was not true, then used the fallacy wrong, and then claimed I was using the incorrect fallacy she didn't understand, which was not true in the first place. Again, it was a twisted knot of a sentence, and most people won't catch it. This woman is becoming more deceptive as she continues, and I have a lot of red warning signs flashing in my mind that this woman believes she is justified by her works, which means she's one of those people who is going to hell because she was never humbled to godly sorrow. If any of you would like to continue reading her critique and respond to it, the link is at the top, and I would encourage you to do so, but only if you have read the book. (If you have not read it, there is no point in responding.)

In short, this woman wrote this critique because she does not want anyone reading this book, and it's all of her selfish motivation, in order to justify herself. If any of you have read the book and want to help combat that problem, you can always go to Amazon to write a review of your own; it would help to silence the mouths of deceptive women like this.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1089322461

A final note: I think I might know who this woman is, but I could be wrong. I just occurred to me. I'll let you guys decide. Here is the link from the Wild Emails section:
http://www.creationliberty.com/forum/index.php?topic=667.0
Maybe I'm wrong, and these two women are separate and have nothing to do with each other. It's just that... why was the joy the issue one of the first objects she raised? Seemed similar. Tell me what you think.

371
This person did not provide a first name, but gave a last name; I was a bit cautious, considering I should just archive the letter and not respond, but I decided to go ahead and respond to it. It's just very odd that a person would not just give their first name and exclude their last name, and normally, I don't post last names, but this is all I was sent.

J. LUPSETT FROM UK:

https://www.cyber-chapel.org/Elders.pdf
https://lewayotte.com/2013/01/10/there-is-no-biblical-support-for-paid-pastorselders/

Hi There is much on this website with which I can heartily agree, but one thing which I cannot is the request for money. Scripture teaches that if a man will not work he should not eat. There is no paid ministry in Scripture. Even Paul, who was a true itinerant, worked night and day in order to support himself (and others) and so he would not be a burden to others. Elders/Pastors who were not itinerant and could therefore easily hold down paid labour were told not only to support themselves and their own families but to have enough to share with those less able to provide (whether cripples or widows etc).

As such, I would urge you to relook at Scripture for instruction on this matter. Whilst you are expecting to live off the charity of others (those who presumably are working as Scripture commands) you weaken your testimony to the Lord and your example to His people.

I have copied two links to material which I find to be excellent on this subject from men who have been willing to stand against the majority on this matter and stand for truth and a good testimony before all men.

I send this with assurance of my prayers



There is much on this website with which I can heartily agree, but one thing which I cannot is the request for money. Scripture teaches that if a man will not work he should not eat. There is no paid ministry in Scripture.
First of all, I am not concerned whether or not you agree with me because your agreement is not relevant to the truth, nor does such a vague, deceptive statement at the start of your letter endear you to me any way. Secondly, I'm ignoring your links because I don't care about your false doctrines. The fact is that you do not know the Scripture on this matter, but before I share it with you, it needs to be said that you ought to be ashamed of yourself that you wrote me in arrogance instead of asking me about the matter first. If you want to believe the nonsense you wrote me and refuse to hear, then go ahead and depart, and I hope you have a wonderful day, but shame on you for not searching the Scriptures on this topic before writing me with such leavened doctrine.

First of all, that sentence heavily implied that you think I don't work. That's insulting, and I don't appreciate it. It's also based on your willful blindness. You don't know a fraction of what I do. For example, having to rebuke arrogant scoffers in emails like this is just one of the many jobs I have to do. These take time to do, having to spend over an hour writing, color-coding, and proof-reading this letter more than once, and if it weren't for such scoffing, self-righteous letters like yours, I could get more done.
Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine. For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward.
-1Ti 5:17-18

Muzzling the ox means that you withhold from them that which they should be rewarded for. Now, perhaps most pastors and elders don't do anything on a regular basis, and in that case, I could get behind a statement that says they should not receive reward because I've seen that many times (i.e. those who just glad-hand people and don't do any work) However, I actually work. I don't have a staff. I do all the study, research, writing, fact-checking, coding, updates, audio editing, video editing, website editing, publishing, corrections, and much more. With the exception of PDFs and the occasional spelling/typo corrections I receive, I do everything else by myself, and it shows that you have obviously never even attempted to do what I do, since you have no idea how much work goes into doing this, while you arrogantly sit back and benefit from the work I've done, judging me and my wife in your unrighteousness, as if we should have nothing to eat because I don't work another full-time job on top of around 60 hours a week I put into this alone. The kind of labor I am doing is what is being talked about in 1st Timothy, and if there are pastors and elders who get lazy, then they should not receive reward, but you should be embarrassed that you would call for food to be taken from the mouths of those who work. It's almost unbelievable that you would be so hard-hearted and cruel, but after all the hateful mail I get on a weekly basis, I shouldn't be surprised anymore.

Even Paul, who was a true itinerant, worked night and day in order to support himself (and others) and so he would not be a burden to others.
Well, at least that confirms for me that you have don't know what you're talking about. Paul owned businesses, which is how he was able to support himself. He worked day and night preaching the Gospel, healing the sick, and teaching. That was his full-time job. I would back that up with some Scripture, but perhaps you should try opening up the book of Acts some time and actually studying it because the evidence that supports what I'm saying is everywhere. (In fact, I have my notes on the book of Acts published, walking through it verse by verse, and you can find that here: http://creationliberty.com/articles/bookacts.php)

And it should be noted that Paul (the man you referred to), by the Holy Spirit of God, wrote this:
For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things? If others be partakers of this power over you, are not we rather? Nevertheless we have not used this power; but suffer all things, lest we should hinder the gospel of Christ. Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple? and they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar? Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel.
-1Co 9:9-14

I'll leave it to Christians in the church to judge whether I am worthy of any reward because I serve them on behalf of the Lord Jesus Christ for your sake, and even if you are unwilling to humble yourself to understand the truth, you are still receiving the benefits from my hard work, which I have been allowed to do only via the gifts of wisdom and understanding I have received from the Lord God.

Elders/Pastors who were not itinerant and could therefore easily hold down paid labour were told not only to support themselves and their own families but to have enough to share with those less able to provide (whether cripples or widows etc).
And you have no Scripture references in your letter whatsoever. That's actually quite typical. About 95% of emails I receive are just like this; scoffers whining about their false doctrines without evidence.

As such, I would urge you to relook at Scripture for instruction on this matter. Whilst you are expecting to live off the charity of others (those who presumably are working as Scripture commands) you weaken your testimony to the Lord and your example to His people.
Mr. Lupsett, I would urge you to relook at Scripture for instruction on this matter. Whilst you are expecting to take advantage of the charity of others around you (those who are working as Scripture commands), you weaken your testimony to the Lord and His people by your selfish, prideful, and willingly ignorant attitude.

I have copied two links to material which I find to be excellent on this subject from men who have been willing to stand against the majority on this matter and stand for truth and a good testimony before all men.
I'm glad you shared those with me so I know to stay away from those two sites. Your leaven was enough to keep me away from those false doctrines. I do appreciate that.

I send this with assurance of my prayers
I'm sure lines like that make you look good on the outside, don't they?
Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
-John 7:24
Help, LORD; for the godly man ceaseth; for the faithful fail from among the children of men. They speak vanity every one with his neighbour: with flattering lips and with a double heart do they speak. The LORD shall cut off all flattering lips, and the tongue that speaketh proud things: Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail; our lips are our own: who is lord over us? For the oppression of the poor, for the sighing of the needy, now will I arise, saith the LORD; I will set him in safety from him that puffeth at him. The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
-Psalm 12:1-6



I am saddened but not surprised by your reply.

You presume any who differ to you must be responded to with hostility and be immediately dismissed.

That's a rather weak position to be in. It leaves little opportunity for growth or for correction.

I pray the Lord further instruct you and that you would have ears to hear.

I also pray for those who have attached themselves to you via the website. That they would be open to correction and instruction even.....or especially....when you are not.

Paul said that just as an ox should receive the reward due (grain) and as a labourer should receive what's due to him (wages) so too should elders receive honour. Honour was their reward....not grain, not wages....honour.

Elders were men who worked (in proper jobs) to support their own families and to support the weaker, poorer members of the local assemblies. They never asked the flock for money. Rather they gave to the needy in the flock. Paul worked with his own hands to earn enough to support himself and others.
 
I understand that the church has taught falsehood on this for hundreds of years and that clergy have come to expect financial support (basically full time wages). However, Scripture is very clear on the matter. There is no paid ministry. True itinerants can rightly expect gifts of food and shelter if they cannot find work due to their travels but Paul gives a better example by working so as not to be a burden. Those who live in one place have no right to expect others to feed them or pay them. They can and should earn their own way and one who establishes himself as a teacher/leader should all the more set the example and work hard enough to share what he has earned with others who are in need.

It is unlikely you will have ears to hear any of this but that doesn't alter the fact it has been shared with you and ignorance will not now be a justifiable defense for disobedience.

It is hard to respect your rushed and thoughtless reply. Had you bothered to read the links first and study the Scriptures shared within them you may have embarrassed yourself less.

Goodnight


I WAS SENT ANOTHER LETTER SIX MINUTES LATER:

Ps.

God doesn't command you to work 60 hours on a website. He does command you to work to provide for your own. If you stopped doing what He nowhere commanded you would have plenty of time to work a full time job.

It is hardly 'cruel and hardhearted' to expect an able bodied man to earn his own money is it?



I am saddened but not surprised by your reply. You presume any who differ to you must be responded to with hostility and be immediately dismissed. That's a rather weak position to be in. It leaves little opportunity for growth or for correction.
No, your arrogance was obvious from the first sentence you wrote in your first letter. What you're doing now is hiding that hostility, and I don't get along well with those who will not be honest and straight-forward with me. Even now you're not writing me looking for a discussion, which is why this will be my last response to you; you're wasting my time. Normally, I would not respond, but for the sake of other brethren in our church, I will answer the fool according to his folly, so he will not think himself wise in his own arrogance.
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
-Pro 26:5


I pray the Lord further instruct you and that you would have ears to hear.
I pray that for myself too, but I would pray it for you as well, and furthermore that you would learn to judge yourself.
For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.
-1Co 11:31


I also pray for those who have attached themselves to you via the website. That they would be open to correction and instruction even.....or especially....when you are not.
I'll be sure to share your words with them, especially the back handed-slap you just gave to all of them, claiming that those of us in Christ's church are not open to correction or instruction (which you have spoken presumptuously), and that you have lied to say that I am not correctable. (This will be laughable to them, since they have watched me submit to correction.) Furthermore, your blinded to your blatant hypocrisy, since I just corrected you from the Scripture, and you refused correction, because you forsake the ways of God and hide your malice behind feigned words.
Correction is grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die.
-Pro 15:10

You speak of things you know not, and God WILL judge.
In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.
-Rom 2:16


Paul said that just as an ox should receive the reward due (grain) and as a labourer should receive what's due to him (wages) so too should elders receive honour. Honour was their reward....not grain, not wages....honour.
I knew you would try that. That's why I gave you correlating verses from 1st Corinthians 9:9-14 to prove the context of what was being said, that they should live of the gospel, just as those who worked in the Temple earned their living that way. (Hint: The Levites did not have honor for dinner.) Only one who is willingly blind cannot see that context. You ignored it so you could continue to believe in the leavened false doctrine you were taught, so you can accuse others with your holier-than-thou attitude.
Which say, Stand by thyself, come not near to me; for I am holier than thou. These are a smoke in my nose, a fire that burneth all the day.
-Isaiah 65:5

This is why I can use Scripture in a conversation like this, and you cannot, because I understand it, but you do not of the strong meat of the Word.
But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
-Heb 5:14


Elders were men who worked (in proper jobs) to support their own families and to support the weaker, poorer members of the local assemblies. They never asked the flock for money. Rather they gave to the needy in the flock. Paul worked with his own hands to earn enough to support himself and others.
You're wasting my time because you just repeated almost verbatim the exact same thing you wrote in your first letter. Did you think repeating yourself was going to accomplish something?
 
I understand that the church has taught falsehood on this for hundreds of years and that clergy have come to expect financial support (basically full time wages).
Clergy is not Biblical term (it's a Catholic term), and I don't earn full time wages.

However, Scripture is very clear on the matter.
Yeah, I showed you the Scripture, but you ignored it.

There is no paid ministry.
That part is correct, but there is reward of charity to those who labor in the Word of God, but you cannot understand that, nor the reasons for it, without the Holy Spirit of God:
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
-1Co 2:14


True itinerants can rightly expect gifts of food and shelter if they cannot find work due to their travels but Paul gives a better example by working so as not to be a burden. Those who live in one place have no right to expect others to feed them or pay them. They can and should earn their own way and one who establishes himself as a teacher/leader should all the more set the example and work hard enough to share what he has earned with others who are in need.
I'm amazed that you just walk blindly in your assumptions that I do not work nor help those who are in need. I have no need to tell you those things to be seen of men; I'll let God judge, and all will be revealed in the end. You won't be able to hide behind your computer screen in that day. (i.e. You have not shared a single thing about what you do and teach, nor shown any evidence of it.)
And again, you are repeating the exact same thing you said in your first letter almost verbatim, and once again, no Scripture. That shows me that you cannot even discuss this matter because you are unlearned; that's why you have to give me links to leavened preachers in place of Scripture because you do not know enough to have a discussion on your own. That tells me everything I need to know about you, and that you are wildly arrogant for someone without understanding. You need to come to the humility of repentance, which is grief and godly sorrow of wrongdoing because you will not enter heaven by saying a "sinner's prayer" and playing church.
Is Repentance Part of Salvation?
But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.
-James 4:6
I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
-Luke 13:3


It is unlikely you will have ears to hear any of this but that doesn't alter the fact it has been shared with you and ignorance will not now be a justifiable defense for disobedience.
To this, I can only respond with the words I was given: It is unlikely you will have ears to hear any of this, but that doesn't alter the fact that it has been shared with you and now, willful ignorance will not be a justifiable defense for false doctrine.

It is hard to respect your rushed and thoughtless reply. Had you bothered to read the links first and study the Scriptures shared within them you may have embarrassed yourself less.
To this, I can only respond: It is hard to respect your rushed and thoughtless reply. Had you bothered to read the Scripture and study what I shared with you, you may have embarrassed yourself less. Although, I will add that my suspicion is that you do not have the Holy Spirit of God to open your understanding; therefore is it impossible for you to see it, no matter how much you study it.
Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
-2Ti 3:7

Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell

Ps.
I have to laugh a little because you try to give a false outward appearance in your writing of having a calm demeanor, even though I can see through that, into the contempt you hide underneath, but you could not wait six minutes before sending another letter to say, "And another thing!" Anything you say beyond this point is only going to embarrass you and make the problem worse.

God doesn't command you to work 60 hours on a website. He does command you to work to provide for your own.
So let's say I worked 60 hours per week as a web designer, building someone else's website who was doing nothing for the Lord Jesus Christ, and earning a paycheck from that, you're saying that would be acceptable? You're literally teaching that doing the same exact work for anyone except the Lord Jesus Christ would be the only acceptable work for the Lord Jesus Christ. I'm actually sitting here laughing a little right now because I don't know how else to react. You have been deceived into the leaven of other false preachers, but I cannot help someone who is that far gone; that is just someone who cannot be taught or reasoned with, and you should depart in peace. (Btw, the definition of a 'fool' in Scripture is someone who cannot be reasoned with.)
Speak not in the ears of a fool: for he will despise the wisdom of thy words.
-Pro 23:9


If you stopped doing what He nowhere commanded you would have plenty of time to work a full time job.
I didn't realize God had given you a prophetic vision that told you His Word was wrong, and that we were not commanded to teach (which is what I am doing on that website), and to spread that message into all nations. But again, you're so arrogant, you think your opinion trumps the Word of God:
And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
-Mat 28:18-20

Thanks to Lord God for the internet because I've been able to reach men and women with Christ's doctrine in every continent across the world at the same time. By His blessings alone, we have hundreds of visitors every day searching out Christ's doctrine. How many have you reached?

It is hardly 'cruel and hardhearted' to expect an able bodied man to earn his own money is it?
No, it's cruel and hardhearted to expect that a man who labors in the Word should have his mouth muzzled, and for that, you should be ashamed, but I can't help a man (or woman, because you have not specified) whose conscience has been seared.
Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
-1Ti 4:2

Everything I teach and produce is free. No one is required to give anything. I started out by working a job and doing ministry, and if I have to go back to that, I will, but because of the charity of a few of my brethren (who have given only by their own conviction from the Holy Spirit of God), I am able to do many times more than I could when I was working another job. And they continue to give so I can keep working.

Here's the bottom line: If you don't like that, then leave because I'm done having you waste my time. I would rather serve those who want to hear, than those who have closed their ears. Have a great day, and I pray the Lord Jesus Christ would show you as much mercy and longsuffering as He has shown me.


"You have to realize, Paul (the author of this letter) repeatedly says that although they have the right to receive money for their work, they did not pursue this right. They did this so they would not hinder the gospel. Oh, and there is also an often ignored smoking gun in this verse. Do you see it? This verse has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with pastors or elders! This is about missionaries. Paul was not an elder or a pastor, he was a missionary. He was travelling from town to town as a missionary spreading the good news of Jesus Christ. Now, I would be the last person to argue that we should not support missionary work, but Paul here says it is ideal for a missionary to find their own work and support themselves! But we cannot deny the fact that in this context, those who proclaim the gospel get their living from the gospel is talking about people who are leaving their home town and travelling far away to share about the Christ. In other words, these are people who would, in any normal situation, have a hard time finding employment and supporting their own physical needs." Quote from one of the links in reference to 1 Corinthians 9

Had you read the links you would have seen full explanations of every verse in Scripture which touches on this matter.

Clergy is indeed a man made tradition. I used the word because I was referring to it as man made, along with the man made tradition of giving them a salary.

This (below) is copied and pasted from another man's website. These are his words not mine, but I fully agree with them.

(I would urge you to open and read the first two links I shared and respond Biblically to them. I am always willing to be corrected if it can be shown from Scripture where my position is wrong. It is a great shame you put up your hackles so quickly. We might otherwise have been able to build one another up in true faith but you seem set upon hostility.)

New Testament Pattern
Should A Christian Ask For Money?
An Open Rebuke
Posted by Rick | Sundry Thoughts


END OF EXCHANGE

I'm not going to post the teaching that this person copy/pasted into the email simply because it's full of awkward punctuation that the forum software would reject. I'm sure that's something you guys could look up online if you were curious, since it has the name and author, but again, this Lupsett person would not (and could not) use the Scripture; he (or she, but I'll just refer to him as he for now) posted links only and referred to other teachers.

If he has studied this matter to such a degree, why could he not have a discussion with me about the issue? Why could he not quote Scripture for himself? Why did he end up repeating himself almost verbatim, as if he was reading cue cards? This is because he is likely unlearned on the subject, but copy/pastes things in ignorance, while trying (and failing) to give an outward appearance of humility and knowledge to deceive others.

This guy should be ashamed, and frankly, I was angry with him when I read this. I have made a lot of effort over the years to stay as far away from the love of money as possible, to work honestly in ministry, to do what's right over what's convenient, and the day I'm posting this, some of you know that Lorraine and I and traveling out of state to go help one of the members of our church. I'll let our church judge if what I say is true. I didn't bother telling that to the person in the email because he didn't care; all he cared about was holding on to this false doctrine, and I could give my theories about why he was doing it, but that's a lot of writing, and Lorraine and I are busy today trying to prepare for our trip, so perhaps I'll save that for the church over Skype if they ask.

In addition, he back-hand slaps all of you, believing that none of you will be corrected to anything. I know for a fact that's not true, but he will condemn as many people as necessary to justify himself.

One thing you'll notice is that this person never said what it is they do in ministry. They didn't mention where they fellowship or any such thing. I tried to investigate and find some information on this person, but I was unable to confirm any of the information I found. I thought I found an account this person had on Instagram, and if I found the right person, and he/she is very worldly. But this is the reason they are not forthcoming with who they are, what they believe, and what they do; whereas all of that is open to the public on my end, and many people who write me take advantage of that fact, hiding behind their computer screens instead of coming forward to be judged openly.

If you read 1st Corinthians, the context Paul gave is clear as day, and that's why I have never argued that a pastor or elder should not earn a reward for their work, but rather, I have preached against them doing ministry for the sake of a reward, and there are many of those kind out there.

I also found it humorous that I called this guy out on his use of the word 'clergy', which he tried to recover by claiming that he was using it on purpose in a negative way. That's a lie by the way. Did any of you catch the problem with it? In the context of the letter, he was referring to what pastors and elders OUGHT to be doing, which means he used the term 'clergy' to refer to those who were to do what is right in the positive sense. To further give evidence of that deception, you'll notice in the last response he sent, he used the term "missionary," which is also a Catholic term, and thus, it appears that this guy (or gal, as I suspect this may be a female) does not understand these details.

He lied about 1Co 9 as well, saying that the context was about "missionaries," but the context was about those who "preach the gospel," as Paul said in verse 14. The muzzle with the ox reference was used in the same context in both Scriptures, but this guy refuses to acknowledge that. Then he lied by saying that he's always willing to be corrected, but when I corrected him, he just referred back to other websites. I can't help someone like that; I need to move on and get back to work, but I hope this helps others to understand the matter more clearly.

Sadly, there is a problem in our society, namely, that people think that "being a minister" means you have to go to a seminary and get a degree, and then afterwards, you have a paycheck waiting for you. They are not willing to put in the work and effort when they have nothing, just working hard and trusting in the Lord God to provide; this system of salaries for pastors has become a blight on this nation, and has forced us to sanctify ourselves from most church buildings because they follow tradition rather than truth. What's more disappointing is now seeing another side, which condemns for having food to eat if you serve the Lord Jesus Christ, and we need to sanctify ourselves from both sides.

In a nutshell, I'm trying to get this person to see the Scripture, while he's trying to get others to see what some other preachers have said. Again, I don't follow traditions and doctrines of men; I follow what God has to say on the matter.

But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
-Mat 15:9


As a final note, this person is a murmuring person, and some of the accusations were so subtle, the average person will not notice them. For example, he called my emails "hackles," which I had to go look up because I had no idea what that was. It actually refers to dogs or wolves when their hair stands up when they are alarmed, and the implication is that I am a wolf. I just wanted to make you all aware of the deception and slyness behind this guy's letter, and I'll let you comment on it as you please.

372
Wild Emails @ CLE / Ignorance About the KJB and Italicized Words
« on: October 28, 2019, 09:24:45 AM »
I know this is a very short email, but this is all he said.

JUDE FROM AMERICAN & INDIA (that's what he wrote):

The real Authorized King James Bible has italics, and should not be altered.


The real Authorized King James Bible originally had different font to indicate those added words. It was later "altered" to italics, and some today have brackets around the words (all of which are acceptable, despite your beliefs). So simply saying "the real King James Bible has italics" is just laziness or ignorance; I can't tell which. Also, I reject your accusation that I altered anything, and if others are looking up the Scriptures I teach on their own (as they should be), they can find those italicized words in their respective Bibles.
If you don't like that my articles have not included the italics, and you believe it is super important to understand the doctrine, then you start up your own ministry, teach the Word of God yourself, and make sure they are all included, so you can provide a better example for all of us to follow. Let me know when you get started on that. Have a great day.

END OF EXCHANGE

The man was so lazy, he could not even be bothered to say, "While reading your site, I noticed that you did not include the italics in Scripture" to simply give a context of what he was talking about. I had to guess based on his implication, which I should not have to do.

The fact is that, if you take a look at an original KJB, you will notice that it is in Gothic font, and the added words are in Roman font. If he believes that should not be changed, then he should go back to reading Gothic font, but he won't do that because it's inconvenient for him; therefore, he's a hypocrite.

For the sake of other Christians, I acknowledge the added words, but do not include them on the website because it would take a lot more individual coding to get that done than you might realize, and even then, to go back and fix every article and book I have online would be a nightmare that would literally force me to stop developing teachings for an extended time to implement, and would slow down the process quite a bit, all for no reason at all.
What do I mean by, "for no reason?" I'll give an example:

He that hath the Son hath life; [and] he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.
-1Jo 5:12

The word "and" was added to the Scripture, so now let's take the argument a step further and read it without that added word, and see if it changes the doctrine:
He that hath the Son hath life; he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.
Did you see a drastic change? Was the Lord Jesus Christ denied through this? Was the Bible corrupted in any way? Is the Son of God no longer the giver of life because the "and" was not there?

The core of the argument Jude was making (even though he likely didn't realize it because he's just copying what he heard some false preacher say) was that by not including italics, people would not know what specific word was added in by the translators. Well, if that is the case, why not just read it without the added words? Would it be wrong to just remove them? No, but meaning is clearer with them; that's all.

Whether or not there is an "and" in between those two sentences does not make that much difference, as I can tell that both thoughts correlate to one another, and one cannot be true without the other. Therefore, the word 'and' clarifies it for simple-minded readers, gives us the intended contextual meaning from the Greek. That's it.
Therefore, is the Scripture changed because I do not have italics on those words? That's absurd, and this man is learning some strange doctrine from someone who is very superstitious. This is why I said I do not associate with the KJB-onlyist crowd, as many of them jump overboard off a perfectly sailing ship. As I said to him in the letter, if people are looking up and reading these Scriptures for themselves, they will find the italics or brackets on their own, and will be able to discern the matter for themselves, but to be frank, most of the time, I don't hardly ever pay attention to it when I'm studying Scripture because it's unnecessary.

We had a guy on our forum a long time ago that made a huge deal out of this before he left, and it was senseless. I would say to anyone else: If you have a problem with the italics issue, then depart in peace; find someone else to go study with and leave us be.

373
Personal information below was redacted.

ISAIAH FROM WASHINGTON:

Greetings Christopher,

Yesterday, I discovered your channel on YouTube. I reviewed a number of videos and search the articles on your website.

It would seem we share the same understanding of the holy scriptures. However, we differ on the subject of the King James Version of The Protestant Bible and the subject of divorce and remarriage.

With regard to divorce and remarriage, I think you are misguided. What you're currently teaching will lead Christians to practice the grave sin of adultery. I do not judge as I once held the same viewpoint.

However, after studying the early Church (< 325 A.D), I realized the requirement for a lawful marriage is female virginity. This view is entirely consistent with all of the scriptures. Also, this requirement is supported by the sciences of biology and genetics.

Reference:
Leviticus 19:20-21 (lies); Leviticus 21:7-8 (defiled), Leviticus 21:13-15 (virginity); Deuteronomy 22:13-21 (evidence of virginity); Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (virgin) 1 Corinthians 7:38 (virgin)

The only exception to the Law of Marriage is for the widow, who may marry a kinsmen redeemer; which is a brother or cousin of the deceased husband. In other words, he must be a close genetic match.

Reference:
Jubilees 41:1-28 (brother); Genesis 38:8-10 (brother); Deuteronomy 25:5-10 (brother); Ruth 3:8-13 (cousin), Ruth 4:1-10 (cousin); 2 Samuel 2:2 (cousin); 2 Samuel 11-12 (David/Bathsheba); Matthew 22:23-33 (brother); Mark 12:18-24 (brother); Luke 20:28-34 (brother); 1 Corinthians 7:8-9 (widow) 1 Corinthians 7:39-40 (judicially) 1 Timothy 5:3-16 (one husband)

This is, what was taught by the Patriarchs, the Prophets, the Messiah, and his Disciples. It was also taught by the Orthodox churches for 700+ years and the Catholic churches for 1500+ years.

This means that if a man is married to A) a promiscuous woman, or B) a divorced woman, then the marriage is considered unlawful. To be more precise, it is an adulterous union and not a valid or legal marriage.

We also have letters from early bishops and rulings from the early church councils. One such rule determined that any priest who attended an invalid marriage ceremony was to be removed from his position in the Church.

That said, I do consider you a brother in the Lord. And I can see you have the Spirit of God leading you to the truth. And so, I will pray that you find it.

If you have questions, feel free to email (**************@gmail.com) or call me at X (XXX) XXX-XXXX.

Your brother in Christ,
Isaiah

P.S. I find your three email rules to be quite amusing. I have also instituted the first two in my communications with others. However, I leave you my phone number, should you change your mind.



Greetings Christopher, Yesterday, I discovered your channel on YouTube. I reviewed a number of videos and search the articles on your website. It would seem we share the same understanding of the holy scriptures. However, we differ on the subject of the King James Version of The Protestant Bible and the subject of divorce and remarriage.
And you have written to argue these points because... ? ? ? Was it going to make you feel better?

With regard to divorce and remarriage, I think you are misguided.
That's interesting because that's exactly what I just thinking about you.

What you're currently teaching will lead Christians to practice the grave sin of adultery. I do not judge as I once held the same viewpoint.
I'm sure you do believe that, and that's because you do not follow the epistles in the New Testament, and I already proved what is taught in the New Testament in my teaching on marriage. You haven't quoted anything that I taught and made a proper argument, so... what's the point of this email?
By the way, it's also important to note that writing out vague statements like that is not an argument.

However, after studying the early Church (< 325 A.D), I realized the requirement for a lawful marriage is female virginity. This view is entirely consistent with all of the scriptures. Also, this requirement is supported by the sciences of biology and genetics. 
And you have liberty to go teach that nonsense to anyone you want. I haven't seen anything in your letter yet to even indicate that you are of Christ, but I have not finished reading your letter yet, so we will see. However, if you thought you were just going to write me your vague opinion and draw me into your false doctrines, you were mistaken, and I apologize if anywhere on our website that I gave you the impression that I cared about your personal feelings and opinions because I don't want you to waste your time.
Oh, I guess I should mention that, just because someone wrote something before 325 AD, that does not automatically mean it's correct. I'm going to the doctrine of Scripture first and foremost in what I teach, not relying on what other men traditionally wrote to be the foundation of doctrine.
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
-Col 2:8


Leviticus 19:20-21 (lies); Leviticus 21:7-8 (defiled), Leviticus 21:13-15 (virginity); Deuteronomy 22:13-21 (evidence of virginity); Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (virgin) 1 Corinthians 7:38 (virgin)
Congratulations. You have demonstrated your keen ability to do keyword searches. However, to have understanding of Scripture requires the Holy Spirit of God:
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
-1Co 2:14

There are many people who have spent their entire lives studying Scripture, and end up in hell because they don't understand it.
Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
-2Ti 3:7

After looking up these verses to double check, it is clear that you do not understand the context of what's being said (and that might be partially due to the fact that you use corrupt new-age bible versions), and though I would normally sit down and try to reason these things out with a born again Christian, you have not given me any indication in your letter that you wanted a discussion about these things the first place. (i.e. You're talking AT me, not with me.)

The only exception to the Law of Marriage is for the widow, who may marry a kinsmen redeemer; which is a brother or cousin of the deceased husband. In other words, he must be a close genetic match.
If you want to go follow the Old Testament laws and rituals, then do so; that's your business. If you follow them, you will be judged by them. However, we Christians follow the Lord Jesus Christ who fulfilled the law. I tell you this to make it clear that you and I don't serve the same master, so you are not confused by carrying around a false belief that you and I are yoked together somehow.

Jubilees 41:1-28 (brother); Genesis 38:8-10 (brother); Deuteronomy 25:5-10 (brother); Ruth 3:8-13 (cousin), Ruth 4:1-10 (cousin); 2 Samuel 2:2 (cousin); 2 Samuel 11-12 (David/Bathsheba); Matthew 22:23-33 (brother); Mark 12:18-24 (brother); Luke 20:28-34 (brother); 1 Corinthians 7:8-9 (widow) 1 Corinthians 7:39-40 (judicially) 1 Timothy 5:3-16 (one husband)
Nice job on those keyword searches. Oh, and by the way, one word does not explain context and doctrine; I'm not sure how familiar you are with the English language, so I thought I should mention that. Going through and explaining the doctrine and context would take me a lot of time, and since I don't yet have any evidence that you are of Christ, I don't want to risk wasting my time doing that because I have a lot of other projects I'm working on right now.

This is, what was taught by the Patriarchs, the Prophets, the Messiah, and his Disciples. It was also taught by the Orthodox churches for 700+ years and the Catholic churches for 1500+ years.
All I can say is that it is a good thing that, at sermon on the mount (Mat 5-7), Jesus did not just give a verse reference to the Old Testament, say "salvation," and then walk away as if all was now understood by everyone. On top of that, you make vague statements and then claim all of church history backs you up, which is hilarious to say the least. That's like someone announcing, "The moon is made of blue cheese. That is what was taught by all astronomers for thousands of years." That's not how you make an argument. I'm not sure what you were expecting to accomplish with these vague statements; did you want me to delete all the Scripture, interpretations, quotes, and references on my website and just write in "Isaiah from Washington said so"?

Look, here is the Gospel of Christ:
Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell
If you cannot read and understand that, then nothing else matters.
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
-Mat 7:21-23


This means that if a man is married to A) a promiscuous woman, or B) a divorced woman, then the marriage is considered unlawful. To be more precise, it is an adulterous union and not a valid or legal marriage.
Unless that person has been born again in Christ and made anew. That's what you don't understand because the Holy Spirit of God is not with you, and you will not be able to understand it because you have not come to repentance (i.e. grief and godly sorrow of wrongdoing) and believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. (i.e. not the fake "jesus" of the Hebrew-roots cultists)

We also have letters from early bishops and rulings from the early church councils. One such rule determined that any priest who attended an invalid marriage ceremony was to be removed from his position in the Church.
The Bible is my authority, not the tradition of men.
These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you. But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
-1Jo 2:27


That said, I do consider you a brother in the Lord. And I can see you have the Spirit of God leading you to the truth. And so, I will pray that you find it.
You are welcome to consider me a brother if you want, but I do not consider you one because you have (so far) not given me a reason to do so.

If you have questions, feel free to email (************@gmail.com) or call me at X (XXX) XXX-XXXX.
Why would I ask questions and seek answers about spiritual matters from a man void of the Holy Spirit of God and lacks understanding? So far, you have only demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about, but hold a prideful attitude as if you could not be deceived.
Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.
-1Co 10:12
Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
-Pro 16:18

As for phone calls, I state on our FAQ that do not make phone calls, and you can see that here:
http://creationliberty.com/faq.php#phonecall
But nonetheless, my suspicions were correct: You did not write me to have a discussion, but rather, you wrote me to talk AT me about your personal feelings and opinions. Again, I have no interest in your feelings and opinions; I trust in the Lord Jesus Christ, and it sounds like you do not, but rather, it sounds like you are a part of the Hebrew-roots cult, and those people have no part with Christ's church.

I find your three email rules to be quite amusing. I have also instituted the first two in my communications with others. However, I leave you my phone number, should you change your mind.
I don't know what you mean when you say my "three email rules" are "amusing." That's what I mean about context; namely, you don't provide any. This shows that you have a habit of not looking for or providing context in your daily speech, and so it makes sense why you don't do that with Scripture either. Claiming it is "amusing," without explaining why, shows a scoffing and scorning arrogance about you, in which you look down your nose at others with a "holier-than-thou" attitude (Isa 65:5), which leads me to be very cautious of you.
Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.
-Pro 22:10


P.S. - I did a bit of research on what little information I could find about you online, and I can see that you added in a bunch of your own rules about salvation. That's interesting; you didn't bother to mention that part in your email. Also, my suspicions about you being a part of the Hebrew-roots cult were confirmed when I found your empty Youtube channel; your "About" page made that very clear. Perhaps the next time you write someone, you should be more upfront about your true beliefs, instead of skulking in the darkness like a coward.
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
-John 3:19-20

You're also a railer, and that is based on the comments you have made on various videos and websites in which you seem to be attracted to the conspiracy so-called "ministries." Going around calling people stupid, lemmings, brain dead, scumbags, weed-smoking zombies, mindless morons, and much more, even from people I saw who were trying to reason with you, or showed you no hostility. The Bible says we are supposed to sanctify ourselves away from anyone who calls himself a Christian and is a railer, and that such men are wicked in their hearts:
But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat... Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.
-1Co 5:11-13

You also didn't mention that you believe in works doctrine, because, as you wrote on another website, you believe that "to be a Christian, you must stop committing all sins." (https://kopulse.info/video/zZ6eeqiLoWKV2NY.html)
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.
-Eph 2:8-9

You have not confessed the truth, and you are a liar.
If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
-1Jo 1:8-10

Take your works-based doctrine, and be on your way; we who are of Christ will not follow the false god you hypocritically called "jesus." Again, if you want to know what the Gospel of Jesus Christ is, it's here:
Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell
If you do not believe that, but still call yourself a "Christian," then you need to depart because you and I have no business together. To say that we "share the same understanding of the holy scriptures" is no better than a joke, and shows your ignorance of what I teach. I can only pray the Lord Jesus Christ would show you the same mercy and longsuffering he has shown to me. I hope you have a great day.

END OF EXCHANGE

I'm beginning to see a common pattern that I was not able to see in years past because now I have found ways to (sometimes) find out more detailed information about the people who write me on the internet through their email address information. It's amazing how often someone writes me vain words that start out saying something like, "We are in agreement on many things," but in reality, we are in disagreement on many foundational doctrines. They try to create a false sense of unity at the beginning, as if they believe it creates some obligation to accept them as Christians, or to take their words more seriously, but it's all a lie in order to deceive people into their way of thinking. This is not to say that every person who comes to you and speaks about agreement in Scripture is lying, but we ought not to simply accept it at face value, and listen carefully to discern the truth.

374
General Discussion / Mark Taylor, False Prophet?
« on: October 24, 2019, 11:59:03 AM »
So I have never really address this guy before, and I might have to do a teaching on it to help those who follow the conspiracy so-called "ministries" to either depart from them, or depart from us because we are not on the same side. Mark Taylor is a false prophet, and the problem is that Mark Taylor will tell people that anyone who calls him a false prophet are in danger of God's wrath, but that is only if it is a true prophet, which Taylor is not.

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
-Mat 7:15


Taylor claims to have predicted Trump's election to presidency back in 2011.

While I was researching this a bit, I found an article by a place called Right Wing Watch, and here's what they said:
"When radical right-wing conspiracy theorist and so-called 'firefighter prophet' Mark Taylor appeared on the 'Daily Renegade' program last weekend, he warned that anyone who called him a false prophet was literally risking their lives because God does not take kindly to those who attack his prophets. During that same program, Taylor struggled mightily to explain away the false prophecies he delivered prior to the 2018 midterm elections, when he repeatedly guaranteed that America would see 'a red tsunami' sweep across the nation as Republicans won at every level.
That is not what happened, and in the wake of the election, Taylor initially tried to defend his false prophecy by predicting that hundreds of Democratic politicians would be rounded up in mass arrests and replaced by Republicans, thereby proving his 'red tsunami' prophecy was accurate."

[https://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/mark-taylor-is-still-standing-by-his-failed-red-tsunami-prophecy]

Though I don't know all the details, Mark Taylor has made a number of ridiculous prophecies like this in the past, and they have not come true. As I listened to Taylor in some of his interviews, he's the type of man who does not quote the Bible, but rather, he paraphrases it, and by doing so, he actually gets some things wrong. I'm not going to go into all the details here because if I end up doing a full teaching on it later, I'll just save the work for that. However, just upon listening to the guy for a few minutes, I did not trust him.

I listened to Taylor try to say that we shouldn't analyze a prophet for every single tiny detail, which was ridiculous because that's basically like saying that the Word of God is not that important, or we should not take His Word with the utmost reverence. Again, these are some of the things I heard from Taylor which leads me to not trust anything he says.

Of course, now Taylor has a book published on his Trump prophecy to turn a profit from it, because, you know... there is a long-running tradition of the prophets of God making a lot of money from their prophecies, right? Uh... wrong. But hey, why not make a movie about himself that played in theaters in 2018, which brought in over $600,000 in ticket sales?

I could have this wrong, but I found this online; it seems to be the prophecy Taylor made in 2011:
1 The Spirit of God says,
I have chosen this man Donald Trump
for such a time as this.
For as Benjamin Netanyahu is to Israel
so shall this man be to the United States of America.
For I will use this man to bring honor, respect, and restoration to America.
America will be respected once again
as the most powerful and prosperous nation on earth (other than Israel).
The dollar will be the strongest it has ever been
in the history of the United States
and will once again be the currency
by which all others are judged.

2 The Spirit of God says,
The enemy will quake and shake
and fear this man I have anointed.
They will even quake and shake
when he announces he is running for President.
It will be like the shot heard across the world.
The enemy will say, What shall we do now?
This man knows all our tricks and schemes.
We have been robbing America for decades.
What shall we do to stop this?

3 The Spirit says,
Ha! No one shall stop this that l have started.
For the enemy has stolen from America for decades,
and it stops now.
For I will use this man to reap the harvest
that the United States has sown for
and plunder from the enemy what he has stolen,
and return it seven-fold back to the United States.

4 The enemy will say, Israel, Israel, what about Israel?
For Israel will be protected by America once again.
The Spirit says, Yes!
America will once again stand hand and hand with Israel,
and the two shall be as one.
For the ties between Israel and America will be stronger than ever,
and lsrael will flourish like never before.

5 The Spirit of God says,
I will protect America and Israel,
for this next president will be a man of his word.
When he speaks, the world will listen
and know that there is something greater in him
than all the others before him.
This man's word is his bond,
and the world and America will know this,
and the enemy will fear this,
for this man will be fearless.

6 The Spirit says,
When the financial harvest begins,
so shall it parallel in the spiritual for America.

7 The Spirit of God says,
in this next election they will spend billions to keep this President in.
It will be like flushing their money down the toilet.
Let them waist their money.
For it comes from and it is being used by evil forces at work.
But they will not succeed.
For this next election will be a clean sweep
for the man I have chosen.

8 They (the enemy) will say things about this man,
but it will not affect him,
and they shall say, It rolls off of him like the duck.
For as the feathers of a duck protect it,
so shall My feathers protect this next President.

9 Even mainstream news media will be captivated by this man
and the abilities that I have gifted him with,
and they will even begin to agree with him,
says the Spirit of God.


Frankly, I don't see how any of this edifying to the church, nor the point of it at all. It does not seem to match up with the patterns God has shown in His Word. Granted, in Hebrews 1, it does say that God has spoken in diverse manners at sundry (i.e. various) times, but when you look at the details on this prophecy, it says that "this next election will be a clean sweep for the man I have chosen," and that's key because the man who was chosen in 2012 was Obama, even though this prophecy was supposed to be about Trump, who was defined at the beginning as "this man."

Therefore, his prophecy did NOT come true. Part of the reason I believe he "prophesied" this was because Trump had publically announced his plans to run back in 2012, but he dropped out and endorsed Mitt Romney instead, but as you can see, none of that was mentioned in Taylor's so-called "prophecy" because it did not come from God.

I do not, nor ever have, supported Mark Taylor, but sadly, there are some people who think that I did because Taylor wrote me and asked if he could share my material about 501c3. I presume that he has referenced to my materials in the past, and sadly, because of the internet, people get the impression that he and I believe the same things are we are yoked together, but that is far from the truth.

Here is the exchange I had with Taylor back in 2016 (I censored the phone number for privacy). I had never heard of this guy before, and he wrote me to ask if he could use my materials:


Hello my name is Mark Taylor and i would like to talk to someone on a phone about some questions I have on the 501c3 classes. I would be happy to call you I don't pay long distance or my contact cell- XXX-XXX-XXXX Blessings mark


http://creationliberty.com/faq.php#phonecall


Hey Christopher, I am called to be a seer prophet and the Lord has been showing me that the 501c3 is a demonic document. I have not been able to get any info on it until I found your website. God has given me a message on this among other things. 501c3 is part of that message. I wrote a prophecy back in 2011 about trump being the next president, I was interviewed by trunews.com on Friday and it should be out by the end of the week. They have asked me to come back the first week of may and this is part of the message that I was going to touch on. I wanting to ask some questions about this, so I would have more understanding about it. Can I get your permission to send people to your website? And stand strong my friend, thank you for what you do for the kingdom of God! The truth will not be silenced in these end times, God is exposing everything write now. Blessings mark


Anything we've got on our website is free for anyone to use or reference to. That's the way our Lord Jesus Christ did things, and I believe we (the sanctified church) should do likewise.
Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give.
-Mat 10:8



Thank you brother!

END OF EXCHANGE

That's it. I did not believe Taylor in his letter because he was trying to name-drop to puff himself up. That's the impression I got from his letter, and I was extremely cautious of him from that alone.

Anyway, you guys are free to make your comments about Mark Taylor if you want. No rumors please because, as you know, there are hundreds (if not thousands) of other people online who read stuff on this forum. Make sure you have your information correct before your just start saying the first thing that comes to your mind; after all, we do not want to act like the cultists who follow after Taylor, but rather, we need to set a better example of how the church should act.

375
Wild Emails @ CLE / Spreading Superstitions About 501c3
« on: October 24, 2019, 10:14:50 AM »

DAVE FROM UTAH:

Mark Taylor's 501C3 Decoded Number of the Beast (Government Ruled =501C3 = (5+1 = 6 C+3 = 6) = 66 The mark of the Beast in 501C3 Churches... Rev. 13:18: Here is a call for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and that number is 666. (Probably, Nero, Roman Government ruling the Church and mark of the Beast).


First of all, you need to get a real Bible. Those new-age versions are not going to help you very much because they are watered down versions that come from corrupt manuscripts.
Why I Use The King James Bible

Secondly, our church does not follow your superstitious numbers games. I just want to be straight-forward with you so you understand that we are sanctified from your conspiracy so-called "ministries" out there, and we are not yoked together with you; that way, we don't waste each others' time. The Bible has 66 books, so are you going to call the Word of God the mark of the Beast too? That's superstitious nonsense from those who live in fear instead of faith.
Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars' hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious.
-Acts 17:22


And finally, I don't support Mark Taylor. He wrote me a few years ago and asked if he could use the information in my 501c3 teaching (which I said anyone was welcome to do), so where do you think Mark Taylor learned about this subject?

Here's a far more important issue you need to understand:
Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell

END OF EXCHANGE

I have received a number of letters that have similar such nonsense in them, and a number of them keep bringing up Mark Taylor. This might be a subject I'll have to cover in a different thread, but to the point of this email, Mark Taylor is a guy that has picked up some popularity over the past few years with his so-called "Trump Prophecies," and he did email me in Apr 2016, requesting to use the information in the book I wrote on 501c3. I don't know if he referenced my materials in his book or not, but he might have, which explains why I'm getting lunatic letters like this, and I'm wondering if I am going to have to do a short teaching on Mark Taylor; I don't know yet, but I do know that I want to send a clear message to people like this that they speak in ignorance and we are not on the same side, in hopes that they might one day see the truth of the Word of God. Please do not post extended information on Mark Taylor in this thread; I'll make another post later on that topic if you want to talk about it (and I'll post the letter he sent me in that other thread too if you want to see it).

377
I confess; I had way too much fun responding to this email. I will warn everyone, I got sarcastic in the letter, and if anyone wants to burn me at the stake for doing so, you're welcome to accuse me of whatever you want. I don't care. Read his letter, and then you decide how you would have responded to him.

TERRY FROM ILLINOIS:

Actually, it was LBJ that caused the problem. What he did was maybe amend the tax code, but he hid its true purpose and forced pastors to look into it for free bucks. Granted, pastors maybe should have known better, but it was so sugar coated that they couldn't tell the difference. This is what the Jews do. The question that I have is, can a 501c3 deny you access to their facility. I went to a church just recently and i actually couldn't stay in the church because there was race mixing going on, and I oppose race mixing and God Yahweh does to. I got into a bit of an argument because of my stand. Actually, they were arguing with me as I was trying to leave. As it turned out they called the police and the police came to my house. It was so quick that i wonder if the police might have put a tracking device on my vehicle. i was told by the police that if i go back to that church I would be arrested, not that i wanted to go back to that church any way. They accused me of disturbing
 the peace, and I told the disturbing the peace is not a crime. The only time it could be a crime is if there is a victim, an injured party. The female cop then said, 'so you know the law,' and I said, no the Constitution something you know nothing about. Then I told the cops to get out and off of my property. In other words they were called on stupidity. Now they think that I am mentally ill. Of course in our country, If you are a Christian you are automatically considered mentally ill. When I was in the National Guard I would get yelled at just because i opened up the bible in the barracks. The other soldiers would complain to the commanding officer. I am retired military after 23 years and I retired a few months early because I was told to talk to an army Psychologist. He told me that i was mentally ill. I asked him, "Are you saying that I'm mentally ill because I'm a Christian?" he said yes. That just says it all. however, since a 501c3 church is not actually a private church, can they actually deny you access to their facility. I don't intend to go there, but it seems strange that they would so quickly call the police that seem to more likely shoot first and ask questions later. The police now wrote me up because i dare to speak out against race mixing, and i know that God Yahweh condemns race mixing.



Actually, it was LBJ that caused the problem.
It's like I was just thrust into the middle of a conversation I was not having. I'm presuming you're referring to Lyndon Johnson? Typically, people start out a letter with a subject of context at the very least because you could be blaming "LBJ" for your irritable bowel syndrome for all I know.

What he did was maybe amend the tax code, but he hid its true purpose and forced pastors to look into it for free bucks.
Oh! Well, it's a good thing you wrote me your opinion about the matter because now I can take down all the references and information I have up on the website and replace them with, "Terry from Illinois said so." I mean, who needs hard evidence, right?

Granted, pastors maybe should have known better, but it was so sugar coated that they couldn't tell the difference.
By sugar, you mean money? You really need to define your terms.

This is what the Jews do.
The Jews also have irritable bowel syndrome? I'm missing context so I can only speculate, based on your letter, that the entire nation of Israel is suffering from bloating and diarrhea.

The question that I have is, can a 501c3 deny you access to their facility.
It depends. Any government institution can deny you access to their facility if you starting acting like a clown, but I don't have enough details to give you an answer yet.

I went to a church just recently and i actually couldn't stay in the church because there was race mixing going on, and I oppose race mixing and God Yahweh does to.
I'm glad you departed. There's no need for you to bring your false god and your leaven to anyone else, burdening them with your false doctrine, racism, and Hebrew-roots, works-based, superstitious nonsense.
And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
-Acts 17:26

The question that I have is: What made you think that I would be in agreement with you in any sense? What led you to believe that I would yoke up with you and your false doctrines? You obviously don't listen to hardly anything I teach, or you would have known better.

I got into a bit of an argument because of my stand.
*gasp* Shocking.

Actually, they were arguing with me as I was trying to leave.
I mean, God forbid they would have cared about your soul and tried to persuade you of the truth of Christ, right?
Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men; but we are made manifest unto God; and I trust also are made manifest in your consciences.
-2Co 5:11


As it turned out they called the police and the police came to my house.
Based on the fact that you don't define what you're talking about or give any details; I'm going to presume there is a lot of information about what you said and did that you left out.

It was so quick that i wonder if the police might have put a tracking device on my vehicle.
Detective Terry is on the case. I am fully aware I'm being quite sarcastic, and I'm not going to beat around the bush: I'm having a great time responding to this letter. I mean, it's still wasting my time, but I'm having fun.

i was told by the police that if i go back to that church I would be arrested, not that i wanted to go back to that church any way. They accused me of disturbing the peace, and I told the disturbing the peace is not a crime.
Okay. You keep on believing that.
breach of the peace: the crime of disorderly conduct or creating a public disturbance, usually involving unnecessary or distracting noise
(See "Terry from Illinois did not say so'; see also Cornell Law School, "Breach of the Peace," Legal Information Institute, retrieved Oct 18, 2019, [law.cornell.edu/wex/breach_of_the_peace])
Ignoring the fact that you went to a 501c3 leavened church building in the first place (almost like you were looking for trouble), you don't understand the doctrine of Christ because even if your ludicrous beliefs were true, Christ didn't tell us Christians to do what you did:
But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up. Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
-Mat 15:13-14

And it should be noted that it's pretty easy to see that you are among those who will be rooted up. If you want to be saved from hell and the lake of fire, you should read and study this immediately:
Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
-Mat 7:21-23


The only time it could be a crime is if there is a victim, an injured party.
It's clear that you don't understand the laws of land, nor do you understand Scripture, but you want me to rely on "Terry said so?"

The female cop then said, 'so you know the law,' and I said, no the Constitution something you know nothing about.
My compliments to the officer, she sounds like a kind and patience lady. At least she tried to tell you the truth and educate you so you would not be arrested in the future. I hope you would listen to the police since you won't listen to Christ:
Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison. Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.
-Matthew 5:25-26


Then I told the cops to get out and off of my property.
Good call. Cops and property are like two races that don't mix.

In other words they were called on stupidity.
Well, maybe that's how they found your property. Birds of a feather do tend to flock together.

Now they think that I am mentally ill.
Whaaaaaaaat?!

Of course in our country, If you are a Christian you are automatically considered mentally ill.
At least you won't have to worry about that.

When I was in the National Guard I would get yelled at just because i opened up the bible in the barracks.
So, because the National Guard wouldn't let you read the Bible, is that the reason you don't understand Scripture?

The other soldiers would complain to the commanding officer.
That's because they said "lights out" and the others were trying to sleep because they had an early start. Were you sleeping under your bunk during morning drills?

I am retired military after 23 years and I retired a few months early because I was told to talk to an army Psychologist. He told me that i was mentally ill.
No, you're just prideful, a scorner, and you do not love your neighbor as yourself. You have not been humbled to repentance (i.e. grief and godly sorrow) of your sin. That's the problem. God will NOT give His grace to the proud of heart:
But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.
-Jms 4:6
Surely he scorneth the scorners: but he giveth grace unto the lowly.
-Pro 3:34


I asked him, "Are you saying that I'm mentally ill because I'm a Christian?" he said yes.
He probably just said "Yes" to get you out of his office. I mean, just based on your letter alone I can tell that you worship yourself first and foremost, and I applaud anyone who had the patience to deal with you.
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
-2Ti 3:1-2

Your pride will be your downfall in the end, and you'll hate me for saying it, but at least I care enough about you to tell you the truth.
Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
-Pro 16:18
And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.
-Mat 7:26-27


That just says it all. however, since a 501c3 church is not actually a private church, can they actually deny you access to their facility.
Our church is not 501c3, but we would deny you access as well. Here's why:
Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
-Rom 16:17-18


I don't intend to go there,
I don't think they intend to allow you, so I don't think you have a decision to make in the first place.

but it seems strange that they would so quickly call the police that seem to more likely shoot first and ask questions later.
So, did you get shot, or did they ask questions first?

The police now wrote me up because i dare to speak out against race mixing, and i know that God Yahweh condemns race mixing.
They "wrote you up?" You talk about this like you got written up for being tardy to class.

Look, it's easy to discern that you are either lying or withholding key information (i.e. deceiving). Personally, I think you're both a liar and deceiver, so I'm not going to come to your defense, and why you would assume that I would come to your defense is beyond my understanding. I just checked my archives, and I don't see that you have ever written me before, so THIS is your first letter to me? Wow. I'm at a loss for words.

All I can say is that you and I are not brethren because you are not of Christ, and if you are unwilling to read and understanding this...
Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell
... then you should depart in peace from our ministry and go your own way because there is nothing more I can do to help you since you refuse to hear.
For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
-Acts 28:27

Have a great day, and I hope the Lord Jesus Christ will grant you as much longsuffering and mercy as He has given me.

END OF EXCHANGE


378
I forgot to post this letter, which I received back in September, and I want to preface that I am very sharp with this man, as you will see. What he initially sent me was a neutral and vague letter, of which I have received many over the years from people who try to advertise themselves to me. It's basically an advertisement letter that they copy and paste to send to as many Christian (or seemingly Christian) websites so he can get more viewers. I never did that because I trusted the Holy Spirit to bring readers and listeners over time if I simply did the work; no special advertising necessary. I've never sent out letters begging for it, I've never paid for any advertising; I just ask that people share the materials if they find them helpful, and that's it. When someone writes me a personal letter, that is obviously directed towards me with personal conversation, I don't mind them sharing what they do in ministry, but the types of letters this Joshua guy sent me are only self-serving, and that's why I don't put up with him for very long.
I should also preface that he listed his name as "Joshua Blessed," and assuming his first name is Joshua (which I am now starting to question), I highly doubt his last name is "blessed." I believe Joshua Blessed is completely (or in part) a fake name he gave himself to hide his identity. To get an idea of who this guy is before you read these letters, on his website, he has a section for "Testimonies," but the authors are all listed as "Testimony," not revealing who these people are, and as you read them, you can clearly discern that it is the same person writing all these so-called "testimonies" because the writing style and errors are the same, so they're all coming from him, but he's not telling anyone that. Here's the first one I found at the top, which can be seen at the following link if you want to check it out:

https://prophecyofyahweh.com/my-encounter-with-mermaid-siren
"I have a dreadful encounter with > Mermaid/Siren which rose up from the toilet at night, as I urinated at toilet... and she would choke me by my throat to kill me. .. So, I learn from youtube, that the same encounter with Sirens / Demons has many godly men and you and yours may encounter also, be ready to resist and not be killed by Siren and dragged by her captive to Marine kingdom..... We have only one weapon to resist and defeat our enemy, that is > We must live a holy life by the power of the holy spirit, to become Yahweh's overcomers as in the book of Revelation, which will empower us to resist and overcoming Demons. The righteousness of the saints is: ' love righteousness and hate iniquity...'"

And for those of you who have the Holy Spirit and study the Word of God, that should tell you everything you need to know.
Here's the email exchange I had with him, and as you will read his letters, notice that you will see periods that look like this, with a space inbetween: ". .." -- what that indicates is that he is copying/pasting a portion of something else he has written, and then, after the period, he is putting two more dots to continue a thought, which is a pattern you will see in his letters. That's some of the evidence that points to a copy/paste email for advertising, especially since you will also notice that he does not respond to my initial letter at all; that is, he ignores what I write to him.


JOSHUA FROM VIRGINIA

Shalom my brother My brother, you have an eternal soul that shall never die in heaven or in hell. Wise know this and therefore seek the face of our heavenly father Yahweh before they die, but fools live like a dog and then dies like a dog. .. You must be born from above by Him, to be His !
HERE IS WHAT ALL FLESH NEED ! http://prophecyofyahweh.com/?p=1624
 


If you want to know why you cannot see clearly (and how I know that you cannot see clearly), the answers are here:
Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell
You have been deceived by the Hebrews roots cultists. Those who are a part of the Hebrew roots cult are not of Christ, and they are not my brethren because they believe in a different "christ" than we Christians believe in. I highly doubt your last name is "Blessed" which means that not only did you LIE in your letter to me when you gave your name, but also it makes what you say on your website a bunch of vain, hypocritical words when the very first thing you've said to me was deception.
These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
-Pro 6:16-19

In addition, it's shameful that you had NO intention of communication of fellowship with your letter, because the fact is that you were just writing to advertise yourself. You should be embarrassed and ashamed, but I have encountered many people like this before, and all of them have lifted themselves up in their pride, none of them have accepted rebuke in humility and come to the grief and godly sorrow (i.e. repentance) of their wrongdoing.
But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.
-James 4:6
The LORD is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart; and saveth such as be of a contrite spirit.
-Psalm 34:18

There are other problems with your letter and contradictions I could have pointed out, but I don't think you'll listen anyway. Nonetheless, despite your deceptions, I hope you and your family have a great day and that you depart in peace.


Shalom Christopher.
# 1 Are you a born from above by Jeus ? if yes, please share your heavenly testimony..
#2 Do you live by the Bible ( the books) or by His holy spirit ? Answer honestly ..



Shalom Christopher.
This is what we call "flattering lips," that is, you repeat it over and over in vanity. You learned that from the Hebrew roots cultists.
They speak vanity every one with his neighbour: with flattering lips and with a double heart do they speak.
-Psa 12:2

You also just provided me evidence to see that this is an email that you copy/paste to a bunch of websites. If you want to know how I figured that out, ask me, but again, you should be ashamed of yourself.

# 1 Are you a born from above by Jeus ? if yes, please share your heavenly testimony..
Yes. Is this "stage #2" of your misspelled, poorly contrived copy/paste quest? If you want the information, it's on the website. Why did you go to the website to contact me if you had concerns about that? Why did not you just go read? This is a link to the About page, which can also be found by going to our website and clicking "ABOUT" http://creationliberty.com/about.php

#2 Do you live by the Bible ( the books) or by His holy spirit ? Answer honestly ..
That's a deceptive question. The Bible IS the Word of God sent by the Holy Spirit, and thus I live by both. What I don't appreciate is your "answer honestly" comment which presumes that I would lie. Again, you should be ashamed of yourself, but glory (i.e. boast) in your shame. (Phil 3:18-19)

Now, let's address the #3 you did not mention: Where is repentance (i.e. grief and godly sorrow) of sin? You won't read the teaching (that's obvious based on your vague response), but I'll give the link one more time just in case there is some hope:
Why Millions of Believers on Jesus Are Going to Hell
JESUS WARNED:
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
-Mat 7:21-23

Why did Jesus say that? Click the link and learn because you are not in a position to be teaching yet until you learn what the Gospel of Jesus Christ is.

Now, that's how you respond to a letter. You didn't respond to my letter, which means this is not a conversation; this you talking AT me (through copy/pasted notes) in your pride, not having a conversation WITH me. Again, this is exactly how almost every Hebrew roots cultist I've ever met has acted towards me (i.e. with a "holier than thou" attitude - Isa 65:5), and if you are brainwashed so heavily into the Hebrew roots cult that you cannot stop doing it, then I don't have any interest in continuing to write you back because it's wasting my time. (i.e. I spend a substantial amount of time on my letters to people, and you don't.) Depart in peace, and have a great day.


Shalom Chris.
Thanks for your honest replyed.
#1  Now I  read your testimony " about", and I praise God for His mercy on you that finally you Repenteted...
Yet , I saw nothing of being baptized with the holy spirit  as > Act 2:4  And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
Did you receive the baptism of the holy spirit since you Repent?  Yes or No ? ( Do not lie..OK?)
#2 At your website I read your carnal doctrine of Inspire only KJV Bible,  God word.... But, I understand you as a babe in Christ you speak as a foolish child. .., for I was a Bible worshiper as you in 1994.
#3 Hear me, I am not here to fight with you but to help you grow spiritually, that you may be a man of God and not a foolish babe .. Ok?
Therefore, put aside your fleshly babe pride and be humble and hear what I have to say to you > Go to my website and eat the spiritual food that you may grow and became the real man of God. 
www.prophecyofyahweh.com



Yeah, you're part of the Hebrew roots cult. We are not brethren. Go back to them if that is your choice. You have not understood the doctrine of repentance and remission of sins, nor will you hear. There's nothing more I can do; have a great day.


Shalom Chris.
#1 Why you did not answer #1 Q . ?
 I know why, for you have not received the baptism of the holy spirit as in > Act 2:4.
If you will humbly acknowledge it and then seek it by fasting and prayers, maybe you will get it .. OK?
#2 Shame on you idol worshiper of UK , KJV Bile.  Is your Jesus a Hebrew Messiah and he spoke a Hebrew or he is UK Messiah and spoke English?
 Does he has a Hebrew name >  Yahshua or  Greek > Iasus, or UK > Jesus?
#3 Today I visited your Facebook page and I saw your abominable worship of the gods of LGBTQ > pets; Dog, cat, pig, mice, rat,..
Can your idol KJV  deliver you or make you free from your Pagan idol > dog. ?
Repent means > Stop !  No more ! Quit !
Will you repent/stop worship the god of this world Devil ? No?
Do not die in your sins, but seek Repentance.   
Learn from my Facebook page > https://www.facebook.com/joshua.blessed.9



You teach false doctrine; you are not of Christ. You cannot control yourself either, so since you will not depart on your own in peace, I will have to block your email address. Have a great day.

END OF EXCHANGE (because I blocked his email address)

In order to understand the last letter he sent me, you need to know that he sent me a list of images. He went onto my Facebook profile and saw that I had a picture of me and my wife with our dog when he was a puppy. He then concluded by saying, "I saw your abominable worship of the gods of LGBTQ" He took the picture of Lorraine and I with the puppy, and he put it next to an sodomite parade where they were walking around with dog collars on in sexual leather outfits. I'm not kidding; that's what he sent me. Now do you understand why I blocked him?
Though I pointed him to my "About" page, if you go look at his website, you cannot find hardly any information on him at all. It's also very difficult to figure out what he teaches because there is little-to-no organization on his site, but the one key thing I noticed about his site is that he almost never defines the terms he uses, and as I've said many times before, beware any so-called "ministry" in which a man does not define the words he uses. (Oh, and by the way, my position on baptism is on the About page, and I have been baptized, but he's so obsessed with works-doctrine, that was his first objection.)
Again, this guy is a part of the works-based Hebrew-roots cult. He teaches the same things they do, like if you do not keep the Sabbath, you go to hell. I just checked his Facebook account, and he has an image on it that reads:
"The real 'Repentance' or BORN-AGAIN experience is when all your heavy burdens (transgressions/sins) have fall off your back at the cross of the Messiah YAHWEH/YASHua."
However, in his letter, he says it means to "turn from sin." Not only does he not understand repentance, but then he contradicts himself by claiming it is multiple things that it is not.
Of course, we understand the Word of God and know that is not what repentance is. Repentance is grief and godly sorrow of wrongdoing (CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE), but he is describing it on his Facebook profile as forgiveness, and I have heard that said before by other people who did not understand the doctrine of Christ. The reason he does not understand is because he has only changed the outward man, but not the inward man (as can only be done by Christ), and I wanted to post this as an example, to show Christians how dangerous the Hebrew-roots cult is, and why you should stay away from them; if you fellowship with them, you will soon find yourself leavened and repeating the same nonsense.

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 32