"The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming."
Psalm 37:12-13
Abortion: Paganism, Satanism,
Sacrifices, and Witchcraft
Christopher J. E. Johnson
Published: Aug 15, 2017
Updated: Aug 22, 2017

Although I've been involved in ministry for many years, some Christians have wondered why I have yet to do a teaching on abortion until now. The reason is because abortion is what I consider to be a "no-brainer" subject, or in other words, it doesn't take a theology degree to figure out that abortion is of the Devil. It's the sin of murder. Even a brand new Christian that's never read the Bible in his/her life can figure out that abortion is murder; it's really not that difficult, so I did not think taking the time to point out the Bible's commandments against murder was necessary, and it would have made for an extremely short article.

Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder,
-Matthew 19:18

Thou shalt not kill.
-Exodus 20:13

When the references to the Scripture being quoted are almost as long as the words of the verses themselves, we know it's a simple matter. However, I'm going to go into a few more details than you'll see on the average mainstream "pro-life" website, which you could probably figure out just from the title.

A Quick Warning

Some of this information will be graphic and disturbing, and I'm not talking about traditional photos of aborted babies or anything like that. You can find those everywhere on the internet, so I have no need to republish them. The truth gets much darker than those photos, and it is not my intention to sicken anyone, but rather, my intention is to get Christians to understand the whole truth about the battle we fight, and not get caught up in political movements that only see what's on the surface.

People know abortion's wrong, even if they claim to believe it's not. This is why so many abortion clinics offer privacy protection and do everything behind closed doors; most people don't want others to know they've had an abortion, because they're ashamed of it and embarrassed by it, and that's because the law of God is written in their hearts:

Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;
-Romans 2:15

Don't be fooled by the femi-nazi types either; the ones who have had an abortion and yell loudly with their cardboard signs in protest for a "woman's right to choose" because they too know the wrong they've done. The Bible explains to us that His law is written in their hearts as well, which is why they press so hard to make excuses when they're addressed on the subject. If there was truly nothing wrong with having an abortion, why do they need to make excuses to justify themselves? The reason someone makes an excuse for their actions is when their conscience convicts them what they do is wrong, and they desperately try to convince themselves and others that have a legitimate excuse.

And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God.
-Luke 16:15

The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
-Jeremiah 17:9

There's been a lot of debate over whether or not it's ethical to murder babies (i.e. abortion), but much of that debate has been over Evolutionism's philosophy. It's not even a question in the Bible; it's only a question when Satan's lie of Evolutionism is upheld by deceived members of our society.
(Read "Evolutionism: A New-Age Religion" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

Evolutionism teaches that a baby in the womb is not a person, but rather, it is a parasite. Feminist and atheist author Libby Anne writes:
"I don’t like sharing my body! When you’re pregnant, your body is invaded by what is for all intents and purposes a parasite... And so, as you can see, I am currently inhabited by a parasite."
-Libby Anne, "Of Pregnancy and Parasites: My Body is Mine!" Patheos, Mar 22, 2012, retrieved Feb 13, 2017, [patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2012/03/my-body-is-mine.html]

Another abortionist author states:
"I propose seeing the fetus that a woman carries to fruition as a parasite. Because regardless of the 'Johnson & Johnson' commercials, the baby showers, the cute little clothes, and the glamourization of childbirth... the fetus is a parasite upon the woman's body!"
-Adrienne Zurub, "The Parasitic Nature of Pregnancy," Ezine Articles, Sept 29, 2007, retrieved Feb 13, 2017, [ezinearticles.com/?The-Parasitic-Nature-of-Pregnancy&id=757602]

One author I read talked about the resources a baby would consume in the mother's womb, and then labeled the baby "a parasite," simply because the child has needs. I'd like to point out that no person on the planet is viable to live on their own if they are abandoned stark naked in the arctic tundra.
(See Albert Rosenfeld, "Pushed Out Into a Hostile World," Life Magazine, April 30, 1965, p. 66)

These people quickly forget that if the baby is a parasite, they are all full-grown parasites themselves. However, despite their claims, recent scientific discoveries have found that babies actually pass beneficial healing cells into the mother during pregnancy, and they may even assist her throughout her life.
(See Peter Baklinski, "Just a 'parasite'? Cutting edge science shows fetal cells heal mother for life," Life Site, Jan 4, 2012, retrieved Feb 13, 2017, [http://bit.ly/1M6P8ol])

The reason they make up these "parasite" excuses is because they know if the Bible is true, then they are murderers. The Bible says that which grows in the mother's womb is a child.

And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
-Genesis 16:11

And the woman conceived, and sent and told David, and said, I am with child.
-2 Samuel 11:5

To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.
-Luke 2:5

The Lord God says He knows these children not only before they were born, but before they were conceived:

Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.
-Jeremiah 1:5

So either God is a liar (which is impossible because God cannot lie - Tts 1:2) when He says they are children and He knows them when they are nothing more than a fertilized egg, or these evolutionists and pagans are liars when they say the baby is not a person. God made Jeremiah a prophet before he was ever born, so it leads us to ask: How many children in the womb were called by God to a great ministry to save souls, but were viciously executed by their own mothers and strange doctors? Again, their excuses are only a convenience to keep them from admitting the truth; that they are murderers, and encourage others to murder.

Why do people murder their babies? Fear; perhaps that they cannot provide. Anger; due to a rape or an unwanted sexual encounter. Laziness; because they regret their decisions and don't want to be responsible for their choices. There are many reasons, but one that I believe eludes most church-goers is the fact that there are many boys and girls being sacrificed to devils/pagan gods for the sake of witchcraft.

Before anyone tries to tell me I'm crazy before they've read the facts, allow me to point out that the Bible explains that is what pagans and witches have done for thousands of years:

Manasseh was twelve years old when he began to reign, and he reigned fifty and five years in Jerusalem: But did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, like unto the abominations of the heathen, whom the LORD had cast out before the children of Israel. For he built again the high places which Hezekiah his father had broken down, and he reared up altars for Baalim, and made groves, and worshipped all the host of heaven, and served them. Also he built altars in the house of the LORD, whereof the LORD had said, In Jerusalem shall my name be for ever. And he built altars for all the host of heaven in the two courts of the house of the LORD. And he caused his children to pass through the fire in the valley of the son of Hinnom: also he observed times, and used enchantments, and used witchcraft, and dealt with a familiar spirit, and with wizards: he wrought much evil in the sight of the LORD, to provoke him to anger.
-2 Chronicles 33:1-6

It's interesting that I've searched through some more popular and extensive Jewish websites, who cover many things on the Old Testament law and prophets, but they won't even talk about this subject. (I don't know the reasons for this, but it could be because it's a dark history of their ancestors adopting such abominable practices and they don't want to talk about it.) In the times of the Old Testament, it was common knowledge what the pagan worshippers of Molech would do to new-born babies.

And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD.
-Leviticus 18:21

There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD: and because of these abominations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee.
-Deuteronomy 18:10-12

When they were causing children to pass through fire, don't misunderstand this to be some ritual in which 10-year-olds walked barefoot over coals or some other similar nonsense; they were taking their new-born babies and putting them in fire to burn alive slowly. It's so arrogant and ridiculous to hear atheists condemn and mock the Christian God of the Bible when he has passed judgment on heathen nations, but remain willfully ignorant that this is just one of the many wicked things they did on a regular basis.
(Atheists have no justification for logic, reason, science, morality, math, or knowledge in general. Read "Everything You Need to Know About Atheism" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones. And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name. And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not: Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people.
-Levitius 20:2-5

And he defiled Topheth [i.e. the good king ordered the high priest to destroy all the pagan abominations; including the gathering places of the homosexuals], which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom, that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech.
-2 Kings 23:10

And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin.
-Jeremiah 32:35

Robert Fraize, a reverend of the Traditional Church of Satan, quoted 12th-century Rabbi Schlomo Yarchi when he described what this "pass through fire" tradition actually means:
"Tophet is Moloch, which was made of brass; and they heated him from his lower parts; and his hands being stretched out, and made hot, they put the child between his hands, and it was burnt; when it vehemently cried out; but the priests beat a drum, that the father might not hear the voice of his son, and his heart might not be moved."
-Schlomo Yarchi, quoted by Robert Fraize, Satans Bible, Lulu.com, 2016, p. 198, ISBN: 9781365082719

The people would take a new-born baby, put him on the hands of the Molech statue that had a fire lit underneath, and the child was burned alive with drums beaten loudly in the background so no one could hear the screams of the baby, nor the cries of a grieving mother, which was not just to appease the crowd, but also to drown out the sounds so the father wouldn't be stricken with emotional grief and attempt to rescue his child.

The modernized term for this is "infanticide:"

infanticide (n): killing an infant, their own or another, within a year after birth
(See 'infanticide', Random House Dictionary, 2017, [dictionary.com]; See also Collins English Dictionary, 10th Edition, William Collins Sons & Co, 2012)

Infanticide Renamed "After-Birth Abortion"

Atheists, pagans, witches, and Satanists are generally looking to gain political sway in convincing the government to support their agenda. For decades, wicked men and women have sought to not only get abortion legalized, but also infanticide, meaning that a woman could legally kill her baby after birth as well as before.

Peter Singer, known as the "Father of Animal Rights," has long advocated for killing babies up to 28 days old, giving mothers the option to kill the child if she decides the baby is too much of a burden on her. In 1979, he wrote:
"Human babies are not born self-aware, or capable of grasping that they exist over time. They [i.e. babies after birth] are not persons. Hence their lives would seem to be no more worthy of protection than the life of a fetus... If the fetus does not have the same claim to life as a person, it appears that the newborn baby does not either, and the life of a newborn baby is of less value to it than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee is to the nonhuman animal."
-Peter Singer, Writings on an Ethical Life, Open Road Media, 2015, ISBN: 9781497645585; Singer is a Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University and author of over twenty books.

Witches and Satanists would certainly be on board with this type of philosophy, and that's exactly where our government is headed at this point. The Bible clearly tells us that if these kinds of things have happened in the past (which they have), they will surely come about again:

All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again. All things are full of labour; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing. The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
-Ecclesiastes 1:7-9

Researcher and anthropologist Laila Williamson wrote:
"Infanticide has been practiced on every continent and by people on every level of cultural complexity, from hunter gatherers to high civilizations, including our own ancestors."
-Laila Williamson, quoted in Violence and Abuse in Society: Understanding a Global Crisis, Vol. 1, ABC-CLIO, 2012, p. 90, ISBN: 9780313382765

Eventually, if given enough time, our nation will allow the practice of killing newborn babies up to a certain age, just as it was in ancient pagan nations. Singer only considers that limitations on infanticide should be put in place to appease the feelings of others, rather than debate the morality of killing children:
"We should certainly put very strict conditions on permissible infanticide, but these conditions might owe more to the effects of infanticide on others than to the intrinsic wrongness of killing an infant."
-Peter Singer, Practical Ethics, Cambridge University Press, 2011, ISBN: 9781139496896

This idea of infanticide has more recently been called "After-Birth Abortion," which is an oxymoron (i.e. a phrase that contradicts itself) because abortion is specifically implied to mean a child still in the womb. The Journal of Medical Ethics, which is another oxymoron since they teach unethical medical practices, published an article called "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live," which said:
"Nonetheless, to bring up such children might be an unbearable burden on the family and on society as a whole, when the state economically provides for their care. On these grounds, the fact that a fetus has the potential to become a person who will have an (at least) acceptable life is no reason for prohibiting abortion. Therefore, we argue that, when circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible."
-Alberto Guibilini & Francesca Minerva, "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" Journal of Medical Ethics, Mar 2, 2012, retrieved Aug 9, 2017, [jme.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03/01/medethics-2011-100411.full]

Before we continue the quote, this is a dumb argument because most people in our society rely on someone else. The people writing this article likely don't know how to fix their car when it breaks down, nor build one from scratch, and they rely on mechanics to do so. They don't know how to program or build computers that they use to do their jobs, but they rely on others. They don't do any farming, but go to the grocery store to buy their food. The point I'm making is that if these authors were dropped off naked in the arctic tundra, they would not be viable on their own, and would have to seek help, being a burden on someone else for their survival, and yet, their selfish political agenda outweighs basic reasoning to see that all of us rely on others for our survival in one way or another; the real question is: why is all the burden of responsibility laid on babies?

"In spite of the oxymoron in the expression, we propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide’, to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk. Accordingly, a second terminological specification is that we call such a practice ‘after-birth abortion’ rather than ‘euthanasia’ because the best interest of the one who dies is not necessarily the primary criterion for the choice, contrary to what happens in the case of euthanasia."
-Alberto Guibilini & Francesca Minerva, "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" Journal of Medical Ethics, Mar 2, 2012, retrieved Aug 9, 2017, [jme.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03/01/medethics-2011-100411.full]

Let me explain what they just said for those of you who didn't catch it. The reason they're not calling it "euthanasia" is the same reason they don't call it "murder;" namely, that "the best interest of the one who dies is not necessarily the primary criterion for the choice," or in other words, they are more concerned about the feelings and choices of the murderer (i.e. the doctor), and the parents of the child, than of the child who is to be murdered. (i.e. It is giving help to the sinners and criminals, rather than to the poor and needy.)

Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked.
-Psalm 82:3-4

The wicked have drawn out the sword, and have bent their bow, to cast down the poor and needy, and to slay such as be of upright conversation.
-Psalm 37:14

They break in pieces thy people, O LORD, and afflict thine heritage. They slay the widow and the stranger, and murder the fatherless.
-Psalm 94:6

The phrase "After-Birth Abortion" is simply another political term to help shave off some of the shame (i.e. feelings of guilt) that would be suffered by the parents, family, and doctor of a dead child. They're doing everything in their power to sever themselves from their conscience.

Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
-1 Timothy 4:1-2
(I'll mention this again later in more detail.)

We Christians should stick to the Biblical term: murder. It's murder no matter if the child is killed as an infant, in the womb, or even by the less-recognized contraceptive murder, which is when a child is first conceived in the womb and is killed off by birth control methods.

Carthage, a north African city on the coast of the Mediterranean, is well known for these types of sacrifices to Molech, and the remains of thousands of infant children have been found in a ritual burial ground. According to recent studies, they were sacrificing at least (i.e. at minimum) 50 children a year, while other sources have said that nearly half of all children in their culture were sacrificed to Molech:
"Just as ancient Greek and Roman propagandists insisted, the Carthaginians did kill their own infant children, burying them with sacrificed animals and ritual inscriptions in special cemeteries to give thanks for favours from the gods, according to a new study. 'This is something dismissed as black propaganda because in modern times people just didn't want to believe it,' said Josephine Quinn, a lecturer in ancient history at Oxford, who is behind the study, with international colleagues, of one of the most bitterly debated questions in classical archaeology. 'But when you pull together all the evidence – archaeological, epigraphic and literary – it is overwhelming and, we believe, conclusive: they did kill their children, and on the evidence of the inscriptions, not just as an offering for future favours but fulfilling a promise that had already been made.'"
-Maev Kennedy, "Carthaginians sacrificed own children, archaeologists say," The Guardian, Jan 21, 2014, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/21/carthaginians-sacrificed-own-children-study]

First, I want to mention that Carthage was made up of Phonicians, which came from the Canaanites talked about in Scripture. The Canaanites come from the land of Canaan, and Canaan was the son of Ham, who was the son of Noah.

And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.
-Genesis 9:18

The Lord God hated the practices of the Canaanites and commanded Israel to stay away from them and their wicked traditions, which would include the infant sacrifices:

After the doings of the land of Egypt, wherein ye dwelt, shall ye not do: and after the doings of the land of Canaan, whither I bring you, shall ye not do: neither shall ye walk in their ordinances.
-Leviticus 18:3

These sacrifices unto Molech, slowly burning newborn babies alive, was one of the many demonic practices of paganism and witchcraft that the heathen nations performed, which is why God, in judging these wicked nations, commanded that the Israelites destroy them completely. The pagans were so plagued with sin, which resulted in disease, suffering, and death, that He wanted them totally purged:

But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee: That they teach you not to do after all their abominations, which they have done unto their gods; so should ye sin against the LORD your God.
-Deuteronomy 20:16-18

However, Carthage was a distant nation that branched off from the Canaanites. This allows us to see what wicked practices they brought to the Israelites, and sadly, the nation of Israel did, on many occasions, adopt those practices against God's commandment.

The following video is an Italian silent movie production from 1914 called Cabiria. Although designed for purely entertainment purposes, they formed a cast of actors who played out a rough mock ritual based on Rome's account of the encounters with the Carthage witches during the Second Punic War (218-202 BC):

Efforts by atheistic/evolutionary scientists have presumed this wasn't happening in Carthage, or in other words, they're trying to prove the Bible was wrong about these evil, corrupt nations. After all, if God punished wicked nations for doing these abominable things, then they would be forced to conclude that what God did was good (even though the Lord God is the only justifiable standard of goodness), but because they don't want to view Him as good, they attempt to provide false evidence that the Bible is wrong, so they can be justified in their hatred of Him.

"The argument has been passionate for years, with scientists often reaching opposed conclusions from the same bone fragments: four years ago a group of scientists published a paper saying the cremated remains did not indicate infant sacrifice. Now in the same issue as Quinn's research, Antiquity is publishing a new paper on the same bones, insisting that the earlier study got the science of burnt infant bones wrong, and therefore greatly overestimated the number who died before birth rather than being murdered in infancy."
-Maev Kennedy, "Carthaginians sacrificed own children, archaeologists say," The Guardian, Jan 21, 2014, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/21/carthaginians-sacrificed-own-children-study]

What's sickening about this article is that the researcher heading up the study claims that "We like to think that we're quite close to the ancient world, that they were really just like us – the truth is, I'm afraid, that they really weren't." The opposite is true; the fact is that they really like to believe they are smarter and better, more evolved, than their ancestors, when our modern society is killing babies MORE often than their ancestors did. The true purpose in their attempts to cover the evidence of child sacrifice is to prove the Bible wrong, not to disconnect some semblance of relation to ancestry.

This practice of sacrificing children unto gods for the purpose of pagan witchcraft never died, and it's been around in every generation. In 17th century France during the reign of King Louis XIV (14th), Louis hired the Lieutenant General of the police in Versailles, Gabriel de La Reynie, to investigate what appeared to be a series of murders, including one of his most cherished mistresses, La Valliere. Reynie's interrogations led him to a witch named La Voisin (meaning "The Neighbor") who provided poisons involved in the murders, but this discovery also revealed a mass chain of Satanic abortion rituals.

La Voisin worked closely with Francoise-Athenais de Rochechouart de Mortemart, or more commonly known as Marquise de Montespan, who was considered the unofficial queen of France because of the authority she was given as King Louis's mistress:
"Of all the high and mighty personages La Voisin served, none approached the power and grandeur of her chief client, Francoise-Athenais de Rochechouart de Mortemart, the Marquise de Montespan, the new, ravishingly beautiful and devastatingly paranoid mistress of King Louis XIV. Louis' court was the most sumptuous in all the world, a monument to the splendor and absolute power on earth of kings, and at the heart of the court was the dazzling De Montespan, who, in the words of court biographer Madame de Sevigne, 'holds all the cards.' The de facto queen, Marie-Therese, and La Valliere, the preceding mistress, quietly deferred to De Montespan's love authority; they were then known as 'the three queens.' According to John B. Wolf, one of Louis' many biographers, 'They rode together in the same carriage; they lived together in the court.'
But it was De Montespan who ruled the heart of Louis XIV, France's greatest king, and therefore the court and, in many respects, France itself. And, as we are to see, in her shadow stood La Voisin. The king, who was to have seven children by De Montespan, openly escorted her everywhere. At thirty, she stunned all who entered her presence; she was 'as beautiful as the day,' and 'a surprising beauty.' She was 'even more blonde than La Valliere, she had a beautiful mouth, beautiful teeth... and a brazen air.' De Montespan surrounded herself with the great artists and writers of the day. She was the subject of dozens of famous portraits."
-Jay R. Nash, Look for the Woman: A Narrative Encyclopedia of Female Prisoners, Kidnappers, Thieves, Extortionists, Terrorists, Swindlers and Spies from Elizabethan Times to the Present, Rowman & Littlefield, 1986, p. 121-122, ISBN: 9781461747727

However, Montespan had a dark side that was vicious against anyone who would seek to replace her or cause her downfall as the most beloved mistress of the king. Even Louis himself was somewhat fearful of her outbursts. Her madness set in, and she began to gamble away enormous sums of money and eat excessively, which caused her to gain weight and fall out of favor with King Louis. At this point, she sought the demonic magics of the witch La Voisin to insure her position of power, and many historians believe that it was through this acquisition of poison that La Valliere, Montespan's main rival, was murdered.

"The royal mistress became a devoted follower of La Voisin, paying her enormous sums for her incantations, black-magic rites, and charms. According to many reliable accounts, including that of Paris Police Lieutenant De la Reynie, this untitled queen went so far as to actually participate in Black Masses herself, lending her naked body to the most disgusting rituals, even the ones that included the unconscionable murder of infants."
-Jay R. Nash, Look for the Woman: A Narrative Encyclopedia of Female Prisoners, Kidnappers, Thieves, Extortionists, Terrorists, Swindlers and Spies from Elizabethan Times to the Present, Rowman & Littlefield, 1986, p. 121-122, ISBN: 9781461747727

More details of these ceremonies were given in the book The Geography of Witchcraft, which was based on the testimony of La Voisin's daughter, who had attended a number of these rituals with her mother:
"It was he who celebrated innumerable Satanic masses at the insistence of Madame de Montespan in order to secure her supreme power and eternal fidelity on the part of the King. A long black velvet pall was spread over the altar, and upon this the royal mistress laid herself in a state of perfect nudity. Six black candles were lit, the celebrant robed himself in a chasuble embroidered with esoteric characters wrought in silver, the gold paten [i.e. a plate made for holding the chalice] and chalice were placed upon the naked belly of the living altar [i.e. Montespan] to whose warm flesh the priest pressed his lips each time the misal directed him to kiss the place of sacrifice. [i.e. Montespan's genitals] All was silent save for the low, monotonous murmur of the blasphemous liturgy. The Host was consecrated [i.e. declared to be sacred for a religious purpose], and then the Precious Blood. An assistant crept forward bearing an infant in her arms. The child was held over the altar, a sharp gash across the neck, a stifled cry, and warm drops fell into the chalice and streamed upon the white figure beneath. The corpse [i.e. the freshly killed baby] was handed to La Voisin, who flung it callously [i.e. cruelly] into an oven fashioned for that purpose which glowed white-hot in its fierceness."
-Montague Summers, The Geography of Witchcraft, Kessinger Publishing, 2003, ISBN: 9780766145368

La Voisin, through her connection with the unofficial queen of France, ignored many laws and did as she pleased. She took on many sexual partners, one of which was the official executioner of Paris, who provided her with severed body parts of murderers he executed, which she took and crafted into those black candles she used in her black mass rituals.

Some of the ritual words La Voisin spoke during the child sacrifices were standard operating procedure for all witches, and are still used today; the only difference being that they exchange certain words they use for what blessing they want to receive:
"Astaroth, Asmodeus, princes of friendship, I conjure you to accept the sacrifice I offer you of this child for the things I ask of you, which are that the friendship of the King and Mgr le Dauphin may continue towards me, and that I may be honored by the princes and princesses of the court, and that nothing I ask of the King may be denied me, either for my relatives or servants."
-Simon, Papal Magic: Occult Practices Within the Catholic Church, Harper Collins, 2009, p. 35, ISBN: 9780061748950

This is why I try to educate born-again Christians that they should sanctify themselves away from witchcraft traditions; namely those traditionally celebrated during Easter and Christmas. The gods and goddesses being invoked, by which the Bible makes clear indication are an abomination against the Lord God, are the main gods and goddesses honored during these holidays. Traditional Christmas and Easter rituals are mentioned in Scripture, and they are always mentioned in the context of sin and defiance against the Christian God of the Bible.
(Read "Christmas: The Rejection of Jesus," "Easter: Christians Celebrating Abomination," and "Halloween: Are Christians Lovers of Death?" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

The incantation used specifically by Montespan after shedding the child's blood was as follows:
"I... (the daughter of...), ask for the King's friendship and that of Mgr le Dauphin, and may I continue to have it, and that the Queen may be barren, that the King may leave her bed and table for me, that I may obtain from him all I ask for myself and my relatives, that my servants and my household may please him, loved and respected by great lords, that I may be summoned to the King's council and know what transpires there, and that this amity may increase more than it has been in the past, so that the King leaves La Valliere [i.e. Louis' current mistress] and pays no more attention to her, and that the Queen may be repudiated [i.e. denounced the validity of her marriage by the king] so that I can marry him."
-Simon, Papal Magic: Occult Practices Within the Catholic Church, Harper Collins, 2009, p. 35-36, ISBN: 9780061748950

For thousands of years, there's been a strong connection between abortion and witchcraft, and that's also why there's a strong connection between witchcraft and feminism. In my book, "Feminism: Castrating America," I expose the witches and witchcraft involved in the feminist movement, and feminists who insist that witchcraft is the true origin of feminism.

Though the following is from the wicked Catholic Church (who have nothing to do with Christianity and the Bible, and founded their religion based on pagan witchcraft), in the 15th century, Pope Innocent VIII (8th) commissioned a document to educate people on the dangers of witchcraft, and some of what they discovered in their investigations on the murder of children:
"That Witches who are Midwives in Various Ways Kill the Child Conceived in the Womb, and Procure an Abortion; or if they do not this Offer New-born Children to Devils. Here is set forth the truth concerning four horrible crimes which devils commit against infants, both in the mother's womb and afterwards. And since the devils do these things through the medium of women, and not men, this form of homicide is associated rather with women than with men, And the following are the methods by which it is done. The Canonists treat more fully than the Theologians of the obstructions due to witchcraft; and they say that it is witchcraft, not only when anyone is unable to perform the carnal act, of which we have spoken above; but also when a woman is prevented from conceiving, or is made to miscarry after she has conceived. A third and fourth method of witchcraft is when they have failed to procure an abortion, and then either devour the child or offer it to a devil."
-Vince Wilson & James Sprenger, Malleus Maleficarum: The Witch Hamme, Lulu.com, 2009, p. 61, ISBN: 9780557206056

To clarify, you did not misread it when it says that they either offer the newborn baby to a devil in a ritualistic sacrifice, which we saw earlier, or they would DEVOUR the child. This means that witches would kill the child, then literally eat its freshly dead corpse, which is most likely done in a fit of demonic possession during one of their devilish rituals.

Some may argue that, in abortions, at least we're not sacrificing them to false gods and consuming them as the heathen did, but I beg to differ. There are a number of abominations against God that are going on behind the scenes in abortion clinics that remain hidden to the public eye, and the following testimony will help demonstrate that these heinous acts against God have continued for thousands of years and are still performed to this day, and quite frequently here in the U.S.

Zachary King is former Satanist that left the World Church of Satan. He began practicing witchcraft at the age of 10, and joined a Satanic coven by age 13, eventually working his way up to the status of "High Wizard:"
"It started with a strong curiosity, wondering if magick was real. This came after watching movies about sorcerers and wizards back in the 1970’s when I grew up. We had a game at school called “Bloody Mary,” or “I Hate You, Bloody Mary,” where you’d go in a bathroom and chant that phrase a certain number of times with the lights off. Every time my group did it, we always saw a demonic face in the mirror. We had no idea that this is what we were looking at, just that all of a sudden there was this scary thing in the mirror and everybody would run out of the bathroom, scared to death … except me. I always thought it was pretty cool. Now, in the same time-frame that I’m doing this, I played campaigns of Dungeons and Dragons every weekend, and I’m always the wizard or the sorcerer in that. Eventually, I wondered if I could do magick for real and tried a couple of spells for money. They both worked, but it could have been just a coincidence so I did it a third time, and the third time I did it, I cast the spell in front of the demon in the bathroom [from the 'Bloody Mary' chant] and thought I’d up the ante a little bit to see what happens. I got $1,000 bucks the next day. From that, I was convinced that magick was real."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

For years now, since I've exposed the truth about people using sorcery and witchcraft to get real results (i.e. it's not just some fun or ritualistic thing for them to do; it actually works), and that games like Dungeons and Dragons help condition children for the occult (i.e. it doesn't make them occultists, but conditions them for it) because it was designed directly after real witchcraft. I have had many people complain in skepticism at me over these issues, however, this former Satanist is confirming exactly everything I've previously taught, and it is the willful ignorance of church-goers that leads them to deny the reality of witchcraft and Satanism; denying how real devils are and how they actually operate.
(Read "Video Games: Causing Witchcraft to Prosper" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

King continues:
"When I was about 12, a friend introduced me to a group that played Dungeons and Dragons that also believed that magick was real. It turned out that this group was a satanic coven. A lot of people ask me, ‘wouldn’t you run and hide at that point?’ I remind them that I grew up in the 70’s where satanic covens on TV are really scary, but … I love pinball machines, video games, and science fiction, like Star Trek and Star Wars, and these guys had almost every science fiction and fantasy movie you could ever want to see. They had pinball machines, an in-ground pool, a big barbeque pit, and it was just like a boys and girls club, and it was just a lot of fun. Let me put it this way, they knew how to recruit. They knew everything that a kid would want to do, so I got involved with it that way."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

I've rebuked church buildings and ministries for doing the same thing as the Satanic covens. Using worldly entertainment as a lure is what Satanists do, so why do church-goers, who claim to be of Christ, mimic the Devil's tactics in their church buildings? (i.e. They lure in teenagers with movies, music, food, games, and many other worldly things.)
(Read "Revivalism: The Devil's Design" & "Is Tithe a Biblical Requirement" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

"That was my first cult. I was in there until I was about 18, and then I joined the World Church of Satan, which is a much bigger, world-wide cult. The position that I attained is called a High Wizard. In a big satanic coven, they are the people who do the magick for the coven. There could be as few as one, and as many as 10. The general number [of high wizards in a coven] is between 2 and 5, and our job was to travel around the world doing whatever spells people want you to do. Now, when I say people, I mean rock stars, movie stars, political figures, rich people … there’s no limit to who will want a spell and what they’re willing to pay for it."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

This is why there is so much demonic activity going on in the music industry. I've tried to warn Christians (or at least those claiming to be of Christ) that their rock music can be dangerous because it was brought about through Satanic witchcraft and demonic channeling (i.e. a devil possesses an artist and they write a song through it), both directly (through the writing and producing of it) and indirectly (through magic rituals to gain the Devil's blessings).
(Read "What's Wrong With Christian Rock?" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

"I had done magick from the age of 10 and became a High Wizard when I was about 21 years old. I had been in the World Church of Satan for about 3 years. I had seen a High Wizard back when I was a child, but I didn’t know that that is what I was looking at. The look is very unique. It’s a top-hat, a wand or a cane, the face painted like a corpse, and an old-school tuxedo of sorts. If you go to YouTube, and look up Pink’s Like a Pill, there’s a High Wizard that appears in her video four times.
The third and fourth time the wizard appears on the screen, you can see that he’s casting a spell. A lot of people seeing that video would see him, but not recognize what they’re looking at. But that’s the look. Now, Satan picks you, and for a cult that big, there’s a CEO and a board of directors. So, the CEO sends word to you, you meet with the CEO and the board of directors, and they tell you that you’ve been chosen. You’re given a book that tells you what your job duties as a high wizard are, and you decide whether you want to do it or not, though I’ve never known anybody to turn it down."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

I want to pause here to point out that everything I've ever researched on this subject is in perfect alignment with King's testimony. I say this so people who may not be informed on this topic will know that he's not just making up a story. King then testified that he took part in ritualistic abortions:
"Just after I turned 14, the coven members came to me and said that I was going to be involved in an abortion in about 9 months. There was a sex party with all the male members between 12 and 15 and a female member over 18 and her purpose was to get pregnant, and then she was going to have an abortion in 9 months. When I was told this, I said 'cool' out loud, but had no clue what an abortion was. In my family, I think I heard my parents whisper the word abortion once when talking about somebody else, so I thought it was a dirty word because they whispered it and I had never heard that word anywhere else. When I asked about what an abortion was to the coven members, I said I don’t know what I have to do here, they explained that there’s a baby in the womb and you are going to kill it. There will be an abortion doctor there to help you and there will be a nurse because it’s a full medical procedure. My first question was, 'is that legal?' The response was, 'Yes it is, as long as it’s in the womb. As long as the baby is still inside the woman, you can kill it.' That’s how it was explained to us. It was also explained that, 'You are killing a baby.' They didn’t say that we would be killing a fetus or killing some cells in a body. None of that. It’s a baby."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

If Satanists said it was just a fetus or a "parasite," then the blood would not be meaningful enough to appease Satan. Even Satanists have enough sense to acknowledge it's a baby, and they kill the child to gain power through their Satanic magic. I'd also like to point that this sex orgy, as King stated, involved boys as young as 12-years-old (which is illegal), and they all likely had sex and seeded an adult teenage woman together, so no one would know who the father was, and killed the baby as a collective sacrifice.

"Now, I don’t think I would have been okay with killing a baby outside of a woman’s body [i.e. he means at the time he was a Satanist], but knowing that I could kill as much as I wanted to if someone was inside the body--in satanism, killing something or the death of something is the most effective way of getting your spell accomplished. As far as trying to get satan’s approval, to give you something that you want, killing something is the best way to go. Killing something is the ultimate offering to satan, and if you can kill an unborn, that is his ultimate goal."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

This is an important distinction for the Satanists, because they need a living sacrifice which requires a living person; so the average citizen will say the child is not a person so they can justify murder, and the Satanist says the child IS a person so they can justify murder. Both are doing the same thing philosophically, that is, trying to justify sin, but they both approach it from two completely opposite presuppositions.

King is then asked about the first abortion ritual he ever performed as a Satanic High Wizard:
"The first one I did was about 3 months before turning 15. It took place in a farm house that was surprisingly more sterile than many of the other abortion clinics I had done abortions in."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

I need to pause here again to point out that he's explaining the farm house they murdered this baby in was MORE sterile than the abortion clinics he would perform rituals in later during his Satanic career. That not only shows you how disgusting many of these clinics are, but it also shows that Satanists care more about the health of the women in their cult than abortion clinics care about their patients.

For example, World Net Daily reported on the facts listed out in a book concerning the true horrors of what goes on behind the scenes in many abortion clinics in America:
"The police knew there was a problem in the Women’s Medical Society of Philadelphia, but they didn’t realize just what the problem was until they got there. They thought they were raiding the largest supplier of illicit prescription painkillers in the City of Brotherly Love, but once inside, they found that Kermit Gosnell’s medical office was something much worse. When investigators with the FBI, DEA and Philadelphia Police Department raided Gosnell’s clinic on February 18, 2010, they expected to find a 'pill mill' but instead found a house of horrors. There was blood on the floor and the smell of urine in the air. The two surgery rooms were dirty and unsanitary, completely unbefitting a surgical facility. Semi-conscious women scheduled for abortions sat on filthy recliners covered with blood-stained blankets in the waiting room or recovery room. And then there were the severed body parts of late-term aborted babies displayed in jars over a dirty sink. And the remains of 47 aborted babies crammed into a freezer and packed into boxes in the basement, all with mysterious wounds across the backs of their necks. Police soon realized they had uncovered a 'House of Horrors' where babies were routinely born alive during very late-term abortions only to be brutally murdered."
-WND, "Eyewitnesses Take You Inside Abortion 'House of Horrors'," July 22, 2017, retrieved Aug 10, 2017, [mobile.wnd.com/2017/07/eyewitnesses-take-you-inside-abortion-house-of-horrors]

This is not some isolated case because there are many complaints coming from women who have been in poorly operated and maintained abortion clinics, but often, these complaints don't typically make mainstream media news because they are pushing the abortion agenda. To report bad stuff happening in abortion clinics would deter young women from going through with killing their babies, and that does not support the mainstream communist goals.

Before we get back to King's testimony, I want to back this up his testimony a bit more by quoting from the Americans United for Life (AUL) report on the health crisis in American abortion clinics, in which they compiled a few of the thousands of abortion complaints throughout the country. Out of the 32 states analyzed in the study, they provided their top ten violations cited by state investigators:
"Common violations included failure to follow [hand] washing protocols, failure to convene infection control committees, and refusal to develop infectious disease protocols. Other violations documented by state officials included:
-Quality assurance programs were not properly implemented.
-Autoclave [high-temperature steam sterilization] and sterilization procedures were not followed.
-Clinics were generally 'unclean,' including some where there was evidence of bloody drainage and fluids on exam tables.
-Dry blood and/or rust found on equipment.
-Instruments labeled as 'sterilized,' but displaying rust and/or dried blood.
-Reusable equipment and instruments were not cleaned and sterilized.
-Contaminated syringe containers were stored incorrectly.
-The bodily remains of aborted [i.e. murdered] children were stored in the same refrigerator as medications and/or food.
-Staff members in some facilities were unable to locate sterile suturing [i.e. stitching] supplies and equipment.
-In a Chicago abortion clinic, a recovery room technician was observed retrieving a paper towel from the garbage and using the same paper towel to cover a tray that would later serve food to patients.
Patients were further exposed to unsanitary conditions by improper water temperatures for laundry, sterilizers not being cleaned monthly, single-use vials being used multiple times and on different patients, vaginal probes not being disinfected between uses, and infectious waste not stored or disposed of properly.

-Americans United for Life, "Unsafe: How the Public Health Crisis in America's Abortion Clinics Endangers Women," 2016, retrieved Aug 10, 2017, [unsafe.aul.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/AUL_UNSAFEreport.pdf]

(Local news station publishes photos of police raid on abortion clinic.)

So when King says that the barn they performed this Satanic abortion ritual in was cleaner than most clinics he had been in, he wasn't joking or making up a story. Getting back to his testimony, King said the woman was "about to have a baby," which means they would wait until she was close to term; making sure the baby was grown as much as possible to provide as much blood as possible:
"There was an abortion doctor and an abortion nurse. There was a woman in stirrups about to have a baby who was surrounded by 13 top members of our coven, which were all high priests and priestesses. I was inside the circle with the woman and the abortion doctor. All the adult members of my coven were there. There were several women kneeling on the floor, swaying back and forth chanting “our body and ourselves” over and over again. Off to the side were several male members of our coven all chanting and praying. The ritual started at 11:45 at night, and the spell began at midnight, which is the witching hour, and the actual death of the child happened at 3:00 am, which is called the devil’s hour. My whole role in all of this was to insert the scalpel. I didn’t necessarily have to do the actual killing--what was important was that I get blood on my hands. So, I had to get somebody’s blood on my hands, whether the woman’s or the baby’s, and then the doctor finishes out the procedure. In that particular one, which was probably one of the more heinous abortions I had ever done, the doctor reached in, ripped the baby out and threw it onto the floor where these women were swaying. The women looked like they were possessed, and when the doctor threw the baby out to them, they cannibalized the baby."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

In case you don't understand what that means, the women in the Satanic ritual looked like they were possessed with devils for a good reason: they were possessed! The devils they were possessed with caused them to lunge at the baby's freshly dead corpse and eat it, and with this kind of knowledge about the rituals of witchcraft, perhaps Christians can get a new perspective about why the Lord God punished and destroyed pagan nations in judgment.

I also want to point out that it is for this reason why I believe the current "pro-life" political movement is a complete waste of time and money. Don't misunderstand; I'm not saying their desire to protect the lives of children is misplaced, but rather, they don't understand the full impact of what the abortion epidemic is really about, and they are only hacking at the branches of the evil tree instead of going for its root. Certainly those organizations who help young pregnant women, who may have nowhere else to turn, are helping a problem, but when fighting against abortion as a whole, very few people have any understanding about the root of it being in witchcraft.

King went on to testify that he had performed ritual abortions 146 times, and roughly 20 of those were done in high-profile abortion clinics. He said some of them were so "terribly unsanitary" that they "looked like a house of horrors, with blood all over the place, including in some rooms with blood on the ceiling." He also points out that other organizations, like Wiccans and the Illuminati, do child sacrifice rituals on a regular basis:
"As the high wizard, you’re the go-to guy in the satanic coven, so most people either call someone that they know in that coven or they’ll call because we did a lot of work with the Illuminati as well, so they’ll call them. This is all, obviously people that have to be in the know of these kinds of things, but you get invited to participate. The World Church of Satan isn’t the only organization that does satanic sacrifices in [these facilities]. There are other witchcraft organizations, such as wiccans, who are really involved in committing abortions inside these [high profile facilities]. You sometimes get invited to do the ritual abortion by the director of the facility or some high-up administrator, or sometimes the doctor is a satanist and they’ll invite you to come in and participate in an abortion or they will want to do a ceremony at the end of the day. Now, at the end of the day, every day, satanic groups do like a Black Mass service, usually around midnight, and it will be an extended service that will last about 2 or 3 hours where they dedicate all the babies that were killed that day to satan. It doesn’t matter why women go in for the abortion, all the babies get dedicated to satan at the end of the day."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

Don't misunderstand, King is not saying that this happens at every abortion clinic, but some of the ones he visited, they would do a mass ritual to dedicate all murdered children in the clinic to Satan, and he knows because he was requested to be the Satanic High Wizard in attendance. During the interview, he said that he suspected there is far more of this activity going on behind the scenes than most people are aware of.

There are some high profile people that participate in these rituals too, and they have their own version of daycare for the children while they make their sacrifices:
"There are kids that come to these events, but they’re generally not in the room when the abortion is taking palace [sic - place]. They’re in a separate room and they have contests to see which one of the kids can stay up until 3:00 am [i.e. the devil's hour], and the kid that can stay up that late gets a reward. The men who are not a part of the top 13 [i.e. those doing the main sacrificial ritual] are doing spells and chanting. They also are casting spells to protect them against anyone who might be praying against them, like a Christian praying against them. Also, whoever we have in our pocket for protection, so if we’ve paid off a sheriff’s deputy or cop or something like that, then no one is investigating us at that time. There are women chanting and swaying. The 13 members are surrounding the woman about to have the abortion, and they are the ones conducting the actual magick spell. In one instance, the one asking for the spell was the mayor of the town. He came to us because he wanted to pass some ordinance for his town, and he had tried it two or three times and it never went through. He had been a member of the coven for quite some time. He had tried every legal avenue to get this thing through, and it never worked, so he got somebody to agree to have an abortion and for it to happen at our satanic coven and during a night where we could do the abortion and do the spell at the same time. Generally, in a small-town coven, which is what that was, everyone would show up to the event. In a bigger place, like when I was a member of the World Church of Satan, you would get the high wizard, the people who want their spell to take place would be there. There would be the abortion doctor and his nurse. Many times, at [high profile abortion facilities], there’s a whole lot of them because a lot of the people that work at those places are witches or Satanists. So, you’ll get a lot of the people there willing to participate in the satanic event."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

It is Hellywood/Hollywood that produces horror movies to make people think that Christians are just some powerless, cowardly idiots that will crumble in terror when confronted with evil. The movies always present the demonic entities as the only one with power, or at least, the greatest amount of power, and typically, if they're brought down at all in the movie, it's always by some man-made device. (e.g. a witchcraft relic, or a Catholic relic, [Catholicism is not Christian--it's another form of witchcraft], etc) However, the fact is that the Satanists know that, despite all the efforts and spells and sacrifices, a single born again Christian praying (i.e. bringing a humble request to God the Father) against their efforts is enough to disrupt everything they do, and it sends them into a spiritual warfare panic, or in other words, the devils and the Satanic occultists are afraid of us, not the other way around. (Not because of our own power, nor the blood of children, but because of the once and for all sacrifice of the blood of the Lamb of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, who is above all, and who we serve as our Lord and Teacher.)

And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
-Matthew 28:18

That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him: The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power, Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.
-Ephesians 1:17-23

Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
-Ephesians 6:10-13

Also, King said that there are a substantial number of witches and Satanists that work at abortion clinics. This makes perfect sense because it's the perfect job for someone who believes what they believe. In order to have the capacity to rip children out of their mother's womb, one would have to have a philosophy (i.e. a way of thinking) that reflected doing something so evil and violent, and witches and Satanists have such a philosophy.
"You know, you’ve got the people that belong to NOW [the National Organization of Women], and a lot of those people are wiccan, and the wiccans, though they profess to have a stance for the preservation of life, they’re allowed to 'smite' or 'smote' anyone who goes against them in any way, which is to say that they’re allowed to destroy them by any means necessary, which is through magick for them."
-Zachary King, "Former Satanist: 'I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics'," Lepanto Institute, Aug 18, 2015, retrieved Aug 2, 2017, [lepantoinstitute.org/abortion/former-satanist-i-performed-satanic-rituals-inside-abortion-clinics]

Sadly, King converted to Catholicism, not to Christ. He just went from one evil cult to the next, and still believes in the ritualistic magic of the Catholics, thinking that Catholic "holy water" will be able to fight against Satan. He is either ignorant, or willingly ignorant, that such Catholic devices are also of Satan and are derived from pagan witchcraft traditions, and we can only pray that he would come out from among all of them and be born again.
(Read "Corruptions of Christianity: Catholicism" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

However, what King said is exactly what I was pointing out in our teaching on feminism. Witches are becoming more and more common among feminists, because they believe witchcraft is an "empowerment" of women, but in reality, they're turning to Satanic practices in defiance of the Christian God of the Bible because the Almighty God judges their sin, or in other words, Satan gives them an excuse that makes them feel good about murdering children.
(Read "Feminism: Satan's Plan to Destroy Your Family" here at creationliberty.com for more details; or get Johnson's book "Feminism: Castrating America" and learn more.)

Another example is Abigail Seidman, who was the daughter of a witch that worked in an abortion clinic:
"The clinic where my mother worked was pervaded with occult imagery and practices. There was goddess art and statuary in the office, waiting, counseling, and recovery room areas, and new age music (occasionally including goddess chants and songs) was piped throughout."
-Abigail Seidman, quoted by Kathleen Gilbert, "Complete interview with Abigail Seidman - abortion and the occult," LifeSite, Dec 13, 2010, retrieved Aug 11, 2017, [lifesitenews.com/news/complete-interview-with-abigail-seidman-abortion-and-the-occult]

As a side note, most people would not recognize much of the goddess chants and songs that are used in pagan worship. Most people would just write it off as Celtic music and not think much of it, but witchcraft is the origin of most Celtic music. (Don't misunderstand; I'm not saying every Celtic song is pagan, but much of it is.) So any of these women sitting in an abortion clinic, listening to those songs played quietly in the background, would not notice much of it, if at all.

Seidman continues:
"The counselors were primarily chosen for their spiritual qualifications, and a few did not even have a degree in a relevant field (ie psychology, counseling, social work). One was a trained chef turned sex worker (or 'sacred prostitute', as they preferred to think of it). After the clinic closed for the evening, the staff would all smoke marijuana together and occasionally take hallucinogens if they were available - this was viewed as a spiritual practice, not a recreational one (they were rather scornful of people who used drugs just to get high for fun rather than to ‘open their minds’ to ‘spiritual realities and higher planes of existence’)."
-Abigail Seidman, quoted by Kathleen Gilbert, "Complete interview with Abigail Seidman - abortion and the occult," LifeSite, Dec 13, 2010, retrieved Aug 11, 2017, [lifesitenews.com/news/complete-interview-with-abigail-seidman-abortion-and-the-occult]

This is a normal perspective for a witch because they know that what we call "drugs" today is actually sorcery. The word "pharmakeia" is where we get the word "pharmaceuticals" or "pharmacy," and "pharmakeia" literally means "sorcery," which is a form of witchcraft in which pagans would use hallucinogenic drugs to enter a state of consciousness (or lack thereof) where they would be more prone to be influenced by "spirits," (i.e. devils and demonic possession) which is something that witch doctors are more well known for in our modern day. (This is one of the reasons there is such a strong link between drugs, rock music, and Satanism.)
(Read "What's Wrong With Christian Rock?" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

"There were also special ceremonies involved when members of the clinic staff got intentionally pregnant in order to have abortions, which would be conducted after hours with a large group. I was not welcome at these ceremonies since I had never had an abortion myself (at the time), so I can’t give details, but on one occasion I babysat the infant daughter of a clinic worker during one, upstairs from the clinic, and I remember hearing bits of song/chanting and that the doctor was not present (he was male and the ceremony was female only), so the abortion was obviously being performed by an unqualified person. The women at the clinic were trained in 'underground' abortion techniques in case of Roe v Wade being overturned."
-Abigail Seidman, quoted by Kathleen Gilbert, "Complete interview with Abigail Seidman - abortion and the occult," LifeSite, Dec 13, 2010, retrieved Aug 11, 2017, [lifesitenews.com/news/complete-interview-with-abigail-seidman-abortion-and-the-occult]

Why The Roe v Wade Decision Was Legally Correct

Before any readers start falsely accusing me out of an emotional reaction over the title to this short section, I ask that you take a deep breath, calm yourself down, and read this section carefully. Although I do not like the ruling of Roe v Wade, and though I disagree with it on a Biblical standpoint, the decision of the Supreme Court Justices was legally correct, and until willfully ignorant church-goers start humbling themselves to understand the facts, they will continue to march into a battle they've already lost. (I just hope those of you born again in Christ will hear me out.)

For those of you who may not know, or may not live in the U.S., Roe v Wade (Jane Roe, a.k.a Norma McCorvey v. Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade) was a 1973 Supreme Court case (410 U.S. 113) which questioned the constitutional validity of a Texas law against women getting abortions under certain circumstances. The details get a bit complicated, but the arguments really came down to whether or not the baby in the womb was a legal person. The Supreme Court Justices ruled (7 to 2) that a child in the womb of his mother is not a legal "person," and therefore, has no "right" to life, nor can it be considered a crime to murder during abortions. (This decision was partially overturned later to abortions only if the child is not viable outside of the womb, which still isn't clearly defined.)

Since our nation is no longer a constitutional republic (i.e. the U.S. is not and never has been a democracy), we have entered into socialism, which means we now require licenses from the government for privileges, rather than having natural born rights. (i.e. The Supreme Court would not have ruled as they did in Roe v Wade in 1873, but in 1973, it's a different circumstance due the drastic changes in our government over that 100-year period.) Americans often claim they have legal rights, when in fact, they are confusing "rights" for "privileges" under a socialist government. Every U.S. citizen exists as a corporate entity, and if you don't have a legal contract that declares you to be a corporate entity, the courts will NOT recognize your existence, and therefore, they do not recognize that you have any legal privileges--including the "right" to life.

U.S. citizens are not recognized by the courts to be a legal person until they have documents on file with the government that show them to be a corporate entity they can legally recognize. There are two main ways to do this; the first is by filing for legal citizenship, or obtaining that documentation through marriage to a U.S. citizen who already has a corporate entity.

The second and most common way of obtaining a U.S. corporate entity is by getting a birth certificate. As the name implies, only children who have been birthed can get a birth certificate, which means, as of now, there is no legal way in existence for a child in the womb to get a corporate status of citizenship, and therefore, there is no current legal way for a child in the womb to be recognized as a person by the U.S. court of law.

What this means is that church-goers who spend their afternoons standing outside in large groups with picket signs that read "ABORTION IS MURDER" are wasting their time. It's not changing anyone's philosophy (i.e. no one ever says "I read their picket signs and changed to a pro-life stance"), and the government does not care because picketers are not speaking the same language. (i.e. Picketers don't care about the legal definitions because they care more about their emotions, and in their willful ignorance, do not take a little time to learn how to fight on that battlefield.) The only way to change the current state of the court's ruling is to find a way to issue all conceived life in the womb a corporate ID, which would only be possible if it were made a federal law that all pregnant women must register with the state. (Sadly, this would lead to pregnant women being questioned by police and arrested/fined for failing to register the child in her womb, but such is the socialist government we now live in.)

Just as the problem with church-goers wasting time fighting the wrong battle against gay marriage (i.e. marriage defined in the Bible is different than it's defined by the state, so church-goers are fighting the wrong battle), church-goers are also wasting time fighting the wrong battle against abortion. In the end, abortion began with witchcraft, and so this is a spiritual battle against devils and the witches who worship them, not a battle of picket signs with cutesy phrases on them.
(Read "Gay Marriage & Christian Hypocrisy" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

Seidman goes on to describe what she witnessed her mother do with her co-workers:
"My mother hosted a menstrual extraction party at our house once in 1992, when there was a lot of fear circulating about the possibility of Bush being re-elected and appointing a lot of pro-life judges, or getting a Republican Congress to work with and chipping away at legal abortion that way."
-Abigail Seidman, quoted by Kathleen Gilbert, "Complete interview with Abigail Seidman - abortion and the occult," LifeSite, Dec 13, 2010, retrieved Aug 11, 2017, [lifesitenews.com/news/complete-interview-with-abigail-seidman-abortion-and-the-occult]

The "menstrual extraction" she's talking about is a simple procedure of vacuum suctioning out the blood of menstruation built up prior to a woman having her period. It's very similar to the procedure done in early-term abortion. There is a phenomenon in which the bodies of women who spend a lot of time together end up auto-synchronizing their menstrual cycles to the same timing, (it's still not clear how or why this happens) which is why the witches all in the same coven could do this together.

Seidman was asked about what deites they worshipped during these rituals:
"The main figure worshipped was The Goddess, goddess figures from various traditions (Hindu, Greek, Roman, Babylonian, Egyptian, etc) were seen as ‘archetypes’ or ‘faces’ of this one true goddess, who was viewed as being in opposition to (and ultimately, to triumph over) the Judeo-Christian God. The goddess was taught to me as being more ancient, having created the world and people to live in it peacefully in a prehistoric ‘golden age’ of matriarchal rule, before the rise of patriarchy and civilization. God was painted as a diabolical figure, jealous of the Goddess’s power, who invented the idea of rape and taught human men to practice it, bringing about the end of humans living in a natural, violence-free state."
-Abigail Seidman, quoted by Kathleen Gilbert, "Complete interview with Abigail Seidman - abortion and the occult," LifeSite, Dec 13, 2010, retrieved Aug 11, 2017, [lifesitenews.com/news/complete-interview-with-abigail-seidman-abortion-and-the-occult]

Obviously, that teaching is the complete opposite of what the Bible teaches, replacing the truth of the God's Word with a feminist, woman-worshipping pagan myth. Seidman goes on to mention that the witches in their coven were encouraged to select a particular goddess figure to worship as a role model, but what was almost humorous was how she compared it to the Catholic Church. Sadly, Seidman joined the Roman Catholic Church after coming out of paganism (i.e. coming from paganism into more paganism). She said it was "much like Catholics choosing a confirmation saint." Seidman also recounts that she was always fearful of the "Mary" concept of the Catholics due to the similarity there was with goddess worship of the pagans, which to me is one of those "Can't see the forest because the trees are in the way" moments where the pagan origins of Catholicism are shining through, and yet, Seidman can't see it. (Or perhaps is unwilling; I don't know.)
(Read "Corruptions of Christianity: Catholicism - Idolatry & Mary" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

Seidman describes more that she learned when she compared what the Bible says to what she was taught by her pagan mother:
"Interestingly, the Goddess was also known as the Great Dragon (this was said to be her 'truest form') - which I was quite surprised to find out existed in the Bible as well, although definitely not a person to be worshipped! Seriously, I had no idea. My exposure to the Bible and Christian theology was minimal at best until a year ago. You could have knocked me over with a feather when I read Revelation."
-Abigail Seidman, quoted by Kathleen Gilbert, "Complete interview with Abigail Seidman - abortion and the occult," LifeSite, Dec 13, 2010, retrieved Aug 11, 2017, [lifesitenews.com/news/complete-interview-with-abigail-seidman-abortion-and-the-occult]

I pray that, if the Lord is willing and will humble her heart to gain understanding, that she will read the parts in Revelation that perfectly describe the Catholic Church she's a part of, particularly in Revelation 17. Perhaps she would read this article, and know to the truth, to come out from the Catholic Church, the mother of harlots, who rides atop the great beast.
(Read "Corruptions of Christianity: Catholicism - A Woman Rides the Beast" here at creationliberty.com for more details.)

Seidman gets back to describing the abortion clinic:
"The clinic’s only male employee was the doctor, and he was strictly business - he showed up, he performed procedures, he left. I got to know him fairly well over the years and he was just in it for the money, he thought the spirituality was ridiculous. He preferred to work in a medical/professional environment (the other clinics where he worked, including the one where my first abortion was performed, were no different from any other doctor’s office in layout or procedure), but his and his wife’s addictions to spending made him work whenever and wherever he could, so he tolerated the goddess stuff. (He was also a bit of a sex addict, so the clinic staff’s willingness to fornicate freely and have abortions whenever possible definitely worked in his favor, and most of the clinic employees had sex with him at some point, except for the sworn lesbians.)"
-Abigail Seidman, quoted by Kathleen Gilbert, "Complete interview with Abigail Seidman - abortion and the occult," LifeSite, Dec 13, 2010, retrieved Aug 11, 2017, [lifesitenews.com/news/complete-interview-with-abigail-seidman-abortion-and-the-occult]

Similar to how orphanages, if not monitored properly, can be somewhat of a safe haven and stomping ground for pedophiles, so too can abortion clinics be for fornicators and adulterers. This is most especially true when pagans and witches operate behind the scenes because most of their beliefs revolve around sex.

If abortions and child sacrifice were taken out of the picture, people would generally be a lot more afraid to fornicate. Though a child should be loved, a child is also the consequence of a choice, and in order to take away the responsibility and consequences of the sin of fornication, abortions were legalized and contraceptives were invented.

Seidman also mentions that she believes most abortion clinics are all business, meaning that they are simply there to turn a profit and that's it, which makes sense. Money is the life-blood of most businesses, and so the bottom dollar becomes their motivation. However, she also mentions that the money side of the business is only what people see on the surface, and that has no effect on how many pagans may be tied to the clinic in personal practice, meaning that either the clinic allows witches and Satanists to come in and do their rituals because the owner of the clinic shares the pagan beliefs, or charges them a fee to use the facility so they can make some extra cash on the side.

It's not uncommon to see witches, pagans, and Satanists defending abortions and abortion clinics during protests. For example, in 2015, many Michigan protesters showed up to speak out against Planned Parenthood (one of the most anti-parental, anti-life organizations on the planet), and they were met in opposition by witches from the Satanic Temple of Detroit, dressed in all black, and put on a show by pouring gallons of milk on women kneeling and hands bound on the side walk, while standing behind an American flag with a hole cut in it.
(See "Protesters show up in masses against Planned Parenthood" Fox 2 News, Detroit, Michigan, Aug 22, 2015, retrieved Aug 9, 2017, [fox2detroit.com/news/local-news/10793008-story])

Also in 2015, a member of "The Satanic Temple," a religious organization of witches who worship Satan, came forward under the fake name "Mary Doe" to sue the Missouri Governor and Attorney General over a state law that requires a woman be given counseling and information on the dangers of abortion and a 3-day wait period before she is allowed to legally kill her baby. Doe claimed this violated her religious liberty, and the reason this is so important for Christians to understand is that child sacrifice is sacred to Satanists, and they do it on a regular basis to cast spells and receive Satanic blessings, so for a state law to inhibit her shedding the blood of her child is preventing her from practicing her religion.
(See Valerie S. Hahn, "Satan worshippers sue Missouri governor, attorney general over abortion law," St. Louis Post-Dispatch, June 23, 2015, retrieved Aug 9, 2017, [http://bit.ly/2vPT0hp])

The Dallas Observer published a 2016 interview with a self-proclaimed "feminist witch," who openly stated that she casts spells to support abortionists:
"She blends activism and paganism in various ways: for example, practicing ritual magic to send energy and support to women advocating for abortion rights."
-Patrick Williams, "Dr. Susan Harper, Feminist Witch, Invokes Goddesses to Show Women the Power in Themselves," Dallas Observer, June 28, 2016, retrieved Aug 15, 2017, [http://bit.ly/294CCeo]

Carter Heyward, a bishop in the Episcopal Church (i.e. Anglicans; an off-shoot of the Catholic Church), attended the National Abortion Federation convention of 1985. She is a female bishop, a female head over their church, which is completely unbiblical. In a speech she gave, she said:
"If women were in charge, abortion would be a sacrament, an occasion of deep and serious and sacred meaning."
-Carter Heyward, quoted by Anne Lafferty, Generation Rex, BookBaby, 2014, ISBN: 9781483534534

This is why amongst pagans, witches, and feminists, or places where women are often given esteemed leadership, abortion is so highly revered. Ginette Paris, Professor of Psychology and feminist/pagan author at Pacifica Graduate Institute in California, said:
"But we must constantly monitor the values attached to shame, as we educate the next generation, so that it can be put aside when it no longer expresses our ideals and can be revived when it appears to be pathologically absent. When an abortion is necessary, not only should there be no shame but there should be a new consensus that to have a child who cannot adequately be cared for is shameful."
-Ginette Paris, The Psychology of Abortion, Spring, 2007, p. 69, ISBN: 9780882145600; See also Ginette Paris, The Sacrament of Abortion, Spring, 1992, p. 106, ISBN: 9780882143521

In case you did not fully understand what she just said, I'll summarize it in simple terms. Paris is saying that people need to be careful about feeling shame for things, and that shame should be eliminated so everyone can feel better about their sinful choices.

shame (n): a painful sensation excited by a consciousness of guilt, or of having done something which injures reputation; or by of that which nature nature or modesty prompts us to conceal; dishonor; disgrace
(See 'shame', American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster, 1828, retrieved Aug 4, 2017 [webstersdictionary1828.com])

Shame comes when someone does something that is contradicted by the conscience, and the conscience comes from God because His law is written in their hearts. (Rom 2:15) Paris is trying to get women to have glory in themselves for murdering their child instead of being ashamed of their sin.

For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things.
-Philippians 3:18-19

When it says their "God is their belly," don't misunderstand the context; it's not referring to a pregnant woman. It means their moral standards are based on what material things they can get for themselves, meaning that they make decisions based on the lust for food, fattening themselves despite who they need to take advantage of in order to get it; it's covetousness. For example, these witches and feminists kill their babies so they won't have to make any sacrifices for them, which is a covetousness of material things for themselves. These are people who glory in their shame, meaning they ought to be ashamed of what they do, but they glorify themselves instead, which is a very apt description of Paris and her writing, who attempts to sear the consciences of women.

Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
-1 Timothy 4:1-2

They will do everything they can to destroy any conscience that would convict them to do what is good. The conscience brings shame, and shame causes us to change our actions; thus, if she can rid herself of the feelings of shame, she can then justify her sin, which is what Paris wants for herself, and she works to convince other women, so that when she gets a crowd around her of women who do the same, she can take pleasure in them because she feels better about herself.

Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
-Romans 1:29-32

Paris is also saying that murdering a child should not be shameful. She actually goes a step further and says that it is only shameful to NOT murder her child, which is why she says "a child who cannot adequately be cared for is shameful," meaning that if you kill your baby, Paris believes that's the most moral course of action, suggesting that one should take pride in murdering children.

Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
-Proverbs 16:18

Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.
-James 4:6

Paris also wrote:
"It is not immoral to choose abortion; it is simply another kind of morality, a pagan one. It is time to stop being defensive about it, time to point an accusatory finger at the other camp and denounce its own immoral stance."
-Ginette Paris, The Sacrament of Abortion, Spring, 1992, p. 156, ISBN: 9780882143521

Paris is saying that those who choose life, who choose to make sacrifices to raise a child, are "immoral." Her position, as she clearly stated, is based on paganism and witchcraft, which is feministic at its core.

But Jesus turning unto them said, Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves, and for your children. For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.
-Luke 23:28-29

Paris, as a pagan witch, believes that a mother sacrificing herself for her child is wrong and stupid:
"From a pagan point of view, it is quite stupid and even absurd to sacrifice a mother for the sake of a newborn, because the child obviously needs her... Artemis, who personifies respect for animal life, accepts the necessity of the hunt, but only if the rules and the absolving rituals are observed. In most Goddess religions a similar reasoning is applied to the fetus and the newborn. It is morally acceptable that a woman who gives life may also destroy life under certain circumstances,"
-Ginette Paris, The Sacrament of Abortion, Spring, 1992, p. 156, ISBN: 9780882143521

Paris credits women with giving life, rather than God giving life. Just because a woman carries the child in her womb does not mean that she "gives life." She attempts to take power and glory away from God and give it unto herself, making herself into a little goddess of her own.

However, the truth is far darker than simply witches giving themselves glory for the creation of life. The following quote is from a pagan who describes how wonderful and uplifting it was for her to murder her own child:
"I believed that adoption would have destroyed both of our families and I would have no one left to love in the end. I felt soul-crushing guilt; my boyfriend left the decision to get an abortion up to me and then never spoke of it again. I had to cross state lines to find an abortion clinic because it is impossible to get an abortion in the state where I live. Even though my heart had been shattered by what I had done, I knew I would have killed myself and my unborn child if I could not have made that choice. Eventually my boyfriend and I broke up and I limped onward with my life. I convinced a mutual friend — who I believed to be my 'Mr. Right' — to date me, and experienced true happiness for the first time. With his support, I searched for a place to belong. I discovered Wicca. Awe-inspiring Gods and Goddesses, magic, faeries, karma — I had found my home. I read everything that caught my eye in the magical/New Age section of libraries and bookstores. But many years passed before I found a book that really helped me begin to heal: Pagan Parenting by Kristen Madden. She says, 'The Goddess is not offended by a woman who makes an intelligent choice about her body and her ability to raise a child. We honor Her by the honesty of choice.' Then I found Buckland’s Complete Book of Witchcraft, which states that in each cycle of reincarnation something has to be learned, even if — as in the case of a child dying — that soul is not here very long. He stated that the soul learned all it needed to learn in that limited cycle. I had found my answer. That soul, my unborn child, had gathered all he required in those nine weeks, but he had a greater purpose, though I couldn’t see it at the time. Only recently have I come to understand my unborn child’s purpose in my life. I have always believed that 'whatever does not kill you makes you stronger' and that first child definitely strengthened me. He taught me to stand up for myself; about grief and loss and how horrible it feels to be completely alone in the world; and not to settle for just anything or anyone. He also taught me to find the good in all situations. Though he was never born and I never gave him a name, he was my first child all the same. He helped to shape the person I am today so that I am a strong, resilient, outspoken role model for my three daughters."
-Alura Anwyn (Likely not her real name), "My Abortion Story: A Pagan Mother Speaks Out," Wtches & Pagans, retrieved Aug 4, 2017, [witchesandpagans.com/opinion/199-a-pagan-mother-speaks-out-nw18.html]; See also Kristin Madden, Pagan Parenting: Spiritual, Magical, and Emotional Development of the Child, Llewellyn Publications, 2000, p. 215, ISBN: 9781567184921; See also Raymond Buckland, Buckland's Complete Book of Witchcraft, Llewellyn Worldwide, 1986, p. 25, ISBN: 9780875420509

This is a woman who was, as she stated, crushed by the guilt of what she had done, and then sought out a religious belief that would help her justify her sin. She definitely rejected the Christian God of the Bible, because He condemns sin of all kinds, including murder. So to avoid having to repent of her sin, she chose Wicca because it helped create an excuse that would allow her to get rid of the shame and guilt she suffered on a daily basis.

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
-Isaiah 5:20

It made me sick to my stomach that she claimed to learn to find "the good in all situations" by murdering her baby! It's sickening enough that one would kill their own child, but then to justify it as a good learning experience takes a viciously demented mind and heart; one so evil that I don't think I'm able to comprehend it, but we need to acknowledge that this is the slippery slope one falls down when adopting witchcraft.

It is for these reasons, the justification of the murder of babies, the sacrifice and consuming (eating) of their bloody, dead corpses, are just some of the many reasons God gave this commandment to the Jews:

Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
-Exodus 22:18

Don't misunderstand; Christians are not given any commandment to carry out punishments on any sin. Such punishments are left up to governments, and this was a civil commandment for the government of children of Israel specifically. However, I want Christians to understand why the Lord God took the sin of witchcraft so seriously, and I hope this article has opened your eyes.

When thou art come into the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD: and because of these abominations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee. Thou shalt be perfect with the LORD thy God. For these nations, which thou shalt possess, hearkened unto observers of times, and unto diviners: but as for thee, the LORD thy God hath not suffered thee so to do.
-Deuteronomy 18:9-14

For all those who have had an abortion, there is no excuse: It was murder. However, Paul was a murderer too, and he repented (i.e. had grief and sorrow for wrongdoing against God), was forgiven by the Lord Jesus Christ, and went on to do wonderful works for the glory of the Son of God. If you are sorry for what you've done, and you want forgiveness of offenses against the Only True Living God, ask Him for it.

Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:
-Matthew 7:7

If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
-1 John 1:9

And to the witches, you too can be forgiven of your sin of witchcraft if you will repent. Though the Almighty God is just in His judgments, being angry against the sins of mankind daily, He's also merciful to those who have the grief and sorrow of their wrongdoing and offenses against Him:

For we ourselves also were sometimes foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another. But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared, Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour; That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.
-Titus 3:4-7

Death, hell, and suffering await all those who murder and practice the crafts of the Devil, but salvation, grace, and eternal life await all those who repent and seek the Lord Jesus Christ's blood as the one-time sacrifice for sin as payment on the account of their souls.

Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, when he offered up himself.
-Hebrews 7:27

And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
-Hebrews 9:27-28

If you are a Christian, this subject of abortion and sacrifice has convicted you, and you want to do something about it: Prayer is the best weapon for combat. As the former Satanist I quoted earlier stated, witches and Satanists cast spells to try and protect themselves against a Christian praying against their dark practices. He also testified that there were three abortion rituals he participated in where the abortion failed and the baby lived, and in all three, there were people praying against it.

You could drive out to a local abortion clinic, park your car, and pray against the sin of murder and witchcraft, and also pray to banish all spirit of devils to be removed from the premises. However, I would warn Christians to stay away from political protestors on any of these sites because, many times, there are false converts and other unbelievers like Catholics or Mormons in these groups, and we do not want to yoke up with them because they're also being used by the same devils. I'm not saying every group is like that, but most of them are (even though they all claim to be good). We ought to pray for the cleansing of the so-called "Christian" protestors as much as the clinic itself, because there are people that need the Lord Jesus Christ both inside and outside of the building.

CLE Only

Google+ Facebook Tumblr
Twitter Youtube Youtube

Android via Amazon
Google Play